UMLS:C0020473 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0020473 (hyperlipidemia)
15,891 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Recently, new calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus (FK-506) and microemulsion cyclosporin, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients and short-term outcomes have been accumulating. In the majority of patients, these calcineurin inhibitors have been used in combination with new immunosuppressive drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Under these circumstances, a comparison of cyclosporin and tacrolimus provides the answer to a very important controversial issue. Which drug should we choose in individual patients? In an attempt to answer this question, this review compared the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in modern immunosuppressive regimens, which have already been published in well designed clinical studies, and discusses how immunosuppression should be individualised in renal transplant patients.Overall, short-term patient and graft survival with cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus is almost identical. The incidence of acute rejection is generally lower in tacrolimus/azathioprine- than in cyclosporin/azathioprine-treated patients. However, in conjunction with MMF, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection between tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients became smaller. Adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes (gum hypertrophy, hirsutism) seem to be less frequent in tacrolimus-treated than in cyclosporin-treated patients. Recent randomised studies showed that the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was almost identical between low-dose tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients. According to the data discussed in this review, the recommendation on the choice of calcineurin inhibitors at this moment is that either cyclosporin or tacrolimus can be used safely and effectively for patients without any risk factors. However, at our centre, we prefer tacrolimus to cyclosporin in patients with a high risk for rejection, such as those with ABO-incompatibility, delayed graft function, sensitisation, and African American race and some other risk factors, such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Moreover, tacrolimus may be preferable to cyclosporin for women because of hirsutism and for children because of the steroid-sparing effect. We consider that cyclosporin should be chosen when patients experience tacrolimus-related adverse events, such as severe chest pain, tremor, gastrointestinal symptoms and encephalopathy. In conclusion, well tolerated and effective immunosuppression is feasible with both cyclosporin and tacrolimus. In the current immunosuppressive regimens, a calcineurin inhibitor, either tacrolimus or cyclosporin, is the essential basic standard immunosuppressant. Clinicians need to decide the best means of optimising therapy for individual patients, based on various risk factors, such as risk of rejection, i.e. sensitisation, delayed graft function and ABO-incompatibility, and some adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes.
...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: what is the best option? 1288 61

The anti-interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL-2R) antibody therapy is an exciting approach to the prevention of acute rejection after renal allograft transplantation whereby immunosuppression is exerted by a selective and competitive inhibition of IL-2-induced T cell proliferation, a critical pathway of allorecognition. The anti-IL-2R antibodies specifically block the alpha-subunit of the IL-2R on activated T cells, and prevent T cell proliferation and activation of the effector arms of the immune system. The anti-IL-2R antibodies are used as induction therapy, immediately after renal transplantation, for prevention of acute cellular rejection in children and adults. During acute rejection, the IL-2Ralpha chain is no longer expressed on T cells; thus, the antibodies cannot be used to treat an existing acute rejection. Two anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibodies are currently in clinical use: daclizumab and basiliximab. In placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials in adults, daclizumab and basiliximab in combination with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection and corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection without increasing the risk of infectious or malignant complications, and neither antibody was associated with the cytokine-release syndrome. Children who receive calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression, as well as children who receive augmented immunosuppression to treat acute rejection, are at increased risk of growth impairment, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, diabetes mellitus, and cosmetic changes. In older children, the cosmetic adverse effects frequently reduce compliance with the treatment, and subsequently increase the risk of allograft loss. Being effective and well tolerated in children, the anti-IL-2R antibodies reduce the need for calcineurin inhibitors while maintaining the overall efficacy of the regimen; thus, the anti-IL-2R antibodies increase the safety margin (less toxicity, fewer adverse effects) of the baseline immunosuppression. Secondly, the anti-IL-2R antibodies decrease the need for corticosteroids and muromonab CD3 (OKT3) in children as a result of decreased incidence of acute rejection. The recommended pediatric dose of daclizumab is 1 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days for five doses, with the first dose administered within 24 hours pre-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains daclizumab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (5-10 microg/mL) in children for at least 12 weeks.The recommended pediatric dose of basiliximab for recipients <35 kg is 10 mg, and 20 mg for recipients > or =35 kg, intravenously on days 0 and 4 post-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains basiliximab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (>0.2 microg/mL) in children for at least 3 weeks.
...
PMID:Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for the prevention of rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients: current status. 1451 Jun 27

