Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) represent a new class of effective and well tolerated orally active antihypertensive agents. Recent clinical trials have shown the added benefits of ARBs in hypertensive patients (reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy, improvement in diastolic function, decrease in ventricular arrhythmias, reduction in microalbuminuria, and improvement in renal function), and cardioprotective effect in patients with heart failure. Several large long-term studies are in progress to assess the beneficial effects of ARBs on cardiac hypertrophy, renal function, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with or without diabetes mellitus, and the value of these drugs in patients with heart disease and diabetic nephropathy. The ARBs specifically block the interaction of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor, thereby relaxing smooth muscle, increasing salt and water excretion, reducing plasma volume, and decreasing cellular hypertrophy. These agents exert their blood pressure-lowering effect mainly by reducing peripheral vascular resistance usually without a rise in heart rate. Most of the commercially available ARBs control blood pressure for 24 h after once daily dosing. Sustained efficacy of blood pressure control, without any evidence of tachyphylaxis, has been demonstrated after long-term administration (3 years) of some of the ARBs. The efficacy of ARBs is similar to that of thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers in patients with similar degree of hypertension. Higher daily doses, dietary salt restriction, and concomitant diuretic or ACE inhibitor administration amplify the antihypertensive effect of ARBs. The ARBs have a low incidence of adverse effects (headache, upper respiratory infection, back pain, muscle cramps, fatigue and dizziness), even in the elderly patients. After the approval of losartan, five other ARBs (candesartan cilexetil, eprosartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan) and three combinations with hydrochlorothiazide (irbesartan, losartan and valsartan) have been approved as antihypertensive agents, and some 28 compounds are in various stages of development. The ARBs are non-peptide compounds with varied structures; some (candesartan, losartan, irbesartan, and valsartan) have a common tetrazolo-biphenyl structure. Except for irbesartan, all active ARBs have a carboxylic acid group. Candesartan cilexetil is a prodrug, while losartan has a metabolite (EXP3174) which is more active than the parent drug. No other metabolites of ARBs contribute significantly to the antihypertensive effect. The variation in the molecular structure of the ARBs results in differences in the binding affinity to the receptor and pharmacokinetic profiles. The differences observed in lipid solubility, absorption/distribution, plasma protein binding, bioavailability, biotransformation, plasma half-life, and systemic elimination influence the time of onset, duration of action, and efficacy of the ARBs. On the basis of the daily mg dose, the antihypertensive potency of the ARBs follows the sequence: candesartan cilexetil > telmisartan approximately = losartan > irbesartan approximately = valsartan > eprosartan. After oral administration, the ARBs are rapidly absorbed (time for peak plasma levels = 0.5-4 h) but they have a wide range of bioavailability (from a low of 13% for eprosartan to a high of 60-80% for irbesartan); food does not influence the bioavailability, except for valsartan (a reduction of 40-50%) and eprosartan (increase). A limited dose-peak plasma levels/areas under the plasma level-time curve proportionality is observed for some of the ARBs. Most of these drugs have high plasma protein binding (95-100%); irbesartan has the lowest binding among the group (90%). The steady-state volumes of distribution vary from a low of 9 L (candesartan) to a high of 500 L (telmisartan). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATE
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. 1085 85

On November, 1997, a 15-year-old boy visited our hospital because of headache, fever and arthralgia. He was treated with 5 mg/day of prednisolone thereafter. On October 21, 1998, he was admitted because of remittent fever and multiple arthralgia and diagnosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) was made. He was also found to have hypertension of 210/110 mmHg, and soon developed ptosis of the eye, facial paresis and perceptive deafness of the right side. Cerebrospinal fluid showed protein of 98 mg/dl and mildly elevated IgG, IgA and IgM levels with normal cell count. Brain MRI examination revealed multiple cerebral lesions in the frontal, parietal and cerebellar areas on the right, whose cause was thought to be vasculitis. Renal angiography demonstrated a right renal artery stenosis, compatible with renovascular hypertension. He was treated with 60 mg of prednisolone per day, which brought about a satisfactory improvement of the above rheumatic and neurologic signs. On November 17, 1998, he received a follow-up study of MRI, which failed to show any cerebral lesions, supporting the effectiveness of prednisolone. An angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor successfully normalized hypertension and renin activity in serum, although renal blood flow did not increase.
 ...
PMID:[A case with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis who developed cerebral vasculitis and venovascular hypertension]. 1121 60

The authors present the results of clinical trail about treatment of arterial hypertension with ENAP (Enalapril) fo KRKA in centers of Bulgaria. Enalapril is ACE-inhibitor usually administered orally once daily, decreases blood pressure by lowering peripheral vascular resistance without increasing heart rate or output. In this clinical trail are given results about blood pressure, heart rate and biochemical indexes. The most frequent adverse events--headache, dizziness, orthostatic effects, abdominal pain e.t.s. occurring in less than 10%. More important side effects like dry persistent cough occurring in 8.6%. The results of clinical trail define high efficacy and good tolerability of ENAP in the treatment of arterial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Enalapril-clinical experience in Bulgaria]. 1122 62

