Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Positron emission tomography (PET) is perfectly suited for quantitative imaging of the kidneys, and the recent improvements in detector technology, computer hardware, and image processing software add to its appeal. Multiple positron emitting radioisotopes can be used for renal imaging. Some, including carbon-11, nitrogen-13, and oxygen-15, can be used at institutions with an on-site cyclotron. Other radioisotopes that may be even more useful in a clinical setting are those that either can be obtained from radionuclide generators (rubidium-82, copper-62) or have a sufficiently long half-life for transportation (fluorine-18). The clinical use of functional renal PET studies (blood flow, glomerular filtration rate) has been slow, in part because of the success of concurrent technologies, including single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and planar gamma camera imaging. Renal blood flow studies can be performed with O-15-labeled water, N-13-labeled ammonia, rubidium-82, and copper-labeled PTSM. With these tracers, renal blood flow can be quantified using a modified microsphere kinetic model. Glomerular filtration can be imaged and quantified with gallium-68 EDTA or cobalt-55 EDTA. Measurements of renal blood flow with PET have potential applications in renovascular disease, in transplant rejection or acute tubular necrosis, in drug-induced nephropathies, ureteral obstruction, before and after revascularization, and before and after the placement of ureteral stents. The most important clinical application for imaging glomerular function with PET would be renovascular hypertension. Molecular imaging of the kidneys with PET is rather limited. At present, research is focused on the investigation of metabolism (acetate), membrane transporters (organic cation and anion transporters, pepT1 and pepT2, GLUT, SGLT), enzymes (ACE), and receptors (AT1R). Because many nephrological and urological disorders are initiated at the molecular and organelle levels and may remain localized at their origin for an extended period of time, new disease-specific molecular probes for PET studies of the kidneys need to be developed. Future applications of molecular renal imaging are likely to involve studies of tissue hypoxia and apoptosis in renovascular renal disease, renal cancer, and obstructive nephropathy, monitoring the molecular signatures of atherosclerotic plaques, measuring endothelial dysfunction and response to balloon revascularization and restenosis, molecular assessment of the nephrotoxic effects of cyclosporine, anticancer drugs, and radiation therapy. New radioligands will enhance the staging and follow-up of renal and prostate cancer. Methods will be developed for investigation of the kinetics of drug-delivery systems and delivery and deposition of prodrugs, reporter gene technology, delivery of gene therapy (nuclear and mitochondrial), assessment of the delivery of cellular, viral, and nonviral vectors (liposomes, polycations, fusion proteins, electroporation, hematopoietic stems cells). Of particular importance will be investigations of stem cell kinetics, including local presence, bloodborne migration, activation, seeding, and its role in renal remodeling (psychological, pathological, and therapy induced). Methods also could be established for investigating the role of receptors and oncoproteins in cellular proliferation, apoptosis, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis; monitoring ras gene targeting in kidney diseases, assessing cell therapy devices (bioartificial filters, renal tubule assist devices, and bioarticial kidneys), and targeting of signal transduction moleculas with growth factors and cytokines. These potential new approaches are, at best, in an experimental stage, and more research will be needed for their implementation.
 ...
PMID:Future direction of renal positron emission tomography. 1635 95

Angiogenesis is important in the growth and progression of solid tumours. The main pro-angiogenic factor, namely vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), also known as vascular permeability factor, is a potent angiogenic cytokine that induces mitosis and also regulates the permeability of endothelial cells. The soluble isoform of VEGF is a dimeric glycoprotein of 36-46 kDa, induced by hypoxia and oncogenic mutation and it binds to two specific tyrosine-kinase receptors: VEGF-1 (flt-1) and VEGF-2 (KDR/flk1). An increase in VEGF expression in tumour tissue or some blood compartments (i.e. serum or plasma) has been found in solid and haematological malignancies of various origins and is associated with metastasis formation and poor prognosis. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody developed against VEGF, binds to soluble VEGF, preventing receptor binding and inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation and vessel formation. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown that bevacizumab alone or in combination with a cytotoxic agent decreases tumour growth and increases median survival time and time to tumour progression. Bevacizumab is the first anti-angiogenetic treatment approved by the American Food and Drug Administration in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It has shown preliminary evidence of efficacy for breast, non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, prostate, head and neck and renal cancer as well as haematological malignancies. Common toxicities associated with bevacizumab include hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding episodes and thrombotic events. This review summarises the critical role of VEGF and discusses the data available on bevacizumab, from the humanisation of its parent murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) A.4.6.1 to its use in cancer clinical trials.
 ...
PMID:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a target of bevacizumab in cancer: from the biology to the clinic. 1684 97

