Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019693 (HIV)
170,526 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A method has been developed to measure the concentration of total phosphorylated zidovudine (ZDV) inside peripheral blood leucocytes (PBLs) using a modified commercial radioimmunoassay (RIA) specific for ZDV. ZDV 5'-monophosphate was readily synthesized and used as a procedural control for RIA modification. PBLs were isolated from healthy volunteers and incubated with ZDV for 24 h to allow metabolic phosphorylation. Viable cells were counted, washed, and extracted overnight with 60% methanol. After evaporation, the extract was reconstituted in Tris buffer, pH 9.5. Because of minimal RIA antibody cross reactivity with phosphorylated ZDV, samples were split into two fractions, one of which was treated with alkaline phosphatase (AP) to liberate phosphate groups. Each fraction was then assayed for ZDV. Concentrations of phosphorylated ZDV were determined by subtracting the concentration of the non-AP-treated fraction from that of the treated fraction. Recovery of phosphorylated ZDV from cell extracts was approximately 90%, and reproducibility was acceptable (coefficients of variation less than 15% for concentrations greater than or equal to 0.25 ng/ml). Intracellular concentrations (0.1-1.4 pmoles/10(6) cells) followed a nonlinear dose-response relationship over the range 0-50 microM extracellular ZDV, with concentration-dependent saturation. These results demonstrate the feasibility of determining concentrations of phosphorylated ZDV in HIV-infected patients, a potentially key step in establishing a therapeutic range and optimal dosing regimen for these patients.
Ther Drug Monit 1990 Sep
PMID:In vitro measurement of phosphorylated zidovudine in peripheral blood leucocytes. 229 12

Recently, the authors were confronted with interference of stavudine and co-trimoxazole when analyzing the antiretroviral drug didanosine (ddI) in plasma of HIV-1-infected patients using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. After increasing the percentage of methanol in the mobile phase from 4% to 8% vol/vol and after decreasing the pH of the mobile phase from 6.8 to 5.8, the authors were able to separate didanosine from stavudine and co-trimoxazole (both are frequently used drugs in combination with didanosine). Subsequently, the adapted bioanalytic methodology was validated, and validation results showed that this new methodology can be used for the quantitative determination of didanosine in human plasma. This observation makes clear that combination therapy for human immunodeficiency virus with multiple (often chemically related) drugs has the potential of unexpectedly complicating bioanalytic analyses because therapeutic strategies may change rapidly after publication of a bioanalytic methodology. Thus, it is evident that the investigation of interference of potentially coadministered drugs should be a standard procedure during the development of any bioanalytical methodology in any laboratory.
Ther Drug Monit 1998 Dec
PMID:Co-trimoxazole and stavudine interference in a high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis for didanosine in human plasma. 985 85

Indinavir is widely prescribed as a component of potent antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Because virologic failure of therapy can result from subtherapeutic drug levels, monitoring of indinavir levels may be important in clinical management. We have developed a simple, accurate, and precise high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for measurement of indinavir concentration in human plasma. In our method, indinavir was extracted from plasma with dichloromethane at pH 10.4, which resulted in quantitative recovery of indinavir and the internal standard (IS), methyl-indinavir (86% and 80%-97%, respectively). Chromatographic separation was accomplished using a Luna C18 (2) (Phenomenex) analytic column with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (25 mM) and 0.2% triethylamine pH 7.0 (34.5:65.5, v/v). Ion-paired reagent triethylamine was necessary to ensure an appropriate retention time for indinavir and differentiate it from other protease inhibitors that were coextracted. Quantification was performed at 210 nm. The standard curves were linear (r2>0.999) over the concentration range 25-5,000 ng/mL, when 1-mL aliquots of plasma were extracted. Inter- and intraday coefficients of variation were acceptable. The assay was used to determine trough and peak levels of in plasma from 12 subjects who received indinavir 1200 mg every 12 hours, 1000 mg every 12 hours, or 800 mg every 8 hours. The concentrations of indinavir found in this study (trough 26-768 ng/mL; peak at 1 hr 3,309-17,568 ng/mL) has a wider range than defined previously (trough 50-300 ng/mL; peak 6,000-12,000 ng/mL). This study illustrates three potential uses of indinavir monitoring: to assess individual dosing regimen, to assess patient compliance, and to monitor unusual indinavir levels caused by changed drug clearance.
Ther Drug Monit 1999 Jun
PMID:Determination of indinavir, a HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human plasma using ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. 1036 54

