Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0019163 (hepatitis B)
 38,309 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Lack of information regarding the presence of native albumin polymer in serum and its structural similarity to the one produced by glutaraldehyde treatment casts doubt on the postulate that hepatitis B virus attachment to hepatocytes is mediated through polymerized albumin. We used a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with murine monoclonal antibodies raised against glutaraldehyde-polymerized albumin to detect native albumin polymer in human serum and its cross-reactivity with other albumin polymers. Presence of polymerized albumin receptor on the HepG2 cell was studied by radioreceptor assay. Purified hepatitis B virus and synthetic peptide analogous to part of pre-S2 sequence (120-145) were used to study polymerized albumin-dependent attachment of the virus to HepG2 cells. Antibodies raised against pre-S2 peptide were used to inhibit the pre-S2 and hepatitis B virus attachment to HepG2 cells. Glutaraldehyde-treated polymerized albumin was found to be immunologically cross-reactive with native albumin polymer. Its levels were found to be significantly raised in sera of patients with liver diseases. Polymerized albumin has specific saturable receptor on HepG2 cells with two classes of binding sites of different equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd1 = (16 +/- 9.6)pmol/L and Kd2 = (1,019 +/- 172)pmol/L. Albumin monomer was unable to compete for the polymerized albumin receptor sites on HepG2 cells. Anti-pre-S2 antibodies inhibit hepatitis B virus and pre-S2 binding to hepatocyte by 40% and 70%, respectively. Added extraneous polymerized albumin and the antibody against it did not interfere with virus attachment to HepG2 cells.
 ...
PMID:Significance of natural polymerized albumin and its receptor in hepatitis B infection of hepatocytes. 184 42

Patients undergoing endoscopy are at risk of infection from the use of contaminated equipment. Dangers arise from the transmission of organisms from one patient to another and from the introduction of opportunist organisms which colonize endoscopic equipment on storage and can lead to sepsis and death in those who are immunocompromised and at ERCP. Staff are in danger from needle-stick injury and sensitivity to aldehyde disinfectants. These risks can be eliminated by careful attention to disinfection techniques. The most important part of endoscope disinfection is thorough mechanical cleaning first, followed by 5-10 min total immersion of the instrument and all channels in 2% glutaraldehyde (or the equivalent). At the end of the endoscopy list, following the disinfection protocol, all equipment should be dried internally and externally prior to storage. Staff must be fully aware of the risks of infection in endoscopy, be protected from hepatitis B by vaccination, and be fully trained in disinfection techniques. Glutaraldehyde should be used only in closed systems or in well-ventilated areas with the operator protected from direct contact from splashing and fumes. Institutions should designate an individual to be responsible for preparing, monitoring and overseeing disinfection procedures within the endoscopy room and for ensuring that regular microbiological testing of equipment (including automatic disinfecting machines) is undertaken.
 ...
PMID:Disinfection of endoscopic equipment. 190 62

Hepatitis B virus binds avidly to albumin polymers, which in turn may mediate viral attachment to liver cells. This hypothesis is critically dependent on prior results obtained using glutaraldehyde-polymerized human serum albumin as a model for naturally occurring albumin species. We used the perfused rat liver to characterize the uptake, cellular distribution, and metabolism of glutaraldehyde-polymerized human albumin. 125I-glutaraldehyde-polymerized human albumin was efficiently removed from the perfusate by the liver (29% extraction). However, few autoradiographic grains were located over hepatic parenchymal cells (6%). Instead, most glutaraldehyde-polymerized human albumin appeared to be removed by endothelial (59%) or Kupffer (31%) cells. Hepatic uptake was strongly inhibited by formaldehyde-treated monomeric albumin, a known ligand of the endothelial scavenger receptor for chemically modified proteins. After uptake, most glutaraldehyde-polymerized human albumin was rapidly degraded and released into the perfusate (74% within 60 min). This process was blocked by chloroquine and leupeptin, suggesting that it involves lysosomal acid hydrolases. We conclude that glutaraldehyde-polymerized albumin is efficiently cleared and degraded by the endothelial scavenger pathway. Glutaraldehyde-polymerized albumin therefore appears to be a poor model for predicting the hepatic handling of naturally occurring albumin species bound to hepatitis B virions. Even if viral particles were to follow this pathway, few would enter parenchymal hepatocytes.
 ...
PMID:Uptake and metabolism of polymerized albumin by rat liver. Role of the scavenger receptor. 282 84

