Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This study evaluated the 24-h antihypertensive effect of single daily doses of celiprolol, a beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonist. Patients with supine diastolic BP between 95 and 114 mm Hg started on placebo or celiprolol 200 mg daily for 2 weeks; non-responders received 400 mg daily for 2 weeks and then 600 mg daily for another 2 weeks. Response was defined as a reduction of diastolic BP to 90 mm Hg or below. One hundred ninety patients were evaluated for efficacy, 114 in the celiprolol group and 76 in the placebo group, 84 men and 106 women, mean age 52 years. Blood pressure after 6 weeks fell from 165/103 to 149/92 on celiprolol and from 162/103 to 157/97 on placebo. The fall in systolic and diastolic BP after celiprolol is statistically different (p less than 0.001) from that after placebo. The pulse rate was reduced to a similar extent by the two treatments. The percent of patients with supine diastolic BP either reduced by at least 10 mm Hg or to 90 mm Hg or below, was 66% after celiprolol and 38% after placebo (p less than 0.001). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable in the two groups: 31% during celiprolol, 25% during placebo. The most frequent reactions observed in both groups were gastrointestinal symptoms, dizziness, fatigue, headache. In conclusion, celiprolol proved to be a safe and effective beta-blocker in the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter study of celiprolol in the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension. 242 40

Ketanserin, the specific S2 serotonin antagonist, is undergoing evaluation for the therapy of hypertension of all degrees of severity. We studied 20 patients with severe hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 120 mm Hg after 40 min of supine rest]. In the first dose-ranging study on eight patients, multiple i.v. injections of 5 mg ketanserin were administered every 4 min (mean 38 mg). Only 4 patients responded adequately (DBP less than 100 mm Hg), 2 responded partially, and 2 did not respond to ketanserin. The major adverse effect of ketanserin, found in all patients, was severe dose-dependent sleepiness. A second double-blind crossover study with ketanserin and placebo (12 patients) assessed neural side effects. The supine DBP dropped from a mean of 134 +/- 4 mm Hg to 112 +/- 4 mm Hg 20 min after ketanserin when the sedation score rose from 0 to 1.2 +/- 0.3 (range 1-3) and the dizziness score from 0.1 +/- 0.1 to 1.4 +/- 0.3 (range 1-3; both p less than 0.01 vs. 1-2 min after ketanserin). Only 7 of 12 patients responded adequately to ketanserin. Twelve of the 20 patients were subsequently given nifedipine 10 mg sublingually; the DBP fell from a mean of 128 +/- 3 mm Hg to 101 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) after 40 min without side effects. Ketanserin does not appear to be a suitable agent for the acute therapy of severe hypertension because of: the imperfect and short-lived blood pressure control; the variability of the hypotensive effect; and sleepiness and dizziness as significant side effects.
 ...
PMID:Effects of intravenous ketanserin on severely hypertensive patients with double-blind crossover assessment of central side-effects. 243 87

Prazosin and terazosin are two alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking agents, their principal difference being the longer half-life of terazosin. The present study was carried out to determine if elderly subjects are different from the young in their pharmacokinetic handling of these two drugs and if age influences the blood pressure response to each drug. Ten young healthy subjects (aged 19-30 years) and five older healthy subjects (aged 54-62 years) received 1 or 2 mg terazosin, 1 or 2 mg prazosin, or placebo 1 week apart according to a 5 X 5 Latin square design. Concentrations of prazosin and terazosin were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure with a detection limit of approximately 0.25 ng/ml. Pharmacokinetic parameters of prazosin were virtually the same in both groups, whereas mean terazosin plasma concentrations were higher in the older group and pharmacokinetic analysis revealed higher peak plasma concentrations and a longer terminal elimination half-life. There was no evidence of increased sensitivity to the hypotensive action of the drug, as peak upright blood pressure falls were similar in the two groups. Symptoms of dizziness in the upright position were also less common. In view of their lack of sedative effects and minimal metabolic disturbances, further studies should be conducted to assess the suitability of these drugs as monotherapy for hypertension in elderly patients.
 ...
PMID:Effect of age on pharmacokinetics of and blood pressure responses to prazosin and terazosin. 244 Nov 67

