Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (
headache
)
56,091
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The efficacy and safety of two dose schedules of the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron (
Zofran
) were studied in 35 patients (group A: 19 patients, group B: 16 patients) previously refractory to standard antiemetics after non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy (greater than 5 emetic episodes). The maintenance of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was further studied in 28 patients (13 A, 15 B) in respectively 36 and 48 retreatment courses. Ondansetron was administered as an 8 mg loading dose (A: 4 mg i.v. + 4 mg orally; B: 8 mg i.v.), followed by oral treatment for 5 days (A: 6-hourly; B: 8 mg 8-hourly). In the first treatment cycle acute emesis was completely controlled in 53% of the patients in group A and in 50% of the patients in group B. Delayed emesis was absent in 75% and 38% of the patients in group A and B respectively. In a second treatment cycle acute antiemetic control was achieved in 54% and 53% of the patients in group A and B respectively. Over the third and fourth subsequent treatments, complete control occurred in 56% and 38% of the patients in group A, and in 46% and 56% of the patients in group B respectively. Delayed emesis did not occur over the following courses in 62%, 89% and 75% of the patients on regimen A, in 57%, 60% and 63% of the patients on regimen B. The observed adverse effects were
headache
(37%) and constipation (42%). No extrapyramidal reactions were seen. Ondansetron is able to re-establish an acceptable antiemetic control in previously refractory patients on non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, without major toxicity. This efficacy is maintained over the three following retreatment courses.
...
PMID:The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron re-establishes control in refractory emesis induced by non-cisplatin chemotherapy. 183 61
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the antiemetic effectiveness and tolerability of Navoban (tropisetron) and
Zofran
(ondansetron) following high-dose (> or = 50 mg/m2) cisplatin chemotherapy. In a randomised, multi-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 117 evaluable chemotherapy-naive patients who received Navoban were compared with 114 who received
Zofran
. Patient diary cards were used to assess both acute (Day 1) and delayed (Days 2-6) nausea and vomiting. Total control of acute vomiting was achieved in 54% of Navoban and 65% of
Zofran
patients (p = 0.052), and total control of acute nausea in 66% and 62% respectively (p = 0.655). Total control of delayed vomiting was achieved in 44% of Navoban patients and 46% of
Zofran
patients (p = 0.765), and of delayed nausea in 56% and 47% respectively (p = 0.207). Both reactions combined were totally prevented during the entire 6-day trial period in 22% of Navoban and 24% of
Zofran
patients (NS), while a further 42% of patients in both groups remained largely free from both nausea and emesis. The few adverse reactions (e.g.
headache
, constipation, diarrhoea) were mainly mild and typical of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in efficacy and tolerability between Navoban 5 mg once daily and the highest recommended dose of
Zofran
(32 mg on Day 1, followed by 8 mg three times a day).
...
PMID:Is Navoban (tropisetron) as effective as Zofran (ondansetron) in cisplatin-induced emesis? The French Navoban Study Group. 774 65
The occurring frequency of 14 most common chemotherapy and anti-nausea drug side-effects was examined. The studies were performed on 29 women with ovarian cancer treated by total number of 125 chemotherapy courses (schedule PAC and Acy) and additionally, in order to eliminate nausea caused by the chemotherapy, by anti-nausea drugs (
Zofran
, Solu-Medrol, Droperidol, Metoclopramide + Fenactil, Torecan).
Zofran
caused the fewest number of side-effects, solu-medrol inhibited nausea and vomiting significantly, however it caused many side-effects such as flush on a face, restlessness, incitement and
headaches
. Torecan did not prevent patients from vomiting. The greatest number of side-effects was observed after droperidol and metoclopramide + fenactil treatment.
...
PMID:[Side effects of drug treatment for ovarian cancer after administration of antiemetic drugs]. 814 54