Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (
headache
)
56,091
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Sumatriptan
has been used successfully in the acute treatment of migraine since 1991. Most patients (70-80%) experience pain relief 2-4 hours after receiving 100 mg sumatriptan orally. During last few years efficacy of lower doses has been studied. Many authors proved that 50 mg of sumatriptan may be as effective as 100 mg. Our study confirmed that 50 mg oral dose of sumatriptan is sufficient in many patients.
Headache
relief was achieved in 58% of treated patients after single dose. The second dose of sumatriptan was effective in next 14% of patients. Totally
headache
relief after two doses of sumatriptan was achieved in 72% of patients. The sumatriptan 50 mg was well tolerated; only 10% of patients reported adverse events, which were minor and transient.
...
PMID:[Evaluation of efficacy and tolerance sumatriptan at a dose of 50 mg in treatment of migraine attack]. 964 70
Migraineurs (94F, 24M) with previous experience of subcutaneous sumatriptan and/or sumatriptan tablets were asked their opinion on sumatriptan nasal spray treatment particularly with respect to onset of action, total efficacy, tolerability, and user friendliness. The information was obtained by means of a self-administered questionnaire handed out at the time of prescription of the nasal spray. The results are based on the patients' cumulative experience of having treated at least two migraine attacks with the spray (20 mg).
Sumatriptan
nasal spray (20 mg) was perceived to have a faster onset of action and, with the exception of a bad taste, to have a better tolerability than the tablets. Compared with subcutaneous sumatriptan, the nasal spray was claimed to be less effective in reducing symptoms of migraine attacks but to cause fewer adverse events. A bitter taste was the most commonly reported side effect of sumatriptan nasal spray--reported by 68% (80 out of 118) of the migraineurs. The user friendliness of sumatriptan nasal spray was rated better than that of subcutaneous sumatriptan and/or sumatriptan tablets. The overall impression of sumatriptan nasal spray was reported to be better or equal to that of the tablet and the injection by 57% and 46%, respectively. It is concluded that the results obtained in clinical practice are very much in line with those obtained in controlled clinical trials. The overall impression of sumatriptan nasal spray is that it is user friendly and useful in the acute treatment of migraine attacks of moderate intensity.
Cephalalgia
1998 Jun
PMID:How does sumatriptan nasal spray perform in clinical practice? 967 8
The effect of the migraine drugs ergotamine and sumatriptan on the cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation was studied in halothane/nitrous oxide-anesthetized normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats. Ergotamine, an ergot alkaloid affecting 5HT, norepinephrine, and dopamine receptors, was administered intravenously as a single dose of 25 microg/kg.
Sumatriptan
, a selective 5HT1-like receptor agonist, was administered by intravenous infusion of 300 microg/kg/h. CBF was measured with the intracarotid 133Xe-injection method. The blood pressure limits of CBF autoregulation were determined by computerized least sum of square analysis. CBF autoregulation was preserved after both ergotamine and sumatriptan. Ergotamine shifted the lower blood pressure limit of CBF autoregulation towards higher blood pressures from 60 +/- 3 mmHg to 82 +/- 4 mmHg (p<0.01), but did not significantly affect the upper blood pressure limit of CBF autoregulation.
Sumatriptan
had no significant effects on the blood pressure limits of CBF autoregulation.
Cephalalgia
PMID:Differential effects of migraine drugs on cerebral blood flow autoregulation. 973 33
Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of
headache
, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. Mild migraine attacks are treated with antiemetics followed by analgesics such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), paracetamol (acetaminophen) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Moderate to severe attacks are treated by antiemetics combined with ergotamine or dihydroergotamine.
Sumatriptan
, a specific serotonin 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, is used if attacks do not respond to ergotamine or if intolerable adverse effects occur. The new migraine drugs zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan and eletriptan differ in their pharmacological profile from sumatriptan, but this translates into only minor differences in efficacy,
headache
recurrence and adverse effects. Migraine prophylaxis should be implemented when more than 3 attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if the adverse effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol and the calcium antagonist flunarizine. Drugs less effective or those with unpleasant adverse effects are the serotonin receptor antagonists (pizotifen, methysergide and lisuride), dihydroergotamine, cyclandelate, NSAIDs, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and amitriptyline. The efficacy of aspirin or magnesium is still under evaluation.
...
