Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0020473 (
hyperlipidemia
)
15,891
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Tacrolimus
(FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other transplants. Extensive data have now confirmed its efficacy as primary or rescue therapy in renal and hepatic transplantation. In prospective and historically controlled studies of primary therapy, tacrolimus generally demonstrated greater efficacy than the conventional formulation of cyclosporin for preventing episodes of acute rejection and allowed reduction of corticosteroid use. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial. However, patient and graft survival rates were similar in both treatment groups (although numerically larger in adults with liver transplants). In children, rejection rates and corticosteroid requirements were usually lower with tacrolimus and patient and graft survival were generally similar with the 2 immunosuppressants. The finding of reduced corticosteroid requirements with tacrolimus may be of particular benefit in prepubertal children, who are still growing. A small amount of evidence has also accumulated regarding the use of tacrolimus as primary therapy in patients who have undergone bone marrow or heart and/or lung transplantation. Data are not conclusive, particularly in children, but tacrolimus appears to be useful for treating patients who have undergone these organ transplantations and may be associated with a lower incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis than cyclosporin in the latter group. Potential efficacy has also been shown in a limited number of patients with pancreas or pancreas-kidney, pancreatic islet and intestinal or multivisceral transplants, and in children who have undergone heart or heart-lung transplantation.
Tacrolimus
also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient for conclusions to be made. However, these results support the need for further study in these populations. Adverse effects occurring during tacrolimus therapy are generally of the type common to all immunosuppressive regimens. However, diabetes mellitus, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are more common in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients.
Hyperlipidaemia
, hypertension, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia are more common with cyclosporin. In 2 large multicentre clinical trials (US liver and European renal), tacrolimus was discontinued more frequently during the first year because of adverse events. However, the tolerability of tacrolimus appears related to dosage, improving as the dose is reduced.
Tacrolimus
should be considered an effective primary immunosuppressant in renal and hepatic transplantation. The drug is also a useful agent for rescue therapy in patients experiencing rejection or poor tolerability to cyclosporin. Thus, tacrolimus provides the clinician with an effective option for patients requiring immunosuppression and, with a different tolerability and efficacy profile to cyclosporin, it will better allow the tailoring of therapy to meet the needs of individual patients.
...
PMID:Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation. 942 97
Since the approval of cyclosporine in 1983, only 3 drugs, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients. All 3 agents decrease the incidence of early acute allograft rejection. An increase in intermediate and long-term graft survival has not been shown. However, survival data from these clinical trials should be interpreted with caution because the studies were not designed for this purpose. All 3 drugs have significant, albeit different, safety profiles. It remains to be seen whether, the lower incidence of hypertension and
hyperlipidemia
seen in tacrolimus-treated patients will reduce the incidence and severity of the cardiovascular disease experienced by renal transplant recipients. Sirolimus causes severe
hyperlipidemia
, and the long-term consequences both on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and on lipid-associated renal injury have yet to be determined.
Tacrolimus
and mycophenolate mofetil appear to increase graft survival in pancreas-kidney recipients but their efficacy in another high-risk group, African-American recipients, has not yet been clearly shown. However, the trend toward improved graft survival in African-American recipients treated with tacrolimus is encouraging. Steroid-withdrawal remains a goal in the posttransplant period. The available data from steroid-withdrawal and steroid-avoidance clinical trials are mixed. Steroid withdrawal can be achieved in about 50% of patients on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppression regimen. Steroid-withdrawal under coverage of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or Neoral (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) may be more successful than that achieved in patients receiving Sandimmune (Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Further studies are needed in this area.
...
PMID:Maintenance immunosuppression: new agents and persistent dilemmas. 1078 29
Tacrolimus
is a cornerstone immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation and compared with cyclosporin, its use is associated with a reduced incidence of acute rejection. Optimizing immunosuppressive management in the early post-transplant period is important for achieving long-term graft function and survival. In attempts to improve the long-term outcomes of renal transplantation further, tacrolimus has been combined with two novel immunosuppressive agents, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus, with encouraging results in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rates and renal graft function.
Tacrolimus
in combination with MMF adjunctive therapy showed significantly better graft survival in patients with delayed graft function, fewer episodes of corticosteroid-resistant rejection and better renal function at the 3-year follow-up compared with cyclosporin microemulsion plus MMF immunosuppression. A tacrolimus plus MMF regimen was also effective for renal transplant recipients at our centre in Pennsylvania, resulting in excellent survival and rejection rates at 1 year post-transplantation. The 3-month results of a US multicentre study comparing tacrolimus in combination with either MMF or sirolimus showed these two treatment regimens to be equivalent in terms of patient and graft survival, delayed graft function, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and renal graft function, although differences were apparent in terms of acute tubular necrosis and
hyperlipidaemia
. In conclusion, the development of a new immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplantation should take account of factors that influence graft function, both in the short and long term, as a way of optimizing individual maintenance therapy.
