Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The results of an open prospective study that evaluated the long-term clinical safety of nicorandil are presented. This study included 199 patients with severe chronic stable angina treated over a 1-year period. The most often reported adverse event was headache, which was responsible for most of the study withdrawals due to clinical intolerance (9.6%). When using a progressive titration scheme, this incidence was substantially reduced to 2.7%. As with other less frequent adverse events (dizziness, gastrointestinal disorders), headaches were reported as being mild to moderate in severity, were experienced during the first days of treatment, and, if treatment was maintained, usually resolved within a few days. The incidence of adverse events was not modified when nicorandil was given in combination with a beta-blocker, a calcium antagonist, or both agents. Cardiovascular safety was satisfactory and laboratory parameters were not altered. At the end of the study, 70% of patients were maintained on nicorandil. These results are in agreement with those reported from the nicorandil safety database, which gathered 1152 patients treated by nicorandil, including those of the present study. In comparative studies of nicorandil versus beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, or nitrates, the overall incidence of adverse events was no different between the two treatment groups, although the safety profile differed according to the drug category.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1995 Mar
PMID:Nicorandil safety in the long-term treatment of coronary heart disease. 764 28

Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS), a controlled-release delivery system given once a day, was evaluated in a multisite study of mild-to-moderate hypertensive subjects, seated diastolic pressure between 95 and 110 mm Hg, on placebo. Of 1,666 subjects enrolled, 69% were eligible to begin treatment. Therapy with nifedipine GITS was started at 30 mg daily and increased by 30 mg/day each week until there was a response (seated diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg and a reduction of > or = 10 mm Hg) or until a maximum dose of 180 mg/day was reached. After titration, responders were kept on active treatment for 12 more weeks. Seventy-six percent of those treated responded, and 88% of the responders completed the 12-week phase. Comparisons were made among relevant subgroups. Elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) had a significantly higher response rate at a lower average daily dose, compared with younger subjects. Response rates were > 70% and relatively similar in (a) white and black patients, (b) diabetic and nondiabetic patients, (c) men and women, and (d) normal-weight, over-weight, and obese patients. Nifedipine GITS had no significant effect on fasting serum glucose or cholesterol fractions. Edema and headache were the most often observed adverse effects during treatment. Incidence of the former was related to dose but occurred without evidence of fluid retention (average body weight fell significantly by 1% during treatment). As antihypertensive monotherapy given once a day, nifedipine GITS is effective and well tolerated for a wide spectrum of hypertensive patients.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993
PMID:Effectiveness of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system for treatment of hypertension: results of the MATH Trial. 769 45

The efficacy and safety of cilazapril in chronic heart failure have been extensively investigated in an international clinical program in patients with underlying chronic heart failure with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. Cilazapril in single doses of 1.25-5 mg produced a significant dose-dependent reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance and a significant increase in cardiac index. In placebo-controlled studies, 1-5 mg of cilazapril once daily for 12 weeks prolonged predose exercise test duration and improved New York Heart Association classification status and signs and symptoms of chronic heart failure, including paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Up to 86% of patients receiving these dosages had improvement, with only 12% of patients requiring the higher dose, 5 mg. These data indicate that cilazapril is effective when administered once daily to patients with chronic heart failure receiving concomitant therapy with digitalis and/or a diuretic. The safety of cilazapril in patients with chronic heart failure has been evaluated in 1,163 patients administered from 0.5 to 15 mg once daily for treatment periods ranging from 1 day to 57 months. Cilazapril was administered to 500 patients for at least 6 months, 264 patients for at least 1 year, and 101 patients for at least 2 years. The most frequently occurring adverse events were dizziness, coughing, dyspnea, fatigue, angina pectoris, and headache. Cilazapril was equally well tolerated by young and elderly patients. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 12.9% of patients, mainly as a result of coughing (1.7%) and dizziness (1%). Forty-four patients (3.8%) died during cilazapril therapy or during a period without treatment. Of these deaths, 93% were due to cardiac causes, especially rhythm disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994
PMID:Heart failure therapy with cilazapril: an overview. 770 63

The effects of the administration of 50 mg of guggulipid or placebo capsules twice daily for 24 weeks were compared as adjuncts to a fruit- and vegetable-enriched prudent diet in the management of 61 patients with hypercholesterolemia (31 in the guggulipid group and 30 in the placebo group) in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Guggulipid decreased the total cholesterol level by 11.7%, the low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) by 12.5%, triglycerides by 12.0%, and the total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio by 11.1% from the postdiet levels, whereas the levels were unchanged in the placebo group. The HDL cholesterol level showed no changes in the two groups. The lipid peroxides, indicating oxidative stress, declined 33.3% in the guggulipid group without any decrease in the placebo group. The compliance of patients was greater than 96%. The combined effect of diet and guggulipid at 36 weeks was as great as the reported lipid-lowering effect of modern drugs. After a washout period of another 12 weeks, changes in blood lipoproteins were reversed in the guggulipid group without such changes in the placebo group. Side effects of guggulipid were headache, mild nausea, eructation, and hiccup in a few patients.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1994 Aug
PMID:Hypolipidemic and antioxidant effects of Commiphora mukul as an adjunct to dietary therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. 784 1

A great number of calcium antagonists are available for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Differences in pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties can be used to optimize therapy in patients and to minimize side effects. In contrast to all dihydropyridine (DHP) derivatives, drugs of the verapamil type slow atrioventricular conduction and are widely used for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. The higher vasoselectivity of new DHP derivatives as compared with nifedipine should be regarded as an advantage for the treatment of patients with impaired left ventricular function. Besides vasodilation, additional effects such as antiatherosclerotic action, amelioration of rheological parameters, bronchial relaxation, or improvement of cerebral capacity in patients with cerebro-organic disorders have been documented for individual drugs. The long plasma half-life of some new calcium antagonists is advantageous with respect to patient compliance. Furthermore, a delayed increase in plasma concentration (high tmax values) is useful to minimize side effects such as reflex tachycardia, flush, headache, and dizziness.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994
PMID:Calcium antagonists in comparison: view of the pharmacologist. 789

