Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0019270 (
hernia
)
15,856
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
This preliminary study describes a new technique to provide
analgesia
in children undergoing umbilical
hernia
repair. The para-umbilical block consists of infiltrating the anterior cutaneous branches of the two tenth spinal roots over and under the rectus sheath far from the operative field. Intra and postoperative
analgesia
as well as operative conditions were assessed in 11 children 16.7 +/- 31 months old, weighing 8421 +/- 6941 g, the block being performed before surgery under light general anaesthesia. Intraoperative
analgesia
, operative conditions and recovery were good in all patients.
Analgesia
was adequate one h after surgery in ten patients, six h after surgery in eight. The block proved to be safe and on the whole effective in this short series. The study should proceed on a multi-centre basis if possible. Indications can be extended.
...
PMID:Para-umbilical block: a new concept for regional anaesthesia in children. 918 66
Ropivacaine is a new, long-acting local anaesthetic, prepared as a single enantiomer (the S form). Ropivacaine has a pKa of 8.07, a protein binding of approximately 94%, but a lower lipid solubility than bupivacaine. Extensive animal toxicological studies have shown a lower propensity for cardiotoxicity with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine. Studies in sheep have shown that the systemic toxicity of ropivacaine is not enhanced by gestation. Studies in human male volunteers have shown that ropivacaine is associated with at least 25% less CNS and cardiovascular adverse effects than bupivacaine following use of intravenous infusions of either drug at a rate of 10 mg/min, to a maximum dose of 150 to 250 mg. With its lower toxicity, especially cardiovascular toxicity, and less intense motor blockade, ropivacaine may have advantages over bupivacaine in epidural pain relief during labour. In general, comparative studies have shown ropivacaine and bupivacaine to have similar efficacy, but ropivacaine has a greater degree of separation between motor and sensory blockade than bupivacaine when it given epidurally for epidural pain relief during labour (as intermittent doses or continuous infusion) or for caesarean section. A significantly lower rate of instrumental deliveries and significantly higher neurological and adaptive capacity scores in neonates at 24 hours were noted for following epidural relief during labour with ropivacaine in a meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing this agent with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is also of great interest when used as an epidural infusion for postoperative
analgesia
. There are a few studies evaluating epidural infusions of ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3% (10 ml/h for 21 hours) after upper or lower abdominal or orthopaedic surgery, and epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (6 to 14 ml/h) after orthopaedic surgery. The studies show that ropivacaine provides postoperative pain relief in a dose-related manner with minimal or a low degree of dose-related motor blockade. Recommended doses of ropivacaine given epidurally to control postsurgical pain or labour pain are 20 to 40 mg as a bolus with 20 to 30 mg as a top-up with an interval > or = 30 minutes. Alternatively, ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (0.2%) can be given as a continuous epidural infusion at a rate of 6 to 14 ml/h (lumbar) or 4 to 8 ml/h (thoracic). Epidural ropivacaine 0.2% provides a good level of
analgesia
with minimal motor block, but the effects of a combination of ropivacaine and an opioid administered epidurally could have potential and need to be investigated. Preoperative or postoperative subcutaneous wound infiltration, during cholecystectomy or
hernia
repair, with ropivacaine 100 to 175 mg has been shown to be more effective than placebo and as effective as bupivacaine in reducing wound pain. The adverse effects associated with epidural administration of ropivacaine include hypotension, nausea, bradycardia, transient paraesthesia, back pain, urinary retention and fever. In comparative studies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, the 2 drugs appear to be associated with a similar incidence of similar types of adverse effects excluding cardiovascular and CNS toxicities which are lower with ropivacaine. In conclusion, ropivacaine is effective for pain relief during labour and in the postoperative period. Ropivacaine is associated with less cardiovascular and CNS toxicity than bupivacaine and provides a greater degree of dissociation between sensory and motor effects producing less intense motor blockade and more rapid recovery to full patient mobilisation.
