Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020473 (hyperlipidemia)
 15,891 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A family with familial combined hyperlipidemia (multiple-lipoprotein type hyperlipidemia) was investigated with regard to mode of inheritance, phenotypic expression, presence of genetic markers, and biochemical parameters related to lipid metabolism. The family of 22 subjects (13 males, 9 females) was composed of 5 type IIa, 8 type IIb, 1 type IV hyperlipoproteinemias and 5 normolipidemics. The distribution of serum cholesterol and serum triglyceride concentration was bimodal. No relationship was observed between hyperlipidemia and blood groups or histocompatibility antigens. Subjects with high HLA 8 or W 15 had, on the average, higher lipid levels than others. However, these antigens were observed in normolipidemics too. The response to therapy with alufibrate (2g/day) was not uniform. Subjects with marked triglyceride lowering exhibited only moderate cholesterol lowering, and marked cholesterol lowering was associated with poor triglyceride lowering. The reduction in serum lipids was observed in unaffected family members as well. It is therefore concluded that alufibrate does not exert an effect on the defect in familial combined hyperlipidemia but on some unspecific sites probably on lipoprotein lipase. The familial combined hyperlipidemia appears to be transmitted in an autosomal dominant mode and very probably determined by more than one gene.
 ...
PMID:[Studies on the heredity and pathogenesis of familial combined hyperlipidemia ("multiple lipoprotein type" hyperlipidemia)]. 100 48

Chronic "idiopathic" pancreatitis (CP) in a 7 year-old-boy, whose father has suffered from CP, and whose former grandfather had suffered from pains possibly of pancreatic origin, led us suspect a hereditary etiology. An analysis, extended in a control fashion to the relatives of the healthy spouse of the affected grandfather, surprisingly revealed 2 more proven and 3 more suspected CP, giving the overall number of 8 affected members in this 35-member 3 generation kindred and revealed a maternal heredity instead of paternal heredity (which was first thought to be apparent). We therefore recommend that in a family suspected to suffer from hereditary CP (HCP), a screening should be extended to cover even the unaffected spouse's family--the present extended study revealed for 23 new members them to belong in an affected family. Without an extensive screening advises for family planning, alcohol consumption etc. can not be given. Plain abdominal X-ray accompanied with epigastric ultrasonographic are suitable for screening, which might be extended to every individual in smaller families, but may be safely restricted to the members ever suffered from epigastric pains in the case of a huge family. Pancreatic duct anomalies, hyperlipidaemia, hypercalcaemia, aminoaciduria or hyperimmunoglobulinaemia, all of which have been seen to accompany HCP, were not present in this family. Neither was any linkage found between the penetrance of HCP and ABO/Rh blood groups or HLA haplotypes.
 ...
PMID:Screening a family for hereditary chronic pancreatitis. 226 97

A family with familial combined hyperlipidaemia in which affected members had nonsymmetric subcutaneous lipomatosis (NSSCL) is described. Affected members had high serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. By contrast, family members without NSSCL had normal lipid levels. There was also a correlation between the degree of hyperlipidaemia and the amount of subcutaneous lipomas. The occurrence of hyperlipidaemia in family members with NSSCL suggests the existence of a genetic linkage between these two characteristics, but did not show any association with HLA haplotyping. To our knowledge this association between lipid abnormalities and NSSCL has not been previously reported.
 ...
PMID:Non-symmetric subcutaneous lipomatosis associated with familial combined hyperlipidaemia. 275 31

A 22-year-old female with diffuse mixed T cell lymphoma in second complete remission underwent allogeneic BMT from her HLA-compatible brother. Transplantation was complicated by acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and combined hepatotoxic/cholestatic liver disease 45 days post-BMT. Cholesterol levels reached 65 mmol/l, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol decreased to 0.23 mmol/l. She developed skin xanthelasmas, lipemia retinalis, and a solitary lung lesion, which was clinically diagnosed as pulmonary cholesteroloma. All these complications resolved following plasmapheresis and hypolipidemic treatment with lovastatin and cholesterol levels normalized.
 ...
PMID:Solitary pulmonary cholesteroloma, multiple xanthelasmas and lipemia retinalis complicating hypercholesterolemia after bone marrow transplantation. 886 64

