Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Nimodipine is one of the most discussed calcium antagonists used in cerebrovascular diseases and, recently, in migraine prophylaxis. Its specificity in preventing cerebral arterial constriction has been invoked to explain nimodipine's efficacy in migraine. The discovery of neuronal receptors specific for dihydropyridines, however, favours a mechanism of action for nimodipine that is not exclusively vascular. This is in accordance with a view of migraine pathogenesis which implicates a primary neuronal event as the basis of the vascular changes observed in migraine patients.
Headache 1990 May
PMID:Is nimodipine useful in migraine prophylaxis? Further considerations. 219 39

This double blind, randomized study of the calcium antagonist Nimodipine 40 mg t.i.d. vs placebo in the prophylaxis of common migraine (migraine without aura) included 192 patients. Patients with 2-8 migraine days/4 weeks, age 18-60, who had no other types of recurring headaches except up to 6 interval headaches/4 weeks were included. The study was carried out at 11 European centers. After a 4 week run-in period, patients were randomly allocated to Nimodipine or placebo for 12 weeks (parallel groups). There were 19 drop-outs, 12 on Nimodipine and 7 on placebo. A gradual and marked improvement was seen both with Nimodipine and with placebo amounting to approximately 60% during the last 4 weeks. Statistical analysis on all included patients (intention to treat) revealed no difference between Nimodipine and placebo for migraine days (P = 0.69) or migraine index (p = 0.91). In patients "valid for analysis of efficacy" there were also no significant differences. Due to a very marked placebo effect and use of the parallel groups design, the present trial was not very powerful despite the large number of patients and a satisfactory compliance. We cannot rule out that Nimodipine might have up to 30% effect on a single main outcome parameter, but the uniform lack of response in all tested parameters makes this unlikely. Therefore Nimodipine probably has only a small or no effect in common migraine (migraine without aura).
Headache 1989 Nov
PMID:European multicenter trial of nimodipine in the prophylaxis of common migraine (migraine without aura). Migraine-Nimodipine European Study Group (MINES). 269 5

This double-blind, randomized study of the Nimodipine 40 mg t.i.d. vs placebo in the prophylaxis of classic migraine (migraine with aura) included 89 patients. Required migraine frequency was 2-8 migraine days/4 weeks and at least two of the attacks within the last 6 months had to be with aura. The study was carried out at 11 European centers. After a 4 week run-in period, patients were randomly allocated to nimodipine or placebo for 12 weeks (parallel groups). There were 7 drop-outs, 3 on Nimodipine, and 4 on placebo. A gradual and very marked improvement was seen both with Nimodipine and placebo amounting to between 60 and 90 per cent during the last 4 weeks. Statistical analysis on all included patients (intention to treat) revealed no difference between Nimodipine and placebo for migraine days or migraine index. In patients "valid for analysis of efficacy" there were also no significant difference. Due to a very marked placebo effect and use of the parallel groups design, the present trial is relatively weak despite a fairly large sample size. It cannot rule out the possibility of an important effect of Nimodipine in classic migraine with a high degree of certainty.
Headache 1989 Nov
PMID:European multicenter trial of nimodipine in the prophylaxis of classic migraine (migraine with aura). Migraine-Nimodipine European Study Group (MINES). 269 6

Nimodipine is a compound that is thought to block the influx of calcium through channels in vascular smooth muscle. This paper describes a double-blind parallel-group comparison of 40 mg nimodipine three times a day and placebo. Sixty-eight patients received treatment after a run-in period of 2 months, and of these, 57 completed 8 weeks or more of the trial. All but five of these completed the full 6-month trial. The nimodipine and placebo groups showed no significant differences in the frequency of attacks, severity or duration of headache, or gastrointestinal or other symptoms.
Cephalalgia 1988 Dec
PMID:Nimodipine in migraine prophylaxis. 306 19

The present studies show that nimodipine prevents and/or improves permanent ischemic neurological deficits in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. This was particularly marked in four double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in which statistically significant reductions in mortality and morbidity as consequence of cerebral vasospasm were found. The drug has been shown to increase cerebral blood flow, to reduce vasoconstriction, although not to fully prevent angiographic vasospasm, and to improve central conduction time. Nimodipine did not increase the rate of rebleeding. Its administration during anesthesia does not result in management problems. In general, nimodipine was well tolerated. Side effects were recorded mainly in open studies using the intravenous formulation and consisted mainly of decreases in blood pressure and headaches. Transient increases in liver enzymes may be due to the organic solvent. Hence, all results indicate that patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage will benefit from preventive or therapeutic nimodipine treatment.
 ...
PMID:Survey of clinical experience with nimodipine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. 332 2