Indinavir is a specific and potent HIV protease inhibitor. A new column liquid chromatographic method for the determination of this drug is described. This assay was developed for the clinical monitoring of trough concentrations in AIDS patients, using a 1-mL plasma sample volume. Determination of indinavir was made by a rapid solid-phase extraction procedure with the new polymeric Oasis HLB sorbent followed by a reversed-phase liquid chromatography and a UV detection at 210 nm. A weighted least squares linear regression (weighting factor = 1/y where y = peak height ratio) was used to calculate the equation relating the peak-height ratio of the drug and the internal standard to the concentration of indinavir in the range 10-800 ng/mL (0.014-1.124 microM). At the lower limit of quantification (10 ng/mL), the mean accuracy was 102 +/- 7% and 104 +/- 11% for within- and between-day analysis, respectively. The limit of detection, based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 2:1, was 4 ng/mL (0.006 microM). Compounds of interest were eluted from the extraction cartridges with 300 microL of mobile phase, and mean absolute recoveries of indinavir and internal standard were 66.4% and 80.3%, respectively. No metabolite of indinavir was found to co-elute with the drug or its internal standard. Among the tested drugs, especially nucleoside analogues and the other protease inhibitors used in clinical care, none was found to interfere with the assay at this time. This simple and selective method is suitable for therapeutic indinavir monitoring.
Ther Drug Monit 1999 Aug
PMID:Determination of indinavir in plasma by solid-phase extraction and column liquid chromatography. 1044 93

The era of antiviral therapy directed against HIV-1 has now entered its second decade. In the twelve years since the FDA approved the first antiretroviral drug zidovudine there have been a number of seminal developments that have revolutionized the approach to therapy. These advances converged to change the treatment paradigm from one of therapeutic nihilism to that of cautious optimism. First, several trials demonstrated that combination therapy of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is superior to monotherapy in extending survival and delaying disease progression. Second, the concept of virologic latency in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients was revised. Mathematic modelling demonstrated that there is an ongoing high level of virus production driving a rapid turnover of CD4 cells at all stages of infection. Hence it was concluded that the aim of antiretroviral therapy (ART) should be to "hit early and hit hard." Third, significant advances in molecular virology facilitated the development of quantitative methods to measure the circulating HIV plasma RNA. HIV viral load has been shown to be a sensitive predictor of disease progression and a valuable marker of response to therapy. However, none of these developments would have translated into improved patient care without the advent of two new classes of drugs-the protease inhibitors (PIs) and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs).
Ther Drug Monit 2000 Feb
PMID:Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in human immunodeficiency virus infection. 1068 74

The relationship between ritonavir plasma concentration, efficacy, and tolerance was evaluated in 31 children with advanced HIV infection who were receiving a triple therapy with ritonavir as protease inhibitor. Median CD4+ lymphocyte count and median viral load before the initiation of ritonavir-containing combination therapy were 1320 cells/mL and 5 log10 copies/mL, respectively. Ritonavir was given at a dose ranging from 300 to 450 mg/m2 twice daily. The median follow-up of triple therapy was 19 months. Response was defined as a drop of viremia of more than 1 log. Plasma drug levels were determined twice during the observation period: after at least 4 weeks and after 3 months of combined treatment. Samples were collected before (residual) and 2 hours (T2) after drug intake. Cholesterol, triglycerides, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase were assessed at the same time. The median values of ritonavir residual and T2 levels were 1.64 mg/L and 5.9 mg/L at observation 1 and 3.35 mg/L and 6.29 mg/L at observation 2, respectively. According to virologic response, median residual concentrations of ritonavir were 3.17, 2.52, and 1.04 mg/L for the complete, the partial, and the no-response groups. The authors observed a wide intersubject variability of ritonavir concentrations with an increase in residual levels between the two observation periods. Residual levels were correlated with virologic response whereas there was no direct association between T2 levels and long-term response. Patients with complete or partial response displayed statistically significantly higher residual concentrations than the no-response group. No correlation could be demonstrated between elevated plasma drug concentrations and abnormal cholesterol or triglycerides values. These results emphasize the importance of a sustained high ritonavir concentration to achieve optimal treatment efficacy. Furthermore, these results prove the clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring and could potentially improve patient evaluation in terms of treatment efficacy, compliance, and viral resistance.
Ther Drug Monit 2000 Aug
PMID:Relationship between efficacy, tolerance, and plasma drug concentration of ritonavir in children with advanced HIV infection. 1094 79

