Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019693 (HIV)
 170,526 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Chemokines play an important role in the regulation of endothelial cell (EC) function, including proliferation, migration and differentiation during angiogenesis, and re-endothelialization after injury. In this study, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used to reveal expression of various CXC and CC chemokine receptors in human umbilical vein EC. Northern analysis showed that CXCR4 was selectively expressed in vascular EC, but not in smooth muscle cells. Compared with other chemokines, stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha), the known CXCR4 ligand, was an efficacious chemoattractant for EC, causing the migration of approximately 40% input cells with an EC50 of 10-20 nM. Of the chemokines tested, only SDF-1alpha induced a rapid, though variable mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ in EC. Experiments with actinomycin D demonstrated that CXCR4 transcripts were short-lived, indicating a rapid mRNA turnover. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) caused a pronounced down-regulation of CXCR4 mRNA in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. In a striking functional correlation, IFN-gamma treatment also attenuated the chemotactic response of EC to SDF-1alpha. IL-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and lipopolysaccharide produced a time course-dependent biphasic effect on CXCR4 transcription. Expression of CXCR4 in EC is significant, more so as it and several CC chemokine receptors have been shown to serve as fusion co-receptors along with CD4 during human immunodeficiency virus infection. Taken together, these findings provide evidence of chemokine receptor expression in EC and offer an explanation for the action of chemokines like SDF-1alpha on the vascular endothelium.
 ...
PMID:Chemokine receptors in human endothelial cells. Functional expression of CXCR4 and its transcriptional regulation by inflammatory cytokines. 946 27

Monocyte-macrophages can be productively infected by CCR5-specific, but not CXCR4-specific, HIV-1. This could be due either to the absence of this chemokine receptor in this cell lineage or to other, yet undefined cellular cofactors that modulate the coreceptor activity of the CXCR4 in these cells. To investigate the basis of macrophage tropism, we studied the expression of CCR5 and CXCR4, as well as several of the other CC chemokine receptors, on monocyte-macrophages at different stages of differentiation. We found that on fresh monocytes, CXCR4 was relatively abundant, but it fell to barely detectable levels in culture over 24 hr and maintained this low level of expression during differentiation in vitro. Some donor macrophages appeared to express CXCR4 at levels comparable to CCR5. In contrast, CCR5 expression was low on fresh monocytes but increased on in vitro differentiation. Taken together, the results show that monocyte-macrophage differentiation is associated with a differential expression of chemokine receptors that may contribute to, but does not fully account for, the selectivity of these cells to HIV entry. GM-CSF, a cytokine that induces macrophage differentiation, caused a rapid decrease in CXCR4 and CCR5 mRNA and was correlated with decreased ability to support HIV entry.
 ...
PMID:Chemokine receptor regulation and HIV type 1 tropism in monocyte-macrophages. 946 23

Human immunodeficiency virus, type I (HIV-1) cell-type tropism is dictated by chemokine receptor usage: T-cell line tropic viruses use CXCR4, whereas monocyte tropic viruses primarily use CCR5 as fusion coreceptors. CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted) inhibit CD4/CCR5-mediated HIV-1 cell fusion. MCP-2 is also a member of the CC chemokine subfamily and has the capacity to interact with at least two receptors including CCR-1 and CCR2B. In an effort to further characterize the binding properties of MCP-2 on leukocytes, we observed that MCP-2, but not MCP-1, effectively competed with MIP-1beta for binding to monocytes, suggesting that MCP-2 may interact with CCR5. As predicted, MCP-2 competitively inhibited MIP-1beta binding to HEK293 cells stably transfected with CCR5 (CCR5/293 cells). MCP-2 also bound to and induced chemotaxis of CCR5/293 cells with a potency comparable with that of MIP-1beta. Confocal microscopy indicates that MCP-2 caused remarkable and dose-dependent internalization of CCR5 in CCR5/293 cells. Furthermore, MCP-2 inhibited the entry/replication of HIV-1ADA in CCR5/293 cells coexpressing CD4. These results indicated that MCP-2 uses CCR5 as one of its functional receptors and is an additional potent natural inhibitor of HIV-1.
 ...
PMID:Monocyte chemotactic protein-2 activates CCR5 and blocks CD4/CCR5-mediated HIV-1 entry/replication. 946 73

