Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale for a new class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) known as selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and to present preliminary clinical data on 2 COX-2 inhibitors that are approved for use in the United States. The primary mechanism of NSAIDs in the treatment of inflammation is the inhibition of COX, which exists in 2 forms. COX-I appears to regulate many normal physiologic functions, and COX-2 mediates the inflammatory response. Theoretically, an NSAID that inhibits COX-2 selectively should decrease inflammation but not influence normal physiologic functions and thus should cause fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Preliminary data suggest that celecoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, is superior to placebo and similar to traditional NSAIDs in the short-term treatment of pain due to osteoarthritis, although it has been associated with adverse effects such as headache, change in bowel habits, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness. Celecoxib also has been shown to be as effective as traditional NSAIDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but it may cause fewer adverse effects, including endoscopically documented ulcers. Celecoxib is metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 isozyme CYP2C9, and thus serious drug interactions are possible. In the treatment of osteoarthritis, rofecoxib has been shown to be as effective as traditional NSAIDs and may cause fewer endoscopically documented ulcers, but its complete adverse-effect profile is not known. Until the selective COX-2 inhibitors are widely used and more clinical as well as pharmacoeconomic studies are published, the exact role of COX-2 therapy cannot be determined. words: cyclooxygenase, celecoxib, rofecoxib, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis.
 ...
PMID:Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for the treatment of arthritis. 1046 13

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs, despite their well-established association with gastroduodenal injury. Recent discovery of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes COX-1 and COX-2 has improved our knowledge of the action of NSAIDs. COX-1 is continuously expressed in almost all tissues, where it converts arachidonate to the prostaglandins (PGs) important in homeostatic function; COX-2 is present in immune cells, blood vessel endothelial cells, and synovial fibroblasts. Classic NSAIDs inhibit both COX isoenzymes by occupying the cyclooxygenase-active site, preventing access by arachidonic acid. In theory, a drug such as celecoxib that selectively inhibited COX-2 might block inflammation, pain, and fever while reducing the side effects (gastric erosions and ulcers) associated with inhibition of COX-1. In animal models of inflammation and pain, celecoxib has shown marked suppression of PG production and inflammation compared with indomethacin, the standard COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor. In clinical trials, celecoxib dosed at 100, 200, and 400 mg BID was found to significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis. In one RA study, celecoxib was found to be as clinically effective as diclofenac after 24 weeks of treatment; at the end of the study, gastroduodenal ulcers occurred significantly more frequently in the diclofenac group (15%) than in the celecoxib group (4%). In a 1-week endoscopy study comparing celecoxib with naproxen and placebo, the incidence of gastric erosions/ulcers was significantly greater in the naproxen group than in the celecoxib or placebo group. The most common adverse effects of celecoxib in clinical studies were headache, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness. Celecoxib has shown significant equivalent anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy and has produced less endoscopically apparent gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration or erosion than have 3 classic NSAIDs. Whether it will have long-term GI adverse effects or interact with other medications to cause serious adverse responses (eg, increased GI bleeding or rash in conjunction with other sulfonamide-like drugs) is unknown and remains to be established.
 ...
PMID:Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. 1050 45