Only scant information is available on the association between family history of kidney cancer and risk of renal cell cancer (RCC), particularly as concerns the variation of the risk according to sex, age, and type of relative or the association of family history of other cancers with RCC. We thus investigated the issue using data from a large multicentric case-control study conducted in Italy between 1992 and 2004 on 767 patients (494 men and 273 women) under age 80 years, with incident, histologically confirmed RCC, and 1,534 controls under age 80 years, admitted to hospital for a wide spectrum of acute, nonneoplastic conditions and frequency matched 2:1 to cases by center, sex, and age. Conditional logistic regression models, conditioned on center, sex, and age and adjusted for year of interview, smoking, body mass index, and number of brothers and sisters were used to estimate odds ratios (OR). Eighteen RCC and 8 controls reported a family history of kidney cancer in one first-degree relative [OR, 5.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.2-12.2]. No significant heterogeneity emerged according to sex or age of the proband or of the affected relative, or smoking habits, body mass index, and history of hypertension of the proband. Although not significant, the OR was higher when the affected relative was a sibling (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.8-27.7) rather than a parent or child (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5-12.9), as suggested from previous studies. The OR of RCC was also significantly elevated for a family history of prostate cancer (OR, 1.9), leukemias (OR, 2.2), or any cancer (OR, 1.5).
 ...
PMID:Family history of cancer and the risk of renal cell cancer. 1716 68

We have recently proposed that lipid peroxidation may be a common mechanistic pathway by which obesity and hypertension lead to increased renal cell cancer risk. During this exercise, we noted a risk factor swap between breast and kidney cancer (oophorectomy and increased parity, detrimental for kidney, beneficial for breast; high blood pressure, detrimental for kidney, beneficial for breast when it occurs during pregnancy; alcohol, beneficial for kidney, detrimental for breast, and so on). We have subsequently proposed the hypothesis that lipid peroxidation represents a protective mechanism in breast cancer, and reviewed the evidence of the role of lipid peroxidation on established hormonal and non-hormonal factors for breast cancer. Here, we review the evidence in support of lipid peroxidation playing a role in the relationships between dietary factors and breast cancer. Available evidence implicates increased lipid peroxidation products in the anti-carcinogenic effect of suspected protective factors for breast cancer, including soy, marine n-3 fatty acids, green tea, isothiocyanates, and vitamin D and calcium. We also review the epidemiological evidence supporting a modifying effect of oxidative stress genes in dietary factor-breast cancer relationships.
 ...
PMID:Lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress genes and dietary factors in breast cancer protection: a hypothesis. 1722 37

black triangle Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumour proliferation and angiogenesis.black triangle In the large, phase III, randomised, double-blind, multicentre Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET) of patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell cancer in whom previous systemic therapy had failed, median progression-free survival was doubled in patients receiving sorafenib compared with those receiving placebo (5.9 vs 2.8mo).black triangle Significantly more patients receiving sorafenib than those receiving placebo in the phase III trial experienced complete or partial responses or stable disease.black triangle Age, risk-assessment score, prior treatment, metastasis in lung or liver, or time from diagnosis did not affect the improved progression-free survival in sorafenib recipients.black triangle In a randomised, phase II discontinuation trial of patients with advanced renal cancer, in which only those showing stable disease with sorafenib were randomised to further sorafenib or placebo, more patients receiving sorafenib were free of progressive disease 12 weeks after randomisation than were those receiving placebo, and median progression-free survival was longer in sorafenib recipients.black triangle In clinical trials, most drug-related adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension occurred more often with sorafenib than with placebo.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: in advanced renal cancer. 1733 1

An elevated familial relative risk may indicate either an important genetic component in etiology or shared environmental exposures within the family. Incidence rates of kidney cancer are particularly high in Central Europe, although no data were available on the familial aggregation or genetic background of kidney cancer in this region. We have, therefore, investigated the role of family history in first-degree relatives in a large multicenter case-control study in Central Europe. A total number of 1,097 cases of kidney cancer and 1,555 controls were recruited from 2000 to 2003 from seven centers in Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, and Russia. The risk of kidney cancer increased with the increasing number of relatives with history of any cancer [odds ratio (OR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.00-1.31 per affected relative], and this association seemed to be more prominent among subjects with young onset (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.09-2.20 per affected relative). Overall, the OR was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.71- 2.76) for the subjects who had at least one first-degree relative with kidney cancer after adjusting for tobacco smoking, body mass index, and medical history of hypertension, and this association was most apparent among subjects with affected siblings (OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.09-15.4). Based on the relative risk to siblings in our study population, we estimated that 80% of the kidney cancer cases are likely to occur in 20% of the population with the highest genetic risk, which indicate the importance of further investigation of genetic factors in cancer prevention for kidney cancer.
 ...
PMID:Family history and the risk of kidney cancer: a multicenter case-control study in Central Europe. 1754 99

