Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, and norfloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, both administered orally, were compared for the treatment of serious urinary tract infections (UTIs). In total, 301 patients from multiple centers who had serious UTIs were randomized to receive fleroxacin or norfloxacin in a double-blind study. The demographic parameters of the two groups were similar. A total of 190 patients were evaluable for efficacy, 94 in the fleroxacin group and 96 in the norfloxacin group. The reasons for exclusion from the efficacy analysis were not significantly different in the two groups, but more patients receiving fleroxacin were prematurely withdrawn from the study. The majority (134) of the diagnoses were complicated UTI, and the pathogens were primarily Enterobacteriaceae. The clinical responses were cure or improvement in 98% of the fleroxacin group and 92% of the norfloxacin group and failure in 2% of the fleroxacin group and 7% of the norfloxacin group. The bacteriologic results by infection were cure in 98% of the fleroxacin group and 89% of the norfloxacin group (including cure with superinfection in 4% of the fleroxacin group and 5% of the norfloxacin group) and failure in 2% of the fleroxacin group and 11% of the norfloxacin group. Adverse events were more common in the fleroxacin group and were mostly nausea, insomnia, and headache. Fleroxacin, 400 mg once daily, was as effective as norfloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, in eradicating UTIs but was associated with more adverse events.
 ...
PMID:Fleroxacin versus norfloxacin for oral treatment of serious urinary tract infections. 845 64

The object of this open-label, noncomparative, multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 400 mg of fleroxacin administered orally once daily for 2-12 weeks to patients with bone and joint infections (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and prosthetic joint infection). A total of 90 adult patients (56 men and 34 women) were treated at 11 centers. Patients returned on days 5-9 of treatment, subsequently every 2 weeks during treatment, and 0-3 days and 28-42 days (compulsory follow-up) after treatment for assessment of bacteriologic, clinical, and safety parameters. A total of 19 patients (13 with osteomyelitis, 5 with septic arthritis, and 1 with prosthetic joint infection) were bacteriologically evaluable. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen isolated in all evaluable infections. Of the 13 patients with osteomyelitis, 11 (85%) were bacteriologically cured and 10 (77%) were clinically cured. Three of the five patients with septic arthritis and the single patient with a prosthetic joint infection were both bacteriologically and clinically cured. Clinical adverse events related to fleroxacin were reported by 25 (28%) of the 90 patients. Most of these events involved the digestive system (primarily constipation and nausea) and the central nervous system (primarily insomnia and headache). The majority of these were of mild or moderate intensity and occurred during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Adverse events led to premature discontinuation of treatment in seven patients. Bone and joint infections continue to represent a therapeutic challenge. Treatment is based mainly on surgical procedures (drainage, sequestrectomy, ablation of implants, and implantation of cement impregnated with antibiotics) and on parenteral administration of antibiotics, requiring hospitalization of the patient. Fleroxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, has proven in vitro activity against bacteria involved in bone and joint infections. Its oral, once-daily administration, which eliminates hospitalization and its attendant costs, makes this drug an effective outpatient treatment of bone and joint infections.
 ...
PMID:A pilot study of oral fleroxacin given once daily in patients with bone and joint infections. 845 77

In a multicenter, randomized, open, comparative trial, patients with uncomplicated gonorrhea were treated with 400 mg of oral fleroxacin or 250 mg of intramuscular ceftriaxone. A total of 458 men and 447 women were enrolled. Of these, 312 men (68%) and 245 women (55%) were evaluable for efficacy. The treatment groups were demographically similar. Among evaluable men, fleroxacin eradicated 154 of 155 (99%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.1-100%) urethral and 2 of 2 pharyngeal infections, while ceftriaxone eradicated 156 of 156 (95% CI: 99.4-100%) urethral and 5 of 5 pharyngeal infections. Among evaluable women, fleroxacin eradicated 127 of 128 (99%; 95% CI: 97.7-100%) cervical, 20 of 20 anorectal, 16 of 16 urethral, and 7 of 7 pharyngeal infections, while ceftriaxone eradicated 108 of 108 (95% CI: 99.1-100%) cervical, 24 of 24 anorectal, 25 of 25 urethral, and 9 of 9 pharyngeal infections. Adverse events were reported by 68 (16%) of 426 subjects in the fleroxacin group and 20 (5%) of 380 in the ceftriaxone group (p < 0.0001). The most common adverse events reported by the patients who received fleroxacin were nausea (5%), headache (3%), and vaginitis (3%). One patient had severe vomiting, 19 participants had adverse reactions classified as moderate, and 48 patients had mild adverse reactions. Fleroxacin was highly effective in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea and represents an oral alternative to ceftriaxone. Adverse events were more common with fleroxacin than with ceftriaxone.
 ...
PMID:Multicenter trial of fleroxacin versus ceftriaxone in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. 845 87