Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (
headache
)
56,091
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the antiemetic effectiveness and tolerability of
Navoban
(tropisetron) and Zofran (ondansetron) following high-dose (> or = 50 mg/m2) cisplatin chemotherapy. In a randomised, multi-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 117 evaluable chemotherapy-naive patients who received
Navoban
were compared with 114 who received Zofran. Patient diary cards were used to assess both acute (Day 1) and delayed (Days 2-6) nausea and vomiting. Total control of acute vomiting was achieved in 54% of
Navoban
and 65% of Zofran patients (p = 0.052), and total control of acute nausea in 66% and 62% respectively (p = 0.655). Total control of delayed vomiting was achieved in 44% of
Navoban
patients and 46% of Zofran patients (p = 0.765), and of delayed nausea in 56% and 47% respectively (p = 0.207). Both reactions combined were totally prevented during the entire 6-day trial period in 22% of
Navoban
and 24% of Zofran patients (NS), while a further 42% of patients in both groups remained largely free from both nausea and emesis. The few adverse reactions (e.g.
headache
, constipation, diarrhoea) were mainly mild and typical of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in efficacy and tolerability between
Navoban
5 mg once daily and the highest recommended dose of Zofran (32 mg on Day 1, followed by 8 mg three times a day).
...
PMID:Is Navoban (tropisetron) as effective as Zofran (ondansetron) in cisplatin-induced emesis? The French Navoban Study Group. 774 65
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of
Navoban
(tropisetron) three different Nordic multicentre trials were conducted during the period 1988-92. In all, 1050 patients were recruited from 15 centres. In the first study,
Navoban
monotherapy was compared with a high-dose metoclopramide cocktail. In the second,
Navoban
+/- dexamethasone was evaluated for those patients not fully protected by
Navoban
alone. In the third trial,
Navoban
was evaluated for various chemotherapy regimens, for long-term efficacy, and for various risk groups of patients. Spontaneous intercycle variations were also evaluated.
Navoban
was found to be as effective as the antiemetic cocktail but with a more favourable spectrum of side effects and a simpler schedule of administration.
Navoban
was more effective during the acute than the delayed phase. Addition of dexamethasone significantly improved prevention of both acute and delayed emesis. Long term efficacy seemed to be stable up to 10 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients treated with noncisplatin regimens showed significantly higher protection rates than patients treated with cisplatin. Various cancer diagnoses and cytostatic agents were also evaluated. Gender and age were important risk factors.
Navoban
was found to be an efficacious antiemetic agent, especially regarding acute nausea and vomiting. Addition of a corticosteroid significantly improved the effect during highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The role of
Navoban
for delayed emesis must be evaluated in future trials. The two most common side effects were
headache
and constipation. Overall,
Navoban
was well tolerated and patient compliance with the drug was high.
...
PMID:Navoban (tropisetron) alone and in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the Nordic experience. The Nordic Antiemetic Trial Group. 774 68
In a prospective randomized study comprising 66 women treated for gynecologic malignancies with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, the new 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist tropisetron (
Navoban
, Sandoz Pharma Ltd.) was compared with a metoclopramide cocktail for the prevention of nausea and emesis. All patients were chemotherapy-naive. Two consecutive courses (including the 1st week posttherapy) were studied. The cisplatin doses were in the range of 50-75 mg/m2, and the regimens also contained doxorubicin, teniposide, etoposide, vincristine, and bleomycin. Complete protection against nausea during the first 24 h (course 1) was achieved in 76% of the tropisetron group and in 85% of the metoclopramide group. Emesis was prevented in 82% of the patients in both groups. During the whole 6-day period, full emetic protection was achieved in 30% and 18% of the patients in the two groups. On days 3-4 of course 1, tropisetron was superior to metoclopramide. The overall tolerability of the tropisetron was excellent or good in 94% of patients, a rate higher than that observed for the metoclopramide regimen (75%). The most common side effects for the latter regimen were sedation (82%) and extrapyramidal reactions (21%). The only significant adverse event recorded after treatment with tropisetron was
headache
of slight or moderate grade.
...
PMID:An open, randomized study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron with that of a metoclopramide-containing antiemetic cocktail in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. 828 22
Efficacy and safety of the antiemetic agent
Navoban
(5HT3-receptor-antagonist Tropisetron) on cytostatic-induced emesis of breast cancers and gynecological cancers was tested in 28 female patients receiving a total of 127 chemotherapy courses containing high (cisplatin), moderate high (cyclophosphamid) or moderate (for example 5 FU) emetogenic cytostatic drugs. We studied antiemetic response rates of
Navoban
(5 mg/d) during the first 24 hours after administration of the chemotherapy as well as response rates of the "delayed nausea and emesis" (days 2-9 after chemotherapy). A complete response was observed in 103 chemotherapy courses (= 81.1%) during the first 24 hours after chemotherapy and in 93 courses (= 73.2%) for the "delayed emesis". Treatment failures (more than 5 vomiting episodes) during the first 24 hours were present in four courses and for the "delayed emesis" in 11 courses. The side effects of
Navoban
such as constipation,
headache
or tiredness were minimum. Therefore no patient refused to receive the necessary chemotherapy.
Navoban
is, with its single dose application, an effective therapeutic drug for the prevention of nausea and emesis in patients receiving a chemotherapy.
...
