Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Neurogenic inflammation has been proposed as a possible pathogenetic mechanism for migraine and cluster headache. Antidromic stimulation of trigeminal fibers causes plasma protein extravasation, mast cell activation and degranulation, vacuolation and increase in endothelial vesicle number within post capillary venules in rat dura mater. The antimigraine drugs sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine block the development of plasma extravasation and ultrastructural changes, as well as plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) increase in the superior sagittal sinus following electrical trigeminal ganglion stimulation. Sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine bind with high affinity to the 5-HT1D/1B receptors, thus suggesting that their neurogenic antiinflammatory activity is mediated by activation of 5-HT autoreceptors present on sensory fibers innervating blood vessels in dura mater.
 ...
PMID:The trigemino-vascular system and migraine. 137 7

Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre studies were carried out to assess the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of 1-3 mg and 1-8 mg sumatriptan, respectively, in the acute treatment of migraine. Data are presented from a total of 519 patients. In both studies, the primary endpoint of efficacy was a reduction in headache severity from severe or moderate to mild or no headache. All doses of sumatriptan were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving symptoms, and the response appeared to be dose-related; an effective response to treatment was achieved within 30 min in 73% of patients treated with 6 mg sumatriptan and 80% of patients treated with 8 mg sumatriptan s.c., compared with 22% for placebo. Sumatriptan was well tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild and transient. The most frequent complaint was irritation and pain at the site of injection. No changes in laboratory values were noted and ECG readings were unaltered by treatment. On the basis of these results, the 6 mg subcutaneous dose has been selected for further evaluation in large-scale studies.
 ...
PMID:Subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan International Study Group. 164 91

Three oral doses of sumatriptan, 100, 200 and 300 mg, given as dispersible tablets, were compared in the acute treatment of migraine in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 1,130 patients from 51 centres in eight countries. Patients treated up to three migraine attacks at home over a 3-month period and recorded the results on a diary card. Safety follow-ups were performed monthly at a clinic. All doses of sumatriptan were significantly (p less than 0.001) more effective than placebo at relieving headache within 2 h of treatment. Response rates, scored on a 4-point scale, were: placebo 27%; 100 mg sumatriptan 67%; 200 mg sumatriptan 73%; and 300 mg sumatriptan 67%. The proportion of patients who required rescue medication within 2 h of treatment was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in all active treatment groups when compared with placebo. Response rates to sumatriptan were the same irrespective of the type of migraine (with or without aura) or the duration of symptoms prior to treatment (less than or equal to 4 or greater than 4 h). Sumatriptan also provided significant (p less than 0.001) relief from nausea and photophobia as compared with placebo. The majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity and were transient. The overall incidence of adverse events was dose-related, the percentage of patients reporting adverse events in the first attack treated being 36, 47 and 53% for 100-, 200- and 300-mg doses of sumatriptan, respectively, compared to 17% of placebo patients (p less than 0.001 for each treatment dose compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Sumatriptan--an oral dose-defining study. The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-Defining Study Group. 165 37

In a multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study of oral sumatriptan (GR43175), given as a dispersible tablet, in the acute treatment of migraine, 149 patients were randomized to receive 100 mg sumatriptan and 84 to placebo. Each patient was provided with three tablets: one to be taken as soon as possible after headache onset; one to be taken 2 h later if the headache persisted and one to be taken if the headache recurred within 24 h. Patients recorded details of the attack and response to treatment on a diary card. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving headache (moderate/severe reduced to mild/none) at 2 h (50 vs. 19%; p less than 0.001) and at 4 h (75 vs. 30%; p less than 0.001). Of the sumatriptan group, 59% took the second dose compared with 80% of the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Compared with placebo, more patients on sumatriptan were pain-free by 2 h (26 vs. 5%; p less than 0.001) and by 4 h (48 vs. 13%; p less than 0.001). Headache improvement was apparent by 1 h in 42% of sumatriptan-treated patients and 17% of patients on placebo. Headache relief was significantly (p less than 0.001) better in patients taking sumatriptan, irrespective of the type of migraine (with or without aura), or the time the drug was taken (less than or more than 4 h after onset). There was no significant difference in the number of patients who took placebo or sumatriptan and whose headache recurred within 24 h of initial resolution (42 vs. 48%; p = 0.535).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of a multiple-dose regimen of oral sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. The Oral Sumatriptan International Multiple-Dose Study Group. 165 38

The efficacy and safety of oral sumatriptan as a 100-mg dispersible tablet was compared with oral Cafergot (2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 200 mg caffeine) in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. In the trial, 580 patients were treated from 47 investigating centres in nine European countries. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than Cafergot at reducing the intensity of headache from severe or moderate to mild or none; 66% (145/220) of those treated with sumatriptan improved in this way by 2 h, compared with 48% (118/246) of those treated with Cafergot (p less than 0.001). The onset of headache resolution was more rapid with sumatriptan, whereas recurrence of migraine headache within 48 h was lower with Cafergot. Sumatriptan was also significantly more effective at reducing the incidence of nausea (p less than 0.001), vomiting (p less than 0.01) and photophobia/phonophobia (p less than 0.001) 2 h after treatment, and fewer patients on sumatriptan (24%) than on Cafergot (44%, p less than 0.001) required other medication after 2 h. The overall incidence of patients reporting adverse events was 45% after sumatriptan and 39% after Cafergot; the difference was not significant. The most commonly reported events in the sumatriptan-treated patients were malaise or fatigue and bad taste; these were generally mild and transient. Nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness or vertigo were reported by a greater proportion of Cafergot-treated patients. It is concluded that oral sumatriptan was well tolerated and is a more effective acute treatment for migraine than Cafergot.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of sumatriptan and Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine. The Multinational Oral Sumatriptan and Cafergot Comparative Study Group. 165 39