...
PMID:Tailoring tacrolimus-based immunotherapy in renal transplantation. 1273 59
It is estimated that there are greater than 100000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control.
Tacrolimus
compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension,
hyperlipidemia
, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient.
...
PMID:Outcomes in kidney transplantation. 1283 99
The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) has dramatically increased medium-term life expectancy after heart transplantation but has had only limited impact on long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients. The original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine has been superceded by a microemulsion formulation (Neoral), which has more predictable pharmacokinetics and allows more precise dose-tailoring. Cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus (
Prograf
) have a similar efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection of heart transplants, but their use is accompanied by nephrotoxicity and by cardiovascular side effects. The efficacy of immunosuppression can be improved by adjunctive therapy, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cellcept), corticosteroids, and induction therapy. One of the most important predictors of patient mortality at >5 years after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)/late graft failure, which accounts for 31% of deaths. Neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. In terms of efficacy, MMF provides a modest advantage over azathioprine in preventing CAV, and the combination of cyclosporine plus MMF results in significantly lower mortality than cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Overall, CNIs have multiple cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension,
hyperlipidemia
and new-onset diabetes after transplantation, although cyclosporine and tacrolimus have somewhat different cardiovascular side-effect profiles. The challenge in choosing the best immunosuppressive regimen is to balance efficacy and safety to optimize graft and patient survival over the course of many decades. Because cyclosporine and tacrolimus have similar efficacy against acute rejection the choice of CNI for heart transplant recipients should be based on the relative risk of cardiovascular and renal side effects.
...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation. 1509 6
In the control of acute rejection, attention is being focused more and more on the long-term adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents used. Since cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in renal transplant recipients, optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors is essential in the long-term management of these patients. Unfortunately, several commonly used immunosuppressive drugs interfere with the cardiovascular system. In this review, the cardiovascular adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents currently used for maintenance immunosuppression are thoroughly discussed. Optimising immunosuppression means finding a balance between efficacy and safety. Corticosteroids induce endothelial dysfunction, hypertension,
hyperlipidaemia
and diabetes mellitus, and impair fibrinolysis. The use of corticosteroids in transplant recipients is undesirable, not only because of their cardiovascular effects, but also because they induce such adverse effects as osteoporosis, obesity, and atrophy of the skin and vessel wall. Calcineurin inhibitors are the most powerful agents for maintenance immunosuppression. The calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin (cyclosporine) not only induces these same adverse effects as corticosteroids but is also nephrotoxic.
Tacrolimus
has a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile than ciclosporin and is also less nephrotoxic. It has little or no effect on blood pressure and serum lipids; however, its diabetogenic effect is more prominent in the period immediately following transplantation, although at maintenance dosages, the diabetogenic effect appears to be comparable to that of ciclosporin. The diabetogenic effect of tacrolimus can be managed by reducing the dose of tacrolimus and early corticosteroid withdrawal. The effect of tacrolimus on endothelial function has not been completely elucidated. The proliferation inhibitors azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have little effect on the cardiovascular system. Yet, indirectly, by inducing anaemia, they may lead to left ventricular hypertrophy. MMF is an attractive alternative to azathioprine because of its higher potency and possibly lower risk of malignancies. Sirolimus also induces anaemia, but may be promising because of its antiproliferative features. Whether the
hyperlipidaemia
induced by sirolimus counteracts its beneficial effects is, as yet, unknown. It may be combined with MMF, however, initial attempts resulted in severe mouth ulcers.
...
PMID:Effect of immunosuppressive agents on long-term survival of renal transplant recipients: focus on the cardiovascular risk. 1534 97
The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (
Prograf
) in renal transplantation is well established. Achieving longterm patient and graft survival are the ultimate goals following transplantation. Many factors negatively impact long-term transplant outcomes, including graft rejection, renal dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension,
hyperlipidaemia
, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM)). Accordingly, careful consideration of the immunosuppressive strategy and its impact on these factors is critical to optimising outcomes. Clinical trials and registry studies conducted over the past decade have demonstrated tacrolimus to be a cornerstone immunosuppressant in renal transplantation. Compared with cyclosporine treatment, tacrolimus has been shown to be associated with decreased acute and chronic rejection, improved renal function over the long-term post-transplant, and a lower incidence of
hyperlipidaemia
and hypertension. In early studies, the incidence of PTDM was significantly higher in patients receiving tacrolimus; however, recent large clinical trials have revealed no significant between-group differences in the incidence of PTDM with tacrolimus treatment and cyclosporine microemulsion treatment. Together, these findings may translate into improved long-term transplant outcomes with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Although approved only for kidney and liver transplantation in the US,
Prograf
was the calcineurin inhibitor used in the majority of patients transplanted in 2003: kidney (67%), liver (89%), kidney/pancreas (81%), pancreas (77%), lung (65%), heart/lung (48%), and heart (42%).
