Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018801 (heart failure)
 72,216 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

National and international societies have issued guidelines on the management of heart failure: The European Society of Cardiology, WHO, ACC/AHA Task Force Report, US Department of Health and Human Services, German Society of Cardiology. The therapeutic approaches to heart failure have undergone considerable changes during the last few years. The guidelines have to be updated almost yearly due to new results from prospective randomized studies. Although an agreement could be reached with respect to general measures and drug treatment, no agreement on mechanical devices, pacemakers and surgical interventions has been reached. The basis for medical treatment of chronic heart failure depends on diuretics, digitalis, ACE inhibitors, and beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists and other positive inotropic drugs, other than digitalis, should be avoided as far as possible. Thiazides, loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists are needed for acute and chronic treatment of heart failure, alone or in combination (diuretic resistant heart failure!). Digitalis glycosides are needed in patients with atrial fibrillation with a fast ventricular rate or atrial flutter and in patients with systolic dysfunction, large hearts and symptomatic failure class NYHA III and IV. However, digitalis does not convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Today there is no question that ACE inhibitors improve the prognosis of all patients with heart failure in all stages, if ejection fraction is reduced. Therefore, most patients after myocardial infarction or after having experienced pump failure due to myocarditis or cardiomyopathy are treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. The beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors seem to be most pronounced the worse the situation is. Relative risk reductions (mortality!) between 10% and 40% have been published depending on the severity of symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Those patients with high absolute risk have more to gain than those with low risk for any given "risk reduction", of course. Recent studies also indicate that most high risk cardiac patients profit from ACE inhibitors even if pump function is normal (i.e., patients with coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebral vascular disease, hypertension) (15). AT1 antagonists can substitute for ACE inhibitors, if the latter are not tolerated due to cough. Up to now, beta-blocking agents apart from diuretics seem to be the best investigated drugs in heart failure. Large controlled studies with bisoprolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in addition to diuretics, digitalis and ACE inhibitors convincingly yielded positive results in chronic left ventricular failure patients. Reduction of mortality by 35% and even of sudden cardiac deaths by 40% have been proven beyond doubt. Thus, heart failure patients today should also receive beta-blocking agents in all stages of the disease. In the era of controlled prospective studies (evidence-based medicine), physicians are well advised to use only drugs that have been proven beneficial in large controlled studies.
 ...
PMID:The management of heart failure--an overview. 1119 49

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult are summarized in detail. According to statements of these Guidelines most patients with chronic heart failure as a rule should receive combination of representatives of 4 different drug classes - diuretic, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, beta-adrenoblocker and usually digoxin. Special indications have been formulated for inclusion in complex therapy of aldosterone receptor blockers (first of all spironolactone), angiotensin1 receptor blockers and direct vasodilators (hydralazine, isosorbide dinitrate).
 ...
PMID:[Contemporary approaches to diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure (summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines)]. 1249 35

A review of the most important topics published during 2001 is presented. The Writing Committee of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association decided to take a new approach to the classification of heart failure that emphasizes both the evolution and the progression of the disease, using potential risk factors and structural disorders as criteria to identify the severity of a heart failure syndrome. Similarly, an ACC/AHA Clinical Competence Statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiography was published with a special emphasis on the computer interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Since various drugs were shown to induce electrocardiographic abnormalities as e.g. QT prolongation associated with ventricular tachycardias, the FDA decided to introduce higher regulatory requirements on the cardiac safety of novel drugs. In cardiovascular surgery Octopus off-pump bypass was demonstrated to be a safe procedure for carefully selected patients with multivessel coronary heart disease. Because of the extensive progress made in cardiovascular surgery, the management of severe heart failure has to be improved and early effective preventive measures have to be introduced to reduce the risk of intractable heart failure. The "New guidelines for evaluating acute coronary syndrome" stress the importance of early identifying and early treatment, including invasive strategy as PTCA with stenting.
 ...
PMID:[Cardiology 2001]. 1250 6

A review of the revised ACC/AHA heart failure guidelines.
 ...
PMID:What makes the new heart failure guidelines tick? Serving as an adjunct to the NYHA's classification, the ACC/AHA system assesses objective signs of heart disease. 1257 83

The aim of this study was to evaluate ventricular arrhythmias occurring in recipients of the InSync ICD for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden death. The InSync ICD was implanted in 142 patients (128 men; mean age 65 +/- 10 years) with heart failure (mean NYHA functional Class 3.0 +/- 0.7) and wide QRS (mean 159 +/- 33 ms). The underlying etiology was ischemic in 55%, idiopathic in 33%, and valvular or hypertensive cardiomyopathy in 12% of patients. The numbers of arrhythmic episodes/100 patient-months was computed with their 95% CI, assuming a Poisson distribution. Implants were performed in 48 (34%) patients who did not have an ACC/AHA guidelines Class I indication for ICD therapy. A total of 104 patients were compliant for follow-up visits. During a 9-month median (range 0.1-24) follow-up of 104 compliant patients, 19 experienced a total of 94 ventricular arrhythmias, all successfully interrupted or self-terminated, with a median number of two separate episodes, corresponding to a rate of 10 episodes/100 person-month (95% CI 8-12). A rate of 12 episodes/100 person-months (95% CI 10-15) was measured in the subgroup of patients with ACC/AHA class I indications, versus two episodes/100 person-months (95% CI 1-5) in the remainder of the population. Among 12 deaths, 9 were due to heart failure, 1 to a non-cardiovascular cause, and 2 to unknown causes. The implantation of ICD in heart failure patients has been prominently extended to primary prevention. Patients without standard ICD indications experienced life-threatening arrhythmic events. The impact of ICD combined with cardiac resynchronization therapy on arrhythmic profile, mortality, and costs in this subgroup of patients need to be more precisely studied, with a particular focus on the various types of underlying heart disease.
 ...
PMID:Cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: preliminary results from the InSync Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Italian Registry. 1268 1

