Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (
headache
)
56,091
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We evaluated the effect of 25 mg bid amitriptyline on muscle contraction headache in 36 patients with Parkinson's disease in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Treatment lasted 12 weeks, and we assessed the efficacy by number of days with
headache
, sum-of-severity score (intensity X number of days with
headache
), and consumption of analgesics. We also administered Hoehn-Yahr staging, the Webster Rating Scale, the Mini-Mental State, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. We assessed the patients after a 4-week run-in period and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Thirty-one patients (15 in the amitriptyline group and 16 in the placebo group) completed the trial.
Amitriptyline
reduced the intensity and the frequency of
headache
, whereas the placebo did not. The Zung Depression Scale and the Webster Rating Scale findings remained unchanged.
...
PMID:Amitriptyline in the treatment of headache in patients with Parkinson's disease: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. 305 26
Ciguatera fish poisoning is the most common fish poisoning in the United States. Symptoms involve the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and neurological systems. No known treatment exists. We explore the therapeutic effect of amitriptyline in two patients and nifedipine in one patient.
Amitriptyline
demonstrated resolution of most symptoms except for heat/cold reversal in one patient and heat/cold reversal, pruritus and
headache
in the second patient. We then used nifedipine in the second patient and noted only the resolution of his
headaches
. We recommend further study of these agents for the treatment of ciguatera fish poisoning.
...
PMID:Treatment of ciguatera fish poisoning with amitriptyline and nifedipine. 343 Jun 58
The similarities and differences in the clinical response and incidence of adverse symptoms between zimeldine and amitriptyline have been evaluated by use of a combined analysis of four double-blind clinical trials in depression. In total, 197 patients were included in this series of studies. The efficacy of the drugs was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Reports of adverse symptoms were actively elicited by use of a check-list of symptoms and rated for severity. The overall clinical efficacy of the two drugs was shown to be equivalent with a high degree of statistical confidence. However, there exist differences in the profile of action.
Amitriptyline
has a significant advantage in insomnia problems. In spite of this zimeldine was shown to be at least as effective as amitriptyline in reducing anxiety.
Amitriptyline
is associated with significantly more anticholinergic side-effects, whereas
headache
is more disturbing during zimeldine treatment. The combination of several independent trials based on similar protocols can be a useful tool to increase the statistical reliability of conclusions relative to that which can be achieved in standard sized, individual studies in depression.
...
PMID:Comparison between zimeldine and amitriptyline of efficacy and adverse symptoms--a combined analysis of four British clinical trials in depression. 623 Aug 96
Amitriptyline
is the medication of first choice in the treatment of chronic tension-type
headache
. In 197 patients with chronic tension-type
headache
(87M and 110F with a mean age of 38 +/- 13 (18-68)) efficacy and tolerability of 60-90 mg amitriptylinoxide (AO) were compared with 50-75 mg amitriptyline (AM) and placebo (PL) in a double-blind, parallel-group trial consisting of a four weeks' baseline phase and 12 weeks of treatment. The primary study endpoint was a reduction of at least 50% of the product of
headache
duration and frequency and a reduction of at least 50% in
headache
intensity. Statistics used were Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance. No significant difference emerged between AO, AM and PL with respect to the primary study endpoint. Treatment response occurred in 30.3% of the AO, 22.4% of the AM and 21.9% of the PL group. A reduction in
headache
duration and frequency of at least 50% was found in 39.4% on AO, in 25.4% on AM and in 26.6% on PL (PAO-PL = .1384, PAM-PL = 1.000, PAO-AM = .0973). A reduction in
headache
intensity of at least 50% was found in 31.8% on AO, in 26.9% on AM and in 26.6% on PL (PAO-PL = .5657, PAM-PL = 1.000, PAO-AM = .5715). Trend analysis with respect to a significant reduction of
headache
intensity (p < 0.05) and the product of
headache
duration and frequency revealed a superior effect of AO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cephalalgia
1994 Apr
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of amitriptylinoxide in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache: a multi-centre controlled study. 806 54
The tricyclic antidepressant, amitriptyline, is an effective drug for the treatment of chronic tension-type
headache
and for other chronic pain syndromes, but it is also effective in the prophylaxis of an episodic type of
headache
such as migraine. However, its efficacy in episodic tension-type
headache
has not yet been clarified. We compared the efficacy of amitriptyline (25 mg/day) in 82 nondepressed patients with either chronic or episodic tension-type
headache
in an open-label study.