The hepatitis B virus binds avidly to albumin polymers which in turn may mediate the initial binding of viral particles to the liver cell. However, the interaction of albumin polymers with the liver remains poorly characterized, and the possibility that hepatic binding reflects an artifact of polymerization with glutaraldehyde has not been excluded. We therefore characterized the binding of 125I-labeled natural and synthetic albumin polymers to suspensions of rat hepatocytes. Saturable binding was demonstrated for all preparations of monomeric and polymeric albumin studied. Glutaraldehyde-polymerized albumin (mean polymerization number = 15) bound much more avidly than naturally occurring albumin polymers (mostly dimers and trimers) or monomeric albumin. Competition between monomer and synthetic polymer was not observed. Reduction of free aldehyde groups on the synthetic polymer decreased nonsaturable binding without affecting saturable binding. Autoradiography confirmed binding of polyalbumin to hepatic parenchymal cells. Glutaraldehyde-polymerized ovalbumin, a protein unrelated to serum albumin, also bound hepatocytes saturably. We conclude that hepatic binding of synthetic albumin polymers is not due to residual aldehyde groups on the polymer and is much more avid than for natural polymer. This difference may reflect the higher degree of polymerization or chemical modification of the synthetic polymer. The hepatic binding sites for synthetic polymer appear distinct from those previously described for monomeric albumin and may not be specific for albumin.
 ...
PMID:Interaction of natural and synthetic albumin polymers with hepatocytes. 303 Sep 17

A variety of albumin polymers were prepared and tested for binding with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg): synthetic polymers cross-linked by either glutaraldehyde or carbodiimide; heat-aggregated polymers made by heating albumin solutions at 60 degrees C for 10 h with or without albumin stabilizer; and polymers isolated from fresh or long-stored commercial therapeutic albumin solutions. A sensitive solid-phase, competitive-inhibition radioimmunoassay, which can detect as little as 10 ng of glutaraldehyde-cross-linked human albumin polymer (PHALB-G), was developed and used to measure binding. The binding of PHALB-G with HBsAg was 150- to 1,000-fold greater than that of any other albumin polymer. Glutaraldehyde-cross-linked bovine albumin polymer showed no binding. Albumin monomer and dimer fractions produced by glutaraldehyde treatment exhibited some binding, albeit much weaker than PHALB-G. As measured by a direct-binding assay with solid-phase PHALB-G, the attachment of HBsAg particles from sera positive for antibody to the e antigen was less efficient than that from sera positive for e antigen, even when all sera were tested at equal HBsAg concentrations. In protein blot experiments with radiolabeled albumin preparations, PHALB-G bound almost exclusively to HBsAg polypeptide P31 and showed no binding with the major polypeptides P23 and P26. None of the other radiolabeled albumin polymers was reactive. These results indicate that the interaction between PHALB-G and HBsAg is not due to polymerization of albumin per se, but rather is unique and site specific.
 ...
PMID:Interaction between various polymerized human albumins and hepatitis B surface antigen. 402 Sep 64

Peptides synthesized for potential application as antiviral vaccines have been mostly tested in the form of conjugates with carrier proteins. The possible use of several distinct synthetic vaccines in prophylaxis would be facilitated by the availability of fully synthetic immunogens. A synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 135 to 155 ( P135 -155) of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) failed to elicit in free form anti-peptide antibodies or anti-HBs. However, polymers of P135 -155 (prepared by linking to diaminoalkanes ) and synthetic conjugates prepared by binding P135 -155 to liposomes or polylysine were immunogenic. A poor correlation was observed between anti-peptide and anti-HBs responses elicited by these conjugates. Glutaraldehyde-fixed liposomes appeared to be the carriers of choice for inducing anti-HBs.
 ...
PMID:Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) elicited by immunization with a synthetic peptide covalently linked to liposomes. 620 27

The potential of alkaline 2% glutaraldehyde solutions, with and without surface active agents, to alter the antigenicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) was analyzed and compared to the antigenic alternation capacities of 0.525% sodium hypochlorite and 2.02% formaldehyde solutions. After treatment of a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive plasma at room temperature for 10 min, there was a 51-67% reduction in surface antigen level and a 90-94% decrease in hepatitis B core antigenicity. Glutaraldehyde is proposed as an alternative to the more noxious hypochlorite and formaldehyde solutions for disinfection of HBV-contaminated articles.
 ...
PMID:Effect of alkaline glutaraldehyde on hepatitis B virus antigens. 641 9

Radioimmune assay (RIA) was used to investigate the effect of fixatives on antigenicity of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and the effect of pronase on the elution of antibody (Ab) from the HBsAG-Ab complex. The effect of pronase on Ab elution was also tested on sections of kidney from a patient with the immune complex disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) was located in pronase treated and untreated sections using the indirect immunoperoxidase technique. Glutaraldehyde was shown to be the fixative of choice for studies involving HbsAG. All fixatives were shown to have less effect on antigenicity at 4 degrees C than at room temperature. Osmium tetroxide reduced antigenicity to one-third, even at 4 degrees C. RIA and SLE kidney section studies showed that Ab was eluted from immune complexes by pronase. Pre-fixation of the antigen (Ag) by glutaraldehyde appears to have no effect on the final elution, although fixation after pronase treatment seemed to enhance the elution effects. The availability of an RIA kit with HBsAg- and AB-coated beads was of great assistance in evaluating reagents to be used in immunoperoxidase studies of HBsAg in immune complexes of patients with membranous nephropathy and Australia antigenaemia.
 ...
PMID:The use of radioimmune assay in investigating reagents to be used in the immunocytochemical localization of hepatitis B surface antigen in immune complexes in the kidney of patients with membranous nephropathy and Australia antigenaemia. 641 96