Acute heart failure is a life-threatening medical emergency and appropriate management can reduce the morbidity and mortality of heart failure. Despite advances in treatments, the number of deaths has increased steadily. Therefore, the guideline was assigned to convey to the physicians the virtue of medical management with recent trends in pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Japanese new guidelines for the management of acute heart failure have been published from the Japanese Circulation Society in October, 2000, which was partially based on ACC/AHA guideline in 1995 but prepared under consideration of medical benefits system and health care system in Japan. We expect that the guideline would be revised to make it more useful with continual advances in the management strategies in the future.
 ...
PMID:[Acute heart failure]. 1275 93

It has been estimated that about 320,000 to 400,000 patients in the USA alone are possible candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to the recently published AHA/ACC/NASPE guidelines for pacing and the results of the COMPANION trial. The selection of the most suitable candidate for CRT/CRTD is a crucial issue, but still a matter of debate. A large variety of clinical, invasive and non-invasive criteria have been proposed for appropriately selecting candidates for CRT. However, in all the studies the parameters have been retrospectively identified and none has reported their results in the form of a multivariate regression model. We have now well characterized the patients in sinus rhythm who most likely benefit from this non-pharmacological approach. The fact that the COMPANION trial was able to single out a specific subgroup of heart failure patients that can be treated better than what was very short time ago best medical therapy validates the large body of research that investigators worldwide have created about this therapy. Finally, the concept that any patients that require ventricular pacing, who have heart failure class II/III or IV may benefit from receiving biventricular rather than right ventricular pacing as much as the other patients with more classical indication for CRT is still open to discussion and needs to be tested in a randomized multicenter trial.
 ...
PMID:The promise of resynchronization therapy. Who (and how many) will benefit? 1276 11

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome. The pharmacological therapy for chronic heart failure has been changing in the past decade with acquired knowledge of the pathophysiology of this medical condition. Primary care physicians currently treat a significant number of patients. This article summarizes core topics of heart failure including epidemiological information, etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and diagnostic tools. Also, we review some of the most relevant research studies that have led to the current recommendations for the pharmacological therapeutic strategies in the management of chronic heart failure. We make reference to the latest guidelines in the management of chronic heart failure submitted by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). New technological advances, such as the biventricular-pacing devices, are an important adjuvant to the established pharmacological therapies for chronic heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Chronic heart failure: a review for the primary care physician. 1500 64

My patient, 65, has been classified as being in ACC/AHA Stage B heart failure, but she denies any history of heart failure. What does this new terminology mean?
 ...
PMID:How to classify heart failure. 1530 7

beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) provide multiple benefits to patients with coronary artery disease. The 2001 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) recommend initiating beta-adrenoceptor blockade in all post-MI patients and continuing therapy indefinitely. Atenolol and metoprolol have been shown to decrease vascular mortality in the acute-MI period. In the post-MI period timolol provided a 39% reduction in mortality in the Norwegian Multicenter Study group and propranolol was associated with a 26% reduction in mortality in BHAT (Beta-blocker Heart Attack Trial). beta-Adrenoceptor antagonist therapy results in reduction of myocardial oxygen demand and is therefore also effective for the treatment of angina pectoris. In CAST (Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial) beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy was associated with a significant reduction in arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest. In the post-MI amiodarone trials EMIAT (European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial) and CAMIAT (Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Trial) there was a mortality benefit and decreased arrhythmic death in patients who received both amiodarone and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy, compared with patients receiving amiodarone therapy alone. In the post-MI defibrillator (implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]) trials, AVID (Antiarrhythmic Versus Implantable Defibrillator) and MUSTT (Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial), beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy was independently associated with improved overall survival. The exception was the ICD patients in MUSTT, and the benefit was attenuated in the amiodarone and ICD patients in AVID.AHA/ACC guidelines recommend the use of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in all patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, based on several large, controlled heart failure trials. Extended-release metoprolol succinate reduced all-cause mortality by 34% in MERIT-HF (Metoprolol Controlled-Release/Extended-Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure). Bisoprolol was associated with a 34% mortality benefit in CIBIS-II (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II) and carvedilol was associated with a 35% mortality reduction in the COPERNICUS (Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival) trial. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists reduce perioperative mortality in patients undergoing cardiac as well as non-cardiac surgery; however, they remain underutilised. Contraindications to beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy include severe bradycardia, high-grade atrioventricular block, marked sinus node dysfunction and acute exacerbations of heart failure. Many of the perceived adverse effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists have not been substantiated by large clinical trials.beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists differ with regard to receptor selectivity, receptor affinity, lipophilicity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Beneficial properties of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists may not always be extrapolated as a class effect, and patient selection and drug preparations should follow trial guidelines. The beneficial effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are clearly proven in cardiac patients and those at risk for cardiac disease. They are indicated for heart failure and proven beneficial in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. These benefits appear to be consistent across most patient subgroups. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists are generally well tolerated, yet significant morbidity and mortality result from their continued underutilisation.
 ...
PMID:Optimising the use of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in coronary artery disease. 1581 91


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>