...
PMID:Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery. 924 93
Antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely given for nonimplant, clean operations, although this view has recently been challenged. We have conducted a randomized multicenter, double-blind prospective trial to compare co-amoxiclav with placebo in 619 patients undergoing open groin
hernia
repair. Altogether 563 (91%) patients fulfilled the protocol; 283 received co-amoxiclav and 280 placebo. There was no difference between the groups in the number of patients receiving local or general anesthetic, the type of repair performed, the use of a subcutaneous fat suture, the type of skin closure used, the use of wound
analgesia
, or the use of a wound drain. Patients were given a card to return to the hospital in the event of their wound discharging or their needing to see their general practitioner. All patients were reviewed at approximately 6 weeks after operation. Fifty (8.9%) patients sustained a wound infection, 25 in the co-amoxiclav group and 25 in the placebo group. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis is of no benefit to patients undergoing open groin
hernia
repair.
...
PMID:Antibiotic prophylaxis and open groin hernia repair. 974 78
The results of 215 laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repairs are reported with a follow-up of 1-4 years (median 2.5 years). The patients" age range was 17-85 (median 59 years). Three recurrences occurred in the first 75 repairs, where a 12 x 7 cm mesh was used. There has been no recurrence in the subsequent 140 repairs where a larger 15 x 10 cm mesh was used for the repair. A total of 5% of patients developed urinary retention after the operation and a further 13% developed minor complications. The procedure was remarkably pain-free, with 25% requiring no
analgesia
after the operation and 67% requiring no
analgesia
after discharge from hospital. There was a rapid return to normal activity, with 55% driving within 1 week of the operation and 85% within 2 weeks. Sixty per cent returned to work within 2 weeks of the operation and 69% within 3 weeks. Forty-two of the patients had undergone a previous open
hernia
repair and 93% of these preferred the laparoscopic repair as there was less post-operative pain and a quicker recovery. The results show that laparoscopic
hernia
repair is remarkably pain-free, allows a rapid return to normal activity and has a low recurrence rate when a 15 x 10 cm mesh is used.
...
PMID:Prospective audit of 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with follow-up from 1 to 4 years. 956 Apr 99
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) requires similar scar size to traditional open repair. To perform LH with minimal access, finer instruments were used. A 5-mm laparoscope was inserted from the umbilicus, and surgical instruments were inserted through 5- and 3-mm trocars to perform LH by the transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Polyester mesh was placed over the
hernia
orifice and the peritoneum was closed with 3-0 silk sutures. Sixteen patients underwent smaller access LH and 24 had standard LH. Although smaller access LH took longer (105.7 versus 83.9 min), significantly fewer patients required
analgesia
after smaller access LH than after standard LH (12.5 versus 70.8%), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (4.6 versus 5.6 days). In addition, a better cosmetic outcome was obtained with smaller access LH. In conclusion, access was minimized by using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh, making LH less invasive and improving the cosmetic outcome.
...
PMID:Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh. 970 6
In a prospective randomized study in children, we compared caudal bupivacaine-clonidine with bupivacaine-morphine to evaluate whether clonidine can be used as an alternative to morphine in caudal anaesthesia. Caudal anaesthesia was administered in 36 children undergoing orchidopexy,
hernia
repair or circumcision, using 1.5 mL kg-1 bupivacaine 0.18% with either 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine (group 1) or 30 micrograms kg-1 morphine (group 2). Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, anaesthetic requirements, recovery time and pain score were monitored for 24 h. Eleven children in group 1 and nine children in group 2 did not need any supplementary systemic analgesics throughout the 24-h observation period. Mean (+/- SD) duration of
analgesia
in the remaining patients was 6.3 h (+/- 3.3 h) in group 1 and 7.1 h (+/- 3.4 h) in group 2 (P = 0.43). Recovery time after anaesthesia was significantly longer in group 1 (16.6 +/- 8.8 min) than in group 2 (11.5 +/- 4.7 min) (P < 0.05). We conclude that
analgesia
provided by 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine added to caudal bupivacaine is comparable with that provided by 30 micrograms kg-1 caudal morphine with bupivacaine. Clonidine at this low dose did not cause respiratory depression.
