Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018801 (heart failure)
 72,216 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) demonstrates that, for patients with heart failure of different aetiologies, administration of the beta 1-adrenoceptor blocker bisoprolol as an adjuvant to the standard therapy leads to a significant avoidance of hospital admissions. A pharmacoeconomic analysis of the results of the CIBIS was conducted for the Federal Republic of Germany, and was restricted to direct costs only. The costs of bisoprolol medication and inpatient treatment of heart failure were considered, the latter forming the major part of costs incurred. Per 1000 patient-years, adjuvant bisoprolol therapy resulted in overall cost savings of Deutschmarks (DM)157,272. Statutory Health Insurance had a net saving of DM186,719 in 1000 patient-years, while patients experienced additional net expenses of DM17,760 over 1000 patient-years. The economic advantage of adjuvant bisoprolol treatment was also borne out in the sensitivity analysis. Adjuvant therapy with bisoprolol was not only clinically beneficial for the patient with heart failure but was also economically advantageous.
 ...
PMID:Economic evaluation of the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study for the Federal Republic of Germany. 1017 49

The clinical benefits of beta-blockers in heart failure are currently subject to intense debate and are being investigated. The economic impact of beta-blockade, however, has largely remained unexplored. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS), while failing to show statistically significant reduction in mortality over conventional therapy, demonstrates that the administration of bisoprolol adjuvant to standard therapy leads to a significant reduction in hospital admission. The present study is a cost minimisation analysis based on CIBIS data for the UK and is restricted to direct costs only. The costs of bisoprolol medication and inpatient treatment of heart failure are considered. The 'base case' analysis and the sensitivity analyses carried on all cost driver parameters show that administering bisoprolol to heart failure patients adjuvantly to the standard therapy is at least cost neutral. Additional drug costs incurred by bisoprolol are compensated by the inpatient treatment costs of heart failure avoided. All other non-quantifiable clinical benefits such as improvement of New York Heart Association functional class are positive extras to patients and the National Health Service.
 ...
PMID:A cost minimisation analysis of cardiac failure treatment in the UK using CIBIS trial data. Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study. 1034 61

Published clinical practice guidelines from the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology--supported by the results of numerous large-scale randomized controlled trials--define the standard universal pharmacologic approach to all patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. According to these guidelines, all heart failure patients regardless of etiology (with rare exceptions such as obstructive valvular heart disease) should be treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor as first-line treatment of the heart failure. In fact, the non-edematous patient with only mild exertional dyspnea may be treated with an ACE inhibitor as sole therapy of the left ventricular dysfunction. As patients become edematous or complain of more moderate congestive symptoms, it is then appropriate to add a diuretic along with the ACE inhibitor. Digoxin is reserved for those patients who remain symptomatic on an ACE inhibitor and diuretic. Carvedilol, the only beta-adrenergic receptor blocker approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of heart failure, has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with New York Heart Association Class II or III symptoms. In the U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program, carvedilol's benefit was seen in patients with either ischemic or nonischemic etiologies of heart failure. Similar findings of benefit in both ischemic and nonischemic heart failure have been observed in the recently reported Second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II) trial as well as in ACE inhibitor heart failure trials. Studies suggesting differences in outcome based on etiology during pharmacologic treatment of heart failure have been too small (inadequately powered) or have assessed this difference only in post-hoc analyses. Thus, the universal pharmacologic management of heart failure with an ACE inhibitor, diuretic, beta-blocker (e.g. carvedilol), and digoxin may be applied to all patients with ischemic or nonischemic heart failure. This makes sense since the pathophysiology of heart failure following myocardial injury is similar for both forms of the disease.
 ...
PMID:Ischemic and nonischemic heart failure do not require different treatment strategies. 1044 79

