Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Anesthesia-related mortality rate is estimated at 1 death per 10,000 procedures. Four general failures in anesthesia management are responsible for the majority of deaths: difficult intubation, aspiration, insufficient ventilation, and insufficient volume substitution. More than half of all critical incidents are considered preventable--by better patient preparation, better monitoring or increased vigilance. One in ten patients complains of simple complications such as nausea, vomiting, or a sour throat. In addition, 10% of all patients experience intra- or postoperative complications such as arrhythmia, hypo- or hypertension. Several patient-related factors, such as age or the number of coexisting diseases, as well as management factors, such as choice of anesthetic technique or the experience of the anesthesiologist, are important determinants of morbidity and mortality. This review gives a comprehensive summary of recent results in risk-analysis and the study of critical incidents in anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:[Anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality]. 189 66

Misoprostol (Cytotec) is a recently released prostaglandin E1 analog approved for use in prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy. We report one of the first known examples of toxicity in an acute ingestion since the drug was first released in international markets in 1984. After an accidental ingestion of 3 mg misoprostol (approximately 15 times the maximum recommended therapeutic dose), a 71-year-old woman exhibited fever, tremor, tachycardia, hypertension, nausea, and abdominal cramping. Recovery ensued with standard supportive care. The physiology of this unique drug and implications for management of acute toxicity are summarized.
 ...
PMID:Acute misoprostol toxicity. 190 33

A 59 year-old housewife was admitted to the emergency service with a sudden onset of chest pain and nausea. Initially she was treated as an acute myocardial infarction, but conventional treatments were not effective, and she was sent to our hospital for further evaluation. Her ECG showed several abnormal findings including T-wave inversion, atrial flutter, QT-time prolongation, ST-segment depression or elevation, and frequent ventricular ectopic beats. The echocardiogram, 201thallium scintigram and coronary angiography were almost normal. Both urinary and plasma levels of catecholamines were remarkably increased, and the plasma epinephrine was extremely high during attacks. Abdominal echotomography and CT-scanning showed a large left adrenal tumor. The 131MIBG scintiscan revealed a high accumulation in this tumor. Then the patient was diagnosed as having pheochromocytoma and catecholamine-induced myocarditis. The administration of phentolamine (10 mg) normalized the inversion of T-wave and the high blood pressure. But when propranolol (2 mg) was administrated in addition to phentolamine, the ECG showed a biphasic low T-wave change. According to these phenomena, we supposed that the alpha-adrenergic receptor was involved in the development of the ST-T changes of the ECG, and the alpha-adrenergic receptor of this patient might be sensitive under excessive catecholamines, according to the inhibition of the beta-receptor by propranolol.
 ...
PMID:[A case of pheochromocytoma with an AMI-like ECG change corrected by an alpha-blocking agent]. 196 1

beta-receptor antagonists have for many years been considered appropriate alternatives in the primary management of mild to moderate hypertension. Generally, they have been shown to be safe with a low frequency of serious side-effects. Among the predictable and usually doserelated side-effects are bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypotension, muscle fatigue and cold extremities. Examples of unexpected side-effects are gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and disturbed intestinal motility, skin reactions, sexual dysfunction, as well as effects related to the central nervous system (CNS) such as emotional disturbances. The CNS-related side-effects, the mechanisms of which are unclear, consist of subtle effects on general well-being, decreased initiative, a depressed frame of mind and disturbed sleep. Generally, however, beta-blockers in therapeutic dosages do not affect the qualitative functions of the brain. Thus, all beta-blockers on the market seem to have high benefit-risk ratio, but independent of their physiochemical properties and pharmacodynamic profile, they seem to cause side-effects to about the same extent. The results so far available have been obtained by primarily using objective methods. Further comparison has now been initiated using documented subjective methods to investigate whether the objectively documented differences are of any clinical relevance to the patient's quality of life. Although it cannot be claimed with certainty, nonselective beta-blockers seem to cause CNS-related side-effects to a greater extent than beta 1-selective blockers. Differences in the degree of hydrophilicity of the beta-blocker are apparently of no clinical relevance in this respect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Quality of life/subjective symptoms during beta-blocker treatment. 198 27

