Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018801 (heart failure)
 72,216 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Originally developed as an antianginal agent, amiodarone was soon found to have antiarrhythmic properties and to be a non-competitive inhibitor of alpha and beta-adrenergic receptors. Many trials studying the use of amiodarone in patients with heart failure have now been performed and are reviewed in this article. The trials appear to show that amiodarone possesses significant antiarrhythmic activity, even in heart failure patients. The drug appears to be well tolerated and proarrhythmia is uncommon. Based on the findings of a large Argentinian randomised trial (GESICA) and the Congestive Heart Failure Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy (CHF STAT), it would appear there is a role for amiodarone in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, but prospective studies are required to confirm this. The benefit of amiodarone in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy might be related to the beta-blocking effect that is seen with the use of conventional beta-blockers. Further studies, including the Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Trial (SCD HeFT), should help determine the role of amiodarone in heart failure patients.
 ...
PMID:Amiodarone in congestive heart failure. 989 84

Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias remains a significant problem. In most studies about 50% of all death related to coronary artery disease and heart failure are sudden and unexpected and are caused by acute fatal ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Most of the patients suffering sudden cardiac death have some kind of structural heart disease but 80% of SCD events are associated with coronary artery disease, 10-15% with dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and only small fraction with the less common disorders as valvular heart disease, ventricular dysplasia and cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis or amyloidosis. In some patients the anomaly responsible for sudden cardiac death is not structural but mainly electrical as in patients with the long QT syndrome, WPW syndrome or in patients with a proarrhythmic effect from antiarrhythmic drugs. In this review, data from clinical trials and other studies on on antiarrhythmic therapies have been evaluated in order to determine effective strategies for the prevention sudden cardiac death in high risk patients. Taken together with the mortality data routine prophylactic use of class I antiarrhythmic drugs in the patients survivors of acute myocardial infarction and patients with heart failure is associated with increased risk of death. Conversely beta-blockers are associated with significant reduction in nonfatal cardiac arrest in the short term trials and sudden cardiac death in long term trials. These benefits are likely due to relief ischemia, reduction of heart rate and maintenance favourable autonomic nervous system balance. Overall trial data on amiodarone suggests that this agent is effective in reducing the risk of death in survivors of cardiac arrest, post infarction patients, and patients with heart failure but the routine prophylactic use of amiodarone remains of uncertain efficacy. The physician who considers the use of antiarrhythmic medications in patients with ventricular arrhythmias must be aware of which arrhythmias are malignant or potentially malignant and which are benign and the decision to initiate antiarrhythmic therapy should be based on consideration of the patients absolute mortality risk.
 ...
PMID:[Antiarrhythmic agents in the prevention of sudden cardiac death]. 1036 92

SCD continues to be an important cause of death and morbidity. Despite expanding insight into the mechanisms causing SCD, the population at high risk is not being effectively identified. Although there is still much to do in the management phase of SCD (predicting the efficacy of various therapies), recent clinical trials have helped define the relative risks and benefits of therapies in preventing SCD. Trials are underway to determine whether treating other patient populations, including asymptomatic patients after MI, will improve survival rate. The approach to reducing mortality rate will always be multifaceted; primary prevention of coronary artery disease and prompt salvage of jeopardized myocardium are 2 important aspects of this approach. In addition to interventions for MI, such as myocardial revascularization when indicated, simple and easily administered therapies that are likely to remain the most effective prophylactic interventions are aspirin, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and cholesterol-lowering agents. However, the MADIT and AVID data clearly demonstrate a role for ICD therapy in a subgroup of patients who have VT/VF and are at risk of cardiac arrest. Even though the absolute magnitude of benefit associated with ICDs is still to be determined, the AVID study and other recent reports provide convincing evidence that patients who have VT/VF fare better with ICDs than with antiarrhythmic drug therapy. For the high-risk population described in this article, in addition to aggressive anti-ischemic and heart failure therapy, ICDs are now a mainstay of life-saving treatment. Still to be surmounted is the challenge of identifying patients who have nonischemic substrates and of providing them with the appropriate therapy. Guided by genetic studies and new insight into the mechanisms of such problems as congenital long QT syndrome, life-saving and life-enhancing therapies may soon be available for the management of SCD.
 ...
PMID:Sudden cardiac death. 1045 74

