Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018801 (heart failure)
 72,216 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We studied 15 patients with essential hypertension (EH) in whom the diagnosis was corroborated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The blood pressure levels (BP) were compared with values obtained from healthy people (HP). We studied 31 HP with 2-D echocardiogram and the parameters of ventricular performance were compared with the values obtained from EH people. ABPM shown that the EH people has higher BP values than HP around 24 hs (EH loss the circadian rhythm of BP). On the other hand the EH had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with normal systolic ventricular function (VF). The systolic wall stress was low because the LVH was inappropriate. The LVH as adaptative mechanism maintains normal the VF in spite of pressure overload without increasing MVO2. When the pressure overload is not eradicated in a variable amount of time the adaptative mechanisms slowly change to a pathologic process caused by collagen deposition in the interstitium of the heart. In advanced stages the remodeling process causes diastolic disfunction, myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias and death by heart failure or suddenly. This last stage is the real hypertensive heart disease.
 ...
PMID:[Structural and functional changes in the heart of the hypertensive patient. An echocardiographic study]. 763 94

Captopril was the first oral inhibitor of the angiotension converting enzyme (ACE). Its introduction into clinical practice in 1981 was a great advance in the treatment of essential hypertension. In subsequent years a number of other ACE inhibitors was developed. They are nowadays, due to their favourable effects and good tolerance, basic antihypertensive drugs. They are indicated either as monotherapy or part of combined treatment, in particular in moderate to severe hypertension or when other antihypertensive drugs are ineffective, poorly tolerated or contraindicated. They are suitable also for hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac failure, in diabetics and in dyslipoproteinaemia. Recent reports indicate that ACE inhibitors preserve the quality of life of hypertonic patients better than other hypotensive drugs. It seems that some can it, even improve.
 ...
PMID:[Captopril and other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension]. 765 65

Ramipril is a second generation angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Like enalapril, it is a prodrug and is hydrolysed in vivo to release the active metabolite, ramiprilat, which has a long elimination half-life, permitting once-daily administration. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril has been confirmed in large-scale noncomparative studies conducted in general practice as well as in more rigorously controlled clinical trials. In the former, approximately 85% of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension have responded successfully to treatment with ramipril 2.5 or 5 mg/day, while comparative trials indicate that the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug is equivalent to that of other established ACE inhibitors and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol. As expected, the response rate to ramipril monotherapy is lower in patients with severe hypertension (around 40%), although the blood pressure lowering effect can be enhanced with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide or piretanide. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril is maintained in patients with diabetes mellitus and preliminary data indicate that the drug has the beneficial effect of decreasing urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients with nephropathy. Ramipril is superior to atenolol in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, although the clinical significance of this effect per se remains to be established. The large-scale Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study demonstrated that ramipril 5 or 10 mg/day significantly decreased the risk of all-cause mortality by 27% in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction, even if transient. The beneficial effect of ramipril was apparent by 30 days of treatment and appeared to be greatest in patients with more severe ventricular damage after infarction. Ramipril is well tolerated in general practice, with 5% or fewer patients discontinuing therapy because of drug intolerance. The data available suggest that ramipril shares a similar tolerability profile to that of other established ACE inhibitors. Thus, clinical data confirm ramipril as a useful alternative ACE inhibitor for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension, and indicate a beneficial effect of the drug in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. It is also reasonable to assume that ramipril will be of value in the treatment of patients with more established heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Ramipril. An updated review of its therapeutic use in essential hypertension and heart failure. 777 15

