Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019693 (HIV)
 170,526 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Therapeutic options are limited for patients refractory to triple therapy with two reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor. Preliminary results showing favorable effects of protease inhibitor combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir due to inhibition of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) prompted us to study this combination. - Thirteen patients with incomplete suppression of plasma HIV-RNA were enrolled and treatment was started with nelfinavir 750 mg tid and saquinavir 400 mg bid. Saquinavir-dosage was escalated in weekly intervals to 400 mg tid and 600 mg tid, respectively. All doses were given with food, and plasma levels of saquinavir and nelfinavir were assessed 4 hours post-dosing after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks. Treatment was considered virologically efficacious if HIV-viral load was reduced by at least 0.5 log10 from baseline. - Double protease inhibitor-treatment with nelfinavir and saquinavir was virologically efficacious in 5/13 (39%) patients after 4 weeks but only in 4/13 (31%) patients after 8 and 1/13 (8%) after 16 and 24 weeks, respectively. No statistical difference in plasma concentrations was observed when saquinavir was administered in increasing doses of 400 mg bid, 400 mg tid or 600 mg tid in combination with nelfinavir. 5/13 (39%) patients developed diarrhea (>4/d), no other serious side-effects were observed. By eight weeks, the mean CD4 count for all patients was significantly higher when compared to baseline. - In patients refractory to standard triple therapy the combination of nelfinavir and saquinavir showed significant elevation of CD4-count, but only short term virological efficacy in a minority of patients. Plasma concentrations of saquinavir could not be increased by weekly dose escalation of the drug from 400 mg bid to 600 mg tid. Saquinavir drug concentrations of 600 mg saquinavir tid and nelfinavir showed rather non-significant lower values when compared to historical controls treated with a double-dose 1200 mg saquinavir tid regimen alone. We conclude that in these patients the combination of nelfinavir plus saquinavir has no advantage in terms of increasing bioavailibility of saquinavir or virological efficacy. During short observation time a beneficial effect on CD4-count was observed.
 ...
PMID:Virological efficacy and plasma drug concentrations of nelfinavir plus saquinavir as salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients refractory to standard triple therapy. 1006 40

Rifampicin (RFP) was developed as one of the anti-tuberculosis drugs in 1966 and has been used for almost 30 years. Establishment of combination therapy using RFP has been contributing to the treatment/eradication of tuberculosis. A number of rifamycin derivatives, as post RFPs, have been synthesized/developed over the the years. Chemical modification of rifamycins has largely been concentrated on the moiety of naphthalene ring because modification of the ansa chain moiety reduces the activity. In 1992, rifabutin was approved as a preventive drug for MAC infection in AIDS patients in the United States and in European countries. It is noteworthy that rifapentine (RPT) was approved as an anti-tuberculosis drug in 1998 by FDA in the United States. A newly synthesized rifamycin derivative (KRM-1648, rifalazil) possesses a potent activity against both M. Tuberculosis and MAC, and it is now under clinical trial for the treatment of Tuberculosis in the United States. KRM-1648 is metabolized to 30-hydroxy KRM and 25-deacetyl KRM in the body, and its 30-hydroxylation is caused by liver cytochrome P450 3A. It is well known that RFP, RFB and RPT induce liver cytochrome P450 in animals and human, and these accelerate the metabolism of concomitant drugs such as HIV protease inhibitors resulting in lowering their blood levels. While KRM-1648 did not induce liver P450 in animals, but it is not examined yet in human. Clinical study of DOT with intermittent therapy of RPT in combination with INH resulted in the preferable therapeutic effect comparable to the RFP therapy. Since KRM-1648 has a potent activity, a high tissue distribution and a long half-life, it may be also suitable for intermittent therapy. For the future novel anti-tuberculosis drugs and therapy for tuberculosis, it is prerequisite to develop new drugs with a preferable antimicrobial activity, to shorten further the treatment period, and to be effective against multi-drug resistant bacilli. It is expected that more effective novel rifamycin derivatives can be developed with the above view points.
 ...
PMID:[Current status and perspectives on the development of rifamycin derivative antibiotics]. 1006 56

All the currently available protease inhibitors are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. All are inhibitors of CYP3A4, ranging from weak inhibition for saquinavir to very potent inhibition for ritonavir. Thus, they are predicted to have numerous drug interactions, although few such interactions have actually been documented either in pharmacokinetic studies or in clinical reports. This article reviews the published literature with an emphasis on the magnitude of interactions and on practical recommendations for management. Many of the drugs commonly taken by patients with HIV have a strong potential to interact with the protease inhibitors. In particular, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are also metabolised by CYPand have been shown to interact with protease inhibitors. Delaviridine is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, but nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. The protease inhibitors also interact with each other, and these interactions are being explored for their potential therapeutic benefits. Other commonly used drugs are also known to affect protease inhibitor metabolism, including inhibitors such as clarithromycin and the azole antifungals and inducers such as the rifamycins. Drugs that are known to be significantly affected by the protease inhibitors include ethinylestradiol and terfenadine; many other drugs have lesser or potential interactions. Although little specific data is available on the drug interactions of protease inhibitors, this lack of data should not be interpreted as a lack of interaction. Retrospective chart reviews have demonstrated that potentially severe drug interactions are frequently overlooked. Much more clinical data is needed, but pharmacists and physicians must always be vigilant for drug interactions, both those that are already documented and those that are predictable from pharmacokinetic profiles, in patients receiving protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Drug interactions of HIV protease inhibitors. 1008 72

