UMLS:C0018801 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0018801 (heart failure)
72,216 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Candesartan is a selective angiotensin II Type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker which binds tightly to, and dissociates slowly from the receptor. It is an effective, long-acting antihypertensive agent with few or no side effects, when compared to placebo in hypertension trials. Several studies indicate that candesartan might prevent diabetes. A research programme of three prospective randomised outcome trials (the CHARM [Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity] programme) has shown that candesartan is of clinical value in a broad spectrum of patients with symptomatic heart failure, regardless of background therapy and ventricular function. There is a clear benefit of candesartan in patients unable to tolerate an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and this benefit is of a similar magnitude to that obtained with an ACEI. CHARM-Added shows that symptoms, morbidity and cardiovascular mortality are further reduced if an AT(1)-receptor blocker is added to an ACEI. This benefit is not only statistically significant but also clinically important. CHARM-Preserved indicate that candesartan can reduce hospital admission for heart failure in patients with preserved systolic function.
...
PMID:Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. 1521 9

Older patients with hypertension are often inadequately treated due to misconceptions regarding reasonable goal blood pressures or concerns about treatment side effects. Adequately treating hypertension can yield impressive benefits in terms of improved morbidity and enhanced quality of life in persons of any age. Antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are especially effective in older persons, many of whom have concomitant conditions such as diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, and other cardiovascular risk factors. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers has been shown to improve many of the complications of hypertension, including left ventricular hypertrophy and renal disease. Results of recent key studies such as Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE), Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT), Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM), and Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) add to the evidence that angiotensin II receptor blockers are well suited for the treatment of hypertension in older patients. These trials also indicate that they are appropriate therapy for heart failure patients and for patients who have experienced acute myocardial infarction, particularly those who are unable to tolerate an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor blockers in older patients. 1526 63

The large Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) trial recently found that in patients with heart failure who were similar to those whom clinicians see in everyday practice, the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan was not only an acceptable alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, but also was beneficial when added to regimens that already included ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Candesartan was beneficial in heart failure patients with or without left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
...
PMID:Angiotensin-receptor blockers in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM trial. 1544 63

Survival in patients with heart failure remains very poor, and is worse than that for most common cancers, including bowel cancer in men and breast cancer in women. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is not completely blocked by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. Blockade of the RAAS at the AT1-receptor has the theoretical benefit of more effective blockade of the actions of angiotensin II. ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) prevent the breakdown of bradykinin: this has been blamed for some of the unwanted effects of ACE-Is although bradykinin may have advantageous effects in heart failure. Consequently, ACE-Is and ARBs might be complementary or even additive treatments; recent trials have tested these hypotheses. The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme compared the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan (target dose 32 mg once daily) to placebo in three distinct but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure. These were: patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who were ACE-I-intolerant (CHARM-Alternative); patients with reduced LVEF who were being treated with ACE-Is (CHARM-Added); and patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (CHARM-Preserved). There were substantial and statistically significant reductions in the primary composite end point (risk of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for heart failure) in CHARM-Alternative. This was also the case in CHARM-Added, supporting and extending the findings of Val-HeFT. In CHARM-Preserved, the effect of candesartan on the primary end point did not reach conventional statistical significance though hospital admission for heart failure was reduced significantly with candesartan. In the CHARM-Overall programme there was a statistically borderline reduction in all-cause mortality with a clear reduction in cardiovascular mortality. All-cause mortality was reduced by 12% in the two CHARM trials in patients with low LVEF. CHARM succeeded in answering a number of questions about the safety and efficacy of ARB use in heart failure. It showed evidence for a clinical benefit of candesartan both additive to and independent of ACE-I use. The benefits in terms of clinical outcomes were seen irrespective of beta-blocker usage. Benefits in patients with preserved LVEF were shown in the proportion of patients hospitalised with worsening heart failure and in overall number of admissions for heart failure. Candesartan had expected effects on blood pressure and renal function, emphasising the need for careful patient monitoring.
...
PMID:Angiotensin inhibition in heart failure. 1552 37

Candesartan cilexetil is the prodrug of candesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Candesartan binds selectively and non-competitively to the angiotensin II receptor type 1, thus preventing the actions of angiotensin II. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy at a dose range of 2 to 32 mg once daily in hypertension of all grades, heart failure, in reducing urinary albumin excretion in diabetes mellitus and in coexisting hypertension and renal failure. Pharmacokinetic properties of candesartan cilexetil in elderly patients are not significantly different from those in younger individuals. Hepatic impairment does not change pharmacokinetics of candesartan cilexetil at doses up to 12 mg/day. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Tolerability of candesartan cilexetil is not much different from that of placebo. All adverse events are usually of mild to moderate severity and not dose-related. The most common adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, and dizziness. The incidence of these adverse effects, as well as of cough, was similar in patients treated with candesartan cilexetil or placebo. The incidence of adverse events in long-term trials was not different from that in short-term trials. Tolerability of candesartan cilexetil does not differ with either age or gender.
...
PMID:Candesartan. 1559 74

Candesartan cilexetil is the orally administered pro-drug of candesartan, a highly selective antagonist of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor that mediates the pressor activities of angiotensin II. Candesartan cilexetil is widely used for the treatment of hypertension and has recently been approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Results of the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) programme suggest that oral candesartan cilexetil reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with CHF and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =40%. There are cardiovascular benefits when candesartan cilexetil is administered as an alternative to an ACE inhibitor, or as an add-on to current treatment regimens that include an ACE inhibitor, in symptomatic CHF. While tolerability is generally good, renal monitoring is required. The recent approval of candesartan cilexetil as both add-on and alternative therapy to ACE inhibitors in patients with CHF and impaired LV systolic function recognises the cardiovascular benefits of candesartan cilexetil in both types of treatment regimens.
...
PMID:Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its use in the management of chronic heart failure. 1573 14

