Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019829 (Hodgkin's disease)
 30,247 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This study reexamined Spanos, Hodgins, Stam, and Gwynn's (1984) contention that susceptibility testing order effects generated a relationship between waking analgesia pain reduction and level of hypnotic responsiveness. Undergraduate volunteers with no previous hypnosis experience were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 (n = 69) first received a cold pressor pain protocol, and then was administered the Standford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS:C). Group 2 (n = 69) was administered the SHSS:C prior to the cold pressor pain protocol. Our findings do not support Spanos, Hodgins et al.'s contention that susceptibility testing order effects generate the often reported relationship between waking analgesia and level of hypnotic responsiveness. We found significant partial correlation coefficients between the SHSS:C and nonhypnotic pain reduction regardless of order of susceptibility testing. Implications regarding the adequacy of design-generated expectancies to explain hypnotic analgesia phenomena were examined.
 ...
PMID:Hypnotic susceptibility order effects in waking analgesia. 965 Apr 37

We compared participants' responsiveness to a standard administration of a hypnotic suggestibility scale (CURSS; Spanos, Radtke, Hodgins, Bertrand, Stam, & Moretti, 1983) that defined the ability to experience hypnosis in terms of cooperation (SI; standard induction, N = 27) with a version of the same scale administered with all references to cooperation removed (CR; cooperation removed, N = 34) and with a version of the scale with the "induction" removed (NI; no induction, N = 35). In a fourth condition, participants were informed that the ability to experience hypnosis depended on their ability to achieve an altered state of consciousness or "trance" (AS; altered state, N = 33). Removing instructions for cooperation had an effect on objective (CR < SI) but not on subjective hypnotic responding. Removing the hypnotic induction had no appreciable effect on any dimension of hypnotic responsivity. Consistent with predictions derived from performance standards theory (Lynn & Rhue, 1991), participants who received the altered state set responded to fewer suggestions than did participants who received the standard induction (SI). Estimates of suggestions passed that were assessed before and after test suggestions were administered were, respectively, weakly to moderately correlated with objective and subjective measures of hypnotic suggestibility.
 ...
PMID:Defining hypnosis as a trance vs. cooperation: hypnotic inductions, suggestibility, and performance standards. 1179 37

We analyzed spontaneous chromosome lesions in peripheral lymphocytes cultured from Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients before and after cytostatic chemotherapy. The mean aberration frequency was significantly higher in HL patients after chemotherapy (7.20+/-0.58 per 100 metaphases) than in non-treated HL patients (4.80+/-0.54), and in non-treated patients than in healthy subjects (2.12+/-0.13). In lymphocytes of HL patients, who received chemotherapy, we found, in addition to ordinary aberrant cells, a large number of multiaberrant (or rogue) cells, i.e. metaphases carrying multiple (at least four) chromosome-type exchange aberrations. Rogue cells were found in 15 out of 18 chemotherapeutically treated HL patients (in total, 60 rogue cells per 5,568 scored cells), whereas in 30 non-treated patients only 1 rogue cell was found (per 4,988 scored cells). No correlation was found between the yield of rogue cells and the aberration frequency in ordinary aberrant cells. Aberration spectra (ratios of chromatid- to chromosome-type aberrations and of breaks to exchanges) were essentially different in ordinary aberrant and multiaberrant cells. These data, as well as analysis of cellular distributions of aberrations, implied independent induction of chromosome damage in ordinary aberrant and rogue cells. Analysis of aberration patterns in diploid and polyploid rogue metaphases belonging to the first, second, and third in vitro division indicated that rogue cells could be formed both in vivo and in vitro, and could survive at least two rounds of in vitro replication, given blocked chromosome segregation. These results suggested that formation of rogue cells, unlike ordinary aberrant cells, was triggered by events other than direct DNA and/or chromosome lesions. A hypothesis regarding disrupted apoptosis as a candidate mechanism for rogue cell formation seems to be most suitable for interpretation of our data. Cultured lymphocytes of chemotherapeutically treated HL patients may represent a model system for further examination of the multiaberrancy phenomenon.
 ...
PMID:Aberrant and multiaberrant (rogue) cells in peripheral lymphocytes of Hodgkin's lymphoma patients after chemotherapy. 1682 23

To examine the influence of hypnotic suggestibility testing as a source of individual differences in hypnotic responsiveness, we compared behavioral and subjective responses on three scales of hypnotic suggestibility: The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS: A; Shor, R. E., Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Berlin: Consulting Psychologists Press); the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale (CURSS; Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., Bertrand, L. D. (1983b). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53, 523-535); and the Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability (GSHA; Hawkins, R., Wenzel, L. (1999). The Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability and response booklet. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 20-31). Behavioral and subjective responses to the CURSS were significantly different than those on the HGSHS: A and GSHA. More participants were classified as "low suggestible" on the CURSS and they reported subjective experiences more similar to everyday mentation. Attitudes and expectancies of participants who received the GSHA were less predictive of responding, but rates of responding and subjective experiences were similar on the GSHA and the HGSHS: A. Discussion focuses on implications for the use of group hypnotic suggestibility scales.
 ...
PMID:Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. 1877 55