A double-blind, randomized, multicentre, parallel-group study was carried out to compare intranasal sumatriptan with placebo in the treatment of migraine. Seventy-four patients (37 in each treatment group) were recruited into the study. Patients received two insufflations of the same treatment (sumatriptan or placebo) 15 min apart. Sumatriptan (20 mg plus 20 mg) was more effective than placebo at relieving headache, defined as a reduction in severity from moderate (grade 2) or severe (grade 3) to mild (grade 1) or none (grade 0), at 60 and 120 min. At 120 min, 75% of patients in the sumatriptan group reported headache relief, compared with 32% of patients in the placebo group (p less than 0.001); 53% of patients in the sumatriptan group were completely pain-free, compared with 11% in the placebo group. A clinically significant reduction in the incidence of nausea, vomiting and photophobia was observed in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group, and sumatriptan was also more effective at reducing the functional disability of the patients. A similar number of patients reported migraine recurrence, within 24 h in both treatment groups. The observed reduction in headache severity, functional disability and nausea following intranasal administration of sumatriptan would appear to obviate the need for a concomitant anti-emetic during a migraine attack. The results support the further development and testing of intranasal sumatriptan.
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled study of intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. The Finnish Sumatriptan Group and the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Group. 165 41

In a two year period, 47 patients with migraine were hospitalized for the management of severe headache; 18 had acute migraine (duration less than 72 hours), 17 had status migrainosus (duration by definition more than 72 hours), and 12 had chronic daily headaches qualitatively of a migraine type. Treatment in all comprised cessation of all previous medication, plus one of the following: intravenous DHE, intravenous lidocaine, a combination of lidocaine + DHE, or subcutaneous sumatriptan. Improvement from DHE, lidocaine, or both was slow and often incomplete. Sumatriptan was not used in patients with chronic daily headaches; in the 8 cases of acute migraine or status migrainosus in which it was used, improvement was rapid and complete in seven.
Headache 1991 Nov
PMID:The hospital management of severe migrainous headache. 166 91

The combination of measurements of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and blood velocity in the middle cerebral arteries (MCA) by transcranial doppler sonography was used to investigate cerebrovascular involvement in migraine. Ten migraine patients with unilateral headache were studied during an attack and when they had been free of attacks for 5 days (non-attack). On both occasions they were given as intravenous infusion of sumatriptan (2 mg), a 5-HT1-like receptor agonist, which relieved the symptoms within 30 min without affecting rCBF. The MCA velocity was normal on both sides on the non-attack day and on the unaffected side during the attack. However, during the attack the MCA velocity on the headache side was significantly lower than that on the non-headache side (45 vs 61 cm/s:mean difference 16.3 [95% confidence interval 10.3-22.3]; p = 0.02). The MCA velocity on the headache side returned to normal after treatment with sumatriptan and recovery. Since rCBF in the MCA supply territory was unaffected, the lower velocity can be explained only by dilatation of the MCA. The mean MCA diameter increase was estimated to be 20%. Thus, headache was associated with intracranial large arterial dilatation on the headache side. Sumatriptan predominantly had effects on the distended artery, which suggests that the 5-HT receptor system has a role in the pathogenesis of migraine.
 ...
PMID:Migraine pain associated with middle cerebral artery dilatation: reversal by sumatriptan. 168 89

Sumatriptan succinate, a 5-HT1D receptor agonist, constricts human cranial arteries. Two parallel-group trials for treatment of acute migraines were conducted in the United States. Adult patients were randomized and given either 6 mg of sumatriptan succinate subcutaneously (n = 734) or placebo (n = 370). At 1 hour, sumatriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing moderate or severe headache pain to mild or no pain (70% vs 22%), in completely relieving headaches (49% vs 9%), and in improving clinical disability (76% vs 34%). Sumatriptan also reduced nausea and photophobia significantly better than placebo. Patients with residual migraines received another injection; those who had originally received sumatriptan received either a second active injection (n = 187) or placebo (n = 178), while those who had received placebo received a second placebo injection (n = 335). Statistical evidence for benefit of second sumatriptan injection is absent. Adverse events associated with sumatriptan were tingling, dizziness, warm-hot sensations, and injection-site reactions. Sumatriptan is effective and well tolerated in patients with acute migraine.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan. 165 6

The results of recent investigations designed to elucidate the neuroeffector functions of sensory fibres, the cause of migraine headache and the mechanism of action of antimigraine drugs are reviewed and discussed. Neurogenic inflammation (vasodilatation and neurogenic plasma extravasation) is one explanation for the development of headaches and the blood flow changes which occur during migraine headache. Numerous studies have recently been carried out on rats and guinea-pigs into the effects of antimigraine agents, including ergot alkaloids, sumatriptan and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), on neurogenic plasma protein extravasation in the dura mater induced by electrical stimulation of trigeminal ganglia or systemic administration of capsaicin. It is known that the dura mater is able to produce headaches in man. Ergot alkaloids have been shown to block neurogenic inflammation via a C-fibre dependent neuronal mechanism. Sumatriptan appears to act fairly similarly although, whereas the ergot alkaloids are non-selective for either 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) receptors or 5-HT1, sumatriptan is selective for 5-HT1 receptors. The antimigraine action of NSAIDs may be via either an effect on blood vessels or an effect on the nerve fibre. The antimigraine effects of ergot alkaloids, sumatriptan and NSAIDs are discussed in the light of the common vasoconstrictor actions of these agents and knowledge that vasodilatation is apparently not responsible for migraine headache pain in most cases.
 ...
PMID:Neuroeffector functions of sensory fibres: implications for headache mechanisms and drug actions. 204 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>