Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019693 (HIV)
170,526 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have isolated HIV-1 variants that infect brain-derived CD4-positive cells, which are resistant to both macrophage (M)-tropic and T-cell line (T)-tropic HIV-1 strains. It is possible that this brain cell tropism of the HIV-1 variants is determined by the interaction of HIV-1 with a chemokine receptor (CKR) gene. We attempted to detect the expression of the CKR-like genes using degenerate PCR primers. The brain-derived cells expressed a CKR-like gene TER1/CCR8. Human CD4-expressing cells resistant to all HIV-1 strains became susceptible to brain-cell tropic HIV-1 variants after expression of TER1 in these cells, but these cells were still resistant to M-tropic strains or T-tropic IIIB strain. TER1 was expressed in brain-derived cells and human T-cells. These findings suggest that TER1/CCR8 functions as a co-receptor for HIV-1 infection for brain-derived cells as well as T cells.
...
PMID:Identification of the chemokine receptor TER1/CCR8 expressed in brain-derived cells and T cells as a new coreceptor for HIV-1 infection. 948 Aug 37

Recently, it was shown that a 32-bp deletion in the CKR5 macrophage chemokine receptor gene produced resistance to HIV infection. Frequencies of the CKR5 mutant allele in Russians, Tatars, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Azerbaijanis, Uigurts, Tuvinians, and Georgians estimated by means of the PCR technique were equal to 0.13, 0.12, 0.85, 0.06, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00, respectively. While the theoretically expected frequency of deletion homozygotes in Russians and Tatars was 1.7%, none of such homozygotes were detected among the 90 persons examined. The data suggested that about 25% of the population in northwestern Russia is highly resistant to HIV infection.
...
PMID:[Population features of gene mutation frequency of the CKR-5 receptor, determining sensitivity to the AIDS virus]. 949 32

Infection of CD4-positive cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires functional interaction of the viral envelope protein with a coreceptor belonging to the chemokine receptor family of seven-membrane-spanning receptors. For the majority of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates, the physiologically relevant coreceptor is the human CCR-5 (hCCR-5) receptor. Although the murine homolog of CCR-5 (mCCR-5) is unable to mediate HIV-1 infection, chimeric hCCR-5/mCCR-5 molecules containing single extracellular domains derived from hCCR-5 are effective coreceptors for certain macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates. Here, we have sought to identify residues in hCCR-5 critical for HIV-1 infection by substitution of mCCR-5-derived residues into the context of functional chimeric hCCR-5/mCCR-5 receptor molecules. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that residues 7, 13, and 15 in the first extracellular domain and residue 180 in the third extracellular domain of CCR-5 are important for HIV-1 envelope-mediated membrane fusion. Of interest, certain substitutions, for example, at residues 184 and 185 in the third extracellular domain, have no phenotype when introduced individually but strongly inhibit hCCR-5 coreceptor function when present together. We hypothesize that these changes, which do not preclude chemokine receptor function, may inhibit a conformational transition in hCCR-5 that contributes to HIV-1 infection. Finally, we report that substitution of glycine for valine at residue 5 in CCR-5 can significantly enhance the level of envelope-dependent cell fusion by expressing cells. The diversity of the mutant phenotypes observed in this mutational analysis, combined with their wide distribution across the extracellular regions of CCR-5, emphasizes the complexity of the interaction between HIV-1 envelope and coreceptor.
...
PMID:Multiple residues contribute to the inability of murine CCR-5 to function as a coreceptor for macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates. 949 44

HIV-1 uses chemokine coreceptors for cell entry. CXCR4 is the major coreceptor for T-cell-line-adapted isolates and CCR5 for non-T-cell-line-adapted isolates. This study investigated if coreceptor usage differs between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. Eighty-one primary isolates representing nine different genetic subtypes (A-J, except I) were tested on U87.CD4 glioma cells stably expressing chemokine receptor CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4. Coreceptor usage was compared to biological phenotype of the isolates (rapid/high, syncytium-inducing or slow/low, non-syncytium-inducing) and to clinical and immunological status of the study subjects. CXCR4 usage was perfectly correlated to the biological phenotype for all subtypes; all of 26 isolates with rapid/high phenotype and none of 55 isolates with slow/low phenotype could infect the CXCR4 expressing cell line. Importantly, the CXCR4-positive, rapid/high phenotype was underrepresented among subtype C isolates. Furthermore, dual tropism for CXCR4 and CCR5 was not found among subtype D isolates. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that these subtype-specific differences in coreceptor usage were not due to differences in clinical status, CD4 counts, or treatment. This study shows that CXCR4 usage determines the biological phenotype for all subtypes, but that there appear to exist subtype-dependent differences in frequency of usage of certain coreceptors. This opens up the possibility that genetic subtypes may differ in important biological properties such as virulence, tissue tropism, and transmissibility.
...
PMID:Differences in chemokine coreceptor usage between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. 949 93

