UMLS:C0018681 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

GUIDELINES ON DRUG SAFETY: Recent European Union draft guidelines for the safety evaluation of drugs intended for long-term use state that during drug development the safety profile of the new compound should be assessed over a period of time consistent with intended usage. This is in reasonable agreement with guidelines prepared by other regulatory authorities. CLINICAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT: Satisfactory preclinical data on a new compound are used to obtain authorization for human testing from the National Committees on Safety of Medicines. Clinical trials are performed in four phases, ranging from phase I studies performed on healthy volunteers (n = 20-50) to postmarketing (phase IV) studies. The latter are of great importance as they cover large patient populations (n = 2000 to > or = 10,000) and allow detection of rare adverse drug reactions. ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS: Type B reactions are serious, unpredictable reactions to a drug that necessitate treatment withdrawal. Type A reactions are dose-dependent, and represent the majority of adverse reactions. They are often managed by dose reduction rather than drug withdrawal. ADVERSE REACTIONS TO ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS: Examples of type B adverse reactions to antihypertensives are the cutaneous and ocular reactions to practolol, and angioneurotic oedema associated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Lacidipine, a second-generation calcium antagonist, is an example of a modern antihypertensive agent with a favourable safety profile. The adverse reactions associated with lacidipine are mild to moderate and of the A type, the major ones being those typical of calcium antagonists (headache, flushing and pedal oedema due to vasodilation.
...
PMID:Assessing the safety profile of a new antihypertensive agent. 882 81

Based on our earlier animal study, we became interested to investigate if thromboxane A2 (TXA2) is involved in angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) induced cough in man. To 11 patients with hypertension, who had developed cough induced by ACE inhibitors, a TXA2 synthetase inhibitor, ozagrel was given for 1 to 2 months together with the ACE inhibitors. One patient developed headache induced by ozagrel and was eliminated from the study after 3 weeks. In other 10 patients, no obvious drug attributable abnormality was observed in subjective and objective symptoms or laboratory tests. In ten patients, cough scores were taken just before and after the administration of a combination of an ACE inhibitor with ozagrel. Median values of cough scores after the combination was significantly (p=0.012) lower than before the combination. Ozagrel reduced cough scores in 5 patients, completely suppressed cough in 3 patients and in 2 of 10 patients, ozagrel did not affect cough scores. Our observations suggest that TXA2 may somehow, mediate coughing induced by the ACE inhibitors. Further, patients on ACE inhibitors who develop cough may benefit from TXA2 synthetase inhibitors.
...
PMID:Thromboxane A2 synthetase inhibition suppresses cough induced by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. 912 80

Combination therapy with the new ACE inhibitor moexipril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) results in significant blood pressure (BP) reductions. This study compares the efficacy and safety of moexipril plus HCTZ to that of a standard combination treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 1 month placebo run-in period, 140 hypertensive patients whose sitting diastolic BP (DBP) averaged 95-114 mm Hg were randomized to receive either once daily moexipril 7.5 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or metoprolol 100 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg for the following 12-week double-blind treatment period. At biweekly visits BP was controlled sphygmomanometrically and the occurrence of adverse events (AE) was documented. At study endpoint adjusted mean reductions in sitting systolic/diastolic BP seen with both combinations were -17.6 mm Hg/-12.8 mm Hg and -17.2 mm Hg/-13.9 mm Hg in the moexipril/HCTZ and metoprolol/HCTZ groups, respectively. The response rate to both kinds of combinations were very similar, 69% and 74% in the moexipril/HCTZ and metoprolol/HCTZ groups, respectively. The percentage of patients which experienced one or more AEs were 46% in the moexipril/HCTZ and 61% in the metoprolol/HCTZ group. Headache and cough which are the most frequently reported AEs after treatment with ACE inhibitors were seen in 9% and 10% of the patients in the moexipril/HCTZ group compared to 10% and 4% in the metoprolol/HCTZ group. The study indicates that the combination of moexipril 7.5 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg is as efficacious and safe as metoprolol 100 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.
...
PMID:Antihypertensive treatment with moexipril plus HCTZ vs metoprolol plus HCTZ in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. 914 Aug 1

