Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Improved measurement of the plasma concentration of nitrendipine demonstrated a plasma half-life of 17-21 h, allowing once-daily (o.d.) instead of currently twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing. To determine the effectiveness of nitrendipine given o.d. vs. b.i.d., 78 hypertensive patients, [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 95-114 mm Hg] were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 12 weeks of treatment with either nitrendipine 10 mg b.i.d. (n = 39) or nitrendipine 20 mg o.d. (n = 39) after a 2-week placebo baseline period. Blood pressures (BPs) were measured in the morning at the end of the dosing interval. Mean +/- SD reduction in supine systolic BP (SBP) and DBP in patients evaluable for efficacy (greater than or equal to 14 days treatment) were 7.2 +/- 16.5 and 7.7 +/- 10.3 mm Hg, respectively, after nitrendipine b.i.d. (n = 38) and 9.4 +/- 15.1 and 9.5 +/- 7.0 mm Hg, respectively, after nitrendipine o.d. (n = 36). Similar falls in BP were found for both regimens in patients completing the full 12 weeks of treatment period (n: o.d. = 28, b.i.d. = 32). Discontinuation due to adverse experiences (AEs) occurred in three patients on b.i.d. and eight patients on o.d., the latter mostly in the first 2 weeks of therapy. Overall, AEs were higher in the o.d. group (% AEs at least possibly related to study medication: o.d. = 44%, b.i.d. = 33%). Most frequent AEs were headache and flushing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Once- vs. twice-daily nitrendipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, Canadian Nitrendipine Study Group. 171 78

In this study of the efficacy and safety of isradipine as first-line therapy in hypertension, 1,647 patients enrolled; 1,472 completed the 4-week placebo run-in period and began treatment with isradipine at 2.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. During placebo, 11% (n = 175) of the 1,647 patients withdrew because of normalization of blood pressure, side effects, noncompliance, violation of the study protocol, side effects from concomitant therapy, or other reasons. During isradipine therapy (n = 1,376), blood pressure decreased from 168 +/- 18/102 +/- 8 mm Hg at the end of the placebo period to 155 +/- 17/94 +/- 9 mm Hg after 2 weeks (p less than 0.001) and 151 +/- 16/92 +/- 9 mm Hg after 4 weeks (p less than 0.001). During active treatment, 6.4% (n = 94) were withdrawn because of flushing, headache, edema, palpitations, gastrointestinal side effects, skin rashes, or other side effects, and two patients because of lack of efficacy. The side effect score in the remaining patients worsened for flushing, remained unchanged for edema, but significantly improved for palpitations, fatigue, dizziness, headache, and nervousness. After 4 weeks, 60% of patients had diastolic blood pressures of less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Thus, isradipine is effective and safe as first-line therapy in patients with primary hypertension as seen in general practice.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Calcium antagonists as first-line therapy in hypertension: results of the Swiss Isradipine Study. Swiss Hypertension Society. 172 Apr 76

The efficacy and safety of isradipine and nifedipine retard were compared in 51 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week placebo run-in period was followed by an 8-week course of treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to either isradipine 1.25 mg twice daily (n = 24) or nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 826); dosages were doubled if blood pressure was not normalized [diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg) after 4 weeks of active treatment. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.01) by isradipine from 162/103 to 145/89 mm Hg, and by nifedipine from 162/104 to 143/88 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 79% with isradipine and 67% with nifedipine. It was necessary to double the dosage in seven of the patients taking isradipine and in three of those taking nifedipine; the mean final dosages were 1.63 mg and 22.4 mg twice daily, respectively. Heart rate did not change significantly with either treatment. There were drug-related adverse events in five patients (21%) taking isradipine (2 edema, 2 headache, 2 palpitations, 1 flushing) and in eight (30%) of those taking nifedipine (5 edema, 2 headache, 1 palpitations). Therapy was withdrawn in one patient in the isradipine group (1 headache) and two patients in the nifedipine group (1 edema, 1 headache). We conclude that isradipine is a highly effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:First clinical experience with isradipine in the treatment of hypertension in Portugal. 172 Apr 85