(1) Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is marketed for the treatment of advanced-stage and metastatic renal carcinoma, and for second-line treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Sorafenib arrived on the market almost simultaneously for second-line treatment of kidney cancer. (2) In second-line treatment of kidney cancer, two non comparative trials showed an unusually high rate of at least partial tumour regression with sunitinib (25%, compared to only 2% with sorafenib). Head-to-head trials of the two drugs are lacking. Although indirect comparisons are notoriously unreliable, sunitinib appears to provide longer progression-free survival than sorafenib (about 9 months versus 5.5 months), although overall survival times are similar. (3) Preliminary results of a trial comparing sunitinib with interferon alfa as first-line treatments in 750 patients with kidney cancer show a 6-month event-free survival advantage in the sunitinib arm. The precise overall survival time has not yet been calculated. (4) In 312 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours in whom imatinib has failed, a double-blind placebo-controlled trial showed that sunitinib prolonged overall survival time, but potential biases undermine these results. (5) The adverse effect profile of sunitinib appears to be similar to those of imatinib and sorafenib, apart from more thyroid disorders. The principal adverse effects are cutaneous, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and haematological disorders. Arterial hypertension, sometimes severe, occurred in 16% of patients treated with sunitinib. Other serious adverse events included tumour haemorrhage and pulmonary embolism. A risk of cardiac toxicity leading to heart failure cannot currently be ruled out. (6) Sunitinib is metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP 3A4, increasing the likelihood of drug interactions. (7) These results support the use of sunitinib as second-line therapy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Additional clinical evaluation is needed, however. In first-line treatment of kidney cancer, it is preferable to wait for detailed results of the ongoing trial, especially effects on survival time, before judging the possible advantages and disadvantages of sunitinib compared to interferon alfa. In second-line treatment, sorafenib is better-assessed than sunitinib and should therefore be preferred, pending a direct comparison of the two drugs.
 ...
PMID:Sunitinib: new drug. For some gastrointestinal stromal tumours. 1772 33

(1) Kidney cancer is infrequent. Most renal malignancies are adenocarcinomas. The prognosis varies markedly from one patient to another. Interferon alfa generally increases survival time by a few months in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers, but it has a negative impact on quality of life. (2) Sorafenib inhibits several kinases implicated in angiogenesis and tumour growth. It was recently approved for second-line treatment of advanced-stage kidney cancer. (3) A double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 903 patients evaluated second-line sorafenib therapy at an oral dose of 400 mg twice a day. Patients with a poor prognosis were not eligible. (4) Sorafenib increased overall survival time by about three months (50% mortality was reached at 19 months in the sorafenib group and at 16 months in the placebo group). The median progression-free survival time also increased by about three months (5.5 months with sorafenib versus about 3 months with placebo). The impact of sorafenib on quality of life was not reported. (5) An indirect comparison shows a higher rate of tumour regression with sunitinib than with sorafenib (25% versus 2%), and also longer progression-free survival (3 to 4 months longer with sunitinib). However, there was no difference between the two drugs in overall survival time, which is the most relevant outcome. Note that no practical conclusions can be drawn from indirect comparisons of this type, as they are subject to too many biases. (6) The main adverse events among patients treated with sorafenib in this trial were cutaneous disorders (about 30% of patients), diarrhoea (about 20%), hypertension (10%), and bleeding (10%). Cases of myocardial ischaemia and neuropathies also occurred. (7) Sorafenib is teratogenic in several animal species. (8) Sorafenib is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP 3A4. The risk of clinically relevant drug interactions is poorly documented. (9) For second-line treatment of patients with kidney cancer and no factors of poor prognosis, available data favour the use of sorafenib, which is better assessed than sunitinib.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: new drug. Second-line treatment of kidney cancer: better evaluated than sunitinib. 1772 34

Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently occurs at advanced stages, severely limiting the success of treatment, and median survival is barely more than a year. Previously, treatment of renal cancer was limited to nephrectomy or immunotherapy (interleukin or interferon-alpha), which was effective in a small subset of patients but often was accompanied by severe side effects. New orally administered targeted therapies have become available, offering broader benefits to patients with advanced RCC. Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as treatment for advanced RCC based on its extension of median progression-free survival from 12-24 weeks. Oncology nurses must ensure patient adherence and manage side effects of emerging treatments. This article reviews the management of skin rash, hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, diarrhea, and fatigue in patients receiving sorafenib. In addition, a case study of a patient receiving sorafenib is presented.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: a promising new targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma. 1856 57

As newer, molecularly targeted, anticancer drugs are entering clinical practice, a wide array of previously unrecognised and ill defined side effects of these drugs are increasingly observed. Sorafenib and sunitinib are two of these novel agents, acting on tumour angiogenesis as well as on other key proliferative pathways; recently approved for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, they may cause peculiar cutaneous, vascular and mucosal toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction, skin rash, hypertension and GERD-like oesophagitis/gastritis. In this review, we shall deal with these poorly recognised, but sometimes extremely distressing, toxicities; pathophysiologic mechanisms will be discussed and suggestions for treatment of each toxicity will be proposed, based on the few pieces of evidence available and, especially, on our empirical experience.
 ...
PMID:Uncovering Pandora's vase: the growing problem of new toxicities from novel anticancer agents. The case of sorafenib and sunitinib. 1818 24


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>