Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019693 (HIV)
 170,526 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Primary macrophages are infected by macrophage (M)-tropic but not T-cell line (T)-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains, and CCR5 and CXCR-4 are the principal cofactors utilized for CD4-mediated entry by M-tropic and T-tropic isolates, respectively. Macrophages from individuals homozygous for an inactivating mutation of CCR5 are resistant to prototype M-tropic strains that depend on CCR5 but are permissive for a dual-tropic isolate, 89.6, that can use both CCR5 and CXCR-4, as well as CCR2b, CCR3, and CCR8. Here we show that 89.6 entry into CCR5-deficient macrophages is blocked by an anti-CXCR-4 antibody and by the CXCR-4-specific chemokine SDF but not by the ligands to CCR2b or CCR3. Reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated expression of CXCR-4 but not CCR3 or CCR8 in macrophages, while CCR2b was variable. Macrophage surface expression of CXCR-4 was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry. Thus, CXCR-4 is expressed by primary macrophages and functions as a cofactor for entry by dual-tropic but not T-tropic HIV-1 isolates, and macrophage resistance to T-tropic strains does not result from a lack of the T-tropic entry cofactor CXCR-4. Since CXCR-4 on macrophages can be used by some but not other isolates, these results indicate that HIV-1 strains differ in how they utilize chemokine receptors as cofactors for entry and that the ability of a chemokine receptor to mediate HIV-1 entry differs, depending on the cell type in which it is expressed.
 ...
PMID:CXCR-4 is expressed by primary macrophages and supports CCR5-independent infection by dual-tropic but not T-tropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. 942 Feb 85

The chemokine receptor CCR5 and to a lesser extent CCR3 and CCR2b have been shown to serve as coreceptors for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry into blood- or tissue-derived macrophages. Therefore, we examined the expression of the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 as RNAs or as membrane-expressed antigens in monocytes maturing into macrophages and correlated these results with the susceptibility of macrophages to HIV-1 infection, as measured by their concentrations of extracellular p24 antigen and levels of intracellular HIV DNA by quantitative PCR. There was little change in levels of CCR1, CCR2b, and CCR5 RNAs. CCR3 RNA and surface antigen were undetectable throughout maturation of adherent monocytes over 10 days. CXCR4 RNA and membrane antigen were strongly expressed in newly adherent monocytes, but their levels declined at day 7. The amounts of CCR5 RNA remained stable, but the amounts of CCR5 antigen increased from undetectable to peak levels at day 7 and then declined slightly at day 10. Levels of susceptibility to laboratory (HIV-1BaL) and clinical strains of HIV-1 showed parallel kinetics, peaking at day 7 and then decreasing at days 10 to 14. The concordance of levels of HIV DNA and p24 antigen suggested that the changes in susceptibility with monocyte maturation were at or immediately after entry and correlated well with CCR5 expression and inversely with CXCR4 expression.
 ...
PMID:CCR5 expression correlates with susceptibility of maturing monocytes to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. 942 Feb 95

The eotaxin receptor (CCR3) is a CD4-associated coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2). By comparison with other chemokine receptors, such as CCR5 and CXCR4, the primary sequences of human CCR3 and its rhesus macaque homolog were markedly different in their extracellular domains. Human CD4+ cells expressing CCR3 from either human or macaque origin could be infected by HIV-2, with apparently similar efficiency, but only cells expressing human CCR3 could be infected by HIV-1. It suggests that HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins interact differently with the CCR3 coreceptor HIV-1 could infect cells expressing chimeric human/macaque CCR3 bearing either the first and second, or the third and fourth extracellular domains of human CCR3. As previously observed for CCR5, there seems to be a certain functional redundancy between domains supporting the coreceptor activity of CCR3. In spite of their close genetic relationship to HIV-2, two macaque simian immunodeficiency virus strains were apparently unable to use the CCR3 coreceptor from either human or simian origin.
 ...
PMID:The rhesus macaque CCR3 chemokine receptor is a cell entry cofactor for HIV-2, but not for HIV-1. 945 94

