Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pharmacokinetics of quinapril, a novel angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and its active metabolite, quinaprilat, were determined following a single 20-mg oral dose of quinapril in six patients with chronic renal failure maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Overall, quinapril was well tolerated by these CAPD patients, with mild and transient side effects, not unexpected in this clinical setting, which included pruritus, headache, nausea, and cough. Blood pressure reduction was observed in four of six patients, with onset reliably two to four hours after dosing and duration up to 48 hours, associated with quinaprilat concentrations in plasma above 90 ng/mL for at least 33 hours postdose. Two patients experienced significant hypotension, systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg, which responded promptly to oral fluid administration and/or reduction in dialysate tonicity. The pharmacokinetic profile of quinapril in these CAPD patients was not significantly different from that previously observed in healthy subjects with normal renal function and in patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction not yet requiring dialysis (RDND). The apparent elimination half-life of quinapril was approximately one hour, with negligible dialysate excretion. The pharmacokinetic profile of quinaprilat in these CAPD patients was similar to that previously observed in patients with RDND. The elimination half-life of quinaprilat was markedly prolonged when compared to that in healthy subjects and averaged 20 hours, with only a small amount of quinaprilat excreted in dialysate (mean = 2.6% of total dose).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite quinaprilat during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. 227 86

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 245 54

Three hundred thirty-one patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, 182 males and 149 females with a mean age of 54 (range, 17-87 years), were studied for 1 year in a clinical trial with ramipril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The patients included had completed double-blind trials with ramipril vs. captopril, HCT, atenolol and ramipril plus piretanide. All cases were treated first with 5 mg ramipril and, where appropriate, also with 25 mg HCT. Adjustment of the dose in the range 1.25-20 mg ramipril was left to the investigator. Overall, a consistent reduction in blood pressure was achieved. Only small changes in mean blood pressure were noted during the 12 months (mean diastolic blood pressure 84.3-86.9 mm Hg, mean systolic blood pressure 145.6-148.2 mm Hg). Two hundred sixty-two (82%) of the 331 patients had diastolic values consistently equal to or lower than 95 mm Hg. There was a downward shift in the dosages upon which the investigators finally settled during the 12-month period in the patients receiving ramipril monotherapy. In patients also receiving HCT the initial dose was increased in most cases. Adverse events were observed in 6.7% of patients taking ramipril alone. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness, asthenia, pain in the upper abdomen and headache. Adverse effects occurred more frequently under continuous additional treatment with HCT, the same symptoms being reported. The clinical trial was prematurely terminated in six patients, in only two cases for medical reasons. The analysis of the laboratory findings revealed no general deterioration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:An open multicenter study to assess the long-term efficacy, tolerance, and safety of the oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 247 9

Calcium channel blockers are recently developed antihypertensive drugs. In terms of mechanisms of action, their specificity is not so well established as that of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors but is better understood than that for diuretics or adrenergic-inhibiting drugs. Calcium channel blockers were originally developed for treatment of angina but were found to lower arterial pressure as well. Three of them are now in wide use in the United States; their therapeutic spectrum in regard to type of hypertension is broad. Sublingual nifedipine has replaced intravenously administered vasodilators as immediate treatment of severe hypertension, and all three drugs, given orally, have been shown to be effective in mild, moderate, and severe hypertension. The three drugs available in this country are verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine. Pharmacological studies have shown that verapamil has the most negative chronotropic and inotropic effects of the three, with nifedipine producing the most vasodilation and having the potential for causing reflex tachycardia. Actually in practice, these various pharmacological differences have proved to have less significance than previously thought, and the drugs seem to have about equal antihypertensive effectiveness. Comparisons of calcium entry blockers with other drugs have shown them to be equally effective in whites as propranolol but more effective in blacks. Responsiveness appears to be related, as well, to pretreatment plasma renin activity and age. Thus, the antihypertensive effect is directly related to age and inversely related to plasma renin activity. The side effects mostly relate to vasodilation, reflex tachycardia, palpitations, headache, and edema; they are not frequent, and the drugs are well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Calcium channel blockers. Potential medical benefits and side effects. 249 Aug 17

We have presented the case of a 37-year-old white man who had recurrent, unilateral, facial edema, temporary partial facial nerve palsy, sensory loss along the ophthalmic and maxillary divisions of the fifth cranial nerve, ageusia bilaterally on the anterior two thirds of the tongue, right extraocular muscle palsies, and intractable migraine-type headaches, leading to the diagnosis of Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome. The serum angiotensin converting enzyme levels, which are postulated to derive from undiscovered granulomas, were found to be elevated. Methotrexate therapy mitigated the clinical course of the disease, and may prove to be useful in the treatment of this rare and recalcitrant condition.
 ...
PMID:Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome: elevations in serum angiotensin converting enzyme and results of treatment with methotrexate. 253 97