Carotid body tumors are rare although they must always remain part of the differential diagnosis of a neck mass. Sonography as the screening method of choice followed by angiography determines the diagnosis. In 11 patients 12 carotid body tumors were extirpated. The reconstruction of the internal carotid artery with an interposition of the greater saphenous vein was necessary in two cases after resection of the tumor. One patient underwent preoperative embolisation because of a huge tumor. Two postoperative radiotherapies were undertaken because of malignancy in one case and a partially extirpated tumor in the other. After a 9 year follow-up period all patients are alive. One patient suffers from a persistent palsy of the hypoglossal nerve and another complains of permanent headache supposedly caused by the reocclusion of the venous interposition of the carotid artery. In conclusion, our data support the diagnostic strategies in patients with suspected carotid body tumors. Regarding the exact therapeutic regimen, we suggest the surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy in cases of confirmed malignancy or partially resectable lesions.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993 Dec
PMID:Diagnosis and treatment of carotid body tumors. 812 61

The efficacy and safety of optimally titrated once-daily (CD) and twice-daily (SR) diltiazem were compared in 111 patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension [seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 95 mmHg and < or = 114 mmHg] in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo run-in, parallel-group trial. Following a 4 week washout and placebo-controlled run-in period, patients were randomized to receive diltiazem CD 180 mg and matching placebo (n = 54), or diltiazem SR 90 mg bid (n = 57). Total daily doses were titrated from 180 mg to 360 mg to achieve a goal of seated DBP < 90 mmHg during a 6 week titration period. The patients continued to receive their optimal dose for a 6 week follow-up period. Ninety-six (96) patients (diltiazem CD: 47, diltiazem SR: 49) completed the study protocol, with 60% of the diltiazem CD and 55% of the diltiazem SR patients achieving the goal of seated DBP of < 90 mmHg (p = 0.685). Although significant decreases occurred in seated and standing measurements of diastolic and systolic BP and heart rate with treatment in both groups, there were no significant differences between treatment groups. Both medications were well tolerated, with a similar frequency of adverse effects [diltiazem CD: 24/54 (37%) patients; diltiazem SR: 24/57 (42.1%) patients] with the most frequently reported adverse effects being headache and edema.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1995 Jun
PMID:Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily formulations of diltiazem in the treatment of systemic hypertension. The Canadian Multicenter Diltiazem-CD Hypertension Trial Group. 852 51

The aim of this 3-month double-blind study was to assess the antihypertensive effect and acceptability of perindopril in comparison with enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 161 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 115 mmHg were randomized to receive perindopril 4 mg or enalapril 10 mg once daily. If supine DBP was higher than 90 mmHg, treatment was adjusted monthly, first by doubling the dose and then by addition of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg. After 3 months of active treatment the decrease in supine and standing blood pressures was statistically significant within both groups but was not statistically different between groups. The percentage of patients (65%) who achieved supine DBP of < or = 90 mmHg in the perindopril group was not significantly different from the enalapril group (73%). Monotherapy resulted in control of supine DBP in 56% of the perindopril group and 58% of the enalapril group; the addition of hydrochlorothiazide resulted in control of supine DBP in 6% and 15% respectively. The number of withdrawals for adverse events was statistically significant between groups (0 in the perindopril group and 7 in the enalapril group, p = 0.01). During active treatment the most frequently reported complaints were headaches and cough; there was not statistically difference between groups. Changes in laboratory parameters were minor and not significantly different between the two groups except for serum glucose, potassium, and triglyceride levels. In conclusion, there was no significance between perindopril and enalapril in terms of efficacy. Clinical acceptability seems to be better in the perindopril group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1995 Jun
PMID:Clinical acceptability of ACE inhibitor therapy in mild to moderate hypertension, a comparison between perindopril and enalapril. 852 53

The lack of comparative studies of nifedipine and felodipine using 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the same patients led to the present study evaluating the antihypertensive efficacy and side effects of treatment with slow-release (SR) nifedipine (20 mg twice daily) and extended-release (ER) felodipine (10 mg once daily). In the double-blind study, subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: 6 weeks of nifedipine SR (20 mg twice daily) followed by 6 weeks of felodipine (ER) (10 mg once daily with evening matched placebo), or vice versa. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring showed no significant differences in systolic BP (SBP) during the day. There were no significant differences in diastolic BP (DBP) throughout the 24 h, although the frequency of DBP recordings > 90 mm Hg was greater during nifedipine (33.1%) than felodipine (27.75%) treatment. The most common side effects were flushing, palpitations, headaches, and ankle edema; there were no adverse effect on lipid profile or glucose level.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995 Dec
PMID:Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring during treatment with extended-release felodipine versus slow-release nifedipine: cross-over study. 860 36

Aneurysms of the superficial temporal artery as a result of trauma occur rarely. These pseudoaneurysms tend to present 2 to 6 weeks following initial injury with a painless swelling which may be associated with a headache, ear discomfort or other vague symptoms. Neurological complications are very rare. A thorough history and physical examination are essential. Investigations such as duplex scanning, angiography or CT scanning may be helpful in difficult cases. The most common treatment is surgical. Embolization may prove to be an alternative to surgery in some cases. We review a rare case of superficial temporal artery aneurysm associated with a facial nerve palsy which was treated surgically. A thorough review of the literature is presented.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1996 Apr
PMID:Traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the superficial temporal artery associated with facial nerve palsy. 867 16


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>