Rofecoxib is a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor which has little or no effect on the COX-1 isoenzyme at doses up to 1000 mg/day. Rofecoxib has greater selectivity for COX-2 than celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac and indomethacin. In well-controlled clinical trials, rofecoxib 12.5 to 500 mg/day has been evaluated for its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis [lower dosages (5 to 125 mg/day) were generally used in the chronic pain indications]. In the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis, rofecoxib was more effective in providing symptomatic relief than placebo, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and celecoxib and was similar in efficacy to ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen and nabumetone. Overall, both the physician's assessment of disease status and the patient's assessment of response to therapy tended to favour rofecoxib. In patients with postsurgical dental pain, pain after spinal fusion or orthopaedic surgery, or primary dysmenorrhoea, rofecoxib provided more rapid and more sustained pain relief and reduced requirements for supplemental morphine use after surgery than placebo. Rofecoxib was more efficacious than celecoxib in patients with acute dental pain and pain after spinal fusion surgery, although celecoxib may have been used at a subtherapeutic dose. In comparison with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen sodium, rofecoxib was similar in efficacy in the treatment of acute pain. Although naproxen sodium provided more rapid pain relief than rofecoxib in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea, the reverse was true after orthopaedic surgery: rofecoxib provided more rapid pain relief and less supplemental morphine was needed. Rofecoxib was as effective as naproxen in providing symptomatic relief for over 8700 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Compared with traditional NSAID therapy, rofecoxib had a significantly lower incidence of endoscopically confirmed gastroduodenal ulceration and, in approximately 13,000 patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, a lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Rofecoxib was generally well tolerated in all indications with an overall tolerability profile similar to traditional NSAIDs. The most common adverse events in rofecoxib recipients were nausea, dizziness and headache. In conclusion, rofecoxib is at least as effective as traditional NSAID therapy in providing pain relief for both chronic and acute pain conditions. Rofecoxib provides an alternative treatment option to traditional NSAID therapy in the management of symptomatic pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. Initial data from patients with primary dysmenorrhoea and postoperative pain are promising and further trials may confirm its place in the treatment of these indications. Rofecoxib has also shown promising results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and is likely to become a valuable addition to current drug therapy for this patient population. Importantly, rofecoxib is associated with a lower incidence of GI adverse events than traditional NSAIDs making it a primary treatment option in patients at risk of developing GI complications or patients with chronic conditions requiring long term treatment.
 ...
PMID:Rofecoxib: a review of its use in the management of osteoarthritis, acute pain and rheumatoid arthritis. 1139 14

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms COX-1 and COX-2. NSAIDs have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties that are proven, and they are extensively used in the treatment of arthritis, pain, and headache. Despite their good efficacy, NSAIDs are associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, which appears to be related to the inhibition of the cytoprotective function of COX-1. Thus, selective COX-2 inhibitors, or coxibs, were designed to inhibit only the production of COX-2-dependent inflammatory prostaglandins, without any effect on COX-1 and its gastroprotective function. This article reviews important evidence on the GI safety of coxibs. Endoscopic studies demonstrated that coxibs, such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, induced significantly fewer ulcers than nonspecific NSAIDs. To analyze whether the incidence of clinical GI events is also lower with coxibs, 2 large controlled clinical trials, the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS) and Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR), evaluated the GI safety of celecoxib and rofecoxib, respectively. Based on evidence from the VIGOR trial, it was demonstrated that rofecoxib has already fulfilled the promise and significantly decreases the risk of clinically important and complicated GI events compared with a nonselective NSAID, naproxen. In contrast, the CLASS trial showed that the incidence of ulcer complications in patients treated with celecoxib was similar in patients treated with nonspecific NSAIDs.
 ...
PMID:An evidence-based evaluation of the gastrointestinal safety of coxibs. 1190 55

The idiopathic stabbing headache (ISH) is characterized by a stabbing pain of short duration, variable localization and an errant evolution pattern. As its biological mechanisms are unknown and the treatment options are little effective, this disorder shows a strong impact on the patient's life. Two females and one male, aged 76, 66 and 72 years, respectively, started presenting ISH within 20 days after the onset of a stroke. All the patients were treated for the ISH with celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, with full recovery from ISH up to 6 days after it was first administered. The interruption of the drug 60 days after the treatment with celecoxib induced again the appearance of algic symptoms in two patients. We concluded that cerebrovascular diseases (CD) can lead to ISH and that the COX-2 inhibitor can be an effective prophylactic drug for ISH after CD.
Cephalalgia 2002 Apr
PMID:COX-2 inhibitor for the treatment of idiopathic stabbing headache secondary to cerebrovascular diseases. 1204 58

