Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Pain, nausea and vomiting are frequently listed by patients as their most important perioperative concerns. With the change in emphasis from an inpatient to outpatient hospital and office-based medical/surgical environment, there has been increased interest in the 'big little problem' of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Currently, the overall incidence of PONV is estimated to be 25 to 30%, with severe, intractable PONV estimated to occur in approximately 0.18% of all patients undergoing surgery. PONV can lead to delayed postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery room discharge and unanticipated hospital admission, thereby increasing medical costs. The aetiology and consequences of PONV are complex and multifactorial, with patient-, medical- and surgery-related factors. A thorough understanding of these factors, as well as the neuropharmacology of multiple emetic receptors [dopaminergic, muscarinic, cholinergic, opioid, histamine, serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine; 5-HT)] and physiology [cranial nerves VIII (acoustic-vestibular), IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagus), gastrointestinal reflex] relating to PONV are necessary to most effectively manage PONV. Commonly used older, traditional antiemetics for PONV include the anticholinergics (scopolamine), phenothiazines (promethazine), antihistamines (diphenhydramine), butyrophenones (droperidol) and benzamides (metoclopramide). These antiemetics have adverse effects such as dry mouth, sedation, hypotension, extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonic effects and restlessness. The newest class of antiemetics used for the prevention and treatment of PONV are the serotonin receptor antagonists (ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron, dolasetron). These antiemetics do not have the adverse effects of the older, traditional antiemetics. Headache and dizziness are the main adverse effects of the serotonin receptor antagonists in the dosages used for PONV. The serotonin receptor antagonists have improved antiemetic effectiveness but are not as completely efficacious for PONV as they are for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Older, traditional antiemetics (such as droperidol) compare favourably with the serotonin receptor antagonists regarding efficacy for PONV prevention. Combination antiemetic therapy improves efficacy for PONV prevention and treatment. In the difficult-to-treat PONV patient (as in the chemotherapy patient), suppression of numerous emetogenic peripheral stimuli and central neuroemetic receptors may be necessary. This multimodal PONV management approach includes use of: (i) multiple different antiemetic medications (double or triple combination antiemetic therapy acting at different neuroreceptor sites); (ii) less emetogenic anaesthesia techniques; (iii) adequate intravenous hydration; and (iv) adequate pain control.
 ...
PMID:Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 1073 May 46

More than a century has elapsed since the appearance of the modern descriptions of polycythemia vera (PV). During this time, much has been learned regarding disease pathogenesis and PV-associated molecular aberrations. New information has allowed amendments to traditional diagnostic criteria. Phlebotomy remains the cornerstone treatment of PV, whereas myelosuppressive agents may augment the benefit of using phlebotomy for thrombosis prevention in high-risk patients. Excessive aspirin use is contraindicated in PV, although the use of lower-dose aspirin has been shown to be safe and effective in alleviating microvascular symptoms including erythromelalgia and headaches. Recent studies have shown the utility of selective serotonin receptor antagonists for treating PV-associated pruritus. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered. What is the specific genetic mutation or altered molecular pathway that is causally related to the disease? In the absence of a specific molecular marker, how is a working diagnosis of PV made? What evidence supports current practice in the management of PV? This article summarizes both old and new information on PV; proposes a modern diagnostic algorithm to formulate a working diagnosis; and provides recommendations for patient management, relying whenever possible on an evidence-based approach.
 ...
PMID:Polycythemia vera: a comprehensive review and clinical recommendations. 1500 17

Eletriptan is a member of the triptan family of selective serotonin receptor agonists. These act against migraine by inducing vasoconstriction of the meningeal arteries. In pharmacological tests, eletriptan has shown high affinity for the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors, which have been implicated in the etiology of migraine headache attacks. Pharmacokinetic evaluations have concluded that eletriptan offers greater bioavailability than sumatriptan, the effective predecessor to eletriptan. A rapid onset of action has also been characteristic of eletriptan in clinical trials, which have likewise demonstrated eletriptan's superiority to sumatriptan in granting relief of headache pain and other symptoms associated with migraine to a greater number of migraine patients. The drug has generally been well tolerated with only mild to moderate adverse events reported. These characteristics make eletriptan an attractive alternative to sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine. (c) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
 ...
PMID:Migraine headache treatment with eletriptan, a second-generation serotonin receptor agonist. 1278 88