Clinical trials continue to guide patient management. However, the hypotheses generally come from observational studies. Studies on women continue to be too little and too few, particularly in light of the fact that most elderly hypertensive patients are likely to be women. Attention has been drawn to the possibility that hypertension per se may engender symptoms such as headache for example, in addition to harder endpoints such as death. The MICROHOPE study, which was not a blood pressure-lowering study, showed that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with ramipril in diabetic patients provided the same beneficial effects previously published for the HOPE study. The doxazosin arm of the ALLHAT study was terminated by the data monitoring and safety board because the doxazosin-treated patients developed congestive heart failure at a greater rate than diuretic-treated patients. Two extensive studies testing two different classes of calcium antagonists against primarily diuretic-based treatment showed that the calcium antagonists were no less effective in terms of preventing hard endpoints. A small, but impressive cross-over study testing the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, pravastatin, against placebo showed that statin treatment lowers blood pressure in hypercholesterolemic patients with hypertension. Meta- analyses emphasized the value of blood pressure reduction in the elderly and added to the controversy and confusion about the role of calcium antagonists in the first-line treatment of hypertension. The point may be moot since with the current recommendations few hypertensive patients will be adequately treated with a single agent.
 ...
PMID:Recent clinical trial highlights in hypertension. 1127 95

This study was designed to investigate the effect of delapril, an ACE inhibitor, and manidipine, a long action calcium antagonist, on persistent microalbuminuria in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. Sixty type 2 diabetic patients were randomized to take delapril 30 mg/day or manidipine 10 mg/day for 48 weeks, in an open label design. Twenty eight of thirty subjects in the delapril group and twenty nine of thirty in the manidipine group completed the study. Urine albumin excretion as measured by the urinary albumin creatinine ratio decreased significantly in both groups (112.0+/-60.9 to 95.3+/-64.9 mg/g and 108.5+/-51.0 to 96.4+/-53.5 mg/g in the delapril and manidipine group respectively, p < 0.05, by paired t-test). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly changed after treatment in the delapril group but significantly decreased in the manidipine group (130.9+/-7.1/80.2+/-6.1 to 127.2+/-7.1/78.0+/-5.3 mm/Hg, p < 0.05, by student's paired t-test). After 48 weeks of treatment, two patients in the delapril group and one patient in the manidipine group converted to normoalbuminuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio < 30 mg/g) and one patient in each group progressed to overt nephropathy (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g). There were no significant changes in fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, serum fructosamine, creatinine, potassium and lipid profiles after 48 weeks of treatment in both groups. Two cases in the delapril group were withdrawn during the study because of an intolerable cough and one case in the manidipine group because of intolerable dizziness and headache. In conclusion, both delapril and manidipine are effective in the reduction of microalbuminuria in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria.
 ...
PMID:Effects on urinary albumin excretion and renal function changes by delapril and manidipine in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. 1133 83

A large-scale, 8-week, open-label, clinical experience trial evaluated the efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor (AT1 subtype) blocker candesartan cilexetil (16 to 32 mg once daily) either alone or as add-on therapy in 6465 hypertensive patients. The study population was 52% female and 16% African American with a mean age of 58 years. It included 5,446 patients who had essential hypertension (HBP) and 1,014 patients who had isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). These patients had either untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140 to 179 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90 to 109 mm Hg inclusive at baseline) despite a variety of antihypertensive medications including diuretics, calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and alpha- or beta-blockers, either singly or in combination. The mean baseline blood pressure for the HBP group was 156/97 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil as monotherapy (in 51% of HBP patients) reduced mean SBP/DBP by 18.7/ 13.1 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 49% of HBP patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.8/11.3 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (16.6/11.2 mm Hg), beta-blockers (16.5/ 10.4 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (15.3/10.0 mm Hg), alpha-blockers (16.4/10.4 mm Hg). The mean baseline blood pressure for the ISH group was 158/81 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil, as monotherapy (in 34% of ISH patients), reduced SBP/DBP by 17.0/4.4 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 66% of ISH patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.4/5.1 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (15.6/3.6 mm Hg), beta-blockers (14.0/4.8 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (13.4/4.3 mm Hg), and alpha-blockers (11.6/4.5 mm Hg). The further blood pressure lowering effects of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy were seen regardless of age, sex, and race. Overall, 6.8% of the 6465 patients withdrew because of adverse events, most commonly headache (6.3%) and dizziness (5.0%). Orthostatic hypotension was infrequent; 0.2% with candesartan cilexetil alone, and 0.8% with candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy. Thus, candesartan cilexetil either alone or as add-on therapy was highly effective for the control of systolic or diastolic hypertension regardless of demographic background when used in typical clinical practice settings.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on background therapy: a clinical experience trial. ACTION Study Investigators. 1141 37