...
PMID:Tacrolimus based immunosuppression. 1559 82
Drugs used for immunosuppression have been implicated in causing numerous long-term side effects including nephrotoxicity, glucose intolerance, and
hyperlipidemia
. In this study, we reviewed our pediatric liver transplant recipients in terms of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as well as fasting glucose and lipid profiles. To date, 79 pediatric liver transplantations have been performed at our center: 24 transplantations of at least 5 months to a maximum of 7.3 years posttransplant are reviewed herein. The mean time posttransplantation was 2.1 years. Nine boys and 15 girls showed a distribution of 19 mixed race, 3 black, and 2 white patients. The mean age at the time of transplantation was 6.6 years (0.8-13.3 years) with 8 cases under the age of 3 years. All recipients started with Cyclosporine Neoral (CSA) as first line, but, at the time of testing, immunosuppression included 5 children on CSA and 19 on
Tacrolimus
. Radionuclide 51 Cr-EDTA Glomerular Filtration Rates (GFR) showed a range from 21 to 220 mL/min/1.73 m2 (mean 96.1, median 89.8). Seven cases had a GFR less than 75 mL/min/1.73 m2. Twenty-one children were on antihypertensives agents: 15 children on 1 agent and 6 children on 2 agents. On full fasting lipid profiles, the total cholesterol ranged from 2 to 7.9 mmol/L (mean 4.4). Only 1 child is currently on statin therapy. Fasting glucose ranged from 3.2 to 5.9 mmol/L (mean 4.1) No difference was observed in glucose values between CsA and
Tacrolimus
. Thus, immunosuppressive therapies, such as the calcineurin inhibitors, are known to cause nephrotoxicity, which is of concern in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Almost all our patients currently require antihypertensive therapy. At present, the renal function is adequate in the majority of the group, but this study needs to be extended to other pediatric liver transplant recipients with particular emphasis on those who are more than 5 years posttransplantation.
...
PMID:Nephrotoxic effects of immunosuppressant therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients. 1584 75
Tacrolimus
was approved in Japan in April 1996 for the prevention of allograft rejection in patients receiving kidney transplants. There has been a concern that immunosuppressive therapy may be associated with cardiovascular and metabolic complications, including
hyperlipidemia
, hypertension, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus. A multicenter (59 institutions) study was conducted in Japan in patients who underwent renal transplantation and received tacrolimus immunosuppression. Patients were followed for >5 years, from April 1996 to December 2002. Of the 1569 patients enrolled, 1542 were evaluated. In this analysis, graft survival rate and medication usage patterns of antihyperlipidemics, antihypertensives, insulin, and oral hypoglycemics were observed for >5 years in patients receiving tacrolimus immunosuppression. The graft survival rates of patients requiring antihyperlipidemic therapy and experiencing acute rejection were significantly lower compared with all other patients (P < .05). The risk of graft rejection was significantly greater in patients with cardiovascular complications requiring antihyperlipidemics or antihypertensives. Graft survival was significantly lower in patients with acute rejection and antihyperlipidemic therapy than in other patients.
...
PMID:Safety analysis after tacrolimus immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients in Japan: 5-year results in >1500 patients. 1591 58
Cardiovascular morbidity, including coronary artery disease and left ventricular hypertrophy, and mortality are high in patients following renal transplantation. Cardiovascular disease is thought to be due to traditional (hypertension,
hyperlipidemia
, diabetes mellitus and smoking) as well as nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors (microinflammation). Furthermore, immunosuppressive drugs, namely, calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus, and steroids, have been reported to adversely affect cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension,
hyperlipidemia
, hyperglycemia). Evidence from comparative trials and from conversion studies suggest that blood pressure,
hyperlipidemia
, and hyperglycemia after renal transplantation may be differentially affected by the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. In the European
Tacrolimus
versus Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study, 557 patients were randomly allocated to therapy with tacrolimus (n = 286) versus cyclosporine (n = 271). In addition, to blood pressure, serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood glucose, we estimated the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease (Framingham risk score).
Tacrolimus
resulted in a significantly lower time-weighted average of serum cholesterol (P < .001), and mean arterial blood pressure (P < .05), but a higher time-weighted average of blood glucose (P < .01) than cyclosporine. Mean 10-year coronary artery disease risk estimate was significantly lower in men treated with tacrolimus, (10.0% versus 13.2%; P < .01) but was unchanged in women (4.7% versus 7.0%).
Tacrolimus
and cyclosporine microemulsion have compound-specific effects on cardiovascular risk factors that differentially affect the predicted rate of coronary artery disease.
...
PMID:Cardiovascular risk estimates and risk factors in renal transplant recipients. 1591 88
1
2
3
Next >>