Carvedilol competitively blocks beta 1, beta 2 and alpha 1 receptors. The drug lacks sympathomimetic activity and has vasodilating properties that are exerted primarily through alpha 1-blockade. Animal models indicate that carvedilol confers protection against myocardial necrosis, arrhythmia and cell damage caused by oxidising free radicals, and the drug has no adverse effects on plasma lipid profiles. Recent data have confirmed the antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Carvedilol has similar efficacy to other beta-blocking agents, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors and hydrochlorothiazide. Carvedilol also improves exercise tolerance and ischaemic symptoms in patients with stable angina pectoris. Significant reductions in serious cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction and in frequency and severity of ischaemic events in patients with unstable angina have also been demonstrated. Interest in the use of carvedilol in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has culminated in the publication of a cumulative analysis of data from 1094 patients with mild to severe CHF who participated in the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Program (4 trials). After a median follow-up of 6.5 months, a significant overall reduction in mortality relative to placebo (3.2 vs 7.8%) was revealed in patients who had received carvedilol 6.25 to 50 mg twice daily (plus diuretics and ACE inhibitors). All-cause mortality, risk of hospitalisation for cardiovascular reasons and hospitalisation costs were also reduced significantly (by 65, 28% and 62%, respectively) in these trials. In addition, the Australia and New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative Group showed a 26% reduction in the combined risk of death or hospitalisation with carvedilol 12.5 to 50 mg/day relative to placebo after a mean 19-month follow-up period in 415 patients with CHF (relative risk 0.74). Adverse events with carvedilol appear to be less frequent than with other beta-blocking agents, are dosage-related and are usually seen early in therapy. Events most commonly reported are related to the vasodilating (postural hypotension, dizziness and headaches) and the beta-blocking (dyspnoea, bronchospasm, bradycardia, malaise and asthenia) properties of the drug. Carvedilol appears to date to have little effect on the incidence of worsening heart failure. Concomitant administration of carvedilol with some medications requires monitoring. Carvedilol is therefore likely to have a beneficial role in the management of controlled CHF, but further clinical studies are required to show the place of beta-adrenoceptor blocking therapy in general in this indication, and the position of carvedilol relative to other similar agents. Carvedilol is also confirmed as effective in the management of mild to moderate hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.
...
PMID:Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders. 921 Oct 87

Valsartan competitively and selectively inhibits the actions of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor subtype which is responsible for most of the known effects of angiotensin II. In clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension valsartan was as effective as losartan, lisinopril, enalapril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Addition of the latter reduced blood pressure in patients who did not respond sufficiently to valsartan monotherapy. Preliminary data also suggest valsartan may be effective in patients with severe essential hypertension. The drug was as effective as lisinopril as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension in patients with renal insufficiency and did not worsen renal function. Headache, dizziness and fatigue were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled studies; the incidence of these adverse events was not significantly different between placebo and valsartan recipients. Compared with ACE inhibitors, valsartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry cough. Thus, valsartan is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and may be particularly useful in patients who experience persistent cough during ACE inhibitor therapy.
...
PMID:Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. 925 84

To investigate the concept of initiating therapy with low doses of a calcium antagonist and an ACE inhibitor, a fixed combination of isradipine 2.5 mg plus the ACE inhibitor spirapril 3 mg was compared with its components, with the full-dose monotherapies (isradipine 5 mg or spirapril 6 mg), and with placebo. After a 2-week wash out phase in pretreated patients and a subsequent 2-week placebo period, 405 patients with a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 100 and 114 mmHg were randomly allocated to 12-week once-daily double-blind treatment in one of the six treatment arms. In patients whose blood pressure was not normalized (defined as DBP< or =90 mmHg) after 6 weeks of treatment, the dosage of either medication was doubled or, in the placebo group, was switched to the fixed combination. After week 6, the mean reductions from baseline in sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure 24 hours after dosing (trough) for the fixed combination or the monotherapies isradipine 5 mg, isradipine 2.5 mg, spirapril 6 mg, spirapril 3 mg, and placebo were 10.4/8.7, 10.0/9.4, 6.5/6.7, 10.0/8.3, 7.0/5.8, and 2.2/4.7 mmHg, respectively. The blood pressure changes obtained with the low-dose fixed combination were essentially identical to those observed with the full-dose monotherapies, thus showing an additive effect of low-dose isradipine and spirapril. In terms of tolerability, the lowest rate of any adverse events was found in the combination group. In this group, typical adverse events of calcium antagonists, such as headache, flushing, ankle edema, or palpitations, were observed only in 5%, 2%, 1%, and 0%, respectively, dry cough, considered typical for ACE inhibitors, was observed in only 1% of the combination group. In conclusion, the low-dose components isradipine 2.5 mg and spirapril 3 mg were shown to have an additive effect when combined, exerting a blood pressure-lowering effect comparable with the full doses and a trend to a better tolerability profile in comparison with the standard doses. Thus, low-dose combination therapy with these drugs appears to be a rational alternative to conventional monotherapy in the first-line treatment of hypertension.
...
PMID:Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose combination of isradipine and spirapril in the first-line treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. 949 99

