Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study one hundred and one patients with supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg phase V, despite treatment with atenolol 100 mg plus chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily also received either felodipine 5-20 mg twice daily or hydralazine 25-100 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. Felodipine achieved a lower supine blood pressure (mean +/- s.d. 177/108 +/- 29/8-138/82 +/- 19/8 mm Hg) than hydralazine (174/109 +/- 25/8-149/92 +/- 26/11 mm Hg), (P less than 0.05/P less than 0.001). Felodipine also lowered supine diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg more often than hydralazine (42 vs 22 patients, P less than 0.001). The incidence of unwanted effects was similar in both groups. The felodipine treated patients experienced more ankle swelling and flushing than those in the hydralazine group who experienced more headache and minor gastro-intestinal upset.
...
PMID:Felodipine vs hydralazine: a controlled trial as third line therapy in hypertension. Cooperative Study Group. 287 21

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which selectively relaxes vascular smooth muscle. By acting at peripheral arterioles, it lowers systemic vascular resistance and thereby produces substantial decreases in blood pressure and increases in cardiac output. Felodipine is indicated for the management of hypertension, and in patients with mild to moderate disease felodipine monotherapy markedly lowers blood pressure. It proved as effective as atenolol, and equivalent to hydrochlorothiazide, either with or without amiloride, in terms of antihypertensive activity. Comparative studies also demonstrated that once daily administration with an extended-release formulation provides equivalent antihypertensive efficacy to the same amount of drug administered twice daily as the standard tablets. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe hypertension refractory to standard drug combinations, felodipine produced considerable reductions in blood pressure when added to beta-blockers and diuretics, either alone or in combination, in studies lasting up to 48 weeks. In comparative studies of multiple-drug treatments felodipine was found to have superior efficacy to hydralazine and prazosin, and was at least as effective as nifedipine, minoxidil and propranolol, when used with diuretics and/or beta-blockers. As an alternative to hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with beta-blockers, felodipine consistently controlled blood pressure in a greater percentage of patients and usually provided greater decreases in blood pressure. The main side effects with felodipine are ankle oedema, headache and flushing. Although the overall incidence of effects is quite high, they are usually mild in nature. Nevertheless, withdrawal due to side effects has been necessary in about 7% of patients overall. Thus, the efficacy of felodipine has been demonstrated in mild, moderate and severe hypertension. At the present time it seems particularly suitable as a second- or third-line treatment in refractory hypertension, but it also can be used as monotherapy for mild to moderate disease.
...
PMID:Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension. 306 35

Recently, calcium antagonists have been reported to have a clinically beneficial effect in patients with asthma. Felodipine is a new calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine group with a high selectivity for arteriolar smooth muscle; it is under clinical investigation for the treatment of hypertension. In this double-blind, randomized crossover trial in 9 patients, the effect of 10 mg felodipine in oral solution on exercise-induced asthma was compared with a placebo on separate days. The FEV1 was at least 80% of the predicted normal value, with variation between study days of less than 10%. Heart rate, blood pressure, and FEV1 were measured before and at 15 and 30 min after each treatment. The exercise test consisted of steady state running at submaximal work loads for 6 to 8 min and started at 30 min after treatments. FEV1 was measured at 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after the end of exercise. The predrug baseline FEV1 values were comparable on the 2 days of the study, and felodipine had no effect on the resting lung function. The mean percentage fall in FEV1 (SEM) after exercise with placebo was 27.0 (4.5)%, and with felodipine it was 13.5 (3.7)%. The difference between felodipine and placebo was statistically significant. While receiving felodipine, the resting heart rate was increased by 15%, with a tendency to lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The heart rate after exercise was higher during felodipine treatment than during placebo treatment. One patient receiving placebo and 7 receiving felodipine noted a transient headache. Two patients receiving felodipine also noticed lightheadedness after exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Felodipine, a new calcium antagonist, modifies exercise-induced asthma. 320

Felodipine (Plendil), a new drug, has been used in the treatment of five patients with refractory essential hypertension (WHO II-III). Their mean blood pressure at the last outpatient visit before the study was opened was 195 +/- 25/129 +/- 21 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.) (range 175-235/110-165 mmHg), despite treatment with combinations of diuretics, beta-blockers and vasodilators, including minoxidil and captopril. Felodipin is a dihydropyridine derivative, a calcium antagonist that exerts a relaxant effect on resistance vessels. The first period of the study consisted of a 5-day stay in hospital followed by 3 months during which observations were carried out at the Outpatients' Department. After the first days in hospital felodipine therapy was introduced at a dose of 25 mg three times daily, given together with diuretics, beta-blockers and, in one case, captopril. At 8.00 immediately before the first dose was given, the blood pressure was 178 +/- 19/118 +/- 19 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.); 2 h later it was 144 +/- 18/85 +/- 4 mmHg, at which level it remained throughout the rest of the study. At the 3-month follow-up the mean pressure (recorded at the Outpatients' Department) was 138 +/- 20/89 +/- 14 mmHg. Side-effects included headache, flushing, palpitations and ankle oedema (in two patients during the second part of the study); they were of a mild to moderate degree and did not interfere with the treatment. There was no evidence of general fluid retention, and the body weight remained constant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Effect of felodipine in refractory hypertension. 322 21

