Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effect of both administration and withdrawal of doxazosin on patients with essential hypertension was evaluated by twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Six hypertensive men were treated with doxazosin starting at 1 mg/day, and the dosage was titrated at weekly intervals up to a maximum of 8 mg/day. The twenty-four-hour BP profile was monitored noninvasively before treatment, in the fourth week of treatment, and on days 2 and 7 after the discontinuation of doxazosin. The average twenty-four-hour systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP) were lowered by doxazosin treatment and returned to the pretreatment levels within two days of doxazosin withdrawal. Doxazosin treatment produced a significant decrease in the daytime SBP and DBP but not in the nighttime BP values. The daytime BP decrease was no longer detected on days 2 and 7 after drug withdrawal. The twenty-four-hour pulse rate was not influenced by either doxazosin administration or discontinuation. The plasma norepinephrine concentration and plasma renin activity were increased by doxazosin treatment and were decreased by drug withdrawal. There was no rebound hypertension following doxazosin withdrawal. Thus, the present study using twenty-four-hour BP monitoring showed that doxazosin treatment reduced the daytime BP in patients with essential hypertension and that this reduction was abolished within two days after doxazosin discontinuation.
 ...
PMID:Effect of administration and withdrawal of doxazosin on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. 781 52

The aims of this study were to determine: (1) the proportion of elderly hypertensive subjects currently attending a hospital hypertension clinic suitable for a trial of antihypertensive drug withdrawal, (2) the proportion of suitable patients who can be successfully withdrawn from drug therapy while receiving nonpharmacological advice, and (3) the factors associated with successful withdrawal. One hundred and five consecutive hypertensive subjects, 53% female, mean age 76 years (range 65-84 years) on pharmacological antihypertensive therapy for > 1 year were studied, of whom 78 (74%) had a clinic SBP < 175 mmHg and DBP < 100 mmHg. Subjects with recent myocardial infarction or stroke or with symptoms of ischaemic heart disease were excluded. Antihypertensive drug therapy was withdrawn in this group and nonpharmacological advice to lower BP was instituted. Clinic BP and weight were subsequently recorded monthly for 12 months in all subjects and at every three months in those who had a possible follow-up period of 24 months. The 24h ambulatory BP was measured at baseline and repeated one month off therapy; 24h urine electrolytes were also assessed at baseline and at 12 months or before restarting drug therapy. Seventy-four (70%) subjects had a potential follow-up of 12 months (four were withdrawn from the study) and 64 were available for two years of follow-up. Antihypertensive treatment was restarted if SBP > or = 160 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 90 mmHg on two consecutive visits. After 12 months, 20 (25%) of those withdrawn remained normotensive, the majority restarting therapy did so in the first three months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Possibilities for antihypertensive drug therapy withdrawal in the elderly. 785 30

Chronic nephrotoxicity is a major complication in high-dose cyclosporine treatment. We examined the glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, and kidney biopsies of 15 psoriatic patients treated with low-dose cyclosporine (< or = 5 mg/kg/d) for 30 months (25 to 35 months) 1 month after drug withdrawal. The mean (95% confidence interval) age of the patients in the study was 44 years (38 to 50 years). Their serum creatinine levels pretreatment and at the time of the study were 0.94 mg/dL (0.85 to 1.0 mg/dL) and 1.2 mg/dL (1.1 to 1.3 mg/dL). Seven patients had a decreased glomerular filtration rate and four of them also had a reduced renal plasma flow, below the 2.5 percentile of normal. Four patients had moderate tubulointerstitial scarring and arteriolopathy, while the remaining patients had mild structural abnormalities. The severity of acute nephrotoxicity during treatment and chronic structural injury were highly correlated (r = 0.81; P < 0.0003). Recurrent episodes of severe acute nephrotoxicity (defined as reversible increase of serum creatinine > 90% of baseline value) was a marker for moderate chronic nephrotoxicity. No correlation was found between chronic structural injury and patient age, sex, pretreatment creatinine level, blood pressure (pretreatment or during treatment), cyclosporine dose and treatment duration, and cyclosporine blood levels. In seven patients continued on cyclosporine for another 12 months (10 to 14 months), repeat studies showed no interval changes. Despite 40 months (30 to 51 months) of treatment, all but one of these seven patients (with previous hypertension and atherosclerotic vascular disease) had mild functional and structural abnormalities. None had any severe acute nephrotoxicity at any time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Chronic nephrotoxicity in psoriatic patients treated with low-dose cyclosporine. 815 88