The efficacy of nimodipine in the prophylaxis of migraine was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study carried out on 33 patients, 20 of whom suffered from classic and 13 from common migraine. Four patients dropped out, but not as a result of the side effects of the drug. The duration of drug treatment was 8 weeks. The dosage used was 30 mg four times daily. Nimodipine proved to be better than placebo, the number of migraine attacks and severity of headache showing a significant reduction. The drug was well tolerated and no marked side effects were noted. The results suggest that nimodipine is a useful new prophylactic drug for migraine, but further studies are needed before its final value can be evaluated.
Cephalalgia 1985 Mar
PMID:Efficacy of nimodipine in the prophylaxis of migraine. 388 53

In a randomized, double-blind cross-over study, 43 patients with classic migraine received 40 mg Nimodipine and placebo as sublingual capsules. There was no significant effect on patients' preference, development of headache, need for escape medicine, duration of headache, severity of headache or headache index. Considerable methodological problems were encountered. Only 54% of the 79 patients selected for the trial could be evaluated. Suggestions for future trials are made.
Cephalalgia 1985 Sep
PMID:Clinical trial of nimodipine for single attacks of classic migraine. 389 68

Bathing headache is rarely described in literature. We report four middle-aged Taiwanese women who developed severe throbbing headache with maximum intensity of onset during bathing. Diffuse cerebral vasospasm was demonstrated in one of them. All their headaches resolved spontaneously (n = 1) or after nimodipine treatment (n = 3). Except for one patient with vasospasm in whom reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy and an asymptomatic cerebellar infarction developed, the others recovered without any complications. The clinical profile of bathing headache points to idiopathic thunderclap headache. It may not be as benign as previously reported. Nimodipine might be effective in treatment of this special headache syndrome.
Cephalalgia 2003 Nov
PMID:Bathing headache: a variant of idiopathic thunderclap headache. 1461 25

Eleven patients with primary thunderclap headache (TCH) were treated with oral nimodipine 30 to 60 mg every 4 hours or IV nimodipine 0.5 to 2 mg/h if the oral regimen failed or images showed cerebral vasospasm. With oral nimodipine, headache did not recur in the nine patients without vasospasm. IV nimodipine was given in two patients with vasospasm, including one who developed ischemic stroke. Nimodipine may be effective for TCH. Vasospasm may warrant IV nimodipine.
 ...
PMID:Nimodipine for treatment of primary thunderclap headache. 1511 86

Delayed cerebral ischemia as a result of cerebral vasospasm is the most common cause of death and disability after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). It leads to death or permanent neurologic deficits in over 17-40% of SAH patients. The initial and main symptom of cerebral vasospasm is diffuse headache and may be accompanied with a slight increase in discomfort from neck stiffness and fever. The clinical diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm is made when the patient experiences an altered level of consciousness or a new focal neurologic deficit. There has been a great progress in identifying the patients at risk, putative mechanisms, and possible treatment options for cerebral vasospasm. However, the problem is by no means solved, mainly due to a limited understanding of the pathologic mechanisms of this complex disease. The iatrogenic factors that can increase the risk of cerebral vasospasm include prolongation of the subarachnoid clot by antifibrinolytic drugs, hypotension, inappropriate treatment of hyponatremia, hypovolemia, hyperthermia and increased intracranial pressure. Nimodipine has been shown to improve neurologic outcome and decrease the incidence of cerebral vasospasm. Triple H therapy is a treatment designed to augment cerebral blood flow for patient with cerebral vasospasm. Hypervolemic hypertension is induced with intravenous volume expansion with crystalloid or colloid to increase cardiac output and raise blood pressure. However, small randomized trials showed no clear benefit. Recently, balloon and chemical angioplasty with superselective intra-arterial injection of vasodilators has emerged as the primary intervention for treating medically refractory ischemia from cerebral vasospasm and in many centers is being used as a first-line treatment or even prophylactically. In addition, promising new treatments for cerebral vasospasm or its ischemic complications include magnesium sulfate, fasudil hydrochloride, tirilazad mesylate, erythropoietin, and induced hypothermia; however, all still need further clinical trials. Newly recognized mediators of cerebral vasospasm after SAH include endothelium-derived mediators, vascular smooth-muscle-derived mediators, proinflammatory mediators involved in blood-brain barrier disruption, cytokines and adhesion molecules, stress-induced gene activation, and platelet-derived growth factors. Moreover, observations in the laboratory have, in many circumstances, matched those of reported small series. Larger, prospective, randomized trials are needed to verify several hypotheses of molecular pathophysiology and clinical treatment regimens.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage--a review. 1567 31


1 2 3 Next >>