Patients with congestive heart failure frequently have ventricular arrhythmias on ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings and sudden cardiac death is seen in almost 50% of such patients. Many antiarrhythmic agents have been approved to suppress the arrhythmia in an effort to improve survival. Some sodium-channel blockers not only failed to improve survival but have been shown to be harmful. This led to the development of potassium-channel blockers, such as d-sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide, and azimilide. d-Sotalol was associated with excess mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction; amiodarone seems to be potentially beneficial; and dofetilide has a neutral effect on mortality. The Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD HEFT) is testing the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) against amiodarone and placebo. The ICDs appear to be superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in certain high-risk patients, although not proved in unstratified patients with heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Class III drugs and congestive heart failure: focus on the congestive heart failure-survival trial of antiarrhythmic therapy. 1056 68

In patients with severe chronic heart failure, many deaths are sudden due to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Supraventricular arrhythmias such as paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation may also cause serious complications in those patients due to acute loss of atrial contraction, pump failure during rapid ventricular response and embolic events. Two therapeutic strategies are currently available for therapy and prevention of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and subsequent sudden arrhythmic death: antiarrhythmic drug therapy and implantable defibrillators. However, selection of the most beneficial strategy for the individual patient to reduce the risk of sudden death remains a major challenge in cardiology. Betablockers exert a favorable antiarrhythmic action without increasing proarrhythmia, thus betablockers may serve as a basic medication in patients at risk for sudden death. However, the general use of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias is not recommended, as these drugs have been shown to increase mortality in patients with severe congestive heart failure due to proarrhythmic or negative inotropic effects (e.g. class Ia antiarrhythmics). Even class III antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone, which has been studied sufficiently in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, is not effective enough for significant reduction of cardiac mortality in patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias and depressed ventricular function (e.g. EMIAT, CAMIAT). But as a positive result of available studies, amiodarone does not increase mortality in those patients. Dofetilide has also not been shown to prolong life significantly by suppressing malignant ventricular arrhythmias (DIAMOND-Study). In patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias or aborted sudden death, ICD therapy has been proven to be superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiac mortality reduction as a secondary prevention strategy (e.g. AVID, CASH, CIDS). For primary prevention of sudden arrhythmic death in high risk patients, 2 studies (MADIT, MUSST) have already demonstrated favorable results, decreasing mortality by ICD therapy in selected patient populations with partly-reduced ventricular function and unsustained but inducible ventricular tachycardias. This topic is, however, undergoing further evaluation by ongoing trials (e.g. MADIT II, SCD-HeFT). From available data, antiarrhythmic drug therapy in high risk patients is not justified on a routine basis, whereas ICD therapy as a secondary and perhaps primary prevention strategy will significantly reduce cardiac mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Sotalol, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, has recently been shown to reduce ICD-shock delivery which indicates that concomitant drug therapy in patients with an ICD device already implanted may be beneficial in terms of reducing ICD discharges due to ventricular and supraventricular tachycardias. In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, restitution of sinus rhythm is the primary therapeutic goal which can be safely achieved by amiodarone and dofetilide (DIAMOND). In the latter, continuous monitoring of the patient is mandatory because of increased risk of torsade de pointes arrhythmias during the first days of drug administration. In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation rate control and anticoagulation with warfarin is the primary therapeutic option, which can be achieved with either drug treatment (Digoxin, betablockers, amiodarone) or by His bundle ablation with subsequent pacemaker insertion.
 ...
PMID:[Antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with heart failure]. 1085 93