Amitriptyline
significantly reduced (P < 0.05) frequency and duration of
headache
as well as analgesic consumption in chronic, but not in episodic, tension-type
headache
. Further placebo-controlled trials, possibly with higher doses of amitriptyline, might confirm if the different pattern of response to amitriptyline can be explained in terms of different involvement of central nociception and of peripheral myofascial factors in the chronic and in the episodic forms of tension-type
headache
.
Headache
1998 Jun
PMID:Amitriptyline is effective in chronic but not in episodic tension-type headache: pathogenetic implications. 966 50
The nociceptive flexor reflex (NFR, R3) was tried for quantitative assessment of pain in patients with various forms of primary and secondary
headaches
.
Amitriptyline
and acupuncture elevated the threshold of R3-reflex emergence, though the threshold of subjective pain sensitivity increased only in response to amitriptyline. NFR is adequate for assessing anesthesia efficacy and investigating the mechanisms of action of analgesics in patients with
headache
.
...
PMID:[Study of mechanisms of action of amitriptyline and acupuncture using nociceptive flexor reflex in patients with chronic forms of headache]. 986 40
This paper reviews pharmacological and other approaches currently used to treat tension-type
headache
(TTH), and examines aspects of the classification and pathogenesis of this common complaint. Accurate diagnosis is essential before treatment is prescribed and should involve complete history taking, thorough neurological examination and evaluation of possible associated factors. The most frequently used drugs for the acute treatment of TTH are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) of which only some have been shown to be efficacious in placebo-controlled trials.
Amitriptyline
remains the first choice treatment for prophylaxis. Other antidepressants, muscle relaxants and benzodiazepines may be used, but few have been evaluated adequately in placebo-controlled trials. Biofeedback and relaxation training, demonstrated efficacious by controlled studies, may be used when the aim is to avoid the side effects of pharmacological treatment.
...
PMID:A review of the treatment of primary headaches. Part II: Tension-type headache. 1093 52
To reduce frequency and severity of the attacks, migraine was treated preventively between the attacks. The most effective drugs were beta-blockers and antidepressants. In a single-blind study we estimated comparative efficiency of amitriptiline (inhibitor of noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake and 5-HT2-receptor antagonist) 12.5-25 mg/daily, fluoxetine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) 10-20 mg/daily, and maprotiline (a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor) 10-25 mg/daily. The duration of the therapy of migraine between the attacks was 12 weeks. Each group included 20 patients. 46 patients completed the whole course of therapy: 14 patients received amitriptyline, 16 patients--fluoxetine, and 16 patients--maprotiline. Positive results of the treatment (a reduction of the frequency of the migraine attacks during a treatment by 50% as compared with the baseline period) were observed in 71% of the patients treated with amitriptyline, in 56% of the patients treated with fluoxetine, and in 38% of the patients treated with maprotiline. All the drugs were able to reduce both intensity and duration of a
headache
. Index of the Quality of Life in the patients with migraine was increased in the groups treated with either amitriptyline or fluoxetine, but not in a group treated with maprotiline. The results obtained agree with the notion about high efficiency of antidepressants given between migraine attacks.
Amitriptyline
and fluoxetine were more efficient in preventive therapy than maprotiline. These findings suggested indirectly, that the efficiency of antidepressants in treatment of migraine is explained by inhibition of serotonin reuptake and by 5-HT2-receptor antagonism, while influence on the inhibition of noradrenaline reuptake was not so significant.
...