We compared the response of blood pressure (BP) to either K-Canrenoate (K-Can) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in 26 mild-to-moderate essential hypertensives in a double-blind, cross-over design over 2 months each. The dose was 12.5 mg o.d. for HCTZ and 50 mg o.d. for K-Can: dosing was doubled after 1 month if seated diastolic BP was > or = 95 mmHg. Eight pts were "selective responder" to the lowest dose of HCTZ (HCTZ-R), and 6 to K-Can (K-Can-R). Seven pts had their high blood pressure controlled by the highest dose of both drugs and 4 were insensitive to both. One pt dropped out during HCTZ for low plasma K+, and 3 during K-Can (nausea and dizziness: 2 pts; plasma creatinine rise: 1 pt). All these side effects were reverted after drug withdrawal. HCTZ-R and K-Can-R differed for PRA (1.4 +/- 0.6 vs 0.8 +/- 0.4 Ang I ng/ml/h, p < 0.05) and Na-K-Cl cotransport (230 +/- 39 vs 372 +/- 24 mumolNa/L RBC/h, p < 0.01). Our data suggest the existence of a subgroup of essential hypertensives surprisingly insensitive to HCTZ, characterized by a "low" PRA and by a Na(+)-K(+)-Cl- cotransport higher than the HCTZ-R. Their selective response to K-Can suggest a peculiar pathogenetic mechanism underlying their high blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Different sensitivity to hydrochlorothiazide and to potassium-canrenoate among essential hypertensive patients. 851 9

In this study we evaluated in hypertensive patients the effects of drug-induced left ventricular hypertrophy regression on cardiac autonomic control, as assessed by means of heart period variability analysis. Power spectral analysis of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring was performed in 30 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline, after 1 year of lisinopril treatment, and after 1 month of drug withdrawal. At the same times, patients underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, echocardiographic study, and plasma renin activity assessment. Lisinopril treatment increased plasma renin activity and reduced 24-hour systolic and diastolic pressures (from 159 +/- 14 to 121 +/- 8 and from 103 +/- 7 to 80 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively) and left ventricular mass index (from 159 +/- 33 to 134 +/- 26 g/m2); moreover, in 12 of 30 patients, left ventricular mass normalization was achieved. Drug withdrawal was followed by an increase in blood pressure without left ventricular mass modification. In the total study population, only high-frequency power was higher after lisinopril treatment. In the subgroup of patients with left ventricular mass normalization, daytime and nighttime high-frequency powers as well as nighttime total and very-low-frequency powers were higher after 1 year of treatment than at baseline. In the remaining 18 patients, power spectral measures after treatment were slightly lower than at baseline and were even lower after drug withdrawal. Thus, in hypertensive hypertrophic patients, lisinopril treatment improves sympathovagal imbalance when left ventricular mass normalization is achieved. In patients without left ventricular mass normalization, drug withdrawal is followed by a worsening of neural cardiac control.
Hypertension 1996 Mar
PMID:Effect of 1 year of lisinopril treatment on cardiac autonomic control in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. 869 34