Rizatriptan is an effective and fast acting drug for the acute treatment of migraine. As with any other acute treatment for migraine, headache recurrence may occur in up to one-third of responders. Combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) seems to reduce the incidence of headache recurrence in clinical practice. Rofecoxib is a member of a new class of NSAIDs, which selectively inhibits the COX-2 enzyme and therefore is associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal side-effects; the drug has a long plasma half-life (17 h). This open label study compared rizatriptan with rizatriptan plus rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine. Fifty-six triptan naive patients from a tertiary centre (37 women and 19 men, ages 16-55 years, mean 35 years) with International Headache Society migraine were randomized into two groups. They were instructed to treat three consecutive moderate or severe attacks with either 10 mg rizatriptan (group 1: 18 women and 10 men) or with 10 mg rizatriptan plus 25 mg rofecoxib (group 2: 19 women and 9 men). The presence of headache and nausea at 1, 2 and 4 h, and of side-effects, use of rescue medication and recurrence were compared. Fifty-four patients completed the study. Group 1 treated 76 attacks and group 2 treated 81 attacks. Absence of headache at 1 h was seen in 19 attacks (25%) in group 1 and in 34 attacks (42%) in group 2 (P=0.082); at 2 h absence of headache was seen in 60% of group 1 attacks and in 76% of group 2 attacks (P=0.115). At 4 h, 75% of group 1 attacks and 88% of group 2 attacks were pain free (P=0.122). With regard to nausea, of those who had nausea at baseline, 31% and 49% of attacks in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were nausea free at 1 h (P=0.091), 75% and 79% at 2 h (P=0.736) and 82% and 91% (P=0.479) at 4 h. Recurrence, based on all attacks of those patients who achieved pain free at 4 h, was observed in 53% of group 1 and 20% of group 2 attacks (P<0.001). Sustained pain-free rates (for the 4-h time point) were 45.6% of group 1 and 78.9% of group 2 attacks. There were no significant differences with regard to rescue medication consumption after 4 h and side-effects in both groups. There was a non-significant trend for the combination group to have a higher response rate. The group treated with rizatriptan and rofecoxib had a lower recurrence rate than the group treated with rizatriptan. This study demonstrated that combining a fast acting triptan such as rizatriptan with rofecoxib reduced headache recurrence rates, was well tolerated and may be more effective than the use of rizatriptan alone. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are necessary to confirm these observations.
Cephalalgia 2002 May
PMID:Rizatriptan combined with rofecoxib vs. rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: an open label pilot study. 1210 94

Nabumetone is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory prodrug, which exerts its pharmacological effects via the metabolite 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA). Nabumetone itself is non-acidic and, following absorption, it undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism to form the main circulating active metabolite (6-MNA) which is a much more potent inhibitor of preferentially cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2. The three major metabolic pathways of nabumetone are O-demethylation, reduction of the ketone to an alcohol, and an oxidative cleavage of the side-chain occurs to yield acetic acid derivatives. Essentially no unchanged nabumetone and < 1% of the major 6-MNA metabolite are excreted unchanged in the urine from which 80% of the dose can be recovered and another 10% in faeces. Nabumetone is clinically used mainly for the management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to reduce pain and inflammation. The clinical efficacy of nabumetone has also been evaluated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, soft tissue injuries and juvenile RA. The optimum oral dosage of nabumetone for OA patients is 1 g once daily, which is well tolerated. The therapeutic response is superior to placebo and similar to nonselective COX inhibitors. In RA patients, nabumetone 1 g at bedtime is optimal, but an additional 0.5-1 g can be administered in the morning for patients with persistent symptoms. In RA, nabumetone has shown a comparable clinical efficacy to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), diclofenac, piroxicam, ibuprofen and naproxen. Clinical trials and a decade of worldwide safety data and long-term postmarketing surveillance studies show that nabumetone is generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse effects are those commonly seen with COX inhibitors, which include diarrhoea, dyspepsia, headache, abdominal pain and nausea. In common with other COX inhibitors, nabumetone may increase the risk of GI perforations, ulcerations and bleedings (PUBs). However, several studies show a low incidence of PUBs, and on a par with the numbers reported from studies with COX-2 selective inhibitors and considerably lower than for nonselective COX inhibitors. This has been attributed mainly to the non-acidic chemical properties of nabumetone but also to its COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor profile. Through its metabolite 6-MNA, nabumetone has a dose-related effect on platelet aggregation, but no effect on bleeding time in clinical studies. Furthermore, several short-term studies have shown little to no effect on renal function. Compared with COX-2 selective inhibitors, nabumetone exhibits similar anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties in patients with arthritis and there is no evidence of excess GI or other forms of complications to date.
 ...
PMID:Nabumetone: therapeutic use and safety profile in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. 1545 29