Felodipine lowers blood pressure by reducing peripheral vascular resistance through a highly selective action on smooth muscle in arteriolar resistance vessels. The selective action may be considered a safeguard against untoward effects on cardiac contractility and conduction. Felodipine does not cause orthostatic hypotension since it has no effect in clinical doses on venous smooth muscle. Felodipine has a natriuretic/diuretic effect, which counteracts the salt and water retention that is often seen during treatment with other potent vasodilators. In clinical studies, felodipine has proved more effective than several established antihypertensive drugs. The combination of felodipine and a beta-adrenergic blocker appears to be a good alternative to standard triple treatment, and felodipine is often effective in patients with previously "refractory" hypertension. The antihypertensive effect of felodipine is dose related. In patients with moderate hypertension, a dose regimen of 5 mg twice a day is usually sufficient, and doses greater than 10 mg twice a day are not often required. Felodipine is generally well tolerated. The most common adverse effects are those expected from a potent arteriolar dilator: ankle swelling, headache, dizziness, flushing, etc. Adverse effects are usually transient or diminish in intensity with continued treatment. The overall frequency of adverse effects with felodipine appears to be similar to that for the established antihypertensive drugs, although the adverse effects differ. Felodipine is a potent arteriolar dilator with therapeutic advantages, especially for patients with moderate to severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Felodipine in hypertension--a review. 244 9

A double-blind controlled, randomized, parallel, multicenter 12-week study was conducted to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril with that of metoprolol in treatment of moderate to severe hypertension. Initially, 118 patients were recruited on lisinopril and 61 on metoprolol; and for the purpose of efficacy analysis at week 8, 115 patients on lisinopril and 60 on metoprolol were included. The doses of lisinopril or metoprolol were 40-80 mg/day and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. At week 4, the pretreatment diastolic blood pressure of 111 mm Hg was decreased to 97 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) with lisinopril: metoprolol decreased the diastolic blood pressure from 110 to 99 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). Similar decreases were noted at week 8; however, the drop in blood pressure with lisinopril was not significantly different from that with metoprolol. Systolic blood pressure also demonstrated a decrease of about 18 mm Hg with lisinopril and 12 mm Hg with metoprolol (p less than 0.01). This larger decrease in systolic blood pressure with lisinopril was statistically significant at week 4 (p less than 0.05). These decreases in systolic blood pressures were maintained at week 8, again with statistical significance (p less than 0.01). Of the 118 lisinopril-treated patients, four were discontinued from lisinopril therapy because of headache, dizziness, rash, flushing, or lymphadenopathy. Four patients out of 61 (9.8%) were discontinued from metoprolol therapy because of fatigue, somnolence, asthenia, weight gain, flatulence, tremor, or bronchospasm. In conclusion, lisinopril 40-80 mg once daily is as effective as metoprolol 100-200 mg once daily in reducing diastolic blood pressure in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril compared to metoprolol in moderate to severe hypertension. 244 53

The antihypertensive effect of the combination of ketanserin, a new antiserotonergic agent, and thiazide has been evaluated in 35 patients with arterial hypertension of mild to moderate degree in the greater than 50-year-old age group. Twenty patients were given ketanserin (20 mg) + hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) (treatment A) while the others were given ketanserin (40 mg) + hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) (treatment B) once daily, for a period of 6 weeks. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure, measured by an automatic recorder, was significantly reduced by both combinations. In particular, treatment A reduced blood pressure from 169 +/- 15/95 +/- 6 mm Hg before treatment to 146 +/- 11/83 +/- 8, 149 +/- 13/82 +/- 10, 143 +/- 12/81 +/- 9, and 151 +/- 14/84 +/- 7 mm Hg at 2, 6, 8, and 24 h, respectively, after the last dose of drug. With treatment B, blood pressure was reduced from 167 +/- 11/97 +/- 7 mm Hg before treatment to 152 +/- 12/89 +/- 8, 151 +/- 15/85 +/- 8, 150 +/- 16/86 +/- 8, and 158 +/- 13/91 +/- 7 mm Hg at 2, 6, 8, and 24 h, respectively. Heart rate was not affected by both treatments despite the fact that ketanserin has been proved to induce a marked vasodilation. Cardiac workload (systolic blood pressure X heart rate) was slightly reduced by the treatments. Treatment A only induced transient dizziness after the first dose of drug; treatment B, on the other hand, induced drowsiness and more marked dizziness, which in one case was also observed after repeated doses of the drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of ketanserin + thiazide in hypertensives older than 50 years. 244 60