Torasemide is a lipophilic anilinopyridine sulphonylurea derivative that acts as a high ceiling loop diuretic and has been used for the treatment of both acute and chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. Torasemide is similar to other loop diuretics in terms of its mechanism of diuretic action; namely, blockade of Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. It has high bioavailability (> 80%), as does bumetanide, but a longer elimination half-life (3 to 4 hours) than either bumetanide or furosemide (frusemide). In the treatment of chronic CHF, oral torasemide (5 to 20 mg/day) has been shown to be an effective diuretic. Patients treated with torasemide for up to 1 year have reduced bodyweight, improved pulmonary haemodynamics, and decreased CHF severity. Intravenous torasemide (20 to 60mg as a single dose) has been shown to be as effective as furosemide in the treatment of acute CHF, and resulted in significant diuresis, bodyweight loss, and improved pulmonary haemodynamics and exercise performance. 'Non-diuretic' dosages (2.5 to 5 mg/day) of oral torasemide have been used to treat essential hypertension, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. When used in these dosages, torasemide lowered diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to below 90mm Hg in 8 to 12 weeks in 70 to 80% of patients. With dose doubling, this level of efficacy occurred in more than 90% of hypertensive patients. Clinical trials have established that blood pressure can be maintained at this level for at least 1 year with low dose torasemide. Torasemide is well tolerated in dosages up to 20 mg/day for at least 1 year. The most commonly reported adverse effects are those associated with loop diuretics in general. These include transient hypokalaemia, hyperuricaemia, dizziness, headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, orthostatic hypotension and fatigue. Adverse effects are comparable with those of other diuretics and rarely necessitate drug withdrawal.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of torasemide in congestive heart failure and essential hypertension. 885 25

The antihypertensive activity and safety of losartan, a specific and selective antagonist of angiotensin II (subtype 1) receptors, was evaluated in 100 inpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 2-week, single-blind, out patient placebo lead-in period, the last 2 days of which included inpatient monitoring of baseline blood pressure, the patients were assigned randomly to receive once-daily doses of either placebo; 50, 100, or 150 mg losartan; or 10 mg enalapril. Patients were treated double blind for 5 days, followed by a day for the study of drug withdrawal. Beginning with the first dose, the three doses of losartan and enalapril significantly decreased peak and trough systolic and diastolic blood pressures compared with placebo (p < or = 0.05). The area under the blood pressure curve was analyzed as an assessment of total blood pressure change throughout the day. On day 1, total blood pressure reduction with losartan (50-150 mg) was slightly less than with enalapril. By day 5 of double-blind treatment, the reduction in blood pressure in these groups was similar, suggesting that losartan has a slower onset of action than enalapril. No rebound hypertension was observed after study-drug discontinuation. Losartan was well tolerated in this trial, with an adverse event profile similar to placebo and enalapril.
 ...
PMID:An inpatient trial of the safety and efficacy of losartan compared with placebo and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension. 887 74

Following establishment of its efficacy in hypertension and congestive heart failure, the ACE inhibitor lisinopril has now been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction when administered as early treatment. The ability of lisinopril to attenuate the detrimental effects of left ventricular remodelling is a key mechanism; however, additional cardioprotective and vasculoprotective actions are postulated to play a role in mediating the early benefit. The GISSI-3 trial in > 19 000 patients has demonstrated that, when given orally within 24 hours of symptom onset and continued for 6 weeks, lisinopril (with or without nitrates) produces measurable survival benefits within 1 to 2 days of starting treatment. Compared with no lisinopril treatment, reductions of 11% in risk of mortality and 7.7% in a combined end-point (death plus severe left ventricular dysfunction) were evident at 6 weeks. Advantages were apparent in all types of patients. Thus, those at high risk-women, the elderly, patients with diabetes mellitus and those with anterior infarct and/or Killip class > 1 -also benefited. These gains in combined end-point events persisted in the longer term, despite treatment withdrawal after 6 weeks in most patients. At 6 months, the incidence rate for the combined end-point remained lower than with control (a 6.2% reduction). The GISSI-3 results concur with those from recent large investigations (ISIS-4, CCS-1, SMILE) of other ACE inhibitors as early management in myocardial infarction. However, the results of the CONSENSUS II trial (using intravenous enalaprilat then oral enalapril) were unfavourable in some patients. These findings, together with the development of persistent hypotension and, to a lesser extent, renal dysfunction among patients in the GISSI-3 trial, have prompted considerable debate over optimum treatment strategies. Present opinion generally holds that therapy with lisinopril or other ACE inhibitors shown to be beneficial may be started within 24 hours in haemodynamically stable patients with no other contraindications; current labelling in the US and other countries reflects this position. There is virtually unanimous agreement that such therapy is indicated in high-risk patients, particularly those with left ventricular dysfunction. The choice of ACE inhibitor appears less important than the decision to treat; it seems likely that these benefits are a class effect. Lisinopril has a tolerability profile resembling that of other ACE inhibitors, can be given once daily and may be less costly than other members of its class. However, present cost analyses are flawed and this latter points remains to be proven in formal cost-effectiveness analyses. In conclusion, early treatment with lisinopril (within 24 hours of symptom onset) for 6 weeks improves survival and reduces cardiovascular morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction, and confers ongoing benefit after drug withdrawal. While patients with symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction are prime candidates for treatment, all those who are haemodynamically stable with no other contraindications are also eligible to receive therapy. Lisinopril and other ACE inhibitors shown to be beneficial should therefore be considered an integral part of the early management of myocardial infarction in suitable patients.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the early management of acute myocardial infarction. 889 68