Everolimus is a derivative of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, originally isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Both everolimus and sirolimus have a similar mechanism of action, exerting potent inhibition of growth factor-induced proliferation of lymphocytes, as well as other hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells of mesenchymal origin. Each agent complexes with the FK506 binding protein 12 to inhibit cyclin dependent kinase(s), collectively termed the target of rapamycin (TOR), causing G1-S phase cell cycle arrest. Safety and efficacy have been documented in large-scale, blinded, randomized, international clinical renal and cardiac transplant trials. Everolimus is more hydrophilic, exhibits a shorter elimination half-life (approximately 30 hours), and demonstrates greater relative bioavailability compared to sirolimus. However, similar to the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, everolimus is biotransformed by the cytochrome P450, 3A4 isozyme. Also similar to sirolimus, clinical experiences identified biologically relevant side effects including hyperlipidemia and exacerbation of cyclosporine (CsA)-associated nephrotoxicity. However, also similar to sirolimus, accumulating evidence suggests that the hyperlipidemia can be controlled and the CsA-associated renal effects appear reduced with a low incidence of acute rejection when everolimus is administered in combination with reduced CsA doses. The experience using everolimus in cardiac transplantation has also provided potentially important insights into the consequences of antiproliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts where reduction in intimal expansion was identified by intravascular coronary ultrasound examination among those patients receiving everolimus. Therefore, available results suggest that the introduction of everolimus as the newest TOR inhibitor should enhance therapeutic options for immunosuppression after organ transplantation.
...
PMID:The evolving experience using everolimus in clinical transplantation. 1504 95

As liver transplantation is now being performed with an excellent 5-year survival rate of approximately 70% at selected centers, attention has been shifted to reduce long-term complications of calcineurin inhibitors including diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, which have a major effect on morbidity and mortality within the transplant setting. Cyclosporine (CsA) monitoring has been performed traditionally by measurement of predose "trough" blood concentrations (C0). Recent development of 2 hour postdose CsA (C2) monitoring strategy has emerged as a much more sensitive approach for assessing the pharmacokinetics and providing greater precision in the optimization of Neoral dosing than C0 measurements. Furthermore, a reduction of risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease and in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection have been associated with the adoption of C2 monitoring. However, further data from multicenter trials are required to evaluate the long-term benefits of this new therapeutic monitoring strategy.
...
PMID:Future directions in immunosuppression. 1504 8

Cardiovascular disease post-transplant, particularly ischemic heart disease, is a significant problem for all transplant recipients. The major risk factors-smoking, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension-are often more prevalent in heart transplant populations than in the general population. One of the main risk factors influencing graft loss and patient survival is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Because CAV affects between 30% and 60% of cardiac transplant recipients within 5 years of surgery, prevention is a key focus for cardiac transplant teams today. CAV is caused by both immunologic mechanisms (e.g., acute rejection and anti-HLA antibodies) and non-immunologic mechanisms relating to the transplant itself or the recipient (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pre-existing diabetes) or to the side effects often associated with immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity and new-onset diabetes after transplantation). The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, effectively prevent acute rejection, but do not prevent the development of CAV. CAV prevention will require a combined approach of new adjunct immunosuppressant agents (e.g., the proliferation signal inhibitors) and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes are also associated with the immunosuppression required to prevent organ rejection. Some studies have shown that hypertension is present more frequently in cyclosporine-treated patients than in tacrolimus-treated patients and that tacrolimus may be associated with a more favorable lipid profile. On the other hand, tacrolimus may be more diabetogenic than cyclosporine with current data suggesting a trend but no statistically significant supporting evidence. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is at times difficult to manage and may be an important determinant along with hypertension and hyperlipidemia of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease. The choice of calcineurin inhibitor for an immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation should consider the associated relative cardiovascular risks.
...
PMID:Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: risk factors and management. 1509 4

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) has dramatically increased medium-term life expectancy after heart transplantation but has had only limited impact on long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients. The original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine has been superceded by a microemulsion formulation (Neoral), which has more predictable pharmacokinetics and allows more precise dose-tailoring. Cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus (Prograf) have a similar efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection of heart transplants, but their use is accompanied by nephrotoxicity and by cardiovascular side effects. The efficacy of immunosuppression can be improved by adjunctive therapy, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cellcept), corticosteroids, and induction therapy. One of the most important predictors of patient mortality at >5 years after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)/late graft failure, which accounts for 31% of deaths. Neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. In terms of efficacy, MMF provides a modest advantage over azathioprine in preventing CAV, and the combination of cyclosporine plus MMF results in significantly lower mortality than cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Overall, CNIs have multiple cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia and new-onset diabetes after transplantation, although cyclosporine and tacrolimus have somewhat different cardiovascular side-effect profiles. The challenge in choosing the best immunosuppressive regimen is to balance efficacy and safety to optimize graft and patient survival over the course of many decades. Because cyclosporine and tacrolimus have similar efficacy against acute rejection the choice of CNI for heart transplant recipients should be based on the relative risk of cardiovascular and renal side effects.
...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation. 1509 6