Autonomic functions, such as increased sympathetic and parasympathetic activity and the brain's suprachiasmatic nucleus, higher nervous centres, depression, hostility and aggression appear to be important determinants of heart rate variability (HRV), which is, itself, an important risk factor of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, sudden death, heart failure and atherosclerosis. The circadian rhythm of these complications with an increased occurrence in the second quarter of the day may be due to autonomic dysfunction as well as to the presence of excitatory brain and heart tissues. While increased sympathetic activity is associated with increased levels of cortisol, catecholamines, serotonin, renin, aldosterone, angiotensin and free radicals; increased parasympathetic activity may be associated with greater levels of acetylecholine, dopamine, nitric oxide, endorphins, coenzyme Q10, antioxidants and other protective factors. Recent studies indicate that hyperglycemia, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, ambient pollution, insulin resistance and mental stress can increase the risk of low HRV. These risk factors, which are known to favour cardiovascular disease, seem to act by decreasing HRV. There is evidence that regular fasting may modulate HRV and other risk factors of heart attack. While exercise is known to decrease HRV, exercise training may not have any adverse effect on HRV. In a recent study among 202 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the incidence of onset of chest pain was highest in the second quarter of the day (41.0%), mainly between 4.0-8.0 AM, followed by the fourth quarter, usually after large meals (28.2%). Emotion was the second most common trigger (43.5%). Cold weather was a predisposing factor in 29.2% and hot temperature (> 40 degrees celsius) was common in 24.7% of the patients. Dietary n-3 fatty acids and coenzyme Q10 have been found to prevent the increased circadian occurrence of cardiac events in our randomized controlled trials, possibly by increasing HRV. We have also found that n-3 fatty acids plus CoQ can decrease TNF-alpha and IL-6 in AMI which are pro-inflammatory agents. There is evidence that dietary n-3 fatty acids canenhance hippocampal acetylecholine levels, which may be protective. Similarly, the stimulation of the vagus nerve may inhibit TNF synthesis in the liver and acetylecholine, the principal vagal neurotransmitter, significantly attenuates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, interleukin 1,6 and 18, but not the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in experiments. Therefore, any agent which can enhance brain acetylecholine levels, may be used as a therapeutic agent in protecting the suprachiasmatic nucleus, higher nervous centres, vagal activity and sympathetic nerve activity which are known to regulate the body clock and HRV and the risk of SCD and heart attack.
 ...
PMID:Brain-heart connection and the risk of heart attack. 1265 78

Carnitine is an ammo acid derivative found in high energy demanding tissues (skeletal muscles, myocardium, the liver and the suprarenal glands). It is essential for the intermediary metabolism of fatty acids. Carnitine is indispensable for beta-oxidation of long-chain fatty acids in the mitochondria but also regulates CoA concentration and removal of the produced acyl groups. AcylCoAs act as restraining factor for several enzymes participating in intermediary metabolism. Transformation of AcylCoA into acylcarnitine is an important system for removing the toxic acyl groups. Although primary deficiency is unusual, depletion due to secondary causes, such as a disease or a medication side effect, can occur. Primary carnitine deficiency is caused by a defect in plasma membrane carnitine transporter in muscle and kidneys. Secondary carnitine deficiency is associated with several inborn errors of metabolism and acquired medical or iatrogenic conditions, for example in patients under valproate and zidovuline treatment. In cirrhosis and chronic renal failure, carnitine biosynthesis is impaired or carnitine is lost during hemodialysis. Other chronic conditions like diabetes mellitus, heart failure, Alzheimer disease may cause carnitine deficiency also observed in conditions with increased catabolism as in critical illness. Preterm neonates develop carnitine deficiency due to impaired proximal renal tubule carnitine re-absorption and immature carnitine biosynthesis. Carnitine stabilizes the cellular membrane and raises red blood cell osmotic resistance but has no metabolic influence on lipids in dialysis patients. L-Carnitine has been administered in senile dementia, metabolic nerve diseases, in HIV infection, tuberculosis, myopathies, cardiomyopathies, renal failure anemia and included in baby foods and milk.
 ...
PMID:Carnitine metabolism and deficit--when supplementation is necessary? 1276 64