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) nicardipine was compared with placebo in the control of postoperative hypertension in cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients. One hundred twenty-two patients (17 cardiac and 105 noncardiac surgery) met the entry criteria (systolic BP greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg) and were randomized (3:2) to receive IV nicardipine (n = 71) or placebo (n = 51). Therapeutic response (greater than or equal to 15 percent reduction in BP from baseline) was achieved in 94 percent of patients treated with IV nicardipine vs 12 percent with placebo (p less than 0.001). The mean response time and infusion rate for IV nicardipine were 11.5 (+/- 0.8) minutes and 12.8 (+/- 0.3) mg/h, respectively. The magnitude of BP reduction was similar in both cardiac and noncardiac postsurgical patients. Blood pressure control was sustained with minimal dose adjustments of IV nicardipine (3.0 +/- 0.2 mg/h) during a prolonged maintenance infusion period of 6.8 +/- 0.5 h. A reflex mean increase in heart rate of 5 bpm was seen in patients treated with IV nicardipine. Sixteen patients (15 noncardiac and one cardiac surgery) had a sustained heart rate of greater than 100 bpm, with a mean increase of 24 bpm from the baseline. In all these patients except three, tachycardia was resolved while receiving nicardipine. None of these patients who had development of tachycardia during nicardipine therapy had exhibited ST segment changes indicative of ischemia. One patient with tachycardia at baseline had exhibited ST segment depression (3 to 4 mm) during nicardipine treatment, which was resolved following discontinuation of nicardipine therapy and application of nitroglycerin (Nitropaste). Hemodynamic evaluation revealed that IV nicardipine significantly decreased mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and significantly increased cardiac index with no change in heart rate. These hemodynamic changes were similar in cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients. Adverse experiences reported with IV nicardipine included hypotension (4.5 percent), tachycardia (2.7 percent), and nausea/vomiting (4.5 percent). In the placebo group, the incidence of adverse experience was 6 percent, with an equal distribution of hypotension (2 percent), nausea/vomiting (2 percent), and headache (2 percent). No clinically important changes in laboratory variables related to IV nicardipine were reported. In conclusion, these findings indicate that nicardipine, a titratable intravenous calcium channel blocker, can rapidly and effectively control postoperative hypertension in cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in the control of postoperative hypertension. IV Nicardipine Study Group. 198 1

Delapril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor discovered in the laboratory of Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd., is the result of drug design based on the structure-activity relationships of ACE inhibitors. Delapril is an antihypertensive agent with a relatively long duration of action and no SH moiety in its structure. Following administration, it is converted into two active metabolites. Delapril effectively lowered blood pressure in 73% of 1,008 patients with hypertension during clinical trials in Japan. Efficacy rates were 73% for essential hypertension, 85% for renal hypertension, and 80% for renovascular hypertension. Excellent hypotensive response was observed in all age groups, from young to elderly patients. Side effects during administration of delapril, based on subjective evidence, were reported in 80 out of the 1,008 cases (7.9%). The main symptoms included orthostatic dizziness (1.7%), dizziness (1.3%), and nausea (1.1%). Dry cough, which has attracted attention in recent years as a side effect of ACE inhibitors, was reported at a low incidence of 1.1%. In a double-blind, controlled study in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in which captopril served as a positive control, delapril showed superior hypotensive effect and greater safety. Data derived from the Japan Study Group on Delapril indicate that this ACE inhibitor has excellent hypotensive effects and a high level of safety. It is suitable as a first-line drug in both monotherapy and combined therapy.
 ...
PMID:Clinical evaluation of delapril in Japan. Report from the Japan Study Group on Delapril. 200 47

From August 1988-June 1989, 983 physicians participated in a phase IV trial by following 7759 women using the monophasic oral contraceptive (OC), Demulen 1/35 (1 mg ethynodiol diacetate and 35 ug ethinyl estradiol) to evaluate its efficacy and safety. The total number of cycles for the study stood at 21,440. In addition, the total woman-years stood at 1787. Only 6382 patients could be evaluated for safety. 4.4% of the patients had adverse reactions to the OC, but only 1.7% of all patients stopped taking it. The leading side effects included nausea (67 cases), headache (45), amenorrhea (42), emotional changes (30), breast pain (19), dysmenorrhea (12), and 11 cases of weight gain, abdominal/pelvic pain, and bloating. Of the 280 reported adverse reactions, only 87 (31%) were considered severe. The leading serious adverse reactions were depression (10) and hypertension (6). Only 5412 patients could be used to determine efficacy. The physicians initially reported 121 (2.2%) pregnancies during the study. The researchers learned that 33 of the 84 returned 2nd questionnaires (response rate, 70%) reported that the women conceived after enrollment but before taking the OC. 36 conceived while taking it, but 8 did not take it daily. Noncompliance may have contributed to pregnancy for the remaining 28 cases. Therefore the 36 confirmed pregnancies made for a failure rate of .7%. 85.7% of the pregnancies happened in the 1st 3 months of taking the OC. Either patient noncompliance or true medication failure accounted for treatment failure. Therefore it is important for physicians to instruct patients on how to take OCs correctly.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of ethynodiol diacetate, 1 mg, with ethinyl estradiol, 35 micrograms, with an emphasis on contraceptive efficacy. A phase IV trial. 204 81