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, in combination with CD4, mediate cellular entry of macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) and T-cell-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), respectively, while dualtropic viruses can use either receptor. We have constructed a panel of chimeric viruses and envelope glycoproteins in which various domains of the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp160 were introduced into the genetic background of an M-tropic HIV-1 isolate, HIV-1(AD8). These constructs were employed in cell fusion and virus infectivity assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, MT4 T cells, primary monocyte-derived macrophages, or HOS-CD4 cell lines, expressing various chemokine receptors, to assess the contributions of different gp120 subdomains in coreceptor usage and cellular tropism. As expected, the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp120 utilized either CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4, whereas HIV-1(AD8) gp120 was able to use only CCR3 or CCR5. We found that either the V1/V2 or the V3 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 individually conferred on HIV-1(AD8) the ability to use CXCR4, while the combination of both the V1/V2 and V3 regions increased the efficiency of CXCR4 use. In addition, while the V4 or the V5 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 failed to confer the capacity to utilize CXCR4 on HIV-1(AD8), these regions were required in conjunction with regions V1 to V3 of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 for efficient utilization of CXCR4. Comparison of virus infectivity analyses with various cell types and cell fusion assays revealed assay-dependent discrepancies and indicated that events occurring at the cell surface during infection are complex and cannot always be predicted by any one assay.
 ...
PMID:Identification of determinants on a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that confer usage of CXCR4. 949 15

HIV-1 uses chemokine coreceptors for cell entry. CXCR4 is the major coreceptor for T-cell-line-adapted isolates and CCR5 for non-T-cell-line-adapted isolates. This study investigated if coreceptor usage differs between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. Eighty-one primary isolates representing nine different genetic subtypes (A-J, except I) were tested on U87.CD4 glioma cells stably expressing chemokine receptor CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4. Coreceptor usage was compared to biological phenotype of the isolates (rapid/high, syncytium-inducing or slow/low, non-syncytium-inducing) and to clinical and immunological status of the study subjects. CXCR4 usage was perfectly correlated to the biological phenotype for all subtypes; all of 26 isolates with rapid/high phenotype and none of 55 isolates with slow/low phenotype could infect the CXCR4 expressing cell line. Importantly, the CXCR4-positive, rapid/high phenotype was underrepresented among subtype C isolates. Furthermore, dual tropism for CXCR4 and CCR5 was not found among subtype D isolates. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that these subtype-specific differences in coreceptor usage were not due to differences in clinical status, CD4 counts, or treatment. This study shows that CXCR4 usage determines the biological phenotype for all subtypes, but that there appear to exist subtype-dependent differences in frequency of usage of certain coreceptors. This opens up the possibility that genetic subtypes may differ in important biological properties such as virulence, tissue tropism, and transmissibility.
 ...
PMID:Differences in chemokine coreceptor usage between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. 949 93

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in mononuclear phagocyte lineage cells (monocytes, macrophages, and microglia) is a critical component in the pathogenesis of viral infection. Viral replication in macrophages serves as a reservoir, a site of dissemination, and an instigator for neurological sequelae during HIV-1 disease. Recent studies demonstrated that chemokine receptors are necessary coreceptors for HIV-1 entry which determine viral tropism for different cell types. To investigate the relative contribution of the beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 to viral infection of mononuclear phagocytes we utilized a panel of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains (from blood and brain tissue) to infect highly purified populations of monocytes and microglia. Antibodies to CD4 (OKT4A) abrogated HIV-1 infection. The beta chemokines and antibodies to CCR3 failed to affect viral infection of both macrophage cell types. Antibodies to CCR5 (3A9) prevented monocyte infection but only slowed HIV replication in microglia. Thus, CCR5, not CCR3, is an essential receptor for HIV-1 infection of monocytes. Microglia express both CCR5 and CCR3, but antibodies to them fail to inhibit viral entry, suggesting the presence of other chemokine receptors for infection of these cells. These studies demonstrate the importance of mononuclear phagocyte heterogeneity in establishing HIV-1 infection and persistence.
 ...
PMID:Role of the beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of monocytes and microglia. 952 62

Like human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), HIV-2 requires a coreceptor in addition to CD4 for entry into cells. HIV and SIV coreceptor molecules belong to a family of seven-transmembrane-domain G-protein-coupled receptors. Here we show that primary HIV-2 isolates can use a broad range of coreceptor molecules, including CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, and CXCR4. Despite broad coreceptor use, the chemokine ligand SDF-1 substantially blocked HIV-2 infectivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating that its receptor, CXCR4, was the predominant coreceptor for infection of these cells. However, expression of CXCR4 together with CD4 on some cell types did not confer susceptibility to infection by all CXCR4-using virus isolates. These data therefore indicate that another factor(s) influences the ability of HIV-2 to replicate in human cell types that express the appropriate receptors for virus entry.
 ...
PMID:A broad range of chemokine receptors are used by primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 as coreceptors with CD4. 955 95