Felodipine, a selective arteriolar dilator, was given to 13 hypertensive patients to assess its hypotensive effects and duration of action. Nine patients were treated with 5 mg three times a day and 4 with 10 mg three times a day. Mean blood pressures fell with both treatment regimens: 5 mg placebo 170/103 mmHg; 5 mg felodipine 148/91 mmHg; 10 mg placebo 154/93 mmHg; 10 mg felodipine 137/82 mmHg. Heart rates increased as blood pressures fell with both treatments. However, in the patients given 5 mg three times a day this effect was less noticeable after successive doses. Plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, both resting and tilted, increased after felodipine. There was a negative correlation between the fall in blood pressure and the increase in noradrenaline, suggesting that those patients with good baroreceptor reflexes were better able to counteract the effects of vasodilatation. Four of the nine patients treated with 5 mg felodipine three times a day experienced mild and transient adverse effects. Of the four patients treated with 10 mg three times a day, three experienced moderate to severe headache, and for this reason recruitment into this group was stopped. Felodipine at a divided daily dose of 15 mg effectively lowered blood pressure.
...
PMID:Felodipine in hypertension. 391 82

Felodipine, a dihydropyridine, is a new vasodilating calcium antagonist which lowers blood pressure (BP) by selective action on vascular smooth muscle, especially in the resistance vessels. The effects on BP, heart rate (HR) and tolerance of different single oral doses of felodipine were studied in two series of hypertensive patients. When felodipine was given as single drug to 14 previously untreated hypertensives in a single-blind manner, BP was rapidly reduced by about 15% while HR increased by 25%. Felodipine given in a double-blind manner to eight patients on chronic beta-adrenoceptor blockade reduced BP by some 15-20% compared to placebo, while HR did not change. There was a significant correlation between the pre-treatment mean arterial BP (MAP) and the maximal relative change in MAP, i.e. the higher the initial BP the greater the reduction after felodipine. A significant correlation was also found between the plasma concentration of felodipine and the relative change in MAP. Felodipine was generally well tolerated. When given alone felodipine caused the side effects expected from a pure vasodilator, i.e. headache, flushing and palpitations. When given together with a beta-adrenoceptor blocker, the side effects were much less apparent.
...
PMID:Short-term effects of felodipine, a new dihydropyridine, in hypertension. 671 59

The author presents a review of the chemically heterogeneous group of calcium antagonists, focused on their pharmacodynamic properties. He includes in the older generation of calcium antagonists drugs like verapamil, dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and dilthiazem (Diacordin, Blocalcin). The newer generation of dihydropyridines comprises substances with a higher vascular selectivity at a concentration of lower order. The latter include felodipine (Plendil), isradipine (Lomir) and nitrendipine (Baypress). The third generation includes drugs like amlodipine (Norvasc) and lacidipine. The slow onset of action of amlodipine is associated with a decline of undesirable side effects, such as flush, tachycardia, headache, oedema of the ankles. An advantage is also the prolonged effect when a single dose per day is administered.
...
PMID:[Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcium channel blockers]. 776 70

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with felodipine and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension using a double-blind randomised crossover design. Thirty-five subjects (22 male, 13 female--ages: median 48 years, range 31-69 years) entered the randomised phases of the study and 32 subjects completed the study. Following a 4-week run-in placebo phase, the treatments were felodipine ("Plendil ER") 5-20 mg and enalapril 5-20 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks, each with matching placebos. Dose titration was at 2 and/or 4 weeks in each phase. Number of subjects with each different end-of-phase dose were for felodipine: 5 mg--8, 10 mg--11, 20 mg--13 and enalapril: 5 mg--6, 10 mg--9, 20 mg--17. Predose supine blood pressure (mean +/- SEM) was reduced in both active treatment phases compared with the run-in phase (159 + 2/101 +/- 1), but there was no significant difference in blood pressure between the active phases: felodipine 143 +/- 2/90 +/- 1 and enalapril 146 +/- 2/92 +/- 1. The most common adverse effects were for felodipine: headache, flushing, ankle swelling; and for enalapril: cough. Felodipine and enalapril as once daily monotherapy are thus of similar antihypertensive efficacy but with predictably different adverse effect profiles.
...
PMID:Comparison of felodipine and enalapril monotherapy in essential hypertension. 819 32

