Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A total of 126 patients from general practice with chronic stable angina pectoris entered the treatment phase of this open, randomized, crossover comparison of 20 mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate, and 20 mg nifedipine. Both treatments were given orally, three times daily, for 4 weeks and sublingual administration of glyceryl trinitrate was allowed throughout. Over the whole treatment period, there was no statistically significant difference between treatments for anginal attacks. However, significantly fewer glyceryl trinitrate tablets were required by patients receiving prophylaxis with nifedipine, although this difference was too small to be of clinical significance. No statistical difference existed between treatments in respect of scores for 'overall intensity of pain', 'physical exercise ability' and 'general well-being'. Of those patients who expressed a preference, the majority preferred the second treatment with no statistically significant difference between isosorbide-5-mononitrate and nifedipine. Both treatments showed similar levels of adverse events, the major difference (not significant) being for flushing of the skin which occurred in five patients given nifedipine compared with one patient given isosorbide-5-mononitrate. It is concluded that, in clinical terms, the two treatments were similar. Headache and dizziness/giddiness were the most frequently recorded adverse events.
 ...
PMID:A multicentre open comparison of isosorbide-5-mononitrate and nifedipine given prophylactically to general practice patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. 265 33

In a randomised controlled trial in 427 men with chronic stable angina continuous use of 5 mg transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) showed no advantage over placebo in terms of efficacy (anginal attack rates and sublingual GTN consumption) or quality of life (as measured with the sickness impact profile and a health index of disability). Patients on the active drug reported headaches more frequently than patients on placebo, and a higher proportion of them withdrew from the trial because of headache. Quality-of-life measurements showed a significant adverse effect of active treatment, principally in the social interaction dimension of the sickness impact profile. A similar effect was observed in placebo patients when crossed to active treatment in a 4-week single-blind period. The results suggest no benefit in the relief of chest pain from 5 mg transdermal GTN when used continuously.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life on angina therapy: a randomised controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate against placebo. 289 36

Nisoldipine is an orally administered calcium entry blocking drug structurally related to nifedipine. In limited clinical trials it has been shown to be effective and relatively well tolerated in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate essential hypertension. As for all dihydropyridine-calcium antagonists, its major properties include potent peripheral and coronary vasodilation and improvement in myocardial oxygen supply relative to demand. These actions occur without depression of cardiac conduction or left ventricular function. Short term clinical trials have shown nisoldipine to produce both symptomatic and objective improvements in patients with chronic angina of effort and have suggested a benefit in vasospastic angina. A small number of comparative trials indicate that nisoldipine is equally as effective as nifedipine. In addition, in combination with beta-adrenoceptor blockade nisoldipine appears to offer additional benefit compared with beta-blockade alone and is well tolerated. In patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension nisoldipine monotherapy, in 1 or 2 daily doses, has maintained blood pressure control and has also been a useful addition to diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in patients with poorly controlled disease. Side effects appear to be dose related, generally mild and transient, and are primarily those resulting from potent peripheral vasodilation - headache, flushing and pretibial or ankle oedema. Although studies to date are promising, there are no published long term studies (greater than 1 year) of nisoldipine in comparison with other calcium entry blockers and other drugs currently in clinical use for the treatment of angina pectoris or hypertension. Until such studies are completed the exact place of nisoldipine in the treatment of these diseases remains to be established.
 ...
PMID:Nisoldipine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. 306 58

Forty-seven patients with chronic stable angina pectoris entered a thirteen-week open-label study with a transdermal therapeutic system of nitroglycerin in order to evaluate its clinical efficacy, safety, and patient acceptance. In 19 patients, a beta-blocker and in 17 patients a calcium-channel blocker were continued throughout the study period without alteration of their doses. The study consisted of a two-week run-in period and an eleven-week active drug period. Acute titration was done with nitroglycerin patches on the basis of weekly patient diaries on frequency of angina and sublingual nitroglycerin consumption. Overall, reductions in frequency of angina and in nitroglycerin consumption were statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Adverse reactions were common but tolerable. The reported side effects were headache in 32, skin rash in 18, dizziness in 10, palpitation and itching in 9 each, nausea in 7, flushing in 3, and vomiting in 1 patient. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that individual dose titration with nitroglycerin patches for obtaining significant antianginal effect is essential. The present therapeutic system is convenient to use and well tolerated and had acceptable side effects in our study population.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with a transdermal nitroglycerin system. 310 41

Nitrate usage worldwide is on the increase as the indications for therapy expand. Present indications for nitrate therapy include chronic stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, complications of acute myocardial infarction, and 'unloading' therapy for acute and chronic congestive heart failure. Nitrates are also being used in the operating suite by anaesthesiologists to control systolic blood pressure during various surgical procedures. New nitrate delivery systems have recently become available which provide considerable dosing flexibility, further increasing the interest in this group of compounds. The dominant action of nitrates is a direct effect on vascular smooth muscle, producing vasodilation of the veins and arteries. These drugs decrease myocardial work by lowering systolic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and reducing intracardiac dimensions. In addition, nitrates have a potent effect on cardiac preload as a result of systemic venodilatation. There is also some evidence that nitrates exert direct effects on the coronary circulation (vasodilatation of coronary arteries and coronary collateral vessels, and direct atherosclerotic stenosis dilatation). These actions may play a role in relieving myocardial ischaemia. Adverse sequelae of nitrate therapy are well known and serious adverse reactions are uncommon. Headache and dizziness are the most frequent side effects. Nitrate tolerance is a definite problem - present evidence indicates that long acting formulations, high doses, or frequent dosing regimens are particularly likely to induce vascular tolerance to nitrates. Consequently, provision of a nitrate-free interval has taken on increasing significance as a strategy to avoid tolerance. Nitrate delivery systems are numerous. Although availability varies from country to country, in most countries there are a wide variety of formulations of glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) available, including sublingual and oral tablets, oral spray, topical ointment as well as discs or patches for transdermal administration, a transmucosal tablet and an intravenous formulation. Similar formulations of isosorbide dinitrate, except buccal