No one would now believe that all infections will respond to a single antibiotic, nor that all known antibiotics should be given to all patients with infection. It is obvious that some patients with specific causes of heart failure need specific treatment, but whether heart failure of ischaemic or nonischaemic origin need different treatments is not certain. Only when parallel clinical trials have been conducted with individual drugs in separate groups of patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic heart failure will the need for different treatment strategies be known. Until then, there will be a dependency on second-rank evidence (that which can be derived from trials with 'surrogate' end-points, from meta-analysis of small trials and from subset analysis of different patient groups within single trials). The best evidence at present comes from subset analysis of two studies, with bisoprolol (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study; CIBIS) and amlodipine (Prospective Randomised Amlodipine Survival Evaluation; PRAISE). These suggest that patients with different causes of heart failure respond to treatment in different ways.
 ...
PMID:Different causes of heart failure need different treatment strategies. 1044 83

There is now considerable clinical trial data to support the use of beta-blockers in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction. A substantial database has accumulated over the last 20 years supporting the benefits of these agents on ventricular function and clinical status. In addition, morbidity and mortality benefits have been suggested, specifically with the non-selective vasodilating agent, carvedilol. More recently, a "new wave" of clinical trials have been conducted to definitively determine the mortality benefits of beta-blockers in patients with mild to moderate CHF as well as addressing other important clinical questions. These questions include whether the beneficial effects of carvedilol on survival can be reproduced by other agents in prospective, adequately powered studies; whether the benefits of carvedilol in systolic heart failure are due to its beta-blocking properties alone or to a combination of the beta-blocking and ancillary effects of the drug; whether beta-blockers are of benefit in patients with severe New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB-IV CHF; and, whether beta-blockers are of benefit (additional to ACE inhibitors) in patients with evidence of systolic ventricular dysfunction when commenced in the immediate post-myocardial infarction period. Major studies are currently being undertaken to address the above questions. Most are still underway but 3 studies have recently reported their results: the second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II), the Research in Left Ventricular Dysfunction Study (RESOLVD), and the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) study. These studies have demonstrated that blockade with beta1-selective, non-vasodilating agents (i.e. bisoprolol and metoprolol) improve survival in patients with CHE Comparison of relative risk reduction in these recent studies with the earlier carvedilol studies raises mechanistic questions, specifically whether non-selectivity, vasodilation and other ancillary properties of carvedilol are critical to its benefit in CHF patients. This question is currently being addressed in the Carvedilol and Metoprolol European Trial (COMET), comparing metoprolol with carvedilol. The beneficial effects of beta-blockers on mortality in patients with mild to moderate CHF have also had major implications in ongoing studies of other agents in this condition. Open-label prescribing of beta-blockers is increasing in these studies and this is having an impact on event rates and thus required duration of administration of study drug. Furthermore, it would now appear unethical to deprive suitable NYHA Class II-III CHF patients of beta-blockers as part of the design of such studies. In conclusion, beta-blockers have now become the most extensively studied class of agents in the treatment of CHF, with a database of over 6000 patients in placebo-controlled studies, and ongoing clinical and mechanistic studies. Despite this, further questions remain regarding the use of these agents in CHF, including their role in the extreme elderly, in patients with diabetes mellitus and in patients with renal impairment.
 ...
PMID:Beta-blockers in heart failure. The 'new wave' of clinical trials. 1047 16

Chronic treatment with beta-receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in heart failure can reduce mortality and improve left ventricular function, but the mechanisms involved in their beneficial action remain to be fully defined. Our hypothesis was that these agents prevent the derangement of cardiac energy metabolism. Rats were subjected to myocardial infarction (MI) or sham operation. Thereafter, animals were treated with bisoprolol, captopril, or remained untreated. Two months later, cardiac function was measured in the isolated heart by a left ventricular balloon (pressure-volume curves), and energy metabolism of residual intact myocardium was analyzed in terms of total and isoenzyme creatine kinase (CK) activity, steady-state levels (ATP, phosphocreatine), and turnover rates (CK reaction velocity) of high-energy phosphates (31P nuclear magnetic resonance) and total creatine content (HPLC). Bisoprolol and partially captopril prevented post-MI hypertrophy and partially prevented left ventricular contractile dysfunction. Residual intact failing myocardium in untreated, infarcted hearts showed a 25% decrease of the total, a 26% decrease of MM-, and a 37% decrease of the mitochondrial CK activity. Total creatine was reduced by 15%, phosphocreatine by 21%, and CK reaction velocity by 41%. Treatment with bisoprolol or captopril largely prevented all of these changes in infarcted hearts. Thus the favorable functional effects of beta-receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors post-MI are accompanied by substantial beneficial effects on cardiac energy metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Effects of ACE inhibition and beta-receptor blockade on energy metabolism in rats postmyocardial infarction. 1060 Aug 34