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a central role in the management of heart failure, reflecting the contribution of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to the pathophysiology of the condition. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) bind specifically to the angiotensin type 1 receptor and may offer further benefits compared with ACE inhibitors. Candesartan, losartan and valsartan have all been evaluated in large clinical outcome trials in heart failure. They display marked differences in pharmacokinetics and receptor-binding properties that may contribute to observed differences in outcome. ELITE II found no significant difference in outcome with losartan as compared with captopril. In the Val-Heft trial, valsartan reduced heart failure hospitalisations when added to conventional therapy including an ACE inhibitor in most patients, but had no effect on mortality. The CHARM programme showed that candesartan reduced morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced systolic function, both when added to ACE inhibitor therapy or when used as an alternative in patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Moreover, the CHARM-preserved study suggested that candesartan is beneficial in patients with heart failure and preserved left-ventricular systolic function. A growing body of evidence show that ARBs are an important contribution to the pharmaceutical management of patients with heart failure.
...
PMID:A review of the current evidence for the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure. 1585 54

Almost 5 million individuals in the United States have chronic heart failure (HF), which is increasing in prevalence. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are standard therapies for HF, although more than 10% of patients with HF are unable to tolerate these agents. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors may not provide complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the long term. Because angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may block the RAS more completely than ACE inhibitors and are better tolerated, several large-scale ARB trials have been performed exploring their potential role in treating patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study (ELITE II) demonstrated no significant differences in morbidity and mortality between the ARB losartan and the ACE inhibitor captopril among elderly patients with HF. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) demonstrated reductions in hospitalizations for HF with the ARB valsartan when added to standard HF therapy, with no effect on mortality. Both trials suggested a potential negative interaction between ARB and beta-blocker therapy. The Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality with the ARB candesartan in patients with HF due to systolic dysfunction, with or without ACE inhibitors and with or without beta blockers. Thus, the addition of ARBs to the treatment regimen of patients with symptomatic HF should be strongly considered.
...
PMID:Clinical update: the role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (Part II of II). 1602 61

ACE inhibitors have significantly decreased cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, the extended 12-year study of the SOLVD (Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Prevention and Treatment trials (X-SOLVD) demonstrated a significant benefit with a reduction of cumulative all-cause death compared with placebo (50.9% vs 56.4%) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.79, 0.93; p < 0.001]. The survival benefits and significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity related to treatment with ACE inhibitors are likely achieved by titrating the dose of ACE inhibitors to the target dose achieved in clinical trials. Although the ATLAS (Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril And Survival) study, which randomly allocated HF patients to low- or high-dose lisinopril, showed no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.03), the predetermined secondary combined outcome of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization was reduced by 15% for the patients receiving high-dose lisinopril compared with low-dose (p < 0.001) with a 24% reduction in HF hospitalization (p = 0.002). Despite the use of ACE inhibitors, blockade of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) remains incomplete, with evidence of continued production of angiotensin II by non-ACE-dependent pathways. The safety and potential benefits of angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) in patients with impaired systolic function have been assessed in moderate to large clinical trials. In patients with impaired LV systolic function and HF, combination therapy with ARBs with recommended HF therapy including ACE inhibitors in patients who remain symptomatic may be considered for its morbidity benefit. Based on the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity)-Added data, candesartan cilexetil in addition to standard HF therapy results in a further reduction of cardiovascular mortality. Close monitoring of renal function and serum potassium levels is needed in this setting. The VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarction Trial) results suggest that valsartan is as effective as captopril in patients following an acute MI with HF and/or LV systolic dysfunction and may be used as an alternative treatment in ACE inhibitor-intolerant patients. There was no survival benefit with valsartan-captopril combination compared with captopril alone in this trial. Despite these results, ACE inhibitors remain the first-choice therapeutic agent in post-MI patients, and ARBs can be used in patients with clear intolerance. Although the use of ACE inhibitors may be appealing in patients with HF and preserved LV systolic function, there is currently no evidence from large clinical trials to support this.
...
PMID:ACE inhibitors in heart failure: what more do we need to know? 1625 23

Recent clinical trials have explored whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or aldosterone blockade should be added to standard angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/beta blocker treatment in heart failure. Both strategies are of some value but it is unclear which strategy should be used first in patients with mild but symptomatic heart failure. The arguments for and against each strategy are discussed. The strongest argument for aldosterone blockade is the consistency in the results of the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) and EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study) studies, but what is lacking is a trial of aldosterone blockade in patients with mild, symptomatic heart failure as such. The strongest argument for ARBs is that the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Added trial result was positive in the precise patient population of interest (mild, symptomatic heart failure). The strength of this argument is diminished by the somewhat different results in Val-HeFT (Valsartan Heart Failure Trial). A third possibility is to use neither an ARB nor an aldosterone blocker and arguments can be marshalled for this position also. Clinicians should now assess these various arguments to select what they believe would be best for their patients.
...
PMID:Angiotensin blockade or aldosterone blockade as the third neuroendocrine-blocking drug in mild but symptomatic heart failure patients. 1633 14

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>