Dual protease inhibitor (PI) therapy has been established either in order to increase plasma concentrations of one PI or to combine synergistic effects of two PI's on viral load. Studies with saquinavir (SQV) and small doses of ritonavir (RTV) as well as experiences from our therapeutic drug monitoring suggest that single daily doses may result in sufficient SQV serum levels throughout an interval of 24 h. A controlled, randomized trial with 20 healthy men was conducted for the comparison of serum levels with 1600 mg SQV (group 1) or 1600 mg SQV/200 mg RTV (group 2). The dosages were selected in order to use RTV as an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and SQV as protease inhibitor. The volunteers received single daily doses following a standardized breakfast on 3 consecutive days. Serum samples were analyzed for SQV and RTV employing LC-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum concentration of saquinavir after 24 hours, the AUC, the maximum concentration and the serum half-lives on day 3 served as target parameters. The minimum SQV concentration amounted to 469.4 ng/ml, when combined with RTV and proved to be significantly higher (p <0.05) than the corresponding concentration with SQV alone (127.3 ng/ml). The SQV maximum concentration was raised approximately 6fold and the AUC 9fold when RTV was coadministered. In combination with 200 mg of RTV the predominant elimination half-life of SQV increased from 2.6 to 6.45 hours. These data prove that under single daily doses of 1600 mg SQV/200 mg RTV HIV-inhibitory concentrations of SQV can be achieved for 24 hours. Due to the high variability of the concentrations, which can be seen with all PI s, we recommend continuous therapeutic drug monitoring of serum trough levels.
 ...
PMID:Single daily doses of saquinavir achieve HIV-inhibitory concentrations when combined with baby-dose ritonavir. 1008 76

There are 3 groups of drugs available for the treatment of patients with HIV disease. These are the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors ('nucleoside analogues') [zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, lamivudine and abacavir]; the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz); and the protease inhibitors (saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and amprenavir). The preferred initial regimen should reduce and maintain plasma HIV RNA below the level of detection. Presently, the regimen of choice consists of 2 nucleoside analogues plus a protease inhibitor with high in vivo efficacy. An alternative combination consists of 2 nucleoside analogues plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Drug interactions are one of the major problems associated with these multidrug regimens. Changes in plasma concentrations of the nucleoside analogues are unlikely to be of clinical relevance as drug effect is mainly dependent on the rate and extent of intracellular phosphorylation. Combinations of zidovudine plus stavudine, and probably zalcitabine plus lamivudine, should be avoided as competition for phosphorylating enzymes may occur. The antiviral efficacy of some nucleoside analogues, e.g. stavudine, may be compromised by prior treatment with other nucleosides (e.g. zidovudine). However, these data need to be clarified in further studies. It is unlikely that administration of other antiretrovirals will influence the activity of nucleoside analogues. Protease inhibitors are metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Combination protease inhibitor therapy can result in drug interactions mediated by enzyme inhibition. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor, saquinavir the least. The protease inhibitors also interact with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Nevirapine and efavirenz induce drug metabolising enzymes and may reduce plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors. A study in healthy volunteers showed that nelfinavir concentrations are increased by combination with efavirenz. Delavirdine inhibits drug metabolising enzymes and increases the plasma concentration of coadministered protease inhibitors. The nucleoside analogues would not be expected to interact with the protease inhibitors. Apart from the ability of didanosine to reduce the area under the concentration-time curve of delavirdine, there are no reports of clinically significant interactions of other antiretrovirals with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Triple therapy is the current standard of care for patients with HIV disease. However, studies of quadruple therapy are already under way. Drug interactions are likely to remain one of the major considerations when selecting a therapeutic regimen for patients with HIV.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and potential interactions amongst antiretroviral agents used to treat patients with HIV infection. 1032 Sep 51

We present the case of a patient with hepatitis C-induced cirrhosis and concomitant human immunodeficiency virus infection who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. The patient developed severe, prolonged tacrolimus toxicity in the presence of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors. At various times, the patient received saquinavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir in conjunction with tacrolimus. In each instance, the tacrolimus concentration rose to toxic levels. We hypothesize that the protease inhibitors' competition for binding to cytochrome P450 isoenzyme system CYP3A induced extreme prolongation of tacrolimus metabolism. After stabilization of the patient, reinstitution of treatment with nelfinavir resulted in a >95% reduction in tacrolimus dosing from 4 mg twice per day to 0.5 mg once every 3-5 days.
 ...
PMID:Concomitant human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor therapy markedly reduces tacrolimus metabolism and increases blood levels. 1044 Apr 8