Risk Stratification and Management of SCD. Management of SCD is undergoing radical change in direction. It is becoming increasingly appreciated that besides depressed left ventricular systolic function and the conventional risk stratification tools, new markers for plaque vulnerability, enhanced thrombogenesis, specific genetic alterations of the autonomic nervous system, cardiac sarcolemmal and contractile proteins, and familial clustering may better segregate patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease who are at high risk for SCD from those who may suffer from nonfatal ischemic events. Better understanding of pathophysiologic processes, such as postmyocardial infarction remodeling, the transition from compensated hypertrophy to heart failure, and the increased cardiovascular risk of coronary artery disease in the presence of diabetes or even a prediabetic state will help to improve both risk stratification and management. The rapidly developing fields of microchips technology and proteomics may allow rapid and cost-effective mass screening of multiple risk factors for SCD. The ultimate goal is to identify novel methods for risk stratification, risk modification, and prevention of SCD that could be applied to the general public at large.
 ...
PMID:Risk stratification and management of sudden cardiac death: a new paradigm. 1452 67

Several randomized clinical trials have been designed to evaluate the usefulness of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In 2 trials, CAT and AMIOVIRT, no survival benefit was reported for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and prophylactic ICD therapy. The major limitation of both trials is the small sample size of 104 patients in CAT and 103 patients in AMIOVIRT. Another limitation of both trials is the lack of a run-in phase on optimized medical therapy. Since LV function may improve considerably on optimized medical therapy, LV function should be reevaluated 3 to 4 months after initiation of ACE inhibitors, ss-blockers and aldosterone antagonists before prophylactic ICD therapy is considered. Two additional trials, DEFINITE and SCD-HEFT, are still ongoing. Particularly SCD-HEFT will follow a sufficient number of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy to give a more definitive answer with regard to the clinical usefulness of prophylactic ICDs in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Recently, the Marburg Cardiomyopathy study (MACAS) was finished. The results of MACAS strongly suggest that reduced LV ejection fraction is the most important arrhythmia risk predictor in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, whereas signal-averaged ECG, baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate variability and T wave alternans do not appear to be helpful for arrhythmia risk stratification. In addition, MACAS showed that total mortality in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction <30% is only about 5% per year on optimized medical therapy after exclusion of patients with end stage heart failure and after exclusion of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, any future study designed to demonstrate a mortality benefit by prophylactic ICD therapy with an 80% power in this patient population needs to enroll more than 1000 patients.
 ...
PMID:Clinical trials of prophylactic implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: what have we learned and what can we expect from future trials? 1507 Dec 76

To date, generally accepted indications for prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy do not exist. Recently, the Marburg Cardiomyopathy Study (MACAS) revealed left ventricular ejection fraction to be the only significant arrhythmia risk predictor in a relatively large patient population with dilated cardiomyopathy. Meanwhile, the preliminary results of two prospective randomized trials evaluating prophylactic defibrillator therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy have been reported. The Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation study (DEFINITE) randomized 458 patients with a history of symptomatic heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% and arrhythmias on Holter to an ICD versus no ICD. As a result, ICD therapy was associated with a significant reduction of arrhythmic deaths, which failed to result in a significant decrease in total mortality due to an insufficient number of patients in DEFINITE. The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) was a three-arm study comparing placebo to amiodarone to prophylactic ICD therapy in a total of 2,521 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (51%) or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (49%). All patients in SCD-HeFT had a left ventricular ejection fraction inverted exclamation mark U 35% despite optimized medical heart failure therapy. SCD-HeFT showed a significant reduction of total mortality in the ICD group, whereas amiodarone did not improve survival.
 ...
PMID:Arrhythmia risk stratification with regard to prophylactic implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Results of MACAS, DEFINITE, and SCD-HeFT. 1516 63


1 2 3 4 Next >>