NEUROHUMORAL SYSTEMS AS SUPERCONTROLLERS: The brain and closely linked hormone systems play a crucial part in short- and long-term cardiovascular control and have many features of adaptive control systems. The cardiovascular control system is a multivariate system, while changes in environmental conditions often result in alterations in system parameters and other non-linearities, in contrast to the fixed parameters of linear control systems. In blood pressure control these features are exemplified by diurnal circadian fluctuations, alterations in lifestyle and psychosocial stress. Because the neurohumoral controllers are involved in virtually all aspects of homeostasis, they can be regarded as supercontrollers. THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM AND THE BRAIN: Analysis in conscious animals of the effects of circulatory disturbances suggests that the central nervous system integrates information from multiple sources of afferents. Integration of the information associated with most reflex and behavioural disturbances is mediated by many neuron groups at different levels of the neuraxis, including suprapontine brain regions. The disturbances considered include baroreflexes in intact animals, some central actions of alpha-methyldopa and reflex responses to hypoxia and haemorrhage. The operations involve the brain in comparisons of the relative magnitude of different inputs, while the occurrences of non-linear changes in baroreflex properties signify alterations in the parameters of the controller. NEUROHUMORAL MECHANISMS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT: Neurohumoral mechanisms also play a key role in cardiovascular development. Increased sympathetic activity early in life causes hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and accounts for the differences in blood pressure and structural variables from corresponding values in Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. In contrast, the renin-angiotensin system affects early cardiovascular development in the same way in each strain, so that it is unlikely to be a cause of hypertension in SHR. However, after drug withdrawal following treatment of young rats with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, there were between-strain differences in late cardiovascular development. Late development is relatively small in SHR compared to WKY rats, which contributes to the long-term attenuation of hypertension in SHR and to the normalization of blood pressure in WKY rats.
 ...
PMID:Circulatory control and the supercontrollers. 890 3

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the interest of aldosterone precursors assays in arterial hypertension with hypokaliemia and adrenal nodules non due to aldosterone. Seven hypertensive patients, 3 men and 4 women, aged 59.5 +/- 10.1 years were included in the study. After drug withdrawal, kaliemia was 3.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (2.7-3.6), active renin 2.9 +/- 1.4 ng/l, plasma aldosterone (aldo) 108 +/- 49.4 pg/ml, cortisol 13 +/- 3.1 micrograms/100 ml, and [S] 0.47 +/- 0.5 micrograms/100 ml. Adrenal CT scan showed an adenoma in 3 patients (30.5 +/- 5 mm) and an unilateral nodular hyperplasia in 4 patients. In all patients, the plasma levels (RIA, chomatographic step) of the following steroids in the mineralocorticoid (MC) pathway were determined: DOC, 18 OH-DOC, B, 18 OH-B and aldosterone. Two from 7 (28%) exerted aldosterone precursors excess, 1 with DOC-producing adenoma (DOC-PA) (table), and 1 with a partial 11 beta hydroxylase deficiency (DOC: 211 pg/ml; S: 1 mu/100 ml). Aldosterone/DOC + 18 OH-DOC ratio proposed as a malignancy index was decreased in the patient with DOC-PA (8.1). No dysfunction in the MC pathway was identified in the 5 other patients. [table: see text] The study suggests the relevance of aldosterone precursors assays in low renin hypertension non due to aldosterone and in incidentally discovered adrenal masses.
 ...
PMID:[Aldosterone precursors and hypertension with hypokalemia and adrenal module non caused by primary hyperaldosteronism]. 894 78


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>