The fixed low-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the non-thiazide diuretic indapamide has been evaluated in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Combination therapy aims to improve overall therapeutic efficacy while minimising adverse effects. In well-designed multicentre clinical trials, perindopril/indapamide at doses ranging from 2/0.625 to 8/2.5 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control. A similar reduction in supine BP was observed when combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was compared with losartan 50 mg/day or atenolol 50 mg/day. Similar reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP were also seen with perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day and irbesartan 150 mg/day. However, response and normalisation rates were significantly higher with combination therapy than with losartan or irbesartan monotherapy. Combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy effectively reduced BP in elderly patients aged 65 to 85 years to a significantly greater extent than either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Supine BP was also normalised in approximately two-thirds of patients in a small noncomparative trial in patients with hypertension and renal impairment. Low-dose perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were headache and cough. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of diuretics, occurred with a higher incidence with combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy than with either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day has shown efficacy in well designed comparative trials with atenolol, losartan and irbesartan including elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Studies comparing this dosage of perindopril/ indapamide with other combination therapies would be beneficial in allowing the place of perindopril/indapamide to be more accurately determined. The fixed-low dose combination of perindopril/indapamide provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day: a review of its place in the management of hypertension. 1146 78

Hypertension is an important risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED). Consequently, there is a high coincidence between hypertension and ED. Oral sildenafil (Viagra) is an effective treatment for ED in patients with treated or untreated hypertension. The most common adverse events of sildenafil (headache, flushing, hypotension) result from its moderate vasodilating properties. The concomitant use of sildenafil and organic nitrates is contraindicated because it may lead to a potentiation of the decreases in blood pressure and thus cause life-threatening hypotension. In contrast, the concomitant use of sildenafil and different classes of antihypertensive agents (beta-blockers, alpha-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists) may lead to additive but not to potentiating blood pressure decreases. Thus, this combination is unlikely to cause clinically significant hypotension or an increased incidence of adverse events. Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED in patients taking concomitant antihypertensive medication, including those on multidrug regimens.
 ...
PMID:[Interaction between sildenafil and antihypertensive drugs: what is evidence-based?]. 1159 59

The involvement of the hypothalamic and/or the pituitary gland during granulomatous, infiltrative or autoimmune diseases is a rare condition of acquired hypothalamic dysfunction and non-tumoral-non-vascular hypopituitarism. Sarcoidosis is a pathogen-free granulomatous disease which affects both central and peripheral nervous systems in 5-16% of patients. In most cases, nervous involvement by sarcoidosis occurs within a multi-systemic disease, although disease localization limited to the nervous system has also been reported. We observed a 26-year-old Italian woman presenting with low-grade fever, headache, visual disturbances, amenorrhea-galactorrhea syndrome and pituitary failure due to an infiltrative lesion involving the hypothalamus and the pituitary stalk. At first, the diagnosis of "probable" neurosarcoidosis was made according to the clinical picture, magnetic resonance imaging, and the study of cerebrospinal fluid lymphocyte sub-populations. In this case, hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea and galactorrhea combined with blunted responses of gonadotropins to luteinizing hormone releasing hormone and acquired growth hormone failure were to be considered as an infrequent manifestation of neurosarcoidosis limited to the medio-basal brain, without other disease localization. Forty-eight months after disease onset, the occurrence of mediastinal lymph node enlargement and increase of angiotensin converting enzyme in serum allowed us to confirm the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis is often hard to diagnose, especially when the neurological localization of the disease is not accompanied by other possible systemic signs, and when the lesion is too deep to obtain biopsy confirmation. The study of cerebrospinal fluid and blood lymphocyte sub-populations integrated by magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful for a correct diagnosis.
 ...
PMID:Amenorrhea-galactorrhea syndrome as an uncommon manifestation of isolated neurosarcoidosis. 1179 35

(1) The 22nd French pharmacovigilance meeting, held in July 2001, presented data on adverse effects notified by health professionals to regional pharmacovigilance centres in France. (2) Non specific "immunostimulants" are not harmless placebos, as might be concluded from the relative lack of data. There have been 315 notifications of severe adverse effects, some with positive rechallenge, reporting cutaneous, gastrointestinal, respiratory, haematological and other disorders. Attributability was considered "likely" in 68% of cases. Three deaths occurred. (3) Other well known adverse effects continue to occur: convulsions with camphor, visual hallucinations with oxybutynin, headache with antimigraine drugs, liver damage with dextropropoxyphene, neuropsychological disorders after buflomedil overdose (especially in patients with renal failure), hyperkalaemia during spironolactone combination with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACE inhibitor), and severe infections after intravesical BCG. (4) Rare adverse effects of old drugs were identified, such as oedema with valproic acid, interstitial pneumonia with flecainide, and a bleeding risk due to tramadol interaction with oral anticoagulants. (5) The adverse effects of new drugs are better documented: celecoxib is now implicated in visual disorders. (6) Overall, the meeting confirmed that only a small proportion of adverse drug reactions are notified, that a large number of hospitalised patients suffer from drug induced complications, and that summaries of product characteristics (SPC) are often too brief or reassuring regarding pharmacovigilance data. The poor risk-benefit ratios of some drugs call for their immediate market withdrawal.
 ...
PMID:Highlights of the 22nd French pharmacovigilance meeting. 1198 73


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>