Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019829 (Hodgkin's disease)
 30,247 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

MAD and MXI1, two recently described members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) gene family, encode proteins that dimerize with and modulate the DNA binding of max. In turn, mad-max or mxi1-max heterodimers or max homodimers can compete for DNA binding sites with dimers formed between max and myc oncoproteins and antagonize the transcriptional activities of this latter class of proteins. Using a combination of somatic cell mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, we have determined the chromosomal locations of the MAD and MXI1 genes. The MAD gene maps to chromosome 2p12-p13, a region involved in translocations and deletions in acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemias as well as non-lymphocytic leukemias and Hodgkin disease. The MXI1 gene localizes to chromosome 10q24-q25, a region involved in translocations and deletions in acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemias and prostatic carcinomas. The availability of genomic clones of MAD and MXI1 will permit an assessment of their involvement in these diseases at the molecular level.
 ...
PMID:Assignment of the human MAD and MXI1 genes to chromosomes 2p12-p13 and 10q24-q25. 782 91

Recent works demonstrated that some transcriptional repressors recruit histone deacetylases (HDACs) either through direct interaction, or as a member of a multisubunit repressing complex containing other components referred to as corepressors. For instance, the bHLH-Zip transcriptional repressors MAD/MXI recruit HDACs together with the mSIN3 corepressors, whereas unliganded nuclear receptors contact another corepressor, SMRT (or its relative N-CoR), which, in turn, associates with both mSIN3 and HDACs to form the repressor complex. Recently, we reported that SMRT also directly associates with LAZ3(BCL-6), a POZ/Zn finger transcriptional repressor involvedin the pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. However, whether LAZ3 recruits the HDACs-containing repression complex is currently unknown. We report here that LAZ3 associates with corepressor mSIN3A both in vivo and in vitro , and found that a central region, which harbours autonomous repression activity, is mainly responsible for this interaction. Conversely, the N-terminal half of mSIN3A is both necessary and sufficient to bind LAZ3. Moreover, we show that LAZ3 also interacts with an HDAC (HDAC-1) through its POZ domain in vitro while the immunoprecipitation of LAZ3 results in the coretention of an endogenous HDAC activity in vivo . Finally, inhibitors of HDACs significantly reduce the LAZ3-mediated repression. Taken together, we conclude that LAZ3 recruits a repressing complex containing SMRT, mSIN3A and a HDAC, and that its full repressing potential on transcription requires HDACs activity. Our results identify HDACs as molecular targets of LAZ3 oncogene and further strengthen the connection between aberrant chromatin acetylation and human cancers.
 ...
PMID:The LAZ3(BCL-6) oncoprotein recruits a SMRT/mSIN3A/histone deacetylase containing complex to mediate transcriptional repression. 975 32

Tumorigenesis is a multi-step process involving a series of changes of cellular genes. Most solid tumors and hematopoietic malignancies often show abnormal chromosome numbers, the aneuploidy. The chromosomal aneuploidy keeps cells in the state of chromosomal instability (CIN) that will increase the mutation rate of cells affected and thus push them deeper into the process of tumorigenesis. The yeast genetic studies showed that normal distribution of chromosome during mitosis is under the surveillance of a set of genes, the spindle assembly checkpoint genes, that include the BUB and MAD gene groups and MPS. In some colorectal cancers with CIN it was found to have hBUB1 gene mutated and the mutated gene functions dominantly. We have examined a series of breast cancer cell lines with or without CIN for the hBUB1 gene mutation and found none. However, we detected various degrees of deletion in the coding sequences of the hBUB1 gene in cells from T lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines, Molt3 and Molt4, and cells from some acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. So far the lesions of deletion are in the kinetochore localization domain of the hBUB1 gene that may explain why the deletion lesions in the BUB1 gene cause aneuploidy in lymphoma and lymphoma cells. The deletions are heterozygous in nature. Like the mutated hBUB1 gene in colorectal cancer, the mutant hBUB1 cDNA from lymphoblastic leukemia cells behaves dominantly.
 ...
PMID:hBUB1 defects in leukemia and lymphoma cells. 1209 43

Haemopoietic stem cell therapy is an increasingly adopted procedure in the treatment of patients with malignant lymphoma. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated 262 patients, 57 (22%) with Hodgkin's and 205 (78%) with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and 665 harvesting procedures in order to assess the impact of poor mobilization on survival and to determine the factors that may be predictive of CD34(+) poor mobilization. The mobilization chemotherapy regimens consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 92 patients (35.1%) and a high-dose cytarabine-containing regimen (DHAP in 87 patients -(33.2%), MAD in 83 (31.7%)). The incidence of poor mobilizers (<2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) was 17.9% overall, with a 10% of very poor mobilizers (< or = 1 x 10(6)/kg). Refractory disease status and chemotherapeutic load (>3 regimens) before mobilization played a negative role and were associated with poor mobilization. Survival analysis of all harvested patients showed an overall survival at 3 years of 71% in good mobilizers vs 33% in poor mobilizers (P=0.002). The event-free survival at 3 years was 23% in poor mobilizers and 58% in good mobilizers (P=0.04). We conclude that in NHL patients, poor mobilization status is predictive of survival.
 ...
PMID:Poor mobilization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with malignant lymphomas treated by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. 1651 34