We have investigated whether the identity of the coreceptor (CCR5, CXCR4, or both) used by primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates to enter CD4+ cells influences the sensitivity of these isolates to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and CD4-based agents. Coreceptor usage was not an important determinant of neutralization titer for primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We also studied whether dualtropic primary isolates (able to use both CCR5 and CXCR4) were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the same antibodies when entering U87MG-CD4 cells stably expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Again, we found that the coreceptor used by a virus did not greatly affect its neutralization sensitivity. Similar results were obtained for CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing HOS cell lines engineered to express green fluorescent protein as a reporter of HIV-1 entry. Neutralizing antibodies are therefore unlikely to be the major selection pressure which drives the phenotypic evolution (change in coreceptor usage) of HIV-1 that can occur in vivo. In addition, the increase in neutralization sensitivity found when primary isolates adapt to growth in transformed cell lines in vitro has little to do with alterations in coreceptor usage.
 ...
PMID:Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates to antibodies and CD4-based reagents is independent of coreceptor usage. 949 39

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uses a variety of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for virus entry, and the ability of the virus to be neutralized by antibody may depend on which coreceptors are used. In particular, laboratory-adapted variants of the virus that use CXCR4 as a coreceptor are highly sensitive to neutralization by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals, whereas primary isolates that use CCR5 instead of, or in addition to, CXCR4 are neutralized poorly. To determine whether this dichotomy in neutralization sensitivity could be explained by differential coreceptor usage, virus neutralization by serum samples from HIV-1-infected individuals was assessed in MT-2 cells, which express CXCR4 but not CCR5, and in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), where multiple coreceptors including CXCR4 and CCR5 are available for use. Our results showed that three of four primary isolates with a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype and that use CXCR4 and CCR5 were neutralized poorly in both MT-2 cells and PBMC. The fourth isolate, designated 89.6, was more sensitive to neutralization in MT-2 cells than in PBMC. We showed that the neutralization of 89.6 in PBMC was not improved when CCR5 was blocked by having RANTES, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta in the culture medium, indicating that CCR5 usage was not responsible for the decreased sensitivity to neutralization in PBMC. Consistent with this finding, a laboratory-adapted strain of virus (IIIB) was significantly more sensitive to neutralization in CCR5-deficient PBMC (homozygous delta32-CCR5 allele) than were two of two SI primary isolates tested. The results indicate that the ability of HIV-1 to be neutralized by sera from infected individuals depends on factors other than coreceptor usage.
 ...
PMID:Evidence that antibody-mediated neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sera from infected individuals is independent of coreceptor usage. 949 40

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 (also known as LESTR and fusin) has been shown to function as a coreceptor for T-cell-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We have developed a binding assay to show that HIV envelope (Env) can interact with CXCR4 independently of CD4 but that this binding is markedly enhanced by the previous interaction of Env with soluble CD4. We also show that nonglycosylated HIV-1(SF-2) gp120 or sodium metaperiodate-treated oligomeric gp160 from HIV-1(451) bound much more readily to CXCR4 than their counterparts with intact carbohydrate residues did.
 ...
PMID:Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope binds to CXCR4 independently of CD4, and binding can be enhanced by interaction with soluble CD4 or by HIV envelope deglycosylation. 949 13

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, in combination with CD4, mediate cellular entry of macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) and T-cell-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), respectively, while dualtropic viruses can use either receptor. We have constructed a panel of chimeric viruses and envelope glycoproteins in which various domains of the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp160 were introduced into the genetic background of an M-tropic HIV-1 isolate, HIV-1(AD8). These constructs were employed in cell fusion and virus infectivity assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, MT4 T cells, primary monocyte-derived macrophages, or HOS-CD4 cell lines, expressing various chemokine receptors, to assess the contributions of different gp120 subdomains in coreceptor usage and cellular tropism. As expected, the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp120 utilized either CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4, whereas HIV-1(AD8) gp120 was able to use only CCR3 or CCR5. We found that either the V1/V2 or the V3 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 individually conferred on HIV-1(AD8) the ability to use CXCR4, while the combination of both the V1/V2 and V3 regions increased the efficiency of CXCR4 use. In addition, while the V4 or the V5 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 failed to confer the capacity to utilize CXCR4 on HIV-1(AD8), these regions were required in conjunction with regions V1 to V3 of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 for efficient utilization of CXCR4. Comparison of virus infectivity analyses with various cell types and cell fusion assays revealed assay-dependent discrepancies and indicated that events occurring at the cell surface during infection are complex and cannot always be predicted by any one assay.
 ...
PMID:Identification of determinants on a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that confer usage of CXCR4. 949 15