In recent years, government agencies of many countries have established consensus guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of hypertension. Once published, guidelines tend to be perceived as directives by a variety of health care providers. Unfortunately, these guidelines often do not reflect the practices of most hypertension experts. This report summarizes the opinions of seven hypertension experts concerning the impact of "official" guidelines on clinical practice. In addition, the individual therapeutic recommendations of these panel members are summarized. Their different treatment strategies reflect the diversity of first rate treatment plans that aim to reduce the cardiovascular sequelae in individual patients with essential hypertension. Most importantly, not one of these seven treatment strategies followed the "preferred" treatment of the U.S. guidelines, which recommend diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line therapy. The present authors approach the treatment of hypertension as a means to reduce cardiovascular events. Thus, reduction of blood pressure is not the most important therapeutic endpoint. The panel believes that whereas many different drugs can produce effective blood pressure reduction, the modern primary goal of antihypertensive drug therapy is to select a regimen most likely to prolong the quality and duration of life. In real terms, this means that the primary goal of treatment is the prevention of the major vascular sequelae of hypertension (heart attack, ventricular remodeling, hypertrophy, heart failure, and stroke) that shorten useful life. There are a number of effective hypertensive treatments, which can be selected based on individual patient requirements. However, many consensus guidelines do not allow the flexibility required to optimize individual patient treatment. As a result, health care providers should not feel compelled to regard the preferences of "official" guidelines as the best, modern, state-of-the-art therapy for an individual patient. All seven experts who are deeply involved in the daily care of patients preferred drugs other than beta-blockers and diuretics (the Joint National Committee [JNC] choices) for first-line therapy of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Modern strategies to prevent coronary sequelae and stroke in hypertensive patients differ from the JNC V Consensus Guidelines. 779 86

Antihypertensive therapy improves the long-term prognosis of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and is able to prevent complications. This is also true for the elderly patient with hypertension. A considerable percentage of patients with mild essential hypertension can be adequately treated without drugs. If drug treatment is required, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and ACE-inhibitors are the agents of first choice. For the individual patient, the appropriate drug should be chosen on the basis of efficacy, lack of side-effects, and depending upon additional diseases, such as cardiac failure, coronary heart disease and renal failure. Only if these selection criteria are fulfilled should differences in prices of the various groups of antihypertensive agents be considered.
 ...
PMID:[Cost/benefit relations: therapy of hypertension]. 786 89

Beta blockers are drugs of first choice for the treatment of essential hypertension today and may be combined with other antihypertensive drugs or diuretics. Use of highly selective beta-1 receptor-blocking agents without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity is particularly recommended for hypertensive patients after transmural myocardial infarction who suffer from exercise-dependent myocardial ischemia. Highly selective beta-1 receptor-blocking agents have only little influence on the lipid metabolism; however, if prescribed in diabetic patients treated with insulin, in patients with cardiac failure or in asthmatic patients, close supervision is mandatory.
 ...
PMID:[Beta blockers in antihypertensive treatment]. 789 48

The relationship between baseline factors defined at 4.3 +/- 1.8 hr after onset of acute myocardial infarction and 28-day survival in 319 patients admitted into the China Medical University was evaluated. The case fatality rate during acute period was 17.9%. Univariate statistics identified a significant relationship between 5 of these factors and survival. Multivariate noncondition stepwise logistic model analysis identified four factors as being most closely related to survival: (1) heart failure; (2) arrhythmia; (3) age; (4) history of essential hypertension. It is concluded that heart failure during the acute period of acute myocardial infarction is the most important baseline factor for prediction of 28-day survival.
 ...
PMID:[Multivariate analysis on prognostic factors for acute myocardial infarction during acute period noncondition stepwise logistic model]. 792 42