This was a double-blind multicenter study to compare the efficacy, tolerability and effects on the quality of life with isradipine and atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 588 patients entering the 6-week placebo run-in period, 549 were eligible for randomization to receive either isradipine or atenolol for 8 weeks. If, at the end of this period, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remained greater than 90 mm Hg, then both agents were given in combination for a further 10 weeks. Tolerability and quality of life were assessed repeatedly during the placebo and active-treatment phases. A subgroup of 30 patients were followed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and their results are now being analyzed. In another subgroup of 26 patients, maximum exercise capacity, as determined by ergometer bicycle-testing, was measured once during placebo and twice during active treatment. At the end of the 24-week study period, both isradipine and atenolol as monotherapy had produced significant decreases in blood pressure. There were no significant differences overall between the compounds in quality-of-life and side-effect profiles, although there was a relative absence of ankle edema and headache with isradipine. Furthermore, patients receiving isradipine had no change in performance on exercise testing whereas patients on atenolol had a significant decrease (p less than 0.01).
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Swedish Isradipine Study in Hypertension: evaluation of quality of life, safety, and efficacy. SWISH Group. 172 Apr 87

The antihypertensive effect of nitrendipine was examined in 29 outpatients with a mild or moderate hypertension and type II diabetes or a dyslipidemic condition. The drug was administered for 90 days at a daily dose of 10 to 40 mg. Following a washout period, the blood pressure (measured by a Dinamap device) was 181/99 mm Hg supine and 172/104 mm Hg standing. Nitrendipine caused a reduction in both pressures and after 90 days their values were 148/74 and 143/80 mm Hg, respectively. Heart rate was not affected by the drug, which also caused no variation in blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In more than 20% of the cases, treatment was associated with headache and flushing, which did not necessitate discontinuation of treatment. Thus, nitrendipine is an effective antihypertensive agent and causes no untoward metabolic effects.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Nitrendipine efficacy and safety in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension. 172 54

Efficacy and tolerability of antihypertensive monotherapy with the calcium antagonist nitrendipine were investigated in a 6-month open trial in 495 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension from 101 practicing internists and general practitioners. Previous antihypertensive therapy (57.4%) was stopped for 1 week and therapy then started with nitrendipine, 20 mg once daily. Sixty-one patients discontinued therapy prematurely because of unwanted effects, mostly characteristic with dihydropyridines (headaches, flushing, and ankle edema), and 23 patients because of insufficient efficacy. In 75% of the remaining 411 patients, the goal blood pressure was achieved by nitrendipine monotherapy (10 mg in 17.6%, 20 mg in 73.3%, and 20 mg b.i.d. in 8%) and diastolic blood pressure was between 90 and 95 mm Hg in another 6%. The reduction in blood pressure did not result in changes of heart rate or weight. Nitrendipine was effective in patients of all age groups but patients older than 60 years of age showed a significantly greater fall in systolic pressure than middle-aged or young patients. At the end of the study, 15 patients still reported side effects. Nitrendipine appears to be well suited for first-line therapy of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Antihypertensive monotherapy with nitrendipine in general practice. 172 58

A total of 555 hypertensive patients took part in a 2-year multicenter, open-label study to determine the efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term therapy with ramipril. In the beginning, all patients were to receive 5 mg of ramipril/day. The dosage was then adjusted in accordance with response to treatment and ranged from 1.25-20 mg of ramipril daily. Of these patients, 129 also received 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide daily at some point during the trial. To evaluate whether tolerance to ramipril developed during long-term treatment, a subgroup of 202 patients was analyzed for efficacy maintenance. Prior to enrolling in the 2-year study, these patients had received ramipril monotherapy in a short-term, double-blind study and had been classified as responders, i.e., their diastolic blood pressure had been maintained at less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. At the end of 104 weeks of treatment, 45.9% of patients were on 2.5 mg of ramipril alone and 43.6% were on 5 mg of ramipril alone. Only four patients required the addition of 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. No clinically important changes occurred, and kidney function was well maintained. The most frequently reported adverse events excluding intercurrent illnesses were dizziness/vertigo (6%), asthenia (4%), nausea (3%), headache (2%), and abdominal pain, gastrointestinal disorder, rash, and increased cough (1% each). Ramipril was safe, effective, and well tolerated in the long-term treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy, tolerance, and safety of long-term treatment with ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. 172 24

