Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020440 (hypercapnia)
 7,939 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The resting mouth occlusion pressure 0.1 s after onset of inspiration (P0.1) and minute ventilation (V'E) and their response to CO2 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain controversial. The ventilatory drive and the factors that predict resting arterial CO2 tension (Pa,CO2) were studied in 19 eucapnic and 14 hypercapnic severe COPD patients, and 20 controls. The CO2 response was evaluated by the Read technique. The V'E, and P0.1 as a function of end-tidal CO2 tension (Pet,CO2) was used to study the ventilatory (deltaV'E/deltaPet,CO2) and P0.1 response (deltaP0.1/deltaPet,CO2). In the patients, respiratory muscle function and pleural occlusion pressure 0.1 s after onset of inspiration (Ppl,0.1) were evaluated with simultaneous measurement of pleural (Ppl) and gastric (Pga) pressures. Hypercapnic patients had lower forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and arterial O2 tension (Pa,O2). Resting P0.1 was higher in patients than in controls, whereas deltaP0.1/deltaPet,CO2 was similar in the three groups. There was no difference in resting P0.1 (3.6+/-2.0 versus 4.3+/-2.8 kPa (2.7+/-1.5 versus 3.2+/-2.1 cmH2O), p=0.2) and Ppl,0.1 (1.4+/-2.3 versus 5.2+/-3.3 kPa (4.08+/-1.7 versus 3.9+/-2.5 cmH2O), p=0.22) between eucapnic and hypercapnic COPD, whereas deltaV'E/deltaPet,CO2 was lower in the hypercapnic group (0.29+/-0.24 versus 0.66+/-0.5 L x min(-1) x kPa, p<0.001). By logistic regression only FEVI and increased diaphragmatic load, and not respiratory drive, predicted resting Pa,CO2. Irrespective of CO2 level, baseline central drive (represented by the mouth occlusion and pleural pressures) and CO2 response are preserved in most patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Effective ventilation is inadequate in the more severely obstructed patients and this results in hypercapnia. Neuroventilatory coupling failure is an attractive explanation for chronic hypercapnia in these patients.
 ...
PMID:Mouth occlusion pressure, CO2 response and hypercapnia in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 976 97

Chest wall compartment kinematics and respiratory muscle coordinate activity, during either hypercapnia or hypoxia, have not been comparatively assessed in healthy humans. We assessed the displacement volume of the chest wall (Vcw) in 5 normal subjects during hypoxic-normocapnic and hypercapnic-hyperoxic rebreathing by using linearized magnetometers. Vcw was divided into displacement volumes of the rib cage (Vrc) and the abdomen (Vab). Esophageal (Pes) and gastric (Pga) pressures were simultaneously recorded and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was calculated by subtracting Pes from Pga. Pressure swings (sw) from end expiration (EE) to end inspiration (EI) were also calculated. During both hypoxia and hypercapnia, from quiet breathing to 40 L/min VE, Vrc,EI increased consistently but Vrc,EE, and Vab,EI did not. Moreover, Vab,EE decreased significantly during hypercapnia and remained unchanged during hypoxia. PesEI decreased (more negative values) and PesEE increased (less negative values) during either stimulus, while PgaEE increased with hypercapnia. Pdisw, calculated as the difference between PdiEE and PdiEI, increased significantly with both hypercapnia and hypoxia ( p = 0.002 for both). On the plot of Pes vs Pga, the slope of a line from end expiratory to end inspiratory lung volume between 20 and 40 L/min VE progressively increased during hypercapnia indicating increasing rib cage muscle (RCM) contribution to inspiratory pressure swings relative to the diaphragm. From these results we conclude that in healthy man: (i) with both chemical stimuli RCM contribution accounts for increase in Vrc displacement; (ii) with hypercapnia, the decrease in Vab,EE displacement indicates abdominal muscle (ABM) contribution to tidal volume; (iii) RCM and ABM assist the diaphragmatic function during hypercapnic stimulation.
 ...
PMID:Chest wall kinematics during chemically stimulated breathing in healthy man. 1264 36

The present study was designed to verify whether during hypercapnic stimulation, as we had previously found during exercise or walking, the partitioning of the respiratory motor output is equally distributed to the muscles of chest wall compartments to assist diaphragm function. We studied chest wall kinematics and respiratory muscle recruitment in seven healthy men during rebreathing of a hypercapnic-hyperoxic gas mixture (CO(2) RT). Data were compared with those previously obtained during either cycling exercise or walking. The chest wall volume ( Vcw), assessed by optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), was modeled as the sum of the volumes of the lung-apposed rib cage ( Vrc,p), diaphragm-apposed rib cage ( Vrc,a) and abdomen ( Vab). Esophageal ( Pes), gastric ( Pga) and transdiaphragmatic ( Pdi= Pga- Pes) pressures were simultaneously recorded. Velocity of shortening ( V') and power ( W'= Px V') of the diaphragm ( W'di), rib cage muscles ( W'rcm) and abdominal muscles ( W'abm) were also calculated. During CO(2) RT the progressive increase in end-inspiratory Vcw resulted from an increase in both end-inspiratory Vrc,p and Vrc,a, while the progressive decrease in end-expiratory Vcw was entirely due to the decrease in end-expiratory Vab. The increase in Vrc,p was proportionally slightly greater than that in Vrc,a. The end-inspiratory increase and end-expiratory decrease in Vcw were accounted for by inspiratory rib cage (RCM,i) and abdominal (ABM) muscle recruitment, respectively. W'di, W'rcm and W'abm progressively increased. However, while most of W'di was expressed in terms of velocity of shortening, most of W'rcm and W'abm was expressed as force or pressure. A comparison of CO(2) results with data obtained during exercise revealed: (1). a gradual vs. an immediate response, (2). a similar decrease in Vab,e and Pabm, (3). an apparent lack of any difference in ABM recruitment, (4). less gradual ABM relaxation, (5). no drop in Pdi but a similar Wdi change and decrease in pressure-to-velocity ratio of the diaphragm. We have found that in healthy humans: (1). the increased motor output with hypercapnia is equally distributed between RCM and ABM to minimize transdiaphragmatic pressure and (2). data on chest wall kinematics and respiratory muscle recruitment are only partly in line with those obtained during walking or cycling exercise.
 ...
PMID:Chest wall kinematics and respiratory muscle coordinated action during hypercapnia in healthy males. 1473 63