Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018799 (heart disease)
34,133 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Antiarrhythmic therapy is known to be associated with a significant risk of adverse cardiac reactions, including a proarrhythmic response. This study assessed in 1,330 patients followed up for 292 +/- 393 days the predictive value for cardiovascular safety of a system by which patients were classified according to ventricular arrhythmias on entry, presence or absence of organic heart disease and drug dose for flecainide acetate. Baseline arrhythmia subgroups included patients with premature ventricular complexes only, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Proarrhythmic events occurred in 6.8% of patients overall and were serious in 2.3% and lethal in 1.0%. However, proarrhythmia was highly dependent on arrhythmia class on entry: serious nonlethal proarrhythmic events occurred in 6.6% of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, only 0.9% with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and 0% with premature ventricular complexes (p less than 0.01). Proarrhythmic death occurred in 3.1% of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 0.2% with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and 0% with premature ventricular complexes only (p less than 0.01). Proarrhythmia was also influenced by the presence of structural heart disease: serious nonlethal proarrhythmia occurred in 2.6% of patients with versus 0.4% of those without organic heart disease, and death occurred in 1.2 versus 0%, respectively. These adverse events were also dependent on dosing regimen. Flecainide caused premature discontinuation due to new or worsened heart failure in 1.4% of patients, all with underlying organic heart disease; however, heart failure was not clearly related to dose or type of arrhythmia. Symptomatic conduction disturbances occurred in 2.2%, and were predicted by preexistent sinus node disease but not by other baseline features.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Classification by type of ventricular arrhythmia predicts frequency of adverse cardiac events from flecainide. 374 6

The Authors present their experience, based on 180 patients, concerning the treatment of chronic ventricular tachycardia. According to the underlying etiology, about 1/3 of the cases were considered idiopathic (most of all in form of salvos), 1/3 were ischemic with a prior myocardial infarction (ventricular tachycardias in the setting of acute myocardial infarction were not considered) and 1/3 had miscellaneous cardiac diseases. Prophylactic treatment of ventricular tachycardia recurrences was divided in three steps: classic antiarrhythmic drugs used in monotherapy (Quinidine or Quinidine-like, betablockers, Verapamil); Amiodarone or recent class I antiarrhythmics (Flecainide, Propafenone); drug combinations. The results of medical treatment were different according to the underlying etiology: the first two steps achieved control of the arrhythmia in 2/3 of patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, in 45% of ventricular tachycardia due to miscellaneous cardiopathy and only in 35% of cases with post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia. Four patients were referred for antiarrhythmic surgery and 3 received a palliative electrical device. During a mean follow-up period of 5 years, there were no deaths in the group with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, 10% of deaths in the group with miscellaneous cardiopathy and 17% in the group with post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia. Idiopathic ventricular tachycardias seem to bear a minimal risk, and the need to treat them depends only on the severity of functional signs and on the frequency of arrhythmic episodes. In patients with severe underlying cardiopathy, particularly ischemic heart disease, active search for an effective treatment is mandatory, due to the high risk of death.
...
PMID:[How and why treat ventricular hyperkinetic arrhythmias]. 673 20

Flecainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent with a controversial role in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias following myocardial infarction after the publication of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). To assess its utility in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), we evaluated the electrophysiologic effects and therapeutic efficacy of intravenous flecainide, administered in a dose of 2 mg per kg body weight in 26 patients of PSVT, studied by programmed electrical stimulation. The patients' age ranged from 18-49 years (mean: 27 +/- 8) and none had organic heart disease. The mechanism of PSVT was atrioventricular nodal reentry (AVNRT) with anterograde conduction through slow pathway and retrograde through fast pathway in 14, and atrioventricular reentry (AVRT) utilizing an accessory pathway in 12 patients. Flecainide was successful in terminating the tachycardia in all (100%) patients of AVNRT and 11 (92%) patients with AVRT. In both the types, the tachycardia was terminated by selective block in conduction through the retrograde limb of the reentry circuit. The drug also produced a complete anterograde block with abolition of preexcitation in 6 out of 8 patients with WPW syndrome. After the drug, the tachycardia was reinducible in one patient of AVNRT and 4 with AVRT. The cycle length of inducible tachycardia increased from 295 +/- 25 ms to 389 +/- 24.5 ms after flecainide (p < 0.001). There were no adverse haemodynamic effects of the drug. Our results, thus, showed that intravenous flecainide is a highly effective and safe antiarrhythmic drug for termination of PSVT mediated by atrioventricular nodal and atrioventricular reentry mechanisms without producing any adverse effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Electrophysiologic effects and therapeutic efficacy of intravenous flecainide for termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. 755 90