The safety and tolerability of lisinopril (1.25-160 mg daily) were assessed in 3,270 patients (2,688 hypertensives and 582 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF] and 280 healthy subjects. The duration of therapy ranged from a single dose to 43 months; 438 patients received lisinopril for at least 12 months (mean 20 months). In the hypertensive population, the most frequent adverse events reported were headache, dizziness, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fatigue, although not all of these events were thought to be related to lisinopril; 6.1% discontinued lisinopril due to adverse clinical events, most commonly cough and nausea. Twelve hypertensive patients died (0.45%), but most of these were not receiving lisinopril at the time of death and none was considered to be drug-related. In CHF patients, the most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, hypotension and fatigue. Again, not all of these reports were considered to be drug-related. Therapy was withdrawn in 9.6% of patients--hypotension, dizziness, diarrhoea and rash being the most frequent reasons. Fifty-three CHF patients died (9.1%) and in three cases death was considered to be related to lisinopril therapy. Hypotension, orthostatic effects or dizziness following the initial dose of lisinopril occurred infrequently (in 1.3% of the hypertensive group, including those receiving hydrochlorothiazide, and in 4.8% of CHF patients). Changes in laboratory parameters were generally minor and seldom resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Long-term treatment of hypertension and CHF with lisinopril for at least 3 years confirms that the drug is well tolerated. Overall, the side-effect profile is very similar to that of other ACE inhibitors with regard to class-specific effects. However, taste disturbance was rarely observed.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with lisinopril. Observations on safety and tolerability. 255 Jun 41

The efficacy and safety of nicardipine were assessed in 29,104 hypertensive patients (mean age, 64 years) during a 90-day multicenter clinical trial. By treatment day 90, blood pressure was controlled in 60% of the patients taking nicardipine alone. The efficacy of nicardipine combined with another antihypertensive agent was examined in 6,479 of the patients. When nicardipine was added to their treatment regimen, blood pressure was controlled by day 90 in 63% of the patients taking beta-blockers, in 58% of those on diuretics, in 50% of those on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and in 49% of those taking centrally acting antihypertensive agents. Nicardipine was well tolerated; only 11% of the 29,104 patients discontinued treatment because of side effects. Most adverse reactions were transient and were related to vasodilation, and included peripheral edema in 7% of the patients, flushing in 7%, and headache in 4%. The results indicate that nicardipine is suitable as initial therapy in arterial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of nicardipine in 29,104 patients with hypertension. 267 15

Perindopril is the ester prodrug of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor S-9780. The influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S-9780 (1 mg administered intravenously) and perindopril (8 mg administered orally) was examined in a double-blind, crossover, acute study in eight young (29 +/- 3 years) and eight elderly (71 +/- 3 years) healthy subjects. Mild headache and light-headedness were the only adverse effects and were more common in the younger subjects. Blood pressure fall was greater in the elderly even after correction for starting blood pressure. Bioavailability of S-9780 was increased in the elderly (35% +/- 17% compared with 19% +/- 7%; p less than 0.025) mainly because of increased conversion rather than absorption. Renal clearance of S-9780 was lower in the elderly (67 +/- 31 ml/min compared with 110 +/- 39 ml/min; p less than 0.03). Dose reduction of approximately 50% is suggested for elderly patients with further adjustment proportional to any preexisting diminished renal function.
 ...
PMID:Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perindopril. 284 67

To identify and measure the incidence of adverse effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril 13,713 patients were studied for one year by prescription-event monitoring. Precise information about the duration of treatment was available for 12,543 patients. The frequency of many events was calculated, including dizziness (483 patients; 3.9%), persistent dry cough (360; 2.9%), headache (310; 2.5%) hypotension (218; 1.7%), and syncope (155; 1.2%). Less common reactions included angioedema, urticaria, and muscle cramps. Altogether 1098 (8%) patients died and the notes of 913 of them (83%) were obtained for detailed scrutiny. With the exception of a few patients with renal failure who deteriorated during treatment (reported on separately), no death was attributed to enalapril. Enalapril was considered to be effective, even in patients with advanced cardiac failure. These results for enalapril are reassuring and provide further evidence of the value of prescription-event monitoring.
 ...
PMID:Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. I: Results of prescription-event monitoring. 284 1

A comparative, controlled, open hypertension study using the direct vasodilator endralazine and the ACE-inhibitor captopril in combined therapy for severe and moderately severe hypertension is described. Both vasodilators cause an approximately 20% reduction in supine and upright blood pressure. Extreme side effects such as hematological alterations, autoimmune states or uncontrollable water retention were not observed. Subjective symptoms, particularly severe headaches, were especially evident after endralazine use. This side effect may possibly be eliminated by gradual titration over several weeks.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy with the vasodilators captopril and endralazine]. 286 3


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>