Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018799 (heart disease)
 34,133 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To assess subendocardial (long-axis) and mid-wall (short-axis) left ventricular (LV) function in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy (MD1), with no symptoms or clinical signs of heart disease, to investigate if they have subclinical cardiac involvement, 28 subjects (14 with MD1, and 14 age- and sex-matched normals) had conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Myocardial velocities and timings to peak systolic contractions were measured. LV wall thickness, diameters, and ejection fraction were not different between the groups. 4/14 of the MD1 patients (29%) had global diastolic dysfunction. Both long-axis and short-axis systolic and early diastolic myocardial velocities were lower in patients with MD1, whereas time-to-peak myocardial contraction was longer; mean longitudinal systolic velocity was 5.5+/-1.7 cm/s in patients with MD1, compared with 7.8+/-1.3 cm/s in normal subjects (P<0.001) 10/14 of the patients (71%) had reduced longitudinal systolic function. Longitudinal systolic and diastolic velocities were inversely related to the duration of the QRS complex ( r=-0.86 and r=-0.63 respectively, both P<0.01), but they did not correlate with the CTG-repeat size. Patients with MD1 have subclinical cardiac impairment revealed by measurement of myocardial velocities using tissue Doppler echocardiography.
 ...
PMID:Subclinical cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy manifesting as decreased myocardial Doppler velocities. 1535 28

The purpose of this research was to determine the frequency and factors affecting disagreement between pediatric cardiologist (MD1 or MD2) and the computer-assisted interpretation (CAI) of pediatric electrocardiograms from patients with heart disease (HD, n = 586) or normal heart (n = 561). Significant disagreement was found in HD (146/586, 25%) compared with normal heart (64/561, 11%) (P < .001). The CAI overinterpreted prolonged QT, sinus rhythm with ectopy, and right ventricular hypertrophy; CAI underinterpreted sinus rhythm, sinus arrhythmia, and right bundle branch block (P < .05). Increased disagreement was independently associated with HD (odds ration [OR], 2.2), younger patient age at the time of the electrocardiogram, if the computer interpretation had more than 3 separate diagnostic statements (OR, 3.2) and if the overreading cardiologist was MD1 (OR, 2.9). Although CAI is helpful, pediatric cardiologists were more likely to disagree with the computer in rhythm diagnosis, recognition of bundle branch block, hypertrophy, and QT interval analysis.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of computerized interpretation of the pediatric electrocardiogram. 1695 Mar 33