In a 4 1/2 year period fetal, echocardiographic studies were performed on 1600 fetuses. In 55 with arrhythmia, 44 had supraventricular ectopic beats, resolved in all, and none had heart disease. Sustained arrhythmias occurred in 11 fetuses. Atrial flutter was present in 3 all with heart disease (Ebstein disease, right atrial tumour and WPW diagnosed after birth). Another 3 fetuses had supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), all with a normal heart. In the bradycardia group, 2 had complete heart block (CHB) associated with AVSD; 2 sinus bradycardia and one had non conducted atrial ectopic beats. Digoxin was the first choice drug for tachyarrhythmia therapy; association with Verapamil, Flecainide, Quinidine and Procainamide was used in 4 of the 6. One fetus with CHB received Orciprenaline with no results. Atrial flutter resolved or improved; in SVT 2 fetuses converted to sinus rhythm and one died in utero. All fetuses with CHB died in cardiac failure. Mortality was 27% (3 cases) in utero and global 36%. In our experience most fetal arrhythmias (90%) were transitory ectopic beats or non lasting bradycardia in normal heart and did not trigger other kinds of arrhythmias. In sustained arrhythmias, heart failure and heart disease had a negative effect on prognosis.
...
PMID:[Fetal arrhythmia. A case load of 4 years and a half]. 777 Dec 7

Flecainide is an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium because it is a potent agent for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease. Flecainide also may be useful in patients with debilitating nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias in the absence of structural heart disease. It is rarely useful in the management of life-threatening sustained ventricular arrhythmias.
...
PMID:Flecainide: its value and danger. 819 70

Patients with supraventricular arrhythmias have been safely and effectively treated with flecainide. We conducted an open-label, 20-center trial to define further the safety and efficacy profile of oral flecainide in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias, including atrial tachycardias (ectopic or multifocal), atrial-ventricular tachycardias (reentrant), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter (PAF), and chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF). Our study population of 151 patients with documented supraventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment included 67 with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), 67 with PAF (symptoms < 15 days), and 17 with CAF (symptoms > of = 15 days)> The initial flecainide dose of 100 mg twice daily could be increased by 50 mg bid every 4 days to a maximum of 200 mg twice daily. Patients who were effectively treated could receive flecainide for 1 year. The study was terminated April 26, 1989, in response to interim results reported by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). All patients were removed from the study by August 1989. At study termination 87% of PSVT, 73% of PAF, and 56% of CAF patients had improved symptomatically while on flecainide therapy. Eleven patients experienced cardiac adverse experiences: proarrhythmic events (3 patients), new or worsened congestive heart failure (7 patients), sinus pauses (1 patient). Cardiac side effects appeared to be more frequent in patients in the CAF group (5/17 patients), all of whom had structural heart disease. Overall, 45 (67%) PSVT, 43 (64%) PAF, and 9 (56%) CAF patients reported at least 1 noncardiac adverse experience; the most common were abnormal vision, dizziness, and headaches. One patient from the CAF group died; the death was considered to be unrelated to flecainide. Flecainide appears to be safe and effective treatment for patients with supraventricular arrhythmias of a variety of mechanisms and appears particularly effective for patients with PSVT. The efficacy is lowest and side effects most frequent in patients with CAF, as seen with other trials of antiarrhythmic medication in these patients. In the context of the CAST experience and other trials of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with CAF, the balance of risk and benefit of therapy should be considered carefully before initiating treatment.
...
PMID:Safety and utility of flecainide acetate in the routine care of patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: results of a multicenter trial. The Flecainide Supraventricular Tachycardia Study Group. 860 95

Flecainide and propafenone are antiarrhythmic drugs of the class 1C (Vaughan and Williams) commonly used for ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs in 170 consecutive patients with ventricular arrhythmias who referred to our cardiological ambulatory. The study population was divided into two groups according to the absence (group A,82 patients) or presence of organic heart disease (group 1B: 51 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35%; group 2B: 37 patients with LVEF<35%). Ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated with a 48 hours Holter monitoring at baseline, and with a control 24 hours Holter monitoring at 15 days (for optimizing the dosage), at 5 months and at 10 months from the beginning of antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients of group A were randomly assigned to antiarrhythmic treatment (flecainide 150-300 mg/die or propafenone 450-900 mg/die). For patients of group B, such choice was leaded by the clinical and strumental data (32 patients were treated with flecainide, 56 patients with propafenone). In the 160 patients who ended the 10 months follow-up, we observed the following results: patients of group A showed a mean percentage reduction in incidence of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) after therapy in comparison to basal conditions of 93% and 89% with flecainide and propafenone, respectively, after a treatment of 5 months (p < 0.001); after 10 months mean percentage reduction of PVC was 91% with each drug (p = n.s.); complex ventricular events (CVE) were reduced of 90% and of 100% after 5 and 10 months, respectively, of treatment with flecainide and of 100% both after 5 and 10 months of treatment with propafenone (p = n.s.) -- patients of group 1B showed a mean percentage reduction of PVC of 87% and 84% after 5 and 10 months, respectiively, of treatment with propafenone (p = n.s.); after 5 months of therapy mean percentage CVE reduction was 66% with flecainide and 86% with propafenone (p < 0.001); after 10 months this mean reduction was 53% with flecainide and 73% with propafenone (p < 0.001). -- patients of group 2B showed a mean reduction of PVC of 59% and 58% after 5 and 10 months of therapy with flecainide, and of 65% and 67% after 5 and 10 months of therapy with propafenone (p = n.s.); CVE were reduced of 28% with flecainide and of 47% with propafenone after 5 months of treatment (p < 0.001) and of 36% with flecainide against 52% with propafenone after 10 months (p < 0.01). In the present study there was no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of tollerance and collateral effects (8% with flecainide vs 7%, with propafenone). Our results confirm the efficacy of the 1C class drugs in the treatment of "essential" ventricular arrhytmias. This efficacy appears reduced in non selected patients with organic heart disease. In these latter patients propafenone has shown more efficacy than flecainide in reducing CVE.
...
PMID:[Propafenone and flecainide in the therapy of ventricular arrhythmias]. 881 14