Today, almost three dozen human chemokines have been identified. The main function of these soluble proteins is the recruitment of leukocytes to sites of infection and inflammation. This review emphasizes the new developments in the field of lymphocyte responses to chemokines. Notably, it was shown that lymphocytes require stimulation to become responsive to chemokines, a process that is closely linked to chemokine receptor expression. As an exception, one chemokine, SDF-1, is a highly effective chemoattractant for non-activated T lymphocytes and progenitor B cells. Of particular interest are the chemokines IP10 and Mig which bind to a receptor with selective expression in activated T lymphocytes and, therefore, may be critical mediators of T lymphocyte migration in T cell-dependent immune-responses. All other chemokines with activities in lymphocytes do also induce responses in monocytes and granulocytes. The involvement of chemokine receptors in HIV infection is briefly mentioned, while other interesting areas in chemokine research, such as hematopoiesis and angiogenesis, are not discussed.
...
PMID:Lymphocyte responses to chemokines. 950 94

The beta-chemokine receptor, CCR5, is a major co-receptor for macrophage tropic non-syncytia-inducing isolates of HIV-1. Recently a 32 bp homozygous deletion in the coding region of CCR5 has been reported in a very small percentage (< 1%) of Caucasian individuals who remain uninfected, despite multiple exposure to the wild-type virus. This mutant allele in the heterozygous form (CCR5/32 ccr5) was readily detected in a normal unrelated Caucasian population of European heritage with varying frequencies (13-20%). However, when a large number of the non-Caucasian population (261 Africans and 423 Asians) were screened for the presence of this deleted allele, not a single case of either homozygous or heterozygous mutant for delta 32 allele of CCR5 was detected. We screened 100 normal individuals and found a single heterozygous case with an identical 32 bp deletion in CCR5 gene reported earlier, the rest possessed wild-type alleles. This deleted gene was inherited in Mendelian fashion among the family members of this individual. Thus, the frequency of this deleted allele in India among unrelated normal individuals is likely to be very low (< 1%). We observed a moderate transdominant effect of this mutant allele in a fusion assay. Finally, we show a significant inhibition of fusion of cell membranes when the 176-bp region of CCR5 was used as an antisense.
...
PMID:First report of a healthy Indian heterozygous for delta 32 mutant of HIV-1 co-receptor-CCR5 gene. 951 55

At the present time more is known about barriers to transmission of infectious agents between species than barriers to transmission within the same species. However differences in resistance to infection have been well-established within given species of various plants and domestic farm animals. Unsurprisingly several similar mechanisms have been observed in humans. A well-known human example of genetic protection is resistance to malaria in endemic areas which has been associated with polymorphism in alpha and beta chain globulin genes, cytoskeleton proteins, and protein/receptors on the surface of red blood cells. Studies regarding infection by Schistosoma mansoni show that the extent of infection depends largely on each individual's intrinsic resistance under the control of a single major gene which has now been located on q31-33 locus of the long arm of chromosome 5. This locus harbors several genes involved in differentiation of auxiliary T lymphocytes. With regard to HIV infection it has been known for several years that a small but significant number of individuals are relatively resistant. This resistance has been attributed to deletion of the gene coding for the chemokine receptor used by the virus as a co-receptor to infect macrophage.
...
PMID:[Genetic predisposition to infectious diseases]. 951 72

More than a decade after the first description of HIV DNA in the nervous system the pathophysiology of HIVD remains largely enigmatic, with data supporting a number of potential mechanisms for the development of neuronal dysfunction. Nevertheless, a few key findings have considerable support in the literature devoted to this subject: 1. HIV dementia is caused by HIV itself; no other pathogen has been consistently found in the brains of patients with HIVD. 2. In comparison with other viral encephalopathies, there appears to be a significant discordance between the amount of virus being produced in the brains of patients with HIVD and the degree of neurological deterioration. 3. The key cell types responsible for viral production within the CNS are the resident macrophages or microglial cells. 4. Other elements within the CNS, particularly astrocytes, are probably infected with HIV as well, but all of these infections are highly restricted in terms of production of virus or viral structural proteins. 5. At least one component of the pathogenesis of HIVD may be the generation of neurotoxins by infected microglia, although the type of neurotoxin, and the specific compound most likely to be involved, are quite controversial. Advances with combination antiviral therapy have successfully reduced plasma viral load in a high proportion of individuals, leading to the speculation (previously almost heretical) that it may be possible to eradicate HIV completely from the systemic immune system. If that were the case, potential "sanctuary" sites such as the immunologically protected CNS might remain as important reservoirs for reseeding of lymphoid tissues. Microglia may be particularly suited for this purpose because they are long lived, can produce HIV for several weeks (at least in culture), and they are apparently relatively immune to virus-induced cytopathology such as syncytium formation. One can speculate about several scenarios resulting from the continued presence of replication-competent HIV within brain. In the worst case, a smoldering infection of the nervous system could lead to neurological deterioration without reinfection of systemic immune cells. The epidemiological data indicating that HIVD is a disease primarily associated with immunodeficiency suggest that the systemic immune system plays a role in maintaining virus residing within the CNS under control. Thus it is quite possible that this scenario would not occur for many years after the systemic infection is controlled. Alternatively, virus could be transported from the CNS by circulating lymphocytes and monocytes and reinfect systemic organs. This would necessitate restarting therapy for those individuals who were previously thought to be cured, but presumably virus within the CNS would not have developed resistance to antivirals. In either case, the techniques currently available do not permit an accurate assessment of CNS HIV load in living people, and this question will remain unanswered until antivirals are discontinued in a few individuals with persistently negative tests for systemic virus. In addition to this most critical question, the relationship between viral levels and HIVD is largely unexplored, as is the possibility that some strains are particularly virulent or neuroinvasive. Furthermore, the potential contribution of host genotype in the development of dementia is unknown. In view of the strong influence of major chemokine receptor (CCR5) truncations on HIV replication, it is entirely possible that more discrete genetic polymorphisms have a subtle effect on either brain invasion or virulence.
...
PMID:The effects of human immunodeficiency virus in the central nervous system. 952 Sep 95