Frovatriptan succinate is one of the most recent serotonin receptor agonists to receive FDA, approved labelling for use in the acute management of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mechanism of action of frovatriptan is thought to be similar to that of a serotonin agonist. However, frovatriptan has distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic properties, chiefly, a high affinity for serotonin receptors 1B and 1D and a long elimination half-life; frovatriptan was shown to be more selective for cerebral than coronary arteries, a property which makes frovatriptan more favourable in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Additionally, frovatriptan has a half-life of approximately 25 h, substantially longer than that of any other agent within its class. This property makes frovatriptan suitable for patients who typically suffer migraines of long duration and/or those who suffer migraine recurrence. The efficacy of frovatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine was demonstrated in five double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. At 2h, headache response rates for frovatriptan 2.5 mg ranged from 38 to 40% compared to 22-35% for placebo. Headache recurrence for frovatriptan 2.5 mg at 24h ranged from 9 to 14% compared with 18% in placebo subjects. Frovatriptan has no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with drugs used for migraine prophylaxis or with commonly prescribed medications. Adverse effects of frovatriptan including dizziness, paresthesia, dry mouth, fatigue and flushing were generally mild and well tolerated. Given the fact that patient response to serotonin agonists is individualised, and selecting an effective agent may involve trial and error, frovatriptan is a welcome alternative in the acute management of migraine.
 ...
PMID:Frovatriptan succinate, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist for migraine. 1531 27

Chronic drug exposure can induce a significant change in neurotransmitter receptor systems and is possibly involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced neurological disorders. Abuse of analgesics is known to induce deterioration in headache status in patients with primary headaches, especially migraine. To assess the possibility of 5-HT2A serotonin receptor plasticity in this condition, we investigated receptor binding on the platelet membrane in patients with analgesic-induced transformed migraine, patients with migraine, and nonheadache controls. Various concentrations of [3H]-spiperone (0.4 to 12 nmol) was used as a radioligand, and ketanserin was used to determine nonspecific binding. A lower maximal number of receptors (Bmax) was observed in patients with migraine as compared to patients with transformed migraine, and controls (467 +/- 58, 708 +/- 36, and 786 +/- 64 fmol/mg protein, respectively, P<0.01); whereas the value of the dissociation equilibrium constant (Kd) remained unchanged (1.72 +/- 0.16, 1.41 +/- 0.13, and 1.25 +/- 0.21 nmol for patients with migraine, patients with transformed migraine, and nonheadache controls, respectively). A significant decrease in Bmax value was observed in patients with transformed migraine after 4 weeks of analgesic withdrawal (770 +/- 25 and 345 +/- 31 fmol/mg protein, P<0.001), whilst no significant change in Kd value was observed (1.95 +/- 0.12 and 2.47 +/- 0.30 nmol, respectively). These findings indicate that 5-HT2A serotonin receptor system is altered in patients with transformed migraine with analgesic overuse. Such receptor plasticity may be an important step in the pathogenic mechanism of transformed migraine.
Headache
PMID:Plasticity of 5-HT serotonin receptor in patients with analgesic-induced transformed migraine. 1561 70

A young woman presented with multiple central hypersensitivity disorders, including fibromyalgia, headache, pelvic pain and several smooth muscle spasm disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder and Raynaud's phenomenon. She also had significant fatigue and sleep problems. Her case illustrates the importance and surprising frequency of atypical bipolar mood disorders in people with multiple central hypersensitivity pain disorders, especially with depression and anxiety resistant to antidepressant treatment. Considering neurological mechanisms common to her overlapping disorders was very helpful in guiding treatment choices. This experience illustrates the value of serotonin receptor type 2 (5HT2) inhibition with atypical neuroleptics, of neural cation channel and glutamate inhibition with anticonvulsants, and the potential usefulness of antidepressants after establishing 5HT2 control to enhance downward inhibitory tracts. Medications with combined usefulness for both bipolar mood and pain disorders were highly effective for her multiple hypersensitivity problems.
 ...
PMID:Serotonin mechanisms in pain and functional syndromes: management implications in comorbid fibromyalgia, headache, and irritable bowl syndrome - case study and discussion. 1576 Aug 6