Lumiracoxib is a highly selective and potent cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, with a novel structure that conveys weakly acidic properties and a unique pharmacological profile. It is rapidly absorbed, with a relatively short plasma half-life. In well designed clinical trials of 1-52 weeks' duration in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis, the efficacy of oral lumiracoxib 100-400 mg/day in decreasing pain intensity and improving functional status was greater than that with placebo and similar to those with nonselective NSAIDs or celecoxib 200mg once daily. In single- and multiple-dose well designed trials in patients with acute pain associated with primary dysmenorrhoea, dental or orthopaedic surgery or tension-type headache, lumiracoxib 100-800 mg once daily was more effective in relieving acute pain than placebo or controlled-release oxycodone 20 mg, and was at least as effective as selective COX-2 inhibitors or nonselective NSAIDs. Lumiracoxib was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with a similar overall tolerability profile to those of placebo and other COX-2-selective inhibitors. In a large 52-week safety trial in patients with OA, lumiracoxib 400mg once daily had a rate of gastrointestinal ulcer complications that was approximately one-third to one-quarter of that of ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily or naproxen 500 mg twice daily. Lumiracoxib was not associated with an increase in cardiovascular events.
 ...
PMID:Lumiracoxib. 1545 39

Selective inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme were developed to treat pain and inflammation while reducing the risk of the serious gastrointestinal side effects seen with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The results of several clinical trials have demonstrated an apparent increased risk of serious cardiovascular events in patients taking the COX-2-selective inhibitors. Although the risk was observed originally with trials conducted with rofecoxib, it was attributed generally to the entire class of COX-2-selective drugs based on a similar mechanism of action and a hypothesis that predicted the possibility of a prothrombotic effect of the drugs compared with nonselective NSAIDs. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that elevated cardiovascular risk is not limited to the use of COX-2-specific inhibitors. An increase in cardiovascular risk actually has been seen with anti-inflammatory drugs of the NSAID class, regardless of whether they are selective or nonselective inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration has recommended that all such drugs carry a black box warning for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks.
Curr Pain Headache Rep 2005 Dec
PMID:An update on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. 1628 38

This 2-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. In part 1 (6 weeks), 102 patients (> or = 12 years old) with hemophilic arthropathy were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib once daily or placebo (1:1 ratio). In part 2 (6 months), 51 patients taking placebo in part 1 were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib or 25 mg rofecoxib once daily; patients taking etoricoxib in part 1 continued the same treatment. Efficacy end points included Patient Assessment of Arthropathy Pain, Patient Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status, and Investigator Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status. Safety was evaluated at each study visit. Etoricoxib provided significant improvement in all end points versus placebo (P < .001). Fewer patients taking etoricoxib discontinued due to a lack of efficacy versus placebo (P = .048). During part 2, efficacy was maintained; etoricoxib and rofecoxib demonstrated similar results. The most common adverse experiences were upper respiratory infection and headache. The incidence of joint bleeding during part 1 was similar between etoricoxib (66.7%) and placebo (72.6%) and during part 2 between etoricoxib (77.0%) and rofecoxib (78.9%). We conclude that etoricoxib provided superior efficacy versus placebo for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy and was generally safe and well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib in the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. 1629


1 2 3 Next >>