PMID:[A comparative efficiency of amitriptyline, fluoxetine and maprotiline in prevention of migraine in attack-free period]. 1098 62
The aim of the present thesis was to investigate the pathophysiology of chronic tension-type
headache
with special reference to central mechanisms. Increased tenderness to palpation of pericranial myofascial tissues is the most apparent abnormality in patients with tension-type
headache
. A new piece of equipment, a so-called palpometer, that makes it possible to control the pressure intensity exerted during palpation, was developed. Thereafter, it was demonstrated that the measurement of tenderness could be compared between two observers if the palpation pressure was controlled, and that the Total Tenderness Scoring system was well suited for the scoring of tenderness during manual palpation. Subsequently, it was found that pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds were significantly decreased in the finger and tended to be decreased in the temporal region in chronic tension-type
headache
patients compared with controls. In addition, the electrical pain threshold in the cephalic region was significantly decreased in patients. It was concluded that the central pain sensitivity was increased in the patients probably due to sensitization of supraspinal neurones. The stimulus-response function for palpation pressure vs. pain was found to be qualitatively altered in chronic tension-type
headache
patients compared with controls. The abnormality was related to the degree of tenderness and not to the diagnosis of tension-type
headache
. In support of this, the stimulus-response function was found to be qualitatively altered also in patients with fibromyalgia. It was concluded that the qualitatively altered nociception was probably due to central sensitization at the level of the spinal dorsal horn/trigeminal nucleus. Thereafter, the prophylactic effect of amitriptyline, a non-selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, and of citalopram, a highly selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, was examined in patients with chronic tension-type
headache
.
Amitriptyline
reduced
headache
significantly more than placebo, while citalopram had only a slight and insignificant effect. It was concluded that the blockade of 5-HT reuptake could only partly explain the efficacy of amitriptyline in tension-type
headache
, and that also other actions of amitriptyline, e.g. reduction of central sensitization, were involved. Finally, the plasma 5-HT level, the platelet 5-HT level and the number of platelet 5-HT transporters were found to be normal in chronic tension-type
headache
. On the basis of the present and previous studies, a pathophysiological model for tension-type
headache
is presented. According to the model, the main problem in chronic tension-type
headache
is central sensitization at the level of the spinal dorsal horn/trigeminal nucleus due to prolonged nociceptive inputs from pericranial myofascial tissues. The increased nociceptive input to supraspinal structures may in turn result in supraspinal sensitization. The central neuroplastic changes may affect the regulation of peripheral mechanisms and thereby lead to, for example, increased pericranial muscle activity or release of neurotransmitters in the myofascial tissues. By such mechanisms the central sensitization may be maintained even after the initial eliciting factors have been normalized, resulting in the conversion of episodic into chronic tension-type
headache
. Future basic and clinical research should aim at identifying the source of peripheral nociception in order to prevent the development of central sensitization and at ways of reducing established sensitization. This may lead to a much needed improvement in the treatment of chronic tension-type
headache
and other chronic myofascial pain conditions.
Cephalalgia
2000 Jun
PMID:Central sensitization in tension-type headache--possible pathophysiological mechanisms. 1103 46
The tricyclic anti-depressant amitriptyline is widely used in the treatment of chronic tension-type
headache
. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the analgesic effect is caused by a reduction of muscle pain or by a general reduction of pain sensitivity. Thirty-three non-depressed patients with chronic tension-type
headache
were treated with amitriptyline 75 mg/day and with the highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram 20 mg/day in a 32-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study. At the end of each treatment period, actual
headache
intensity and pericranial myofascial tenderness were recorded, pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds were measured in the finger and in the temporal region and the electrical pain threshold was measured at the labial commissure.
Amitriptyline
reduced tenderness and
headache
intensity significantly more than placebo (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). The reduction in tenderness could be ascribed solely to the group of patients who responded to amitriptyline treatment by at least 30% reduction in
headache
while tenderness was unchanged in non-responders.
Amitriptyline
did not affect pressure or electrical pain thresholds at any of the examined locations. Citalopram had no significant effect on any of the examined parameters. These findings indicate that amitriptyline elicits its analgesic effect in chronic myofascial pain by reducing the transmission of painful stimuli from myofascial tissues rather than by reducing overall pain sensitivity. We suggest that this effect is caused by a segmental reduction of central sensitization in combination with a peripheral anti-nociceptive action.
Cephalalgia
2000 Jul
PMID:Amitriptyline reduces myofascial tenderness in patients with chronic tension-type headache. 1107 46
1
2
3
4
Next >>