Chronic allograft nephropathy is a devastating complication of kidney transplantation that is responsible for a significant proportion of graft loss. This complication is characterized by a progressive decline in kidney function, which is not attributable to a specific cause. Many risk factors exist for the development of chronic allograft nephropathy, including donor-, recipient-, and transplant-related factors (eg, use of calcineurin inhibitors and acute rejection episodes), as well as comorbid conditions such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. There is no definitive treatment for this complication; management has focused on minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors in conjunction with addition of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. Alterations in the immunosuppressive regimen must be done cautiously, as precipitating acute rejection will cause further damage to the allograft. Optimal control of blood pressure, particularly with the use of agents such as angiotensin II receptor blockers, in conjunction with management of dyslipidemia may be effective concurrent therapies in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy.
...
PMID:Chronic allograft nephropathy: pathogenesis and management of an important posttransplant complication. 1526 52

Renal transplant recipients are susceptible to hyperlipidemia and the development of atherosclerosis as a consequence of the immunosuppressive agents they require, which include corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and sirolimus. Fibric acid derivatives and 3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors are prescribed commonly to optimize lipid profiles and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in this type of setting. The authors describe 3 cases of reversible acute renal allograft dysfunction in patients treated with fenofibrate. Serum levels of monitored immunosuppressant agents remained therapeutic throughout the time period. Discontinuation of the fenofibrate resulted in the resolution of renal dysfunction. The pathologic changes to the proximal tubules in all 3 biopsy specimens were in keeping with a toxic rather than an ischemic etiology. Although the control of hyperlipidemia is crucial in the transplant patient population, the authors suggest that caution be exercised and serum creatinine levels be closely monitored in patients started on fibrates.
...
PMID:Fenofibrate-associated reversible acute allograft dysfunction in 3 renal transplant recipients: biopsy evidence of tubular toxicity. 1533 27

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, both in terms of survival benefit and quality of life. The major limitation is the continuing shortage of kidneys suitable for transplantation, reinforcing the need to maximise graft survival. After the first year of transplantation, chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD) is the first cause of late graft deterioration and failure. CRAD has been defined as a progressive renal dysfunction, independent of acute rejection, drug toxicity and recurrent or de novo nephropathy, with features on biopsy of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) characterised by vascular intimal hyperplasia, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Protocol biopsy-based studies have demonstrated a high and early prevalence of CAN lesions during the first year in patients with normal and stable renal function. Beyond 1 year, the injuries associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) appear to be very common. The physiopathology of CRAD is complex and multifactorial. Both alloantigen-dependent factors (acute rejection, HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, inadequate immunosuppression) and alloantigen-independent factors (donor age, brain death, ischaemia/reperfusion injuries, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cytomegalovirus, CNI-related nephrotoxicity) are involved. Consequently, CRAD appears as a dynamic process, evolving with time, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be modulated in order to provide the most suitable treatment at the different phases of its natural history. On the basis of this scheme, the new paradigm would be the use of a CNI-based regimen during the period of maximal risk of (subclinical) acute rejection, followed by a conversion to a CNI-free regimen in order to avoid the long-term consequences of nephrotoxicity. Fortunately, new agents are being introduced in clinical practice providing a large range of combinations and allowing individualisation of immunosuppressive regimens. Large, prospective, multicentre trials are warranted, and the challenge is to define new endpoints of CRAD and to determine the best therapeutic strategy.
...
PMID:Combating chronic renal allograft dysfunction : optimal immunosuppressive regimens. 1574 97

Calcineurin inhibitors potentially contribute to risk of cardiovascular events through the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. The exact extent to which calcineurin inhibitors affect these risk factors is difficult to establish since pre-existing renal disease and concomitant immunosuppressive agents (such as steroids or TOR inhibitors) also exert an effect. Clinical trials have consistently shown a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus with tacrolimus, which has been borne out in large-scale registry analyses. However, the risk of hypertension is approximately 5% higher with cyclosporine than tacrolimus, as is the risk of hyperlipidemia. Statin therapy is effective in treating dyslipidemia and has significant benefits in renal transplant patients. An individualized approach to choice of calcineurin inhibitor, by which cyclosporine or tacrolimus are selected based on the patient's particular risk profile, may thus help to reduce the toll of cardiovascular mortality among renal transplant recipients in the future.
...
PMID:Assessing the relative risk of cardiovascular disease among renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine. 1577 54

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>