Glutaraldehyde is a potent sterilizing agent with a very broad-spectrum of biocidal activity including Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, spores and viruses such as HBV and HIV (the aetiological agents responsible for hepatitis B and AIDS, respectively). The aim of this study was to evaluate, in experimental conditions simulating the operative risk in dental practice, a 2% potentiated acid glutaraldehyde-based product (DIBA-GLAXO) not only in the disinfection and sterilization of the water circuits of dental units, but also with regard to physico-chemical compatibility, as well as from the toxicological viewpoint. DIBA, in the dental unit disinfection cycle, proved capable of destroying the bacterial cultures of all 16 pathogens used to contaminate artificially the water circuits of the unit handpieces. When the contamination was produced using bacterial spores, 5 hours of contact were sufficient to obtain sterility. The residual concentrations of glutaraldehyde in the circuit washing water, after optimization of the washing process, may be regarded as safe for the patient. Lastly, the product analysed was found to be compatible with the mechanical components of dental unit water circuits. No corrosion phenomena were observed even after total immersion in DIBA for a period equivalent to approximately 20,000 disinfection cycles.
 ...
PMID:Disinfection and sterilization in dentistry. Use of potentiated glutaraldehyde (DIBA-GLAXO) in the water systems of dentistry units: analysis of microbiological activity, physico-chemical compatibility and residues in washing water. 1014 90

(1) Infections following invasive endoscopy are rare and are usually of endogenous origin. Nevertheless, infections do occur due to inadequate cleaning and disinfection and the use of contaminated rinse water and processing equipment. (2) Rigid and flexible operative endoscopes and accessories should be thoroughly cleaned and preferably sterilized using properly validated processes. (3) Heat tolerant operative endoscopes and accessories should be sterilized using a vacuum assisted steam sterilizer. Use autoclavable instrument trays or containers to protect equipment during transit and processing. Small bench top sterilizers without vacuum assisted air removal are unsuitable for packaged and lumened devices. (4) Heat sensitive rigid and flexible endoscopes and accessories should preferably be sterilized using ethylene oxide, low temperature steam and formaldehyde (rigid only) or gas plasma (if appropriate). (5) If there are insufficient instruments or time to sterilize invasive endoscopes, or if no suitable method is available locally, they may be disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde or a suitable alternative. An immersion time of at least 10 min should be adopted for glutaraldehyde. This is sufficient to inactivate most vegetative bacteria and viruses including HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Longer contact times of 20 min or more may be necessary if a mycobacterial infection is known or suspected. At least 3 h immersion in glutaraldehyde is required to kill spores. (6) Glutaraldehyde is irritant and sensitizing to the skin, eyes and respiratory tract. Measures must be taken to ensure glutaraldehyde is used in a safe manner, i.e., total containment and/or extraction of harmful vapour and the provision of suitable personal protective equipment, i.e., gloves, apron and eye protection if splashing could occur. Health surveillance of staff is recommended and should include a pre-employment enquiry regarding asthma, skin and mucosal sensitivity problems and lung function testing by spirometry. (7) Possible alternative disinfectants to glutaraldehyde include peracetic acid (0.2-0.35%), chlorine dioxide (700-1100 ppm) and superoxidized water. These are very effective, killing vegetative bacteria, including mycobacteria, and viruses in 5 min and bacterial spores in 10 min. An endorsement of compatibility with endoscopes, accessories and processing equipment is required from both the solution/device manufacturer and the endoscope manufacturer. Other important considerations are stability, cost and safety from the user and environmental standpoints. (8) Cleaning and disinfection or sterilization should be undertaken by trained staff in a dedicated area, e.g., SSD or TSSU. A suitable training programme is described. (9) If endoscopes are processed by immersion in disinfectants, harmful residues must be removed by thorough rinsing. Sterile or bacteria free water is essential for rinsing all invasive endoscopes and accessories to prevent recontamination. (10) If an automated washer disinfector is used it must be effective, non-damaging, reliable, easy to use and its performance regularly monitored. (11) If used, washer disinfectors and other processing equipment should be disinfected on a regular basis, i.e., between patients or at the start of each session. This will prevent biofilm formation and recontamination of instruments during rinsing. Disinfection should include the water treatment system, if present. (12) To comply with the Medical Devices Directive, manufacturers are obliged to provide full details on how to decontaminate the reusable devices they supply. This should include details of compatibility with heat, pressure, moisture, processing chemicals and ultrasonics. (13) The Infection Control Team should always be involved in the formulation and implementation of decontamination policies. Wherever possible, the national good practice guidelines produced by the Medical Devices Agency and/or professional societies shoul
 ...
PMID:Decontamination of minimally invasive surgical endoscopes and accessories. 1143 15


1 2 Next >>