The concept of predictive medicine based on the detection of genetic markers for disease susceptibility stemmed from the finding that many diseases are associated with specific HLA alleles. This model suggested that similar associations probably existed with other genes located all along the human genome. The Human Specimen Study Center (HSSC) was created to assist in investigating this possibility and has contributed significantly to the knowledge contained in current genetic and physical human genome maps. Predictive medicine is intended not for patients but for healthy individuals, its goal being to determine whether their susceptibility to a specific disease is increased or not. Fetuses with evidence of disease are excluded from the province of predictive medicine, which can, however, determine whether a healthy fetus is at high risk for developing a disease in adolescence or adulthood. Predictive medicine is based on probabilities: it evaluates diseases susceptibility but cannot predict with 100% certainty that a specific disease will occur. Whereas many preventive interventions are directed at groups (e.g., immunization programs), predictive medicine is conducted on an individualized basis. For instance, glaucoma is a monogenic disease whose early detection can allow to prevent permanent loss of vision. The fruits of predictive medicine are expected to be greatest, however, in the polygenic multifactorial diseases that are prevalent in industrialized countries, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, and arteriosclerosis. An ability to detect subjects who are susceptible to breast cancer would be extraordinarily useful, and may be a goal within reach since two breast cancer susceptibility genes have already been identified. Genes associated with increased susceptibility to colon cancer have also been reported. Predictive medicine raises a number of sensitive ethical issues. Individuals should be free to accept or decline disease susceptibility testing after having been fully informed. Confidentiality is vital. The results of susceptibility tests should not be made available to employers or insurance agencies. Susceptibility testing should be offered only if the disease requires a specific treatment or lifestyle modification. Unnecessary anxiety may be one of the main adverse effects of susceptibility testing. A large number of disease susceptibility or resistance genes will probably be identified in the near future, and this will inevitably have an impact on the way physicians approach their patients. Physicians in the XXIst century will spend an increasingly large proportion of their time counselling their patients on how to stay healthy. This trend can be expected to translate into a marked increase in life expectancy. Rather than seeking to add years to life, physicians will strive to add life to years.
 ...
PMID:[Predictive medicine and its ethics]. 929 63

Chronic rejection is the most common cause of the long term renal graft loss. It is characterized by luminal thickening and obliteration, interstitial sclerosis, glomerulosclerosis and tubular atrophy development. The pathology is still unclear. Alloantigen-dependent factors (acute rejection, HLA mismatch) and allograft-independent factors (ischaemia-reperfusion, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, infection, nephrotoxicity, reduced nephron dose) have been implicated in the etiology of chronic rejection. As a result of these factors, endothelial cells are activated and express a variety of adhesion molecules, cytokines and growth factors. Lymphocytes and macrophages infiltrate the areas of local damage and express other cytokines and growth factors (TGF, bFGF, PDGF). In the next step, vascular smooth muscle cells proliferate and migrate from the media into the vascular intima and produce local extracellular matrix. Which factors are the most important and which mechanisms are the key for the development of chronic rejection are in the focus of ongoing research.
 ...
PMID:[Chronic rejection of renal allografts. Part 1. Present knowledge of etiopathogenesis]. 1074 33