We have treated 128 patients aged 40 +/- 9 years (60 males and 68 females), all with essential hypertension (W.H.O. I and II), over a period of 10 yr. The treatment was performed with clonidine at a dose that ranged from 0.150 to 1,200 mg (twice daily). Forty-two patients also received a diuretic (HCTZ 25 mg daily). Mean blood pressure decreased significantly from 169 +/- 10 mm Hg systolic, 107 +/- 3 diastolic to 145 +/- 6 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) 90 +/- 3 mm Hg diastolic (p less than 0.001). Side effects occurred during the first month. These were drowsiness 28%, dry mouth 35%, constipation 13%, dizziness 9%, postural hypotension 2%, and male impotence 3.3% (2/60). Side effects still present after 120 months of treatment were drowsiness 11.7%, dry mouth 26.6%, constipation 14.1%, dizziness 4.7%, and male impotence 1.7% (1/59). The number of patients who discontinued treatment resulting from side effects were 3.34%, all of them within the first 6 months. There were no changes in renal or liver function or in serum electrolytes or lipids. Retinopathy improved in most patients. Electrocardiogram (ECG) improved in 45 patients with LVH. It is concluded that clonidine provided sustained blood pressure control with minimum side effects during 10-year therapy for hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Safety aspects of long-term antihypertensive therapy (10 years) with clonidine. 245 59

To investigate the safety of labetalol in the treatment of hypertension in patients with heart failure, sixteen hypertensive patients with a history of congestive heart failure and an ejection fraction at rest less than 45%, had measurements of ejection fraction and cardiac output by first pass radionuclide angiography at baseline, at the end of 2 weeks maintenance with labetalol (titrated to the effective antihypertensive dose of 200-1600 mg daily), and in the post-treatment placebo period. On labetalol, heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower than placebo at rest and the ejection fraction was higher (30 vs 25%) (p less than 0.05). At maximal exercise on labetalol the heart rate and blood pressure were lower than at placebo maximal exercise (p less than 0.05) and the ejection fraction was higher (32 vs 27%) (p less than 0.01). Exercise tolerance was not changed by labetalol. No patient was discontinued from the study because of worsening heart failure. Dizziness was reported in 5 of 16 patients usually at one visit. Dyspnea that was reported in 4 of 16 patients improved with minor adjustments in digitalis or diuretic dose. In conclusion, labetalol reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction without reducing cardiac performance.
 ...
PMID:Hemodynamic effects of labetalol in patients with combined hypertension and left ventricular failure. 246 9

The dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nitrendipine offers a pathophysiologically based antihypertensive treatment with a potent dilation of resistance vessels, increased arterial compliance, and an acute natriuretic/diuretic response. Prolonged nitrendipine treatment in essential hypertension is not associated with stimulation of the sympathetic nervous and the renin-angiotensin systems or accumulation of sodium and water. The antihypertensive effectiveness is similar to that of diuretics and beta-blockers, and the responsiveness appears to be greater in elderly and black patients. During long-term (approximately 1 year) nitrendipine treatment in mild to moderate hypertension, the blood pressure reduction is well sustained in "short-term" nitrendipine responders. In patients with severe hypertension, nitrendipine has a potent antihypertensive effect in combination with beta-blockers and/or diuretics. In mild-moderate hypertension, a single daily dose (10-40 mg) may be sufficient, whereas two daily doses (20-80 mg/day) seem necessary in severe hypertension. Common side effects are headache, flush, and palpitations (approximately 20-30%), but these are generally mild and transient. Dizziness and malaise occur in approximately 5%, often later during treatment. Peripheral edema in 5-20% of the patients is generally mild but persistent. Nitrendipine has no adverse effects on glucose and lipid metabolism or on plasma levels of electrolytes and urate. The ultimate aim of antihypertensive treatment is to prevent cardiovascular complications. As for other calcium antagonists, no study on primary prevention of cardiovascular complications in hypertension has been published. With regard to regression of left ventricular hypertrophy accompanying essential hypertension, conflicting results have been found with nitrendipine.
 ...
PMID:Review of long-term trials with nitrendipine. 246 50

Dilevalol, the stereoisomer of labetalol, was given in repeated incremental intravenous bolus injections to 10 patients with severe hypertension requiring urgent blood pressure lowering. The mean cumulative dose of dilevalol was 445 +/- 165 mg. Blood pressure was reduced from 201 +/- 33/131 +/- 13 to 150 +/- 12/109 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) and heart rate did not change significantly. In only one patient was the study discontinued because of side effects (nausea and dizziness). There were no other clinically significant adverse reactions and no change was observed in electrocardiogram or routine biochemical and hematologic tests. Five of these patients, who achieved diastolic blood pressure of less than or equal to 105 mm Hg, participated in a subsequent outpatient phase of the study with combination of oral dilevalol with hydrochlorothiazide. Of these only one achieved good blood pressure control. We concluded that in such severely hypertensive patients intravenous dilevalol was safe and effective for the short-term lowering of blood pressure. However, long-term outpatient maintenance with this drug needs further evaluation.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous dilevalol in the treatment of severe hypertension. 247 30


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>