PMID:A practical guide to the management and prevention of migraine. 982 55
Cost-effectiveness and cost per successful treatment has been evaluated in 186 outpatients randomised to treat moderate to severe migraine attacks either with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg (n = 97) or with their current therapy (n = 89) during an open, multicentre study of 3 months. Within 2 hours,
headache
severity decreased to none/mild in 86% of all attacks in the sumatriptan group (STG) compared to 25% in the customary group (CTG). Migraine was alleviated earlier in the STG than in the CTG (median 3.78 vs. 13.39 hours, p < 0.0001). The direct and total cost of treatment was 133 and 2012 BF, respectively, in the CTG and 1400 and 2522 BF, respectively, in the STG. Measuring the effectiveness of earlier pain relief with sumatriptan, the incremental cost-effective ratios for direct and total cost were 132 and 53 BF per hour of relieved pain, respectively. For this price, significantly more sumatriptan patients improved their quality of life by more than 20% (61.6 vs. 20.6% patients, p < 0.001) and less sumatriptan patient consulted a medical professional (11.3 vs. 29.2% patients, p < 0.01), used less medication for adverse events (6.2 vs. 22.5%, p < 0.001) and suffered less from associated migraine symptoms. The median number of hours of diminished work-efficiency (3 vs. 7 hours, p < 0.01) or of suspension of non-professional activity (10 vs. 24 hours, p < 0.001) was also significantly lower in the STG. The total cost per successfully treated patient was lower in the STG.
Sumatriptan
is more effective, provides a better quality of life, reduces health care resource utilisation, and improves work productivity as compared to the CTG, thereby resulting in a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio.
...
PMID:Subcutaneous sumatriptan compared with usual acute treatments for migraine: clinical and pharmacoeconomic evaluation. 992 21
Sumatriptan
, a selective 5-hydroxy-triptamine (5-HT1) receptor agonist, has been used recently in the treatment of acute migraine. Some in vitro experiments suggested that sumatriptan has vasoactive properties in vascular beds distinct from cerebral circulation. In view of this we investigated the vascular effects of the standard 6 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) dose of sumatriptan, on the surface areas of the head using thermography, a simple and reliable method for detecting temperature changes. The head temperature of 127 patients (double-blind), 102 migraines (52 during
headache
attack and 50
headache
-free) and 25 healthy control subjects were evaluated using thermography in basal condition and 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after s.c. sumatriptan injection of placebo. During the entire observation period systemic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR) and continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) were detected automatically. A significant head temperature decrease was observed after s.c. sumatriptan administration, in both healthy controls and migraine subjects; placebo administration did not show any change of temperature. In migraine patients during
headache
attack, head temperature reduction corresponded to the relief of
headache
symptoms. This vasoconstrictor effect detected with thermography is not isolated to cranial circulation but it is also systemic. In fact, we observed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in both systolic and diastolic systemic blood pressure. No significant changes in heart rate and ECG abnormalities were otherwise detected. These findings suggest that sumatriptan is effective in the treatment of migraine attack, but it must be used with caution in migraines with concomitant hypertension.
...
PMID:Effect of subcutaneous sumatriptan on head temperature in migraines. 1005 66
Menstrual migraine may be debilitating, long-lasting, and refractory to treatment. Because the efficacy and tolerability of abortive and prophylactic treatment options for menstrual migraine have generally not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials, treatment choices are often made on the basis of personal experience and anecdotal reports. This article reviews evidence from retrospective analyses and prospective studies showing that sumatriptan injection and tablets are effective and well tolerated in menstrual migraine. (1)
Sumatriptan
injection 6 mg was as effective in the treatment of menstrual migraine attacks as it was for nonmenstrual attacks in a retrospective analysis of data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials (n = 1104). In the menstrual migraine group, 80% of women treated with sumatriptan injection 6 mg compared with 19% of placebo-treated patients reported
headache
relief 1 h postdose (p < 0.001). (2)
Sumatriptan
injection 6 mg was effective in the acute treatment of menstrual migraine attacks in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-attack study (n = 226). Across the two attacks, 70-71% of patients treating menstrual migraine attacks with sumatriptan injection 6 mg compared with 22-24% of placebo-treated patients reported
headache
relief 1 h postdose (p < 0.001). (3)
Sumatriptan
tablets 100 mg were effective in the acute treatment of menstrual migraine attacks in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in women diagnosed with menstrual migraine (n = 115). For menstrual migraine attacks,
headache
relief 4 h postdose was reported by 67% of sumatriptan-treated patients compared with 33% of placebo-treated patients.
Sumatriptan
injection and tablets were generally well tolerated in these studies, in which adverse events were characteristic of those typically observed in sumatriptan acute migraine clinical trials. These data demonstrate that sumatriptan injection and tablets are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of menstrual migraine.