CyA is the core immunosuppressant of choice for the majority of transplant patients. The introduction of Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CyA. and more recently a range of adjunctive immunosuppressants have further enhanced the efficacy and tolerability of CyA-based immunosuppression. In the first year following transplantation the major causes of morbidity and death are graft failure, acute rejection, and systemic infection. Patients with deteriorated pulmonary circulation before transplantation are at increased risk of early postoperative death. Risk factors for early acute rejection include female donor sex, young donor age, and multiple HLA-DR mismatches. The principal cause of death in the long term is graft vasculopathy which accounted for 40% of all deaths. Risk factors that have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of graft vasculopathy include hyperlipidemia, recipient age and gender, donor age, the number of HLA AB and DR mismatches, and CMV infection. Strategies proposed to reduce the risk of graft vasculopathy include aggressive use of lipid-lowering agents, avoidance of low CyA doses, and the use of adjunctive rapamycin or RAD therapy. Rejection surveillance therefore relies on routine serial endomyocardial biopsy. Recent research suggests that a more accurate assessment of the state of the graft can be obtained by considering the results across a number of biopsy samples obtained from different parts of the heart, rather than basing clinical judgment on the worst single result obtained. New molecular markers such as granzyme A mRNA are likely to improve the power of histology to diagnose and predict rejection. Neoral pharmacokinetics give greater bioavailability and less intrapatient variability than Sandimmune. In the keynote OLN 351 study comparing Neoral with Sandimmune in de novo heart transplant recipients, fewer Neoral patients needed antilymphocyte therapy to treat rejection, fewer female patients had rejection episodes in the Neoral group, the tolerability of the two formulations was equivalent, and there was a lower incidence of infections in the Neoral group. The clinical impact of Neoral in comparison with Sandimmune in de novo heart transplant patients has been investigated in a number of additional trials, including long-term studies, which have confirmed that Neoral is associated with: Lower CyA doses than Sandimmune. Equal or greater antirejection efficacy than Sandimmune. Comparable tolerability to Sandimmune. During the administration of intravenous CyA as an induction therapy in the days immediately following transplantation, there is evidence to suggest that a 6-hour infusion given twice daily, which mimics the pharmacokinetic profile of oral dosing, may be clinically more effective than a continuous 24-hour infusion. Milligram-for-milligram dose conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral is feasible. Following conversion, a reduction in the CyA dose may be required in the majority of patients to maintain target levels. In pediatric patients, the rate of elimination of CyA is greater and bioavailability increases with increasing age. Younger patients (less than 8 years of age) may be managed more effectively with a 3-times-daily, rather than a twice-daily dosing schedule. A number of studies have compared the clinical effects of Sandimmune and Neoral in maintenance therapy for cardiac transplant patients. As with de novo patients, these studies have found the new formulation of CyA to be associated with lower rates of acute rejection, lower therapeutic doses, and comparable tolerability. Milligram-to-milligram conversion from the old to the new CyA formulation is generally well tolerated, although in a minority of patients there is a significant increase in CyA levels. These may be associated with a transient increase in side effects which resolve on dose reduction. There is a dose-sparing effect with Neoral. Routine monitoring of both CyA and serum creatinine levels are adv
 ...
PMID:Neoral use in the cardiac transplant recipient. 1081 48

Cardiovascular disease post-transplant, particularly ischemic heart disease, is a significant problem for all transplant recipients. The major risk factors-smoking, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension-are often more prevalent in heart transplant populations than in the general population. One of the main risk factors influencing graft loss and patient survival is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Because CAV affects between 30% and 60% of cardiac transplant recipients within 5 years of surgery, prevention is a key focus for cardiac transplant teams today. CAV is caused by both immunologic mechanisms (e.g., acute rejection and anti-HLA antibodies) and non-immunologic mechanisms relating to the transplant itself or the recipient (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pre-existing diabetes) or to the side effects often associated with immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity and new-onset diabetes after transplantation). The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, effectively prevent acute rejection, but do not prevent the development of CAV. CAV prevention will require a combined approach of new adjunct immunosuppressant agents (e.g., the proliferation signal inhibitors) and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes are also associated with the immunosuppression required to prevent organ rejection. Some studies have shown that hypertension is present more frequently in cyclosporine-treated patients than in tacrolimus-treated patients and that tacrolimus may be associated with a more favorable lipid profile. On the other hand, tacrolimus may be more diabetogenic than cyclosporine with current data suggesting a trend but no statistically significant supporting evidence. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is at times difficult to manage and may be an important determinant along with hypertension and hyperlipidemia of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease. The choice of calcineurin inhibitor for an immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation should consider the associated relative cardiovascular risks.
 ...
PMID:Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: risk factors and management. 1509 4