The presence of the HIV-protease inhibitor indinavir in saliva was analyzed to investigate whether salivary indinavir concentrations are applicable to monitor compliance and/or predict plasma indinavir levels. Fourteen HIV-infected outpatients treated with indinavir and 24 healthy volunteers who ingested a single dose of indinavir were included. Paired plasma and citric-acid-stimulated saliva samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations showed a high correlation (r = 0.85, p < 0.01) with corresponding plasma levels. The median saliva/plasma ratio was 65% (P25 50%; P75 94%). The ratios were independent of the plasma concentration; however, a relation with time after ingestion was seen. The unbound fraction of indinavir in plasma was not significantly correlated with the saliva/plasma ratio after stimulated saliva collection, in contrast with a subset of nonstimulated saliva from healthy volunteers, where we did find a significant correlation. Although stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations are highly correlated with plasma concentrations, it is not possible to predict plasma indinavir levels by the salivary concentrations for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring, due to large interindividual and intraindividual variation. Nevertheless, monitoring compliance by measuring the presence of indinavir in saliva is possible: ingestion of indinavir can be assessed with a sensitivity of 84.8% in the whole dosing interval or with 98.8% between 1 and 6 hours after the last dose, which is comparable with plasma.
Ther Drug Monit 2000 Aug
PMID:Saliva as a specimen for monitoring compliance but not for predicting plasma concentrations in patients with HIV treated with indinavir. 1094 85

A sensitive and selective liquid chromatographic assay has been developed for the determination of the five protease inhibitors currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir) in a single run. Pretreatment of a 1-mL plasma sample spiked with internal standard was made by a solid-phase extraction procedure using a polymeric reversed-phase sorbent. Liquid chromatography was performed using a narrowbore C18 reversed-phase column and gradient elution. A double ultraviolet detection at 265 nm (amprenavir) and at 210 nm (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and internal standard) was used. Calibration curves were linear in the range 25-10000 ng/mL and the assay has been validated over the range 25-5000 ng/mL. Average accuracy at four concentrations was in the range of 100.5-104.2% and 96.9-100.5% for within-day and between-day, respectively. The coefficients of variation were less than 10%. Mean absolute recoveries varied from 85.4% (ritonavir) to 98.8% (saquinavir). No metabolite of the protease inhibitors was found to coelute with the drugs of interest or with the internal standard. At this time, among the tested drugs, especially all the presently licensed nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that can be used in combination with the protease inhibitors, none was found to interfere with the assay. This method is now in use in the authors' laboratory for the therapeutic monitoring of the HIV-protease inhibitors.
Ther Drug Monit 2000 Aug
PMID:Simultaneous determination of the five HIV-protease inhibitors: amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir in human plasma by solid-phase extraction and column liquid chromatography. 1094 89

The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of saliva as an alternative body fluid for therapeutic drug monitoring of nevirapine. The pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in plasma and saliva during a dosing interval was assessed in HIV-1-infected patients taking nevirapine (200 mg twice daily) to explore the relation between the concentration of nevirapine in plasma and saliva. To validate the anticipated relationship prospectively, single, paired plasma and saliva samples were obtained from nevirapine-treated HIV-1-infected outpatients. The plasma nevirapine concentration was strongly correlated with the salivary concentration. The mean saliva/plasma concentration ratio was 0.51 and was independent of the time after ingestion. Salivary nevirapine concentrations were used to estimate the corresponding plasma concentrations for 31 outpatients. Compared with the true plasma concentrations, the estimated concentrations were biased by -4.2%, with a precision of 13.3%. These data show a strong correlation between the salivary and plasma concentrations of nevirapine at a dosage of 200 mg twice daily. This relation has been validated prospectively, and the prediction of plasma concentrations was accurate and precise. Therefore, the authors conclude that saliva can be a useful body fluid for therapeutic drug monitoring of nevirapine.
Ther Drug Monit 2001 Jun
PMID:Saliva as an alternative body fluid for therapeutic drug monitoring of the nonnucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor nevirapine. 1136 34

The authors assessed the impact of protease and reverse transcription (RT) mutations and individual pharmacokinetic parameters on virologic response to a four-drug regimen including ritonavir/saquinavir. Treatment was given at the start of the study (M0) to 22 HIV-1 protease inhibitor-naive or pretreated patients. Protease and RT genes were sequenced at M0, at the time of virologic failure, or at the end of the follow-up. Plasma ritonavir and saquinavir peak C(max), C(min), and area under the curve (AUC) were determined based on samples taken 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after administration. HIV-1 RNA decreased to less than 50 copies/mL in 11 patients (group 1). At M0, five of them had no RT mutation and 10 had three or fewer secondary protease mutations with no new mutation during follow-up. Ritonavir and saquinavir pharmacokinetics showed wide interindividual variability. Treatment failed in 11 patients (group 2): 9 had three to eight protease mutations and a mean of 5.8 RT mutations at M0, with emergence of new mutations during follow-up. Pharmacokinetics was similar to those of group 1. The other two patients with virologic failure showed no baseline primary mutation but were the only patients with insufficient saquinavir and ritonavir AUC. The authors showed the complementarity between drug-resistance genotype and individual pharmacokinetics and the potential utility of AUC and Cmax to manage treatment.
Ther Drug Monit 2001 Aug
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and resistance mutations affect virologic response to ritonavir/saquinavir-containing regimens. 1147 13


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>