PMID:[Effectiveness and tolerance of Navoban (5HT3-receptor antagonist tropisetron) in prevention of cytostatic drug-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast carcinomas and gynecological malignancies]. 890 Jun 4
In this double-blind, randomized trial performed at five study centers, the prophylactic, antiemetic effect of two different dosages of tropisetron (
Navoban
; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) was investigated in dacarbazine-treated patients with melanoma. Patients received tropisetron 5 mg or 10 mg orally (as one capsule) once daily (minimum 3 days) on each day of chemotherapy. No significant differences were found in the effects of tropisetron 5 mg and 10 mg. During the first 24 hours, total control of vomiting was seen in 93% and 98% of patients receiving tropisetron 5 mg and 10 mg, respectively. Total control of nausea was achieved in 84% and 80% of patients receiving tropisetron at these dosages. Over days 2 to 7 of chemotherapy, total control of vomiting and nausea remained high. Patients reported that quality of life remained good throughout chemotherapy, as did mood; only a small decrease in food intake occurred. Tropisetron was well tolerated. Constipation was the most common adverse event, occurring in 13% of patients.
Headache
(4%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (2%) also were observed.
...
PMID:Dose comparison of tropisetron (Navoban) 5 mg and 10 mg orally in the prophylaxis of dacarbazine-induced nausea and emesis. 911 21
Emesis is one of the most frequent and distressing adverse effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Conventional antiemetic regimens are unsatisfactory due to their poor efficacy and their adverse events, particularly in children. Tropisetron (
Navoban
; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) belongs to a new class of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists with antiemetic effectiveness in patients receiving anticancer agents. We evaluated tropisetron (0.2 mg/kg/d) in 24 chemotherapy-treated children who had experienced severe emesis during previous chemotherapy courses in spite of concomitant administration of either alizapride or metoclopramide. Complete control of emesis was achieved in 70% of the courses (37% of those including cisplatin). No severe adverse effect was reported.
Headache
was observed in two courses and constipation was observed during two other courses. Tropisetron proved clearly superior to conventional antiemetics and safe in use.
...
PMID:Prevention of emesis by tropisetron (Navoban) in children receiving cytotoxic therapy for solid malignancies. 911 22
Three Nordic multicenter studies were performed between 1988 and 1992 to evaluate the efficacy of tropisetron (
Navoban
; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) as an antiemetic agent in patients undergoing various types of chemotherapy. More than 1,050 patients were recruited from cancer centers in Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. In the first two studies, chemotherapy-naive patients were studied for 6-day periods over two consecutive treatment cycles. The first study comparing tropisetron with a metoclopramide cocktail was performed as an open, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. All 259 chemotherapy-naive patients received cisplatin > or = 50 mg/m2 on the first day of chemotherapy; other cytostatic agents were allowed on days 1 to 6 of therapy. Patients received either tropisetron or an antiemetic cocktail of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam over the study period. Total control of acute vomiting during the first course of chemotherapy was achieved in 63% of patients in the tropisetron treatment group and in 64% of patients in the antiemetic cocktail group. Acute nausea was prevented completely in 40% of patients in the tropisetron group and in 61% of the metoclopramide cocktail group during course 1 (P < .001). For delayed nausea and vomiting, there were no significant differences between the two antiemetic regimens. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated. The second study compared the efficacy of tropisetron plus placebo with tropisetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in patients not fully controlled by tropisetron monotherapy during course 1. One hundred sixty patients were involved in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Acute vomiting was completely prevented in 40% of patients treated with tropisetron plus placebo compared with 75% of patients treated with tropisetron plus dexamethasone (P = .001). The results for acute nausea were similar. Delayed vomiting and delayed nausea were completely prevented in significantly more patients receiving the tropisetron-dexamethasone combination than in those receiving the tropisetron-placebo combination (P < .05). Adverse events were reported less frequently in patients receiving tropisetron together with dexamethasone. The third study was an open, nonrandomized multicenter trial designed to investigate the long-term antiemetic effect of tropisetron on various types of chemotherapy and on various types of patients. An interim analysis of this study has been reported previously (Ann Oncol 4:539-542, 1993). Six hundred thirty patients were studied over a mean number of 4.6 courses (range, 1 to 19 courses) of chemotherapy. Each received tropisetron daily on days 1 to 6 of therapy. Complete protection from nausea and vomiting was achieved in 67% of the complete series. The long-term effects of tropisetron therapy remained consistent over 10 consecutive courses of chemotherapy. Tropisetron was more effective during noncisplatin treatment compared with cisplatin treatment; it was also more effective in men and in older patients (> 50 years of age). The most frequent adverse events were
headache
(18%) and constipation (8%).
...
PMID:Tropisetron (Navoban) alone and in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis: the Nordic experience. 911 23
The most frequent side effects of chemotherapy are nausea and vomiting. This issue is a clinical analysis of the protective effect of a 5HT3 antagonist (
Navoban
-R; Sandoz Pharma Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) against chemotherapy--induced emesis (especially with the most emetic cytostatics--cisplatin and dacarbazine). In the first day of treatment,
Navoban
demonstrates a control of emesis for 75% of patients and in the following days for 80% of patients. The nausea is more frequent than vomiting. The most frequent side effects of
Navoban
were:
headache
(75% of patients), dizziness (62% of patients) and tiredness (50% of patients). This drug is a good protective against chemotherapy induce emesis and is very easy to administer.
...
PMID:[The antiemetic action of tropisetron (Navoban) in the cytostatic treatment of neoplastic diseases]. 945 57