The present study investigated the effect of the new ACE-inhibitor moexipril versus the beta 1-adrenergic blocker atenolol on metabolic parameters, adverse events (AEs) and sitting systolic (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) in obese postmenopausal women with hypertension (stage I and II). After a 4-week placebo run-in phase, 116 obese, postmenopausal women with primary hypertension were randomised into two treatment groups receiving once daily dosages of either moexipril 7.5 mg or atenolol 25 mg initially (mean age: 57 +/- 7 years in both groups; mean weight: 94 kg in the moexipril group and 89 kg in the atenolol group, corresponding to a body mass index (BMI) of 35.2 kg/m2 and 34.1 kg/m2 in both groups, respectively). After 4 and 8 weeks, the dosages were uptitrated to moexipril 15 mg, or if necessary to moexipril 15 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, or to atenolol 50 mg and atenolol 50 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, in patients whose blood pressure was not sufficiently controlled. At endpoint, metabolic parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, glucose, insulin) were not significantly altered in either treatment group. Most frequent adverse events under monotherapy (moexipril/atenolol) were asthenia (5.3/13.0%), headache (13.2/21.7%), cough (7.9/6.5%), pharyngitis (21.1/8.7%) and peripheral oedema (5.3/13.0%). Overall at least one AE was reported in 66% of the patients treated with moexipril and in 78% of those treated with atenolol. Reduction of SSBP/SDBP at endpoint was 14.7 +/- 1.9/10.0 +/- 1.1 and 8.7 +/- 1.9/8.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg after treatment with moexipril and atenolol, respectively. The results showed that moexipril and atenolol are equally effective in reducing blood pressure without adversely affecting blood lipids and carbohydrate metabolism.
...
PMID:Comparison between moexipril and atenolol in obese postmenopausal women with hypertension. 981 86

The TEAM trial investigated the effectiveness and tolerance of a fixed combination of the ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (2 mg trandolapril and 180 mg verapamil retard) (preparation Tarka) in an open multicentre prospective study of treatment of moderately severe hypertension (diastolic pressure at the end of the two-week wash-out period 100-115 mm Hg). The trial comprised 163 patients who were treated first for four weeks by a monotherapy with 2 mg trandolapril. After these four weeks patients who attained normal blood pressure proceeded with trandolapril treatment. Hypertensive patients who did not attain normal diastolic pressure levels were treated for another four weeks by a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR. After four weeks of treatment with trandolapril 62 patients of 163 (37%) had a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR reduced the diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg in 71.6% of the patients resistant to treatment with 2 mg trandolapril and in another 15.6% of patients it reduced the diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg or more. After two months of treatment 60 patients had a normal blood pressure due to trandolapril (37%) and another 73 patients (45%) treated by a combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR, i.e. a total of 133 patients (82%) who originally suffered from moderately severe hypertension, attained a normal diastolic blood pressure. The mean decrease of diastolic pressure after two months of treatment was 19.5 mm Hg in "non-respondents" to trandolapril monotherapy and 23.6 mm Hg in "respondents". The mean decrease of systolic pressure in "non-respondents" and "respondents" after trandolapril treatment was 19.5 mm Hg and 35.0 mm Hg resp. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil was not only effective but was associated with a minimum of undesirable effects. The incidence of headaches declined significantly. The combination of the above preparations is useful also because both preparations have a cardio- and nephroprotective effect and do not affect the lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Treatment with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR is indicated in moderately severe hypertension not responding to monotherapy, in particular when associated with diabetes, hyperlipoproteinaemia, ischaemic heart disease or left ventricular hypertrophy.
...
PMID:[The TEAM study--a study of the effectiveness and tolerance of treatment of essential hypertension with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil]. 982 54