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is an important pathogen that can cause chronic lung disease in immunocompetent patients and disseminated disease in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Treatment of MAC with antituberculosis drugs was unsatisfactory, but the introduction of the newer macrolides, clarithromycin and azithromycin, and of rifabutin has greatly improved the outcome of treatment regimens for MAC. However, these agents are also associated with many new treatment-related adverse effects and potential drug-drug interactions. Rifamycins [rifampicin (rifampin) more than rifabutin] induce cytochrome P450 enzymes and accelerate the metabolism of clarithromycin and HIV protease inhibitors. Conversely, clarithromycin inhibits these enzymes, resulting in increased rifabutin toxicity. The net results are treatment regimens that may be extremely difficult to tolerate, especially for elderly or debilitated patients. Clarithromycin and azithromycin must be administered in combination with other agents such as ethambutol to prevent the emergence of macrolide resistance. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to the combination of a macrolide, rifabutin and ethambutol, and many have significant adverse effects (mostly gastrointestinal) with this regimen. For some patients the treatment is worse than the disease. The same 3-drug regimen is also effective therapy for disseminated MAC in AIDS patients, in whom the additional problem of a rifamycin/protease inhibitor interaction may be present. Fortunately, as opposed to pulmonary MAC disease in immunocompetent patients, disseminated MAC disease is a diminishing problem because of effective prophylactic regimens for MAC and improved antiretroviral therapy for HIV. Significant progress has been made in the treatment of MAC disease with the introduction of the newer macrolides. It is to be hoped that even better drugs that are more active against MAC and are associated with less toxicity and drug-drug interactions will be introduced in the future.
 ...
PMID:Risk-benefit assessment of therapies for Mycobacterium avium complex infections. 1045 81

Food-drug interactions can be associated with alterations in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of various drugs that may have clinical implications. The various phases in which food may interact with a coadministered drug are: (i) before and during gastrointestinal absorption; (ii) during distribution; (iii) during metabolism; and (iv) during elimination. Absorption and metabolism are the phases where food has most effect, and this review will focus on those areas. It will also review the variable and complex effects of antacids and metal ions on drug absorption. Mechanisms related to food effects on drug absorption have been described under 5 categories: those causing decreased, delayed, increased or accelerated absorption, and those in which food has no significant effect. Among the major variables that interface between differential effects of food and postprandial bioavailability are: (i) the physicochemical characteristics and enantiomorphic composition of the drug; (ii) timing of meals in relation to time of drug administration; (iii) size and composition of meals (especially fat, protein and fibre); and (iv) dose size. However, the influence of food is largely a matter of the design of the pharmaceutical formulation. In addition, the mechanism of 'food effect' may involve physiological and sensory responses to food, such as changes in gastrointestinal milieu and gastric emptying rate, reflex action, and may also involve the site and route (either portal or lymphatic) of drug absorption. Mixing drugs with fruit juice, such as grapefruit and orange juice, and acidic beverages, such as commercial soft drinks, may affect absorption because of decreases in gastric pH, which could offer a therapeutic advantage in certain clinical conditions, such as patients with HIV disease and cancer. The increased bioavailability caused by the concomitant intake of grapefruit juice results from the inhibition of intestinal cytochrome P450(CYP)3A4, but not hepatic CYP3A4 or colon CYP3A5, which probably involves the bioflavonoid naringenin and furanocoumarins. Although there is a vast amount of literature, there is still no rational scientific basis to predict the effect of food for a particular chemical entity or a chemical class of therapeutic agents. A mechanistic understanding of the effects of food may serve as a key to the pharmacokinetic optimisation of patient therapy, both in outpatients and hospitalised patients of various age groups.
 ...
PMID:Effects of food on clinical pharmacokinetics. 1051 19

Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors have dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality due to HIV-1 infection. However, most of these antiretrovirals are also potent inhibitors (and occasionally inducers) of hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 systems and, therefore, have the potential to alter the elimination of any substance that utilizes these metabolic pathways. We describe a patient infected with HIV-1 who was treated with ritonavir and saquinavir and then experienced a prolonged effect from a small dose of methylenedioxymetamphetamine (MDMA or ecstacy) and a nearly fatal reaction from a small dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). We also discuss the potential for HIV-1 protease inhibitors to alter the metabolism of other abusable prescribed and illicit substances.
 ...
PMID:Life-threatening interactions between HIV-1 protease inhibitors and the illicit drugs MDMA and gamma-hydroxybutyrate. 1052

Three patients negative for human immunodeficiency virus infection were admitted for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and aspergillosis infections. They were treated with different drug combinations, but all regimens included clarithromycin for MAC and itraconazole for aspergillosis. All patients experienced an increase in clarithromycin concentrations and clarithromycin: 14-OH-clarithromycin ratio compared with expected range values. They had no clinical side effects. The time course suggested a possible interaction between clarithromycin and itraconazole, presumably through itraconazole's effects on cytochrome P450 3A4 activity. A bidirectional interaction cannot be ruled out. The data suggest that, when necessary, these two drugs can be administered together safely. Further investigation is necessary to determine the extent and clinical consequences of coadministration in humans.
 ...
PMID:Potential interaction between itraconazole and clarithromycin. 1060 94


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>