Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Inhalational general anesthetics can contribute to postoperative morbidity (Table II). Postoperative effects of inhalational anesthetics on the central nervous system are speculative. The "toxic" effects of these agents during the postoperative period are most often an extension of their pharmacologic and physiochemical properties. Inhalational anesthetics may produce a number of varied changes in mental status after surgery such as headache, emergence excitement, and delirium. It is very important for health professionals to be aware of the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with preexisting heart disease if early detection and treatment are to occur. Relative to the common postoperative problems of atelectasis, pneumonia, and aspiration, inhalational agents may have a contributory role especially in patients with preexisting pulmonary disease. Postoperative nausea and vomiting are other common problems in which inhalational agents may have a role in their development. Although extensively investigated, suspected halothane hepatoxicity is a very rare complication if it exists at all. The renal effects of inhalational anesthetics are usually mild and transitory, although the use of methoxyflurane can produce direct nephrotoxicity. The evidence to support a clinically significant direct immunosuppressant effect of inhalational anesthetics after surgery is inconclusive. A concensus exists that any minor, short-lived effects are in all probability overshadowed by the nonspecific stress of surgery itself. By reducing this stress, anesthetics undoubtedly have a protective effect. There are probably no major mutagenic or carcinogenic effects of inhalational anesthetics under normal conditions. Inhalational anesthetics should be avoided during pregnancy because of their teratogenic potential and their effects on the uterus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The postoperative adverse effects of inhalational anesthetics. 351 Oct 14

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common side effects after surgery and have numerous patient factors and etiologies. Although self-limiting, PONV is not without risks and complications. In the past numerous antiemetics have been used successfully in the management of PONV; however, these drugs are associated with adverse effects. Ondansetron is a serotonin receptor antagonist that is effective in preventing and treating PONV. It is believed that ondansetron binds at the serotonin receptor both in the vagal afferents of the gastrointestinal tract and in the chemoreceptor trigger zone. The reported side effects from ondansetron are minor compared with those of the more commonly used antiemetics such as droperidol and metoclopramide and include headache, dizziness, musculoskeletal pain, drowsiness and sedation, and shivers.
 ...
PMID:Ondansetron: perioperative use of a serotonin receptor antagonist for the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting. 863 70

A prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study was undertaken to compare the effects on heart rate and blood pressure during surgery and on the incidence of nausea, vomiting and headache after surgery of i.m. prochlorperazine 0.2 mg.kg-1, i.v. prochlorperazine 0.1 mg.kg-1 and i.v. ondansetron 0.06 mg.kg-1 given at induction of general anaesthesia to patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. The effects of the test drugs after administration on heart rate and blood pressure were similar, as were the incidences of retching and vomiting in the recovery ward after each test drug. Postoperatively, compared with placebo (7%), nausea per se was most frequent in those given i.v. prochlorperazine (25%, P < 0.01), and less frequent in those given i.m. prochlorperazine (2%) and i.v. ondansetron (15%). Vomiting per se was reduced from 24% to 7% (P < 0.025) by i.v. prochlorperazine and to 4% (P < 0.0005) by i.v. ondansetron. The incidence of nausea with vomiting was reduced from 35% to 15% (P < 0.025). 16% (P < 0.05) and 11% (P < 0.005) by i.m. prochlorperazine, i.v. prochlorperazine and i.v. ondansetron respectively. I.m. prochlorperazine and i.v. ondansetron increased the frequency (from 35% to 64%, P < 0.0005 and to 71%, P < 0.0005, respectively) of those experiencing no PONV and delayed the onset of PONV, but only i.m. prochlorperazine reduced the severity of postoperative vomiting. Headache was frequent in the control (69%), i.v. prochlorperazine (62%) and i.v. ondansetron (69%) groups, and least frequent after i.m. prochlorperazine (53%; P < 0.05 versus i.v. ondansetron). It is concluded that these drugs have no adverse cardiovascular effects within 10 minutes of administration, i.m. prochlorperazine and i.v. ondansetron reduce PONV more effectively than i.v. prochlorperazine and postoperative headache after septorhinoplasty occurs less frequently in those given i.m. prochlorperazine than in those given i.v. ondansetron.
 ...
PMID:The prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of prochlorperazine and ondansetron in nasal septal surgery: a randomized double-blind comparison. 890 62

Blood brain barrier disruption enhances drug delivery in primary central nervous system lymphoma. In this study, we report adverse events that were encountered intraoperatively and in the postoperative period in these patients. A retrospective analysis of 17 patients documenting demographic data, preprocedure medical history, intraoperative, and postoperative anesthetic complications was conducted between January 2002 and December 2004. Seventeen patients underwent 210 treatments under general anesthesia with a mean of 12.4+/-7.2 treatments per patient. Focal seizures occurred in 13% of patients. Generalized motor seizures occurred in 4 treatment sessions in 2 different patients. The incidence of seizures was significantly higher when the internal carotid artery was used for injection, as opposed to the vertebral artery (20.8% and 6.02%, respectively, P=0.0034). Tachycardia associated with ST segment depression occurred 9 times (4.3%) in 3 patients. One patient had significant ST segment elevation (more than 1.5 mm). Transient cerebral vasospasm after methotrexate injection occurred in 9% of patients. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed in 11.9% of patients. After emergence, lethargy and obtundation occurred in 7.6% of the cases. The incidence of postoperative headache and reversible motor deficits was 6% and 3.8%, respectively. Our review highlights the problems that were encountered during blood brain barrier disruption under anesthesia and in the postoperative period. Further prospective studies are required for comprehensive evaluation of intraprocedure and postprocedure complications that will allow development of an optimal anesthetic plan and will improve patient outcome by preventing potential complications.
 ...
PMID:Perioperative complications of blood brain barrier disruption under general anesthesia: a retrospective review. 1815 25

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and complications profile of general anaesthesia (GA) compared with that of regional anaesthesia (RA) for BM harvesting (BMH). The study included 281 donations carried out between 1992 and 1999. Of these, 204 (73%) were allogeneic donations, and GA was carried out in 69% (140 of 204) and RA in 31% (64 of 204) of cases. The other 77 donations were autologous (27%), using GA in 87% (67 of 77) and RA in 13% (10 of 77) of cases. No life-threatening complications occurred, but there were minor intra- and postoperative events during 26 (9%) and after 58 (21%) donations. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was reported in 40 (14%) cases and post-spinal headache after five out of 58 (8.6%) donations in which spinal anaesthesia was carried out. The incidence of intra- and postoperative events did not differ significantly between the GA and RA groups. However, the incidence of postoperative events was higher in the allogeneic group compared with that in the autologous group (25 vs 10%, P<0.01) and in female donors compared with male donors (29 vs 14%, P=0.002). In conclusion, both GA and RA are comparable with regard to BMH. Nevertheless, non-severe intra- and postoperative events were frequent.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of general vs regional anaesthesia for BM harvesting: a retrospective study of anaesthesia-related complications. 1948 63