Cells of the dendritic lineage are thought to be among the first cells infected after mucosal exposure to HIV. In this study, we have identified the presence of multiple chemokine receptors on dendritic cells (DC) that may function as coreceptors for HIV entry. DC effectively used CCR5 for entry of macrophage (M)-tropic isolates. CCR3, the eotaxin receptor, initially identified on eosinophils, is expressed on DC and may be used as an entry coreceptor by certain dual-tropic strains. CXCR4 was not expressed on DC, although SDF-1 induced a calcium flux and DC could be infected by T cell line (T)-tropic HIV. Our findings provide evidence for the presence of a non-CXCR4 SDF-1 receptor on DC that is used mainly by T-tropic strains of HIV. DC from individuals homozygous for a 32-bp deletion of the CCR5 gene are also infectable with M-tropic strains of HIV-1, and this infection is inhibited by stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)1, suggesting that this receptor can also be used by M-tropic HIV for entry. Delineation of the spectrum of coreceptor usage on DC may offer new approaches to interfere with the initiation and propagation of HIV infection.
 ...
PMID:Dendritic cells express multiple chemokine receptors used as coreceptors for HIV entry. 955

Selective leukocyte trafficking towards sites of inflammation is mediated by chemokines. RANTES is a CC chemokine that attracts lymphocytes, monocytes, dendritic cells, eosinophils, basophils and NK cells. A natural form of human RANTES lacking two N-terminal residues was isolated from stimulated sarcoma cells, fibroblasts, and leukocytes. RANTES(3-68) showed a more than tenfold reduction in chemotactic potency for monocytes and eosinophils. To elucidate the mechanism involved, receptor recognition studies were performed. In cells transfected with the CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5, the major co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains, RANTES(3-68) mobilized calcium and desensitized RANTES(1-68)-induced calcium fluxes equally well as RANTES(1-68). However, RANTES(3-68) was ineffective on CCR1 and CCR3 transfectants. The reduced potency of natural RANTES(3-68) by selective loss of receptor-activating characteristics was confirmed with recombinant RANTES(3-68). In chemotaxis assays using monocytic cells, RANTES(3-68) inhibited RANTES(1-68), macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha), MIP-1beta or monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), but not MCP-1- or MCP-2-induced chemotaxis. Thus, a minor post-translational modification has a remarkable impact on the biological activities of RANTES and a pathophysiologically induced change in the relative amounts of intact and truncated RANTES might affect the outcome of inflammation or HIV infection.
 ...
PMID:Natural truncation of RANTES abolishes signaling through the CC chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR3, impairs its chemotactic potency and generates a CC chemokine inhibitor. 956 66

CC chemokine receptors 1 and 3 (CCR1 and CCR3) are expressed by eosinophils; however, factors regulating their expression and function have not previously been defined. Here we analyze chemokine receptor expression and function during eosinophil differentiation, using the eosinophilic cell line HL-60 clone 15 as a model system. RNA for CCR1, -3, -4, and -5 was not detectable in the parental cells, and the cells did not specifically bind CC chemokines. Cells treated with butyric acid acquired eosinophil characteristics; expressed mRNA for CCR1 and CCR3, but not for CCR4 or CCR5; acquired specific binding sites for macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha and eotaxin (the selective ligands for CCR1 and CCR3, respectively); and exhibited specific calcium flux and chemotaxis responses to macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha, eotaxin, and other known CCR1 and CCR3 agonists. CCR3 was expressed later and at lower levels than CCR1 and could be further induced by IL-5, whereas IL-5 had little or no effect on CCR1 expression. Consistent with the HIV-1 coreceptor activity of CCR3, HL-60 clone 15 cells induced with butyric acid and IL-5 fused with HeLa cells expressing CCR3-tropic HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, and fusion was blocked specifically by eotaxin or an anti-CCR3 mAb. These data suggest that CCR1 and CCR3 are markers of late eosinophil differentiation that are differentially regulated by IL-5 in this model.
 ...
PMID:CC chemokine receptors 1 and 3 are differentially regulated by IL-5 during maturation of eosinophilic HL-60 cells. 957 May 58


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>