...
PMID:Comparison of clonidine 1 microgram kg-1 with morphine 30 micrograms kg-1 for post-operative caudal analgesia in children. 1008
Surgical treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia is controversial. This is a prospective study of 50 patients who had laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (n = 25) or Lichtenstein repair (n = 25) for recurrent inguinal hernia. The two groups of patients were comparable in age, sex and type of
hernia
. Post-operatively, a seroma or a wound haematoma developed in 12 patients after Lichtenstein repair and in 4 patients after laparoscopic repair (p < 0.05). On average,
analgesia
was taken for 6.4 days after Lichtenstein repair compared with 3.4 days after laparoscopic repair (p < 0.05). In our unit, laparoscopic repair was associated with fewer complications and a significantly shorter duration of post-operative
analgesia
than Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia.
...
PMID:Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit's experience. 1055 Sep 52
An analysis of prospectively collected data of 56 patients submitted to bilateral
hernia
repair is reported. Simultaneous repair was performed in 32 patients (Group S) while a sequential repair in 24 (Group D). Mean operating time was longer for the combination of two sequential repairs than for simultaneous repair (132 min +/- 8.9 vs 123 min +/- 11, p < 0.001). Mean hospital stay was similar in unilateral and bilateral repairs (18.0 hrs +/- 4 vs 21.2 hrs +/- 3.4, p = ns). Ther were no difference in complications between the two groups. Time taken to return to full activity was nearly double in the combination of two sequential repairs than in simultaneous repair (25 days, sd +/- 4 vs 16 days +/- 3, p < 0.001), while postoperative
analgesia
requirements were similar. The Authors conclude that bilateral simultaneous anterior tension free repair under local anesthesia is the treatment of choice in case of bilateral inguinal hernias.
...
PMID:[Anterior approach and simultaneous tension-free repair of bilateral inguinal hernia under local anesthesia]. 1055 13
Epidural
analgesia
(EA) was used in 29 patients undergoing surgical removal of lumbar discal
hernia
. Marcain EA with controlled medicinal sleep and non-assisted breathing allowed to perform the whole operation in 27 patients. EA may be ineffective in combination of sequestrated disk
hernia
with scarry adhesive process. The technique of the operation demands a single use of the anesthetic drug which is potent enough to make blockade throughout the operation up to the end.
...
PMID:[The characteristics of epidural analgesia during the removal of lumbar intervertebral disk hernias]. 1073 58
We have evaluated the intra- and postoperative analgesic efficacy of preservative-free S(+)-ketamine compared with bupivacaine for caudal block in paediatric
hernia
repair. After induction of general anaesthesia, 49 children undergoing
hernia
repair were given a caudal injection (0.75 ml kg-1) of S(+)-ketamine 0.5 mg kg-1 (group K1), S(+)-ketamine 1.0 mg kg-1 (group K2) or 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (group B). No additional analgesic drugs were required during operation in any of the groups. Haemodynamic and respiratory variables remained stable during the observation period. Mean duration of
analgesia
was significantly longer in groups B and K2 compared with group K1 (300 (SD 96) min and 273 (123) min vs 203 (117) min; P < 0.05). Groups B and K2 required less analgesics in the postoperative period compared with group K1 (30% and 33% vs 72%; P < 0.05). Postoperative sedation scores were comparable between the three groups. We conclude that S(+)-ketamine 1.0 mg kg-1 for caudal block in children produced surgical and postoperative
analgesia
equivalent to that of bupivacaine.
...
PMID:S(+)-ketamine for caudal block in paediatric anaesthesia. 1109 7
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>