Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019163 (hepatitis B)
 38,309 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In December 2001, all U.S. chronic hemodialysis (HD) centers were surveyed regarding selected patient care practices and dialysis-associated diseases. The results were compared with similar surveys conducted in previous years. During 1997-2001, the percentage of patients vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection increased from 47% to 60% and the percentage of staff vaccinated increased from 87% to 89%. In 2001, an estimated 65% of patients had been vaccinated for influenza and 26% for pneumococcal pneumonia. In 2001, routine testing for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was performed on staff at 42% of centers and on patients at 62% of centers; anti-HCV was found in 1.5% of staff and 8.6% of patients. In 2001, the incidence of HBV infection was higher among patients in centers where injectable medications were prepared at the dialysis station, and both HCV prevalence and incidence were higher among patients in centers where injectable medications were prepared at the dialysis station compared to a dedicated medication room. During 1995-2001, the percentage of patients who received dialysis through central catheters increased from 13% to 25%; this trend is worrisome, as infections and antimicrobial use are higher among patients receiving dialysis through catheters. However, during the same period, the percentage of patients receiving dialysis through fistulas increased from 22% to 30%. In 2001, 25% of catheters were used for new patients awaiting an arteriovenous (AV) access, 28% for established patients with a failed access awaiting new AV access, 40% as an access of last resort, and 6% for other reasons, including patient preference. The percentage of centers reporting one or more patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) increased from 12% in 1995 to 31% in 2001.
Semin Dial
PMID:National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2001. 1525 Sep 25

In December 2002, all U.S. chronic hemodialysis centers were surveyed regarding selected patient care practices and dialysis-associated diseases. The results were compared with similar surveys conducted in previous years. In 2002, 85% of hemodialysis centers were free-standing and 81% operated for profit; the proportion of centers operating for profit has increased each year since 1985. During 1995-2002, the percentage of patients who received dialysis through central catheters increased from 13% to 26%; this trend is worrisome, as infections and antimicrobial use are higher among patients receiving dialysis through catheters. However, during the same period, the percentage of patients receiving dialysis through fistulas increased from 22% to 33%. The percentage of centers reporting one or more patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) increased from 12% in 1995 to 30% in 2002. During 1997-2002, the percentage of patients vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection increased from 47% to 56% and the percentage of staff vaccinated increased from 87% to 90%. In 2002, routine testing for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was performed on patients at 64% of centers; anti-HCV was found in 7.8% of patients. In 2001, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Centers were surveyed regarding their awareness of the recommendations and about a variety of infection control practices. In general, the incidence of HBV and HCV was not substantially different for the infection control practices evaluated, including where staff obtain clean supplies for patient treatment, reuse of unused and unopened supplies, and practices for changing external transducer filters/protectors. However, in 2002, the incidence of HBV infection was higher among patients in centers where injectable medications were prepared on a medication cart or medication area located in the treatment area compared to a dedicated medication room. Also, those centers that used a disposable container versus a nondisposable container for priming the dialyzer had a significantly lower incidence of HCV.
Semin Dial
PMID:National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2002. 1566 66

The total number of end-stage renal disease patients treated by renal replacement therapy increased from 1584 on 31 December 2002 to 1661 on 31 December 2003 (4.9% increase). Of these patients, 70.5% were treated by hemodialysis, 7.0% by peritoneal dialysis and 22.5% had a functioning renal graft. The patients were treated at 18 dialysis centers and one transplant center. The number of prevalent patients treated by renal replacement therapy per million of the population (p.m.p.) was 846 at the end of 2003. The number of incident (new) patients in 2003 was 131 p.m.p. The gross mortality rate of dialysis patients was stable through the years of the study and reached 11.8% in 2003. 57.6% of new patients starting hemodialysis were > or = 65 years old and 23.2% were diabetics. Epoetin therapy was prescribed to 89.8% of dialysis patients. The number of patients positive for hepatitis B or hepatitis C viruses is stable and low (3.1% of all dialysis patients).
Ther Apher Dial 2005 Jun
PMID:Renal replacement therapy in Slovenia: 2003 annual report. 1596 87