The efficacy and tolerability of felodipine, in a low dose of 5-10 mg daily was assessed in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, aged 53 +/- 11 years. The results of office vs 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) were compared. Inclusion criteria included an office systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) > 140/90 mm Hg and a 24 h ABPM SBP/DBP > 135/85 mm Hg. Felodipine was initiated at a dose of 5 mg daily. At day 28 of the study, if office DBP > 90 mm Hg, the dose was doubled to 10 mg daily. At the end of the study (day 84), 24 h ABPM was done again. Side effects were noted throughout the study. Four patients dropped out during the study (two due to headache, one due to pedal edema and one rejected further participation). Of the remaining 28 patients, at day 28, 12 required an increased dose of 10 mg/day. At the end of the study, office BP was below 140 90 mm Hg in 71% of the patients. In the whole group BP decreased from 158 +/- 15/101 +/- 8.4 to 138 +/- 9/85 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < 0.001. ABPM showed that BP was normalized in 82% of the patients. It decreased from 146.8 +/- 9.56/94.8 +/- 7.4 to 130.2 +/- 10.6/83 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, P < 0.001. BP was similarly reduced in working and sleeping hours, with preservation of the circadian rhythm. Heart rate was unaffected by the drug. Five patients showed persistently elevated SBP on office measurements while on ABPM, the values were within normal limits. This finding confirms the existence of a white coat effect in patients with proven hypertension and the superiority of ABPM over office BP measurements in clinical investigations. In summary, ABPM showed that the antihypertensive effect of felodipine was sustained throughout normal 24 h, including the critical (as regards cardiovascular morbidity) awakening hours.
...
PMID:Efficacy of low felodipine dose monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. 887 49

The main objective of fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension is to improve blood pressure (BP) control with lower, better tolerated dosages of 2 antihypertensives rather than higher dosages of a single agent. Felodipine and metoprolol lower BP via different, but complementary, mechanisms and controlled release formulations of these 2 drugs are available as a fixed dose combination, felodipine/metoprolol. In clinical trials in patients with hypertension, felodipine/metoprolol was significantly more effective than placebo and the respective monotherapies administered at the same dosages. Mean BP was reduced to < 155/90 mm Hg in patients treated with combination therapy and controlled in approximately 70% of patients. In one study that titrated dosages to effect, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than felodipine or metoprolol monotherapy recipients required dosage increases to achieve BP control (45 vs 60 and 67%, respectively). Data from double blind comparative studies show that the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine/metoprolol 5 to 10/50 to 100 mg/day is significantly greater than that of enalapril monotherapy or captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and equivalent to nifedipine/atenolol and amlodipine. In comparisons with enalapril, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than enalapril recipients required dosage titration to achieve BP control. Compared with amlodipine, felodipine/metoprolol significantly reduced mean 24-hour average BP (8.9/5.5 vs 14.4/9.5 mm Hg after 6 weeks; p < 0.001). Both treatments preserved diurnal rhythm. Long term follow-up studies show that the antihypertensive effect of felodipine/metoprolol occurs mostly during the first month of treatment with small additional decreases in BP being observed in the second and third months, and a relatively constant effect thereafter. According to a validated questionnaire, quality of life was relatively similar during 12 weeks treatment with felodipine/metoprolol, enalapril or placebo. In a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted in Sweden, felodipine/metoprolol was more cost effective than enalapril as initial treatment for hypertension. Peripheral oedema, headache and flushing were the most commonly reported adverse events with felodipine/metoprolol and felodipine monotherapy, whereas dizziness, fatigue, headache and respiratory infection were more frequent with metoprolol monotherapy. Dose-dependent adverse events such as oedema may occur less often in patients taking lower dosages in combination than in those taking higher dosages of felodipine monotherapy. Thus, patients with hypertension treated with felodipine/metoprolol experience greater control of BP, with less need for dosage titration, than those treated with felodipine, metoprolol or enalapril monotherapy. Importantly this greater efficacy does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events relative to monotherapy. Additionally, in short term studies felodipine/metoprolol had a similar (minimal) effect on QOL to enalapril monotherapy but was more cost effective.
...
PMID:Felodipine/metoprolol: a review of the fixed dose controlled release formulation in the management of essential hypertension. 1071 4


<< Previous 1 2