Cephalalgia
1999 Jan
PMID:Sumatriptan is effective in the treatment of menstrual migraine: a review of prospective studies and retrospective analyses. 1009 54
Migraine is a common illness characterised by severe, often throbbing and/or unilateral
headache
, which may be accompanied by sensitivity to light or noise. A minority of migraine attacks are preceded by transient visual or sensory disturbances. Migraine is associated with reductions in health-related quality of life both during and between attacks. Despite methodological limitations in cost-of-illness studies, it is clear that the cost of migraine to society is substantial. Indirect costs (primarily workplace productivity losses) make up 75 to 90% of total costs. Direct costs, such as the cost of drug treatment, physician consultation, hospitalisation and emergency room treatment, make up most of the remainder.
Sumatriptan
is an effective and well tolerated agent in the treatment of migraine. Its main advantage over other agents used in the acute management of migraine appears to be its rapid onset of action.
Sumatriptan
reduces
headache
severity within 2 hours of oral administration in 50 to 67% of patients and within 1 hour of subcutaneous administration in 70 to 80% of patients.
Headache
recurs in approximately 40% of patients who initially respond to oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan; however, a second dose of the drug is effective against the symptoms of recurrence in a majority of patients. Some patients experience relief of non-
headache
migraine symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia. Adverse events reported after sumatriptan are generally mild and transient. Data from studies of patients who used their usual therapies and sumatriptan in nonblinded, sequential phases indicate that both workplace and nonworkplace productivity losses were reduced during sumatriptan therapy. A cost-benefit analysis applied to some of these workplace productivity data indicated that, including direct costs and productivity savings, sumatriptan was associated with a net reduction in total cost of migraine. In retrospective cost analyses, sumatriptan was associated with increased prescription costs: the effect of the drug on other direct treatment costs was less clear. A retrospective pharmacoeconomic model suggested that the cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous sumatriptan versus subcutaneous dihydroergotamine depended on which outcome measure was of greatest interest. For measures of rapid relief of migraine, sumatriptan was superior, but the cost of achieving rapid relief was substantial.
Sumatriptan
improved global quality-of-life scores compared with patients' usual therapy in a randomised crossover trial and appeared to do the same when the drugs were administered in nonblinded, sequential phases in trials which used general and migraine-specific quality-of-life instruments. Thus, sumatriptan is associated with a fast onset of action and improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with migraine. However, the cost of achieving rapid relief of migraine symptoms may be substantial. Compared with patients' usual treatments, sumatriptan appeared to reduce workplace and non-workplace productivity losses. However, few economic data from well controlled prospective comparisons of sumatriptan with other available agents are available to quantify the effect of sumatriptan on the overall cost of migraine.
...
PMID:Sumatriptan. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in migraine. 1016 35
This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and tolerability of four doses of sumatriptan nasal spray (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg) with a placebo, in the acute treatment of a single migraine attack. In total, 544 patients received the study medication as a single spray in one nostril, to treat a single migraine attack in the clinic. Efficacy assessments included the measurement of
headache
severity, clinical disability, and the presence/absence of associated symptoms. The incidence of
headache
recurrence was also assessed. The three highest doses of sumatriptan (5 mg 49%, 10 mg 46%, 20 mg 64%) were significantly better than the placebo (25%) at providing
headache
relief (moderate or severe
headache
improving to mild or none) 120 min after treatment (P </= 0. 01). Also, the 20 mg dose was significantly superior to both the 10 and 5 mg doses at this time point (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients who were
headache
-free 120 min after treatment, was also higher following 20 mg (42%) rather than following any other sumatriptan dose (14-24%, P < 0.005 20 vs 10 mg) or placebo (11%).
Headache
recurrence in patients who had responded to initial treatment was reported by 30-41% of patients who received sumatriptan, compared with 33% of patients in the placebo group.
Sumatriptan
nasal spray was well tolerated, the incidence of adverse events with each dose of sumatriptan being similar to the placebo (20-27 and 23%, respectively). Apart from bad/bitter taste, the events were comparable with those reported following sumatriptan treatment by other routes of administration.
...
PMID:Sumatriptan nasal spray: a dose-ranging study in the acute treatment of migraine. 1020 49
Sumatriptan
is a highly effective treatment for migraine in adults but its efficacy in children has not been determined. Fourteen children with migraine (6.4 to 9.8 years of age; seven girls, six with aura) participated in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate the efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray. After sumatriptan, 12 of 14 (versus 6 of 14 after placebo) reported a decrease in pain intensity (p = 0.031); complete
headache
relief was obtained in 9 of 14 after sumatriptan versus 2 of 14 after placebo (p = 0.016). Migraine-associated symptoms were also significantly reduced by sumatriptan.
...
PMID:Intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine in children. 1072 Mar 11
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>