The incidence of migraine varies over the course of the menstrual cycle. In the general population, approximately 60% of women with migraine report an increased frequency of headache during menses. The estrogen withdrawal that occurs just prior to the onset of menses and that leads to loss of serotonergic tone is thought to be the trigger for headaches that arise at this time of the menstrual cycle. The ability of triptans, specific serotonin receptor agonists, to prevent menstrual migraine is consistent with this hypothesis. Moreover, compared with headaches that occur during other times in the cycle, menstrual migraines are more severe in most women and may be of longer duration, as well as more resistant to treatment in a subset of women.
Headache 2006 Oct
PMID:Menstrual migraine: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and impact. 1704 42

There are potential concerns regarding serotonin receptor agonists in SLE patients with migraine, particularly patients with concomitant Raynaud's syndrome. We estimated the prevalence of lupus-related headache and Raynaud's syndrome in the Montreal General Hospital SLE clinic cohort and evaluated the relationship between these two variables in multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for age, sex, race, SLE duration and the presence of lupus anticoagulant and antibodies to cardiolipin and beta2 glycoprotein I. We also assessed, through chart review in those individuals with both Raynaud's syndrome and migraine, a history of serotonin receptor agonist use, and any associated worsening vasospasm. Based on Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) scores, the cumulative incidence of lupus-related headache in our sample (n = 391) was 46.1%; the prevalence of Raynaud's syndrome was 49.4%. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for lupus-related headache and Raynaud's syndrome was 1.7 (95% CI 1.1, 2.5). In addition, there was a strong independent relationship between headache and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (adjusted OR 5.6 [95% CI 1.8, 17.0]). The data from our chart review suggest that careful use of serotonin receptor agonists in patients with both Raynaud's syndrome and migraines may be undertaken, although caution would necessitate that these agents not be used in individuals with very severe Raynaud's (eg, digital ulcerations, and so on).
 ...
PMID:Headache, Raynaud's syndrome and serotonin receptor agonists in systemic lupus erythematosus. 1712 May 94

A variety of drugs from diverse pharmacological classes are in use for migraine prevention. Traditionally, they have been discovered by serendipity. Examples include beta-adrenergic blockers, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin receptor antagonists. The mechanisms of action of migraine preventive drugs are multiple but it is postulated that they converge on two targets: (1) inhibition of cortical excitation; (2) restoring nociceptive dysmodulation. The antiepileptic drugs (e.g., topiramate, valproate, gabapentin), calcium channel blockers such as verapamil, and inhibitors of cortical spreading depression are some examples of drugs that reduce neuronal hyperexcitability. On the other hand, modulators of the serotonergic and adrenergic systems and cholinergic enhancing drugs may restore descending nociceptive inhibition and play a role in migraine prevention. To date, Level 1 evidence and clinical experience favor the use of the antidepressant amitriptyline, the anticonvulsants divalproex and topiramate, and the beta-adrenergic blockers propranolol, timolol and metoprolol as first line migraine preventive drugs. The evidence for others (e.g., verapamil) is not as strong. Migraine preventive drugs have varying degrees of adverse effects, some of which could be limiting, and their efficacy should balanced with their risks of adverse effects, patients' expectations and desires, and compliance. It is hoped that future migraine preventive drugs target migraine mechanisms more specifically, which could well enhance the therapeutic index.
Headache 2007 Apr
PMID:Current trends in migraine prophylaxis. 1742 10

Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder. Despite the need for a perfect treatment of this debilitating condition, the ideal "cure" eludes us. In 1992, the first triptan was released in the US for use in acute migraine. Triptans are more specific for the serotonin receptor 5-hydroxy triptamine (5-HT) 1 than previously prescribed drugs, such as ergotamines, with fewer side effects. This was an important first step in specific acute migraine therapy. Today however, triptans continue to be underutilized. There remains a concern, among practitioners and patients, about possible cardiovascular safety issues, despite the lack of strong evidence of serious adverse events. In fact, triptans now have a safe track record over more than a decade of use. Other perceived downfalls to use, include cost and variable efficacy. The more we learn about the clinical features and pathophysiology of migraine, the closer we are to finding a satisfactory monotherapy. Until then, recognizing that mixed mechanisms underlie migraine symptoms, rational polytherapy can be useful. Research on the roles of serotonin, calcitonin gene related peptide, glutamine and N-methyl-D-aspartate in the trigeminovascular system holds promise for those searching for the perfect migraine headache cure.
 ...
PMID:Acute migraine: Current treatment and emerging therapies. 1848 69


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>