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection requires binding of the envelope protein gp120 to host CD4 receptors and the action of the chemokine receptors CXCR4 or CCR5, which define cell tropism. The proline-containing V3 loop of gp120 determines the selection of the chemokine receptor and participates in conformational changes on binding of gp120 to CD4. In this study, we show that macrophage-tropic and T-cell-tropic V3 loop peptides bind specifically to the active site of the immunophilins FK506-binding protein (FKBP12), and cyclophilins A and B. Macrophage-tropic and T-cell-tropic V3 loop peptides inhibited the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) activities of the immunophilins. Kd values in the range 0.036-4.1 microM were determined with V3 loop peptides labeled with an environmentally sensitive fluorophore. The observed binding properties of the V3 loop peptides reveal structural motifs of linear water-soluble peptidic substrates for tight interaction with immunophilins. FKBP12, and cyclophilins A and B were found to be present in normal human blood in the ranges 0.8-1.7, 1.4-2.3 and 2.4-3.1 nM, respectively, as demonstrated by PPIase activity measurements and western blot analysis. Cyclophilins A and B levels in serum of HIV-1-infected individuals were increased 3.6-fold and 1.6-fold. Due to the interaction of immunophilins with V3 loop peptides and with the envelope protein gp120, a role of immunophilins in HIV pathogenesis as conformases or docking mediators seems possible, since immunophilin receptors on cell membranes and immunophilin-related virulence factors of pathogens have been identified.
...
PMID:The V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 envelope protein is a high-affinity ligand for immunophilins present in human blood. 954 59

CCR5, a chemokine receptor expressed on T cells and macrophages, is the principal coreceptor for M-tropic HIV-1 strains. Recently, we described an NH2-terminal modification of the CCR5 ligand regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), aminooxypentane-RANTES (AOP-RANTES), that showed potent inhibition of macrophage infection by HIV-1 under conditions where RANTES was barely effective. To investigate the mechanism of AOP-RANTES inhibition of HIV infectivity we examined the surface expression of CCR5 using a monoclonal anti-CCR5 antibody, MC-1. We demonstrate that AOP-RANTES rapidly caused >90% decrease in cell surface expression of CCR5 on lymphocytes, monocytes/ macrophages, and CCR5 transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. RANTES also caused a loss of cell surface CCR5, although its effect was less than with AOP-RANTES. Significantly, AOP-RANTES inhibited recycling of internalized CCR5 to the cell surface, whereas RANTES did not. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells are cultured for prolonged periods of time in the presence of RANTES, CCR5 expression is comparable to that seen on cells treated with control medium, whereas there is no CCR5 surface expression on cells cultured in the presence of AOP-RANTES. Immunofluorescence indicated that both AOP-RANTES and RANTES induced downmodulation of cell surface CCR5, and that the receptor was redistributed into endocytic organelles containing the transferrin receptor. When RANTES was removed, the internalized receptor was recycled to the cell surface; however, the receptor internalized in the presence of AOP-RANTES was retained in endosomes. Using human osteosarcoma (GHOST) 34/CCR5 cells, the potency of AOP-RANTES and RANTES to inhibit infection by the M-tropic HIV-1 strain, SF 162, correlated with the degree of downregulation of CCR5 induced by the two chemokines. These differences between AOP-RANTES and RANTES in their effect on receptor downregulation and recycling suggest a mechanism for the potent inhibition of HIV infection by AOP-RANTES. Moreover, these results support the notion that receptor internalization and inhibition of receptor recycling present new targets for therapeutic agents to prevent HIV infection.
...
PMID:Aminooxypentane-RANTES induces CCR5 internalization but inhibits recycling: a novel inhibitory mechanism of HIV infectivity. 954 33


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>