In this study, the tolerability and safety of ramipril, as monotherapy and in combination with a low dose of furosemide, were assessed in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in general practice. After a placebo run-in phase, patients received ramipril as monotherapy in a dose of 2.5 to 5 mg daily for 6 weeks. Nonresponders (diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg) entered a double-blind treatment period, and received either 10 mg of ramipril daily, or 5 mg of ramipril in combination with 20 mg of furosemide daily. The tolerability of the study medication was assessed by reported adverse events, and by monitoring blood cell count, electrolytes, serum creatinine, fasting blood glucose, and apolipoproteins AI and B. Of a total of 770 patients who entered the placebo run-in phase, 661 patients were enrolled in the first active treatment period. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, cough, dizziness, asthenia, cramps, diarrhea, and nausea, but not all of these events were related to ramipril treatment. A total of 38 patients discontinued active treatment due to nonserious adverse events, mainly cough, dizziness, or diarrhea. There appeared to be a relationship between the prevalence of cough and ramipril dosage; however, an increased incidence of cough was also observed during outbreaks of influenza in France. There were no significant changes in laboratory variables during the study.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Tolerability of ramipril in a multicenter study of mild-to-moderate hypertension in general practice. 172 26

The safety and tolerability of lacidipine was assessed in a volunteer population, and its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles evaluated. In normotensive subjects, single oral doses of 3-5 mg of lacidipine produced a dose-related fall in peripheral vascular resistance. This was accompanied by reflex-mediated increases in heart rate and cardiac output to maintain blood pressure. Adverse events were those typically related to the vasodilatory action of lacidipine, such as flushing and headache. A 4-mg dose of lacidipine elicited a cardiovascular response equivalent to that with 10 mg of nifedipine, given as a single oral dose. Lacidipine did not affect sinoatrial or atrioventricular conduction in the healthy subjects studied. Two specialized electrophysiologic studies in patients confirmed that lacidipine does not affect pacemaker tissue and that it exhibits relative selectivity for the vascular smooth muscle. Lacidipine is eliminated primarily by hepatic metabolism, and extensive first-pass loss occurs after oral dosing. Absolute bioavailability is less than 10%. The systemic availability of lacidipine was increased in healthy elderly subjects and in patients with impaired hepatic function, but not in patients with impaired renal function.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of lacidipine. 172 14

The purpose of this study, designed as an open multicenter trial, was to test the antihypertensive efficacy, patient acceptability, and side effects of long-term treatment with slow-release nifedipine in a large population. The drug was studied in 330 outpatients with essential hypertension, WHO stage 1-2, recruited in 20 hospital centers. After washout period was completed, nifedipine (20 mg bid) was given for 1 month (phase 1). Then, the treatment was extended for 4 months (phase 2) with variable doses (range 20-80 mg daily). No other antihypertensive drugs were administered during phase 1. However diuretics, beta blockers, or captopril were added to nifedipine during phase 2 in 11 patients. Seventy patients did not meet criteria for inclusion at washout. During phase 1 and 2, 66 additional patients were excluded due to side effects, the need of other antihypertensive drugs, or non-compliance. Systolic blood pressure significantly lowered (10% or more) in 84% patients in phase 1 and in 76% in phase 2. No responders were 6.1% and 3.6%, respectively. Diastolic blood pressure was normalized in 60% of patients after 5 months of therapy. Effects on blood pressure were equal in young patients and in the elderly, but a minimal rise in heart rate was recorded in younger patients. At least one side effect occurred in 46.6% patients, mainly headache (15.4%), hot flashes (13.3%), ankle edema (12.8%), or palpitation (6.6%). Sixteen patients (8.2%) were obliged to stop nifedipine treatment due to the severity of the side effects. This trial confirms the efficacy of nifedipine in hypertension, both in young and in aged patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1990 Aug
PMID:Long-term therapy with slow-release nifedipine in essential hypertension. 207 4


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>