Antiarrhythmic drugs are known to affect the depolarization and repolarization time in a different fashion. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of Sotalol, Flecainide and Propafenone on some common (QT, QTc, JT, JTc) or uncommon (QTc dispersion, T-peak to T-end interval) electrocardiographic parameters in order to evaluate the effects of these antiarrhythmic drugs on ventricular repolarization time both in terms of absolute values and of dispersion across the myocardium. The analysis of these antiarrhythmic drug effects was performed on the standard 12-lead electrocardiograms of 31 patients (17F and 14M, age 38.1+/-17 years, range 11-67 years) in the free-drug state and at the steady state after oral treatment with Sotalol (160 mg daily), Flecainide (200 mg daily) and Propafenone (450 mg daily). These drugs were prescribed, separately, to all the 31 patients, free of underlying structural heart disease, for the treatment of their atrio-ventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia. Data of the present study show that Sotalol, over the range prescribed, significantly prolongs ventricular repolarization index QT (P=0.001), JT (P=0.0001) and JTc (P=0.0001) values in an homogeneous fashion, as shown by the significant decrease in QTcD (P=0.019) and Tp-Te (P=0.01). On the contrary, Flecainide treatment was associated with an increase in QTcD (P=0.029), Tp-Te (0.0001), QT (P=0.001), QTc (P=0.0001) and QRS (P=0.0001), with no significant changes in JT and JTc. Propafenone, over the range prescribed, did not affect repolarization time, resulting only in a prolongation of depolarization time as expressed by the increase of QRS (P=0.0001).
...
PMID:Compared effects of sotalol, flecainide and propafenone on ventricular repolarization in patients free of underlying structural heart disease. 982 29

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years. Current opinion among physicians on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. This has several potential benefits, including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms, hemodynamic improvements, and possibly a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. After normal sinus rhythm has been restored, antiarrhythmic therapy is necessary to reduce the frequency of AF recurrence. In the selection of an antiarrhythmic agent, both efficacy and safety should be taken into consideration. Many antiarrhythmic agents have the capacity to provoke proarrhythmia, which may result in an increase in mortality. This is of particular concern with sodium-channel blockers in the context of patients with structural heart disease. Flecainide and propafenone are well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients without significant cardiac disease but with AF. Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide (recently approved), ibutilide (approved for chemical conversion of AF and atrial flutter), and azimilide (still to be approved) in patients with AF and structural heart disease. To date, amiodarone and sotalol still hold the greatest interest, and although controlled clinical trials with these agents have been few, a number are in progress and some have been recently completed. These agents are effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and are associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmia when used appropriately. Because of the relative paucity of placebo-controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with AF, experience until recently has tended to dictate treatment decisions. Increasingly, selection of drug therapy is being based on a careful and individualized benefit-risk evaluation by means of controlled clinical trials, an approach that is likely to dominate the overall approach to the control of atrial fibrillation in the largest numbers of cases of the arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy is likely to be dominated by compounds that exert their predominant effect by prolonging atrial repolarization.
...
PMID:Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization. 1056 77

Flecainide is an antiarrhythmic considered safe in patients who have no structural cardiopathy, and frequently used in the prevention of atrial fibrillation. However, in patients with a history of infarction and/or severe conduction disorders, its proarrhythmicity may be lethal. Torsade-de-pointes type tachycardia is not included as one of these proarrhythmic effects, since the drug's scant action on ventricular repolarization makes this adverse effect very unlikely. We present the case of a patient who, shortly after beginning treatment with flecainide, was admitted because of syncope related to bradyarrhythmias, long QT, and torsade-de-pointes. There have been very few published cases in which one finds such an association between flecainide and this infrequent arrhythmia.
...
PMID:Torsade-de-pointes in a patient under flecainide treatment, an unusual case of proarrhythmicity. 1705 39


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>