The use of immunosuppression regimens containing a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), an adjunct immunosuppressant (e.g., azathioprine, everolimus or mycophenolate mofetil) and corticosteroids has effectively reduced the risk of early graft loss due to acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. At present, late graft loss due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major challenge for transplant teams. CAV is characterized by intimal hyperplasia as a result of endothelial cell injury. Factors relating to the transplant procedure itself (e.g., ischemic time and reperfusion injury), cardiovascular risks (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pre-existing diabetes and new-onset diabetes after transplantation), immunologic risks (e.g., acute rejection episodes, anti-HLA antibodies) and the side effects of immunosuppression with CNIs or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity) have all been implicated in the development of CAV. The 2 main approaches to the prevention of CAV are modification of underlying risk factors (e.g., treatment with anti-hypertensive agents and lipid-lowering drugs, and optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen) and improvement in immunosuppression. CNIs remain the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens in heart transplantation, but new parameters for monitoring CNI exposure and new immunosuppressive regimens hold the promise of reduced overall CNI exposure with consequent reductions in vascular toxicity and improved clinical outcomes. Traditionally, trough levels of cyclosporine (C(0)) have been used to monitor exposure to cyclosporine and to assess the need for dose adjustment. However, optimal cyclosporine exposure can now be achieved through monitoring of cyclosporine levels 2 hours after dosing (C(2) monitoring). Furthermore, in a pivotal trial in heart transplantation, the new proliferation signal inhibitor, everolimus, plus full-dose cyclosporine and corticosteroids, has been shown to have improved impact on prevention of biopsy-proven acute rejection (and other efficacy end-points) and longer term on the prevention of CAV. In addition, there is evidence from studies in renal transplant recipients that everolimus plus reduced exposure cyclosporine is effective and well tolerated-with the regimen having a reduced potential for CNI-related nephrotoxicity and for other CNI-related cardiovascular side effects.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation. 1509 7

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, both in terms of survival benefit and quality of life. The major limitation is the continuing shortage of kidneys suitable for transplantation, reinforcing the need to maximise graft survival. After the first year of transplantation, chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD) is the first cause of late graft deterioration and failure. CRAD has been defined as a progressive renal dysfunction, independent of acute rejection, drug toxicity and recurrent or de novo nephropathy, with features on biopsy of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) characterised by vascular intimal hyperplasia, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Protocol biopsy-based studies have demonstrated a high and early prevalence of CAN lesions during the first year in patients with normal and stable renal function. Beyond 1 year, the injuries associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) appear to be very common. The physiopathology of CRAD is complex and multifactorial. Both alloantigen-dependent factors (acute rejection, HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, inadequate immunosuppression) and alloantigen-independent factors (donor age, brain death, ischaemia/reperfusion injuries, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cytomegalovirus, CNI-related nephrotoxicity) are involved. Consequently, CRAD appears as a dynamic process, evolving with time, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be modulated in order to provide the most suitable treatment at the different phases of its natural history. On the basis of this scheme, the new paradigm would be the use of a CNI-based regimen during the period of maximal risk of (subclinical) acute rejection, followed by a conversion to a CNI-free regimen in order to avoid the long-term consequences of nephrotoxicity. Fortunately, new agents are being introduced in clinical practice providing a large range of combinations and allowing individualisation of immunosuppressive regimens. Large, prospective, multicentre trials are warranted, and the challenge is to define new endpoints of CRAD and to determine the best therapeutic strategy.
 ...
PMID:Combating chronic renal allograft dysfunction : optimal immunosuppressive regimens. 1574 97


1 2 Next >>