Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0019204 (
hepatocellular carcinoma
)
71,386
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The PLHC-1 fish
hepatoma
cell line (Poeciliopsis lucida) was used in the neutral red assay to evaluate the acute cytotoxicities of direct-acting (alkylbenzenes, phthalate diesters, and pesticides) and metabolism-mediated (benzo[a]pyrene) toxicants. The sequence of cytotoxic potencies for the alkylbenzenes and phthalate diesters appeared to be a direct function of their hydrophobicity (as described by logarithmic octanol/water partition coefficients). The organochlorine pesticides (alachlor and p,p'-methoxychlor) were more cytotoxic than the organophosphorus pesticides (EPN, diazinon, and malathion). The PLHC-1 cell line apparently maintained sufficient
xenobiotic
-metabolizing capacity, as the
hepatoma
cells were able to metabolize benzo[a]pyrene to cytotoxic intermediates. Xenobiotic-metabolizing capacity was temperature dependent, with enzymatic activity increasing as the temperature was increased from 28 to 34 to 37 degrees C, was inducible by Aroclor 1254 (a chemical inducer of cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase activity), and was reduced by EPN (an inhibitor of P450 activity).
...
PMID:In vitro cytotoxicity studies with the fish hepatoma cell line, PLHC-1 (Poeciliopsis lucida). 186 89
The dioxin receptor is a gene regulatory protein which exhibits many structural and functional similarities to steroid hormone receptors. In this study we compare the subunit composition of two forms of the dioxin receptor, sedimenting at approximately 9S and approximately 6S respectively, which are present in nuclear extract from wild-type Hepa 1c1c7 mouse
hepatoma
cells following treatment in vivo with dioxin. The nuclear approximately 9S receptor form contained the 90 kd heat shock protein, hsp90. As assessed by a gel mobility shift assay, this receptor form did not bind to the
xenobiotic
response element (XRE) of the target gene cytochrome P-450 IA1. In contrast, the smaller approximately 6S receptor form did not contain any immunochemically detectable hsp90. Moreover, this receptor form specifically bound to the XRE recognition sequence. Thus, the specific DNA binding activity of the dioxin receptor was inhibited by association with hsp90, and the approximately 9S dioxin receptor species could be regarded as a nonactive receptor form. Neither the approximately 9S nor the approximately 6S receptor forms were detected in nuclear extract from a dioxin treated mutant clone of Hepa 1 that expresses a nuclear translocation deficient receptor phenotype. We conclude that activation of the dioxin receptor is, at least, a two step process involving binding of the ligand and dissociation of hsp90 from the ligand-binding receptor protein. Inhibition of the DNA binding activity of transcription factors by protein--protein interaction has also been described for several steroid hormone receptors and for the NF kappa B factor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:The specific DNA binding activity of the dioxin receptor is modulated by the 90 kd heat shock protein. 215 80
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) Ya subunit gene expression is induced in mammalian tissues by two types of chemical agents: (i) planar aromatic compounds (e.g., 3-methylcholanthrene, beta-naphthoflavone, and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p- dioxin) and (ii) electrophiles (e.g., trans-4-phenyl-3-buten-2-one and dimethyl fumarate) or compounds easily oxidized to electrophiles (e.g., tert-butylhydroquinone). To study the mechanism of this induction, we have introduced deletions in the 5' flanking region of a mouse GST Ya subunit gene, fused it to the coding sequence for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity, and transfected the Ya-CAT genes for expression into
hepatoma
cells. We show that a single cis-regulatory element, between nucleotides -754 and -713 from the start of transcription, is responsible for the induction by both planar aromatic and electrophilic compounds. Using murine
hepatoma
cell mutants defective in either the Ah-encoded aryl hydrocarbon receptor (BPrc1 mutant) or in cytochrome P1-450 gene (c1 mutant), we show that induction by planar aromatic but not by electrophilic inducers requires a functional Ah receptor and cytochrome P1-450 activity. From this it is concluded that Ya gene activation by planar aromatic compounds involves metabolism of these inducers by the phase I
xenobiotic
-metabolizing cytochrome P1-450 system into electrophilic compounds, which is consistent with a recently proposed model [Prochaska, H. J. & Talalay, P. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 4776-4782]. Therefore, the regulatory sequence of the Ya gene should be considered an electrophile-responsive element (EpRE) activated exclusively by inducers containing an electrophilic center. An EpRE-containing 41-bp oligonucleotide ligated at the -187 site of the Ya gene promoter confers upon it an increase in basal activity and
xenobiotic
inducibility. The basal activity augments with the number of EpRE copies. DNase I protection patterns show the protection of the EpRE domain by a nuclear factor(s) that becomes more abundant upon exposure of Hepa 1c1c7 cells to tert-butylhydroquinone.
...
PMID:Xenobiotic-inducible expression of murine glutathione S-transferase Ya subunit gene is controlled by an electrophile-responsive element. 216 52
Three nuclear factors, the Ah receptor, XF1, and XF2, bind sequence specifically to the Ah response elements or
xenobiotic
response elements (XREs) of the cytochrome P450IA1 (P450c) gene. The interactions of these factors with the Ah response element XRE1 were compared by three independent methods, methylation interference footprinting, orthophenanthroline-Cu+ footprinting, and mobility shift competition experiments, using a series of synthetic oligonucleotides with systematic alterations in the XRE core sequence. These studies established the following (i) all three factors interact sequence specifically with the core sequence of XRE1; (ii) the pattern of contacts made with this sequence by the Ah receptor are different from those made by XF1 and XF2; and (iii) although XF1 and XF2 can be distinguished by the mobility shift assay, the sequence specificities of their interactions with XRE1 are indistinguishable. Further characterization revealed the following additional differences among these three factors: (i) XF1 and XF2 could be extracted from nuclei under conditions quite different from those required for extraction of the Ah receptor; (ii) XF1 and XF2 were present in the nuclei of untreated cells and did not respond to polycyclic compounds, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and beta-napthoflavone, while nuclear Ah receptor was undetectable in untreated cells and rapidly increased in response to TCDD; (iii) inhibition of protein synthesis did not affect the TCDD-induced appearance of the Ah receptor but substantially decreased the constitutive activities of XF1 and XF2, suggesting that the Ah receptor must be present in untreated cells in an inactive form that can be rapidly activated by polycyclic compounds, while the constitutive expression of XF1 and XF2 depends on the continued synthesis of a relatively unstable protein; (iv) the receptor-deficient and nuclear translocation-defective mutants of the
hepatoma
cell line Hepa1, which are known to lack nuclear Ah receptor, expressed normal levels of XF1 and XF2, suggesting that the former factor is genetically distinct from the latter two; and (v) a divalent metal ion, probably Zn2+, is known to be an essential cofactor for the Ah receptor but was not required for the DNA-binding activities of XF1 and XF2. Together, these findings indicate that the Ah receptor is distinct from XF1 and XF2, while the latter two activities may be related. Because the DNA-binding domains of these three factors overlap substantially, their binding to XREs is probably mutually exclusive, which suggests that the interplay of these factors at Ah response elements may be important to the regulation of CYP1A1 gene transcription. The results of preliminary transfection experiments with constructs harboring XREs upstream of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene driven by a minimal simian virus 40 promoter are presented that are consistent with this hypothesis.
...
PMID:Multiple DNA-binding factors interact with overlapping specificities at the aryl hydrocarbon response element of the cytochrome P450IA1 gene. 217 7
A persuasive body of evidence indicates that substantial protection against chemical carcinogenesis can be achieved by induction of enzymes concerned with the metabolism of carcinogens. There are two classes of anticarcinogenic enzyme inducers: (a) monofunctional inducers (e.g., phenolic antioxidants, isothiocyanates, coumarins, thiocarbamates, cinnamates, 1,2-dithiol-3-thiones) that elevate Phase II enzymes (such as glutathione S-transferases, NAD(P)H:quinone reductase, UDP-glucuronosyl-transferases) in various tissues without significantly raising the Phase I enzyme, aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (cytochrome P1-450); and (b) bifunctional inducers (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, flavonoids, and azo dyes) that induce both Phase I and Phase II enzymes of
xenobiotic
metabolism. Induction of Phase II enzymes appears to be a sufficient condition for achieving chemoprotection, and since certain Phase I enzymes are responsible for activating carcinogens to their ultimate reactive forms, selective Phase II enzyme inducers offer intrinsically safer prospects for achieving chemoprotection. Whereas induction of both Phase I and II enzymes by bifunctional inducers depends on the Ah receptor, induction of Phase II enzymes by monofunctional inducers is independent of a functional Ah receptor. Studies on the structural requirements for induction of quinone reductase [NAD(P)H:(quinone acceptor) oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.99.2] by monofunctional inducers in Hepa 1c1c7 murine
hepatoma
cells have revealed that such inducers contain a distinctive chemical feature (or acquire this feature by metabolism) that regulates the synthesis of this protective enzyme. The inducers are all Michael reaction acceptors characterized by olefinic (or acetylenic) linkages that are rendered electrophilic by conjugation with electron-withdrawing groups. Typical examples are alpha, beta-unsaturated aldehydes, ketones (including quinones), thioketones, sulfones, esters, nitriles and nitro groups. The potency of these inducers parallels their reactivity as Michael acceptors. These generalizations have provided mechanistic insight into the vexing question of how so many seemingly unrelated anticarcinogens induce chemoprotective enzymes. They have also led to the prediction of entirely new and unsuspected structures of inducers, with potential for chemoprotective activity.
...
PMID:Mechanisms of induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis. 269 44
Nonoxidative alcohol metabolism to form fatty acid ethyl esters contributes to alcohol-related end-organ damage, and these products are formed by two synthase enzymes. We recently purified the major (pI 4.9) synthase from human myocardium. The N-terminal sequence (A P Y T V V Y F P V R G R X K A L R M L X A D) is greater than 73% identical with that of a neutral (pI 6.7) detoxification enzyme, glutathione transferase P from rat
hepatocellular carcinoma
(P P Y T I V Y F P V R G R C E A T R M L L A D). Moreover, both the major human fatty acid ethyl ester synthase and bovine liver glutathione transferase catalyze the formation of fatty acid ethyl esters (Vmax 105 and 98 nmol per hr per mg, respectively). In addition, both enzymes catalyze the formation of glutathione-
xenobiotic
conjugates (Vmax 67 and 335 mol per hr per mol of enzyme, respectively). Physiological concentrations of glutathione increase the rate of formation of fatty acid ethyl esters up to 5-fold, and the glutathione transferase substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene is a potent inhibitor of human myocardial fatty acid ethyl ester synthase. Thus, the identification of the major form of human myocardial fatty acid ethyl ester synthase as an acidic glutathione transferase links alcohol and
xenobiotic
metabolism and may relate the enhancement of tumorigenesis by alcohol abuse with carcinogen-conjugation reactions.
...
PMID:Metabolism of ethanol and carcinogens by glutathione transferases. 273 99
Human
hepatoma
which had been xenografted into nude mice have been estimated for their ability to catalyze glucuronic acid and glucose conjugation of endogenous compounds and p-nitrophenol. The
xenobiotic
p-nitrophenol was glucuronidated with a comparable rate in microsomes from human
hepatoma
, human liver and host liver. With regard to glucuronic acid or glucose conjugation of the endogenous compounds of bile acids, bilirubin and steroid hormones, glucosidation of bile acids was the only conjugation mechanism that was not decreased or deficient in microsomes from
hepatoma
, but showed about a 2-fold increase in reaction rate compared to normal human liver. Human
hepatoma
and host liver were shown to respond to phenobarbital treatment which led to about a 2-fold increase in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity toward bilirubin in
hepatoma
and in host liver. Compared to normal tissues, alterations in the pattern of glycoside conjugating enzymes were not only observed in microsomes from human
hepatoma
, but also in microsomes from human adenocarcinoma of the kidney, exhibiting negligible UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activities toward bile acids and steroid hormones. Bile acid glucoside formation was measurable in kidney adenocarcinoma with an activity which was similar to the activity observed in
hepatoma
. In comparison to normal renal tissue, glucose-conjugating activity toward bile acids decreased about 2-fold in kidney adenocarcinoma.
...
PMID:Glycoside conjugation in microsomes from hepatic and renal carcinoma of man. 282 Aug 59
The identification of biological "markers" indicating distinctively different functions between preneoplastic and neoplastic as compared with normal cells has been a subject of intensive investigation, especially as additional technology becomes available. Although no distinct single biochemical marker is ubiquitous to the process of neoplasia or even to a single histogenetic type of neoplasm, a variety of histogenetic types of neoplasms in the human and experimental animals exhibit an extreme degree of marker or phenotypic heterogeneity. Particularly well studied are markers which occurred during the process of hepatocarcinogenesis in the rodent as well as in its final product, the
hepatoma
. Although phenotypic heterogeneity is characteristic of hepatocellular carcinomas in both the rat and mouse, some degree of predominant marker pattern(s) has become apparent. In multistage hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat a frequent but not completely ubiquitous marker is the enzyme gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. In the mouse, although such markers have not been as extensively studied as in the rat, glucose 6-phosphatase is a predominant but not exclusive histochemical marker. Many preneoplastic lesions occurring during the stage of promotion exhibit reduced levels of enzymes of oxidative
xenobiotic
metabolism, but this pattern is not ubiquitous. Studies on the transcription of specific genes in mouse liver as well as preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in this tissue further demonstrate the phenotypic heterogeneity characteristic of differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas. In general, current evidence supports the two theses that no single biologic marker or set of markers is uniquely characteristic of the preneoplastical and/or neoplastic phenotype and marker or phenotypic heterogeneity is by far the rule rather than the exception in hepatocarcinogenesis in the rodent and quite possibly in all histogenetic types of neoplasms in mammals.
...
PMID:Biological markers characterizing the development of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in rodent liver. 288 60
Monoamine oxidases (MAO; EC 1.4.3.4.) A and B occur in the outer mitochondrial membrane and oxidize a number of important biogenic and
xenobiotic
amines. Monoclonal antibodies specific for human MAO A or B and immunocytochemical techniques were used to visualize the respective enzymes in human placenta, platelets, lymphocytes, liver, brain, and a human
hepatoma
cell line. MAO A was observed in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of term placenta, liver, and a subset of neurons in brain, but was not observed in platelets or lymphocytes, which are known to lack type A enzyme. MAO B was observed in platelets, lymphocytes, and liver, but not in placenta, which contains little or no MAO B. MAO B was also observed in a subset of neurons in the brain that was distinct from that which contained MAO A. MAO A and MAO B were also observed in some glia. Unlike most tissues examined, liver cells appeared to contain both forms of the enzyme. These studies show that MAO A and MAO B can be specifically visualized by immunocytochemical means in a variety of human cells and tissues and can provide a graphic demonstration of the high degree of cell specificity of expression of the two forms of the enzyme.
...
PMID:Immunocytochemical localization of monoamine oxidases A and B in human peripheral tissues and brain. 302 89
The potential of fibrate drugs to induce peroxisomal proliferation in human liver cells was evaluated in athymic nude mice transplanted with human
hepatoma
cells and treated by clofibrate in vivo as well as in cultured human
hepatoma
cells in the presence of fibrate drugs added to the culture medium. Clofibrate did not induce peroxisomal activities and neither acted as a peroxisomal proliferator in human PLC/PRF/5 or SK-HEP-1 heterotransplants under conditions of induction of peroxisomal activities in the host rodent liver. Similarly, clofibric acid or bezafibrate did not induce peroxisomal activities in cultured human PLC/PRF/5 or SK-HEP-1 cells under conditions of induction of peroxisomal activities in cultured primary rat liver cells. The lack of response of the human cells to peroxisomal proliferators of the fibrate type may indicate a species specificity with respect to induction of peroxisomal activities by
xenobiotic
peroxisomal proliferators.
...
PMID:Clofibrate does not induce peroxisomal proliferation in human hepatoma cell lines PLC/PRF/5 and SK-HEP-1. 303 May 38
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>