HIV-1 uses chemokine coreceptors for cell entry. CXCR4 is the major coreceptor for T-cell-line-adapted isolates and CCR5 for non-T-cell-line-adapted isolates. This study investigated if coreceptor usage differs between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. Eighty-one primary isolates representing nine different genetic subtypes (A-J, except I) were tested on U87.CD4 glioma cells stably expressing chemokine receptor CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4. Coreceptor usage was compared to biological phenotype of the isolates (rapid/high, syncytium-inducing or slow/low, non-syncytium-inducing) and to clinical and immunological status of the study subjects. CXCR4 usage was perfectly correlated to the biological phenotype for all subtypes; all of 26 isolates with rapid/high phenotype and none of 55 isolates with slow/low phenotype could infect the CXCR4 expressing cell line. Importantly, the CXCR4-positive, rapid/high phenotype was underrepresented among subtype C isolates. Furthermore, dual tropism for CXCR4 and CCR5 was not found among subtype D isolates. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that these subtype-specific differences in coreceptor usage were not due to differences in clinical status, CD4 counts, or treatment. This study shows that CXCR4 usage determines the biological phenotype for all subtypes, but that there appear to exist subtype-dependent differences in frequency of usage of certain coreceptors. This opens up the possibility that genetic subtypes may differ in important biological properties such as virulence, tissue tropism, and transmissibility.
 ...
PMID:Differences in chemokine coreceptor usage between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. 949 93

Viral and host factors influence the rate of HIV-1 disease progression. For HIV-1 to fuse, a CD4+ cell must express a co-receptor that the virus can use. The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 are used by R5 and X4 viruses, respectively. Most new infections involve transmission of R5 viruses, but variants can arise later that also use CXCR4 (R5-X4 or X4 viruses). This is associated with an increased rate of CD4+ T-cell loss and poor prognosis. The ability of host cells to support HIV-1 entry also influences progression. The absence of CCR5 in approximately 1% of the Caucasian population, due to homozygosity for a 32-nucleotide deletion in the coding region (delta32-CCR5 allele), very strongly protects against HIV-1 transmission. Heterozygosity for the delta32-CCR5 allele delays progression typically by 2 years. A recent study showed that a conservative substitution (V64I) in the coding region of CCR2 also has a significant impact on disease progression, but not on HIV-1 transmission. This was unexpected, since CCR2 is rarely used as a co-receptor in vitro and the V64I change is in a transmembrane region. Because a subsequent study did not confirm this effect on progression to disease, we analyzed CCR2-V64I using subjects in the Chicago MACS. We show that CCR2-V64I is indeed protective against disease progression and go on to show that the CCR2-V64I allele is in complete linkage disequilibrium with a point mutation in the CCR5 regulatory region.
 ...
PMID:A chemokine receptor CCR2 allele delays HIV-1 disease progression and is associated with a CCR5 promoter mutation. 958 7

CD8+ T lymphocytes confer significant but ultimately insufficient protection against HIV infection. Here we report that activated neonatal CD8+ T cells can be productively infected in vitro by macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 isolates, which are responsible for disease transmission, whereas they are resistant to T cell-tropic (T-tropic) HIV strains. Physiological activation of CD8-alpha/beta+ CD4- T cell receptor-alpha/beta+ neonatal T cells, including activation by allogeneic dendritic cells, induces the accumulation of CD4 messenger RNA and the expression of CD4 Ag on the cell surface. The large majority of anti-CD3/B7.1-activated cord blood CD8+ T cells coexpress CD4, the primary HIV receptor, as well as CCR5 and CXCR4, the coreceptors used by M- and T-tropic HIV-1 strains, respectively, to enter target cells. These findings are relevant to the rapid progression of neonatal HIV infection. Infection of primary HIV-specific CD8+ T cells may compromise their survival and thus significantly contribute to the failure of the immune system to control the infection. Furthermore, these results indicate a previously unsuspected level of plasticity in the neonatal immune system in the regulation of CD4 expression by costimulation.
 ...
PMID:Productive infection of neonatal CD8+ T lymphocytes by HIV-1. 952 30


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>