Results of the studies published or reported within the last 2 years provide convincing evidence that beta-blockers can decrease mortality in patients with chronic symptomatic heart failure because of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS)-II and Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) trials showed a 34% reduction in all-cause death with bisoprolol and metoprolol therapy in patients with class II-III heart failure. Data from Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS), with a 35% mortality reduction, extended this benefit to class IV patients treated with carvedilol who do not require intravenous diuretics or positive inotropes. Ongoing beta-blocker studies address new topics, such as treatment of older patients, in whom diastolic heart failure may be more common, and direct comparison of different drugs. Although the use of beta-blockers for heart failure tends to increase, implementation of the knowledge from the trials in clinical practice still remains a challenge.
 ...
PMID:Overview of the results of recent beta blocker trials. 1135 13

The efficacy of treatment with diuretics and vasodilators in heart failure has shown that compensatory mechanisms may induce vicious circles that can precipitate the deterioration of congestive heart failure (CHF). By counteracting sympathetic stimulation of cardiac beta-receptors, beta-blocking drugs could provide some benefit in CHF. Indeed, the sympathetic stimulation enhances metabolic costs and could lead to a further deterioration of myocardial fiber function. This could be counteracted by beta-blockade. On the contrary, the loss of adrenergic responsiveness due to beta-adrenergic downregulation and depletion of norepinephrine stores from sympathetic nerves could be responsible for the progressive deterioration of cardiac function. Moderate doses of beta-blocking agents could restore such a catecholamine sensitivity by upregulation of beta-receptors and restoration of norepinephrine stores. Results of clinical trials with beta-blockade in CHF are so far controversial. Most studies enrolled patients with cardiomyopathy and included small numbers of patients or were uncontrolled. The CIBIS trial (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study) has been launched in Europe to answer the question of the potential benefit on prognosis of beta-blockade therapy in heart failure from any etiology, especially ischemic CHF. It is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentric trial involving two parallel groups of patients (300 in each group) followed over a 2-year period. Results from the CIBIS trial should provide conclusive information concerning the use of beta-blocking therapy in CHF.
 ...
PMID:Beta-blockade treatment in heart failure: the cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study (CIBIS) project. CIBIS Committees and Investigators. Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study. 1153 31

Previous trials (Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure [MERIT-HF], Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study [CIBIS] II) have demonstrated a mortality benefit of beta-adrenergic blockade in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The recent Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) trial has extended these results to a more advanced patient population. This trial did not, however, include patients who could not reach compensation, patients with far advanced heart failure symptoms, or a significant number of black patients. Future studies of beta-blockade may focus on these patients or patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:The Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) trial. 1180 69

The cost-effectiveness of adding the beta blocker bisoprolol to standard treatment in patients with congestive heart failure was investigated, based on data from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS II). The medical resource consumption from CIBIS II was combined with Swedish cost data for medication and hospitalisations. Costs of added years of life, i.e. consumption net of production, were also included in the analysis. The health effects were measured in terms of gained years of life. The results of the analysis show that the cost-effectiveness of bisoprolol compares favourably with that of other cardiovascular treatments. Without the inclusion of costs of added years of life, the cost-effectiveness was in the range of SEK 3,351-13,096 per gained year of life, and with the costs of added years of life included, the cost-effectiveness was in the range of SEK 137,533-147,278 per gained year of life.
 ...
PMID:[Cost-effectiveness of bisoprolol in chronic heart failure]. 1188 11


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>