Co-administration of antihypertensive drug therapy and hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is frequent in postmenopausal women but it is not known whether HRT interacts with concomitant antihypertensive therapy. The present study was designed to investigate efficacy and safety of the ACE inhibitor moexipril in comparison to placebo in hypertensive, postmenopausal women on HRT. After a 4-week placebo run-in phase, 95 postmenopausal women (35-74 years of age) who had a sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95-114 mm Hg and were treated with HRT were randomised to a 12-week treatment with moexipril 15 mg or placebo. Efficacy and safety were assessed by measuring changes in sitting BP and metabolic parameters associated with cardiovascular disease including triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol/HDL ratio and glucose. Adverse events were recorded continuously. After 12 weeks of treatment, moexipril 15 mg was significantly more effective in reducing sitting systolic and diastolic BP from baseline than placebo (-12.2/-9.9 mm Hg vs -1.6/-4.3 mm Hg, P < 0.001). Metabolic parameters were not affected by treatment with moexipril: mean levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol/HDL ratio and glucose remained unchanged throughout the study. Fibrinogen, an independent cardiovascular risk factor, increased after placebo (+35.0 mg/dl) and decreased after treatment with moexipril (-33.6 mg/dl), the difference, however, was not statistically significant. Moexipril was well-tolerated by postmenopausal women using HRT. The most frequent adverse events included headache (21.3%), cough (12.8%) and rhinitis (10.6%) and there were no significant differences in the number and severity of adverse events between the moexipril and placebo groups. This study indicates that moexipril is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of hypertensive, postmenopausal women and can safely be co-administered to HRT.
...
PMID:Co-administration of an ACE-inhibitor (moexipril) and hormonal replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. 1037 52

A 70-year-old man admitted to a local hospital because of facial muscle weakness, tinnitus and facial pain in left side, was then given corticosteroid with a tentative diagnosis of Bell's palsy and his symptoms gradually improved. Since these symptoms recurred six months later, he was referred to our neurological service. As his brain CT revealed diffuse thickening and enhancement of the dura mater, he was thought to have hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP). Intravenous antibiotics were started for aspiration pneumonia and his neurological symptoms gradually improved. HP caused by bacterial infection was thus likely and antibiotics, rifampicin and metronidazole, were administered orally as an outpatient. However, one month later, these symptoms were worsened with headache and double vision. He was then rehospitalized. MR imagings of the head with gadolinium disclosed diffuse meningeal thickening and enhancement, especially of the left-sided cerebellar tentorium. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were moderately elevated. Serum angiotensin converting enzyme was within normal range. The test for cytoplasmic antineutrohil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) in the serum was negative, however, that for perinuclear ANCA was positive at a titer of 99 EU. Lumbar puncture showed normal findings and negative culture results for bacteria, fungi or mycobacteria. Dural biopsy specimens showed non-specific granulomatous inflammation of the dura with epithelioid histiocytes and Langerhans type multinuclear giant cells with caseous necrosis, however, with no presence of fungi or tubercle bacilli. After the oral administration of cyclophosphamide (100 mg, daily) and prednisolone (40 mg, daily), his neurological symptoms and laboratory findings have been gradually improved and he is well one year after discharge. This case together with previous reports suggests that ANCA positive HP without evidence of other organ involvements may belong to the limited form Wegener's granulomatosis. In the literatures of idiopathic HP, the treatment effect with corticosteroid alone is initially favorable, but transient. On the other hand, using the combined therapy of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone, the remission has been achieved in more than 90% of patients with WG. These data suggest that P-ANCA positive HP should be treated with a combination of corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide.
...
PMID:[An old man presenting with fluctuating bilateral multiple cranial nerve palsies and positive test for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody]. 1051 63

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>