The proportionality which in general exists between rates of sympathetic nerve firing and the overflow of noradrenaline into the venous drainage of an organ provides the experimental justification for the use of measurements of noradrenaline in plasma as a biochemical measure of sympathetic nervous function. Static measurements of noradrenaline plasma concentration have several limitations. One is the confounding influence of noradrenaline plasma clearance on plasma concentration. Other drawbacks include the distortion arising from antecubital venous sampling (this represents but one venous drainage, that of the forearm), and the inability to detect regional differentiation of sympathetic responses. Clinical regional noradrenaline spillover measurements, performed with infusions of radiolabelled noradrenaline and sampling from centrally placed catheters, and derived from regional isotope dilution, overcome these deficiencies. The strength of the methodology is that sympathetic nervous function may be studied in the internal organs not accessible to nerve recording with microneurography. Examples of the regionalization of human sympathetic responses disclosed include the preferential activation of the cardiac sympathetic outflow with mental stress, cigarette smoking, aerobic exercise, cardiac failure, coronary insufficiency, essential hypertension and in ventricular arrhythmias, and the preferential stimulation or inhibition of the renal sympathetic nerves with low salt diets and mental stress, and with exercise training, respectively. By application of the same principles, regional release of the sympathetic cotransmitters neuropeptide Y and adrenaline can be studied in humans. Cotransmitter release, however, is detected only with some difficulty. In restricted circumstances we find evidence of regional cotransmitter release to plasma, such as the release of neuropeptide Y from the heart at the very high rates of sympathetic nerve firing occurring with aerobic exercise, and cardiac adrenaline release also with exercise and after loading of the neuronal adrenaline pool by intravenous infusion of adrenaline.
 ...
PMID:Clinical application of noradrenaline spillover methodology: delineation of regional human sympathetic nervous responses. 811 6

The critical left ventricular (LV) mass when hypertensive heart failure appears, and whether LV dysfunction in hypertensives with heart failure is normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy were investigated. LV dimension, LV mass, LV mass index, LV ejection time (LVET) and pre-ejection period (PEP) were measured in 27 normal subjects and 56 essential hypertensives, the latter divided into three groups: group I, without LV hypertrophy; group II, with LV hypertrophy; and group III, with hypertensive heart failure. LV mass and LV mass index were 135.0 +/- 23.8 g and 85.8 +/- 11.7 g/m2, respectively, in normal controls, 133.0 +/- 30.8 g and 82.0 +/- 18.4 g/m2 in group I, 222.3 +/- 38.0 g and 136.1 +/- 19.9 g/m2 in group II, and 422.0 +/- 30.3 g and 235.7 +/- 19.6 g/m2 in group III of essential hypertensives. The upper limits of LV mass and LV mass index in group II (mean + 2SD) were about 300 g and 180 g/m2, respectively. Significant shortening of LVET was observed only in group III, but PEP was prolonged with an increase in LV mass. LV diastolic dimension and PEP were not normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy (mean: 16 months). These results indicate that the critical LV mass marking the transition from non-failing hypertrophied left ventricle to failing ventricle associated with essential hypertension is about 300 g, or LV mass index of 180 g/m2, and that LV dilatation and depressed myocardial contractility in essential hypertensives with a past history of congestive heart failure were not normalized by chronic antihypertensive therapy.
 ...
PMID:Is left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients with heart failure normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy? 817 28

Due to its physiological and pharmacological action ANF could be an ideal diuretic and vasorelaxation product in the treatment of oedema and essential hypertension. Experimental and clinical investigations in oedematous conditions revealed a very slight diuretic and natriuretic effect of ANF, as compared with healthy subjects. This is due to the reduced renal perfusion pressure, the increased RAAS activity, enzymatic degradation of ANF by endopeptidase and also its inactivation via C-receptors. Moreover the use of ANF is very limited due to its short half-life and peptide structure. In recent years therefore new possibilities are sought how to influence the metabolism of endogenous ANF and thus increase its activity. Neutral endopeptidase inhibitors (NEP) inhibit ANF degradation, increase thus its plasma level and in cardiac weakntlakess have a marked diuretic and natriuretic effect. The administration of NEP inhibitors in patients with essential hypertension did not reveal so far an adequate effect on blood pressure. Inhibitors of C-receptors potentiate also the effect of endogenous ANF. In experiments they enhance Na excretion and lead to a drop of blood pressure. Recently another natriuretic peptide was detected--urodilatine. In experimental and clinical studies in cardiac failure urodilatine administration leads to an increase of diuresis and natriuresis greater than after ANF. Haemodynamic effects after urodilatine are also greater than after ANF whereby urodilatine does not cause reflex tachycardia and is resistant to peptidase degradation. Its therapeutic administration is a new perspective in the treatment of oedematous conditions and essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Use of natriuretic peptides in clinical practice]. 818 76


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10