Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020473 (hyperlipidemia)
 15,891 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The immunosuppressive benefits of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in short-term and medium-term renal allograft survival are well documented. It is becoming increasingly clear that the basis of this immunosuppression, the inhibition of calcineurin, may be linked with nephrotoxicity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and new-onset diabetes mellitus, side effects that may lead to CRAD, death due to CVD, and late renal allograft loss. This clinical picture presents a clear need for new strategies that produce adequate immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection while simultaneously reducing the side effects associated with CNI-related therapies. Sirolimus combined with cyclosporine and tacrolimus has demonstrated an ability to reduce incidences of early acute rejection and, used as base therapy, has provided protection against acute rejection equivalent to that of cyclosporine, without the consequent nephrotoxicity associated with CNIs. In preliminary results from an ongoing clinical trial, sirolimus has been used to eliminate cyclosporine during maintenance immunosuppression, with subsequent improvements in measures of blood pressure and renal function. In addition, the antiproliferative properties of sirolimus and its ability to prevent graft vascular disease in animal studies make sirolimus a promising agent to decrease incidences of CRAD and improve long-term renal allograft survival. These findings point to a clear need to further explore both the efficacy of sirolimus immunotherapy and its long-term effects.
 ...
PMID:Exploring treatment options in renal transplantation: the problems of chronic allograft dysfunction and drug-related nephrotoxicity. 1158 88

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) has dramatically increased medium-term life expectancy after heart transplantation but has had only limited impact on long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients. The original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine has been superceded by a microemulsion formulation (Neoral), which has more predictable pharmacokinetics and allows more precise dose-tailoring. Cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus (Prograf) have a similar efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection of heart transplants, but their use is accompanied by nephrotoxicity and by cardiovascular side effects. The efficacy of immunosuppression can be improved by adjunctive therapy, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cellcept), corticosteroids, and induction therapy. One of the most important predictors of patient mortality at >5 years after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)/late graft failure, which accounts for 31% of deaths. Neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. In terms of efficacy, MMF provides a modest advantage over azathioprine in preventing CAV, and the combination of cyclosporine plus MMF results in significantly lower mortality than cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Overall, CNIs have multiple cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia and new-onset diabetes after transplantation, although cyclosporine and tacrolimus have somewhat different cardiovascular side-effect profiles. The challenge in choosing the best immunosuppressive regimen is to balance efficacy and safety to optimize graft and patient survival over the course of many decades. Because cyclosporine and tacrolimus have similar efficacy against acute rejection the choice of CNI for heart transplant recipients should be based on the relative risk of cardiovascular and renal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation. 1509 6

Owing to the increasing disparity of organ demand and organ supply the search for optimal immunosuppressive strategies has become a central issue in kidney transplantation (KTX). In the focus today are modifications of the use of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs, Cyclosporine A/Tacrolimus) and steroids, as they are nephrotoxic and promote cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These modifications can either be withdrawal or avoidance of these substances in combination with new and/or established immunosuppressants. Because about half of all KTXs are performed by or with the help of urologists' knowledge of modern immunosuppressive regimens is crucial also for urologists. We performed a literature research (PubMed, DIMDI, medline) for CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols and studies to elucidate their influence on graft-function and graft- and patient-survival. New substances and actual studies were also evaluated. Several published reports on CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols after KTX exist, including withdrawal, reduction or avoidance. The time of reduction seems to be crucial: an initially increased immune response should be counterbalanced by an initially intensified immunosuppression. Therefore, late steroid withdrawal seems to be safer than early withdrawal especially in Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance also seems feasible on a CNI based regimen, especially in context with induction therapy. Withdrawal or avoidance of CNIs seems feasible with mycophenolate acid and/or induction therapy with IL 2-receptor antibodies as co-immunosuppressants. This is of interest in grafts with deteriorating function or from donors with extended criteria. Also, CNI- and steroid-free immunosuppression can be successfully performed with new immunosuppressants but results are yet premature. CNI- and/or steroid reduction, withdrawal or even avoidance is feasible. As long-term graft function is the goal of KTX and as more kidneys from donors with extended criteria are transplanted "tailored immunosuppression" will replace standards in the future.
 ...
PMID:Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments. 1733 1

The evidence base relating to the use of everolimus in heart transplantation has expanded considerably in recent years, providing clinically relevant information regarding its use in clinical practice. Unless there are special considerations to take into account, all de novo heart transplant patients can be regarded as potential candidates for immunosuppression with everolimus and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Caution about the use of everolimus immediately after transplantation should be exercised in certain patients with the risk of severe proteinuria, with poor wound healing, or with uncontrolled severe hyperlipidemia. Initiation of everolimus in the early phase aftertransplant is not advisable in patients with severe pretransplant end-organ dysfunction or in patients on a left ventricular assist device beforetransplant who are at high risk of infection or of wound healing complications. The most frequent reason for introducing everolimus in maintenance heart transplant patients is to support minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor therapy, for example, due to impaired renal function or malignancy. Due to its potential to inhibit the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and to reduce cytomegalovirus infection, everolimus should be initiated as soon as possible after heart transplantation. Immediate and adequate reduction of CNI exposure is mandatory from the start of everolimus therapy.
...
PMID:Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update. 2438 94