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, diltiazem was compared with metoprolol as add-on therapy to diuretic treatment in 115 patients with hypertension. Following a placebo and diuretic period of four weeks, patients were randomized to either slow release diltiazem 90 mg twice daily or metoprolol 100 mg once daily using a double dummy technique. If after four weeks a target supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than or equal to 90 mmHg pressure was not reached, the doses of diltiazem and metoprolol were doubled. Supine inclusion systolic/diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP) at randomization were 158 +/- 13 (mean +/- SD)/102 +/- 5 mmHg in the diltiazem group and 158 +/- 17/101 +/- 6 mmHg in the metoprolol group. Active therapy significantly lowered SBP and DBP in both groups by 7-10%. Heart rate was significantly lowered in both groups, although the effect of metoprolol was more pronounced. Response rates (supine DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or decreased by greater than or equal to 10%) were 43% on diltiazem 90 mg twice daily and 52% on metoprolol 100 mg once daily, increasing to 82% and 62%, respectively, after dose escalations. No serious side effects were seen, but three patients, two on diltiazem and one on metoprolol, were withdrawn from the study due to severe headache, nausea and bradycardia respectively. of mild to moderate adverse reactions, tiredness was most frequent, occurring in 14.5% and 15.8% on active diltiazem and metoprolol therapy, respectively. We conclude that both diltiazem and metoprolol lower BP when added to diuretics in hypertensive patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Diltiazem compared with metoprolol as add-on-therapies to diuretics in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group. 207 68

Oral contraceptives (OCs, long-acting progestins (LAPs), and IUDS are reviewed in terms of new information on safety and efficacy. OC formulations are described and their mechanism of action and efficacy indicated. Reports are provided for thromboembolism, hemorrhagic and thrombotic stroke, ischemic heart diseases, alterations in lipid and hypoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism, hypertension, coagulation changes, breast and cervical cancers, and such minor side effects as menstrual irregularities, nausea, headaches, weight gain, premenstrual syndrome effects, and mood and libido changes. Noncontraceptive health benefits and clinical considerations are discussed. Norplant, as the only long acting progestin available in the US is described in terms of its formulations, mechanism of action, sequelae and metabolic effects, menstrual irregularities, metabolic effects, nuisance side effects, candidates for insertion, method of insertion and removal, and continuation rates. 2 IUD types are identified as the only ones available in the US, Progestasert T and T-Cu-380A (Paragard). Mechanism of action, efficacy, candidates, major sequelae such as salpingitis, infertility, and uterine perforation, minor sequelae such as metrorrhagia and dysmenorrhea, and other considerations are indicated. OCs in the US contain an average of 35 mg of ethinyl estradiol and assorted progestins e.g.s, ethynodiol diacetate, norethindrone acetate, nortestosterone derivatives with a complex mechanism of action. The failure rate for use effectiveness is 6 pregnancies/100 woman years. Modern formulations have combined rates of no more than 50 to 100 adverse events/100,000 users. Some of the effects are indicated as follows: Thromboembolism accounts for 60% of adverse effects and appears to be declining along with hemorrhagic and thrombotic stroke, however, modern use studies are only partially available. Myocardial infarction related to OC use may be embolic, and has a low risk at 7/100,000 users. Low-dose contraceptives substantially reduce the associated risks. Those with risk factors need close monitoring. Norplant is useful for those not wanting to take a daily regimen and is commonly accompanied by menstrual irregularity and sometimes headaches. Continuation is 80% after the 1st year and 40% after 5 years. Candidates for IUDs are parous women in monogamous relationships, who are not at risk for salpingitis, which is related to IUD use, or sexually transmitted diseases. Continuation is 70% after 1 year compared with 50% of OC users.
 ...
PMID:Modern trends in contraception. 212 11

In a multicenter study in general practice, the tolerability and safety of ramipril alone and in combination with a low dose of furosemide were assessed in moderate hypertension. After a placebo run-in period involving 770 patients, 661 were included in the active treatment period and received ramipril alone (2.5-5 mg/day). After 6 weeks, the nonresponders entered in a double-blind period and they received daily ramipril 10 mg or ramipril 5 mg in combination with furosemide 20 mg. In this hypertensive population, the adverse events more commonly reported were headache, cough, dizziness, asthenia, cramps diarrhea and nausea, but not all these events were related to ramipril. There was seemingly a relation between cough prevalence and rampiril dosage; an increased incidence was also observed during the outbreaks of flu-syndrome in our country. 38 patients discontinued the active treatment due to non-serious adverse events, mainly cough, dizziness or diarrhea. No serious adverse drug reaction was observed. Laboratory data (blood cells count, electrolytes, serum creatinine, fasting blood glucose, apolipoproteins AI and B) remained most commonly unaffected. In moderate hypertension in general practice, this study confirms that ramipril is well tolerated, especially with regard to the class effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:[Tolerance to Triatec in monotherapy and in combination with Lasilix in a French multicenter study]. 214 97


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>