As there is a high risk of indirect and direct transmission of infectious agents in chronic hemodialysis, infection control procedures should be established in dialysis units. This paper presents the findings of a questionnaire designed to survey the current status of infection control procedures in hemodialysis settings. Two hundred and forty-three hemodialysis units in Japan were surveyed. Nearly 90% of hemodialysis units reported compliance with each procedure recommended by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, including use of disposable gloves, handling of non-disposable or non-single-use items, and routine serological testing of blood-borne viruses. However, more than 50% of units reported that they did not comply with recommendations concerning some procedures, such as places for preparing medications and their delivery, clean areas in the units, vaccination for hepatitis B, and additional measures for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs-Ag) positive patients. Especially, the concept of universal precautions seemed to be misunderstood in units with a high prevalence of anti-hepatitis C antibody-positive (anti-HCV Ab-positive) patients. In conclusion, further intensive education and training will be necessary to establish infection control procedures.
Ther Apher Dial 2006 Feb
PMID:Surveillance of infection control procedures in dialysis units in Japan: a preliminary study. 1655 41

The percentage of patients infected with blood-borne diseases, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, is high in patients undergoing hemodialysis regularly. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is transmitted via the fecal-oral route, and blood-borne HEV infection has also been reported recently. On the basis of these findings, we investigated the actual status of HEV infection in regular hemodialysis patients. Out of 1077 patients undergoing hemodialysis at two key hospitals and three outpatient hemodialysis clinics, 300 were randomly selected as the subjects. Among these 300 hemodialysis patients, 19.0% were IgG-type anti-HEV antibody-positive. The percentage of HEV-infected patients increased with patient age and it was particularly high in patients 40 years of age or older. The percent IgG-type anti-HEV antibody positivity was not significantly different (P = 0.14) between anti-HCV antibody-positive patients (27.8%) and anti-HCV antibody-negative patients (17.8%). The percentage of HEV-infected patients among the hemodialysis patients was higher than that previously reported among patients with healthy kidneys. No correlation was observed between the percentage of HEV-infected patients and HCV infection incidence or a history of blood transfusion. The percent IgG-type anti-HEV antibody positivities were significantly different among the facilities. It was impossible to specify the route of infection, and the correlation between the incidence of infection and hemodialysis therapy was not clear. Because more routes of infection are possible for patients undergoing dialysis than for persons with normal kidney function, it seems necessary to analyze the significance of infection incidence, the route of infection and infection prevention measures.
Ther Apher Dial 2006 Apr
PMID:Prevalence of hepatitis E virus infection in regular hemodialysis patients. 1668 23

Patients treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) are considered to be at higher risk for infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Immunoprophylaxis is therefore deemed a standard of care. Active immunization in RRT patients leads to a lower incidence of protective titers of HBV antibodies (HBAbs) than the titers seen in healthy counterparts. Our hypothesis is that, for complex reasons, active immunization is more effective in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) than in patients on hemodialysis (HD), and that the effectiveness of immunization depends on dialysis adequacy (Kt/V). We carried out a prospective multicenter study with an enrollment period that ran from January 1998 to December 2004. Follow-up data were analyzed as of August 2004. Inclusion criteria were an age of 18 years or older and newly indicated RRT Exclusion criteria were a history of HBV or the presence of either HBV antigen (HBAg) or HBAbs in the protective range. The choice of RRT modality (HD or PD) was based on patient preference (preceded by thorough counseling). Active immunization followed accepted guidelines for RRT patients and began after clinical and laboratory steady state had been achieved. The endpoints were the number of patients with a protective HBAb titer and the number with newly diagnosed hepatitis B. In PD patients, we calculated Kt/V on regular basis. We enrolled 211 patients, 171 of whom chose HD treatment, and 40 of whom chose PD. Positive response to immunization (defined as a serum level of HBAbs above 10 mIU/mL) was achieved in 58 HD patients (34%) and 21 PD patients (53%, p = 0.03). In subgroup of PD patients with a weekly Kt/Vgreater than 1.7 (n=28), the response rate rose to 71%--as compared with just 8% in patients with a weekly Kt/V below 1.7 (p = 0.0003). In the PD cohort as a whole, the level of HBAbs correlated with Kt/V No new cases of hepatitis B or HBAg positivity occurred in either group. From the viewpoint of successful HBV immunoprophylaxis in RRT patients, PD is the better modality choice. In PD patients, the success rate of immunoprophylaxis depends on weekly Kt/V, which we propose should be 1.7 or higher
Adv Perit Dial 2005
PMID:Peritoneal dialysis is the better therapy choice for successful anti-hepatitis B vaccination. 1668 8

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a blood-borne virus. Some present data demonstrate an occupational risk of HGV infection in medical staff of dialysis units. The aim of this investigation was to assess the prevalence of HGV exposure in dialysis staff. This study was performed in a main dialysis unit in Iran. In 27 dialysis staff, HGV exposure was detected serologically by the presence of anti HGV envelope protein E2 (anti-E2) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and compared with 77 hemodialysis (HD) and 13 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. All of them were also screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV). A low prevalence of HGV exposure was found in the dialysis staff (0%), which nearly corresponded to the prevalence of the dialysis patients (HD 3.89%, CAPD 0%). The prevalence of anti-HCV and anti-HBs in staff was 37.03% and 33.33%, respectively, which was higher than HGV anti-E2. The prevalence of HGV exposure was low in dialysis staff in our study, and was near to the prevalence of HGV exposure in dialysis patients. Therefore, it can be concluded that the occupational risk for HGV exposure in our investigation was minimal.
Ther Apher Dial 2007 Oct
PMID:Hepatitis G virus exposure in dialysis staff. 1784 96

Chronic hepatitis B or C can cause severe liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both viral infections together especially hepatitis c virus infection (HCV) are the mayor indication for liver transplantation in Western Europe and the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HCV infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) plays a key role for the outcome after liver transplantation concerning patient and graft survival rates. Allograft dysfunctions, cirrhosis of the allograft and graft failure are major complications after recurrent viral hepatitis. The survival after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease changed dramatically during the last two decades with results today comparable with non-HBV-related liver transplantations. Availability of immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) as well as nucleoside/nucleotide analogues like lamivudine or adefovir in the pre- and post-transplant setting conferred to significant better results due to an efficient prophylaxis and the possibility of therapy of HBV reinfection of the allograft. New drugs such as entecavir, tenofovir and telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infections may offer even more opportunities in the transplant setting. In contrast, despite recent achievements in the treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferons and ribavirin, patients with HCV cirrhosis or after liver transplantation are difficult to treat. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in prophylactic and therapeutic approaches of HCV reinfection after OLT are only low compared to the pre-cirrhotic HCV infection. Moreover, best treatment duration and dosage of recurrent HCV infection with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin remains to be defined.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007 Sep
PMID:Prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation. 1789 Feb 61

This paper describes the recruitment and participation of Pacific people in a large hepatitis B screening programme undertaken in Auckland, New Zealand between April 2000 and December 2002. Thirty three percent (32,700) of the adult Pacific population was screened, with coverage highest among the Tongan community (50%) largely though the efforts of two active ethnic specific Pacific and non-Pacific providers using combinations of language-targeted promotion, outreach visits and opportunistic recruitment at general practice visits. Important differences were found in recruitment methods and patterns between Pacific populations and for different age groups. These findings suggest that funders, planners and providers of health programmes need to respond to the diversity within Pacific communities, and understand the importance of ethnic-specific providers when mobilising large numbers of people for population health interventions.
Pac Health Dialog 2006 Sep
PMID:Mobilising Pacific people for health: insights from a hepatitis B screening programme in Auckland, New Zealand. 1818 85

Although the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccines in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment has been documented, the persistence of immunity in this population remains largely unknown. In this study we evaluated the persistence of hepatitis B vaccine immunity in HD patients. We followed 37 hepatitis B vaccinated HD patients (following a four-dose vaccination schedule of 40 mug injections intramuscularly in the deltoid muscle at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months) for up to one year to evaluate the persistence of immunity (as indicated by serum levels of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) equal to or higher than 10 IU/L). One year after vaccination, 18.9% of patients had lost their anti-HBs (transient responders), while 81.1% still had detectable antibodies in the serum (persistent responders). From 81.1% of persistent responders 11.5% and 88.5% were weak and high responders, respectively. There was no significant difference between persistent and transient responders regarding age, sex, or nutritional factors. We did not find any factors that related to maintaining protective levels of anti-HBs in HD patients. It seems that an antibody titer above 100 IU/L following vaccination is necessary in order to maintain that level of antibody one year later.
Ther Apher Dial 2008 Apr
PMID:Persistence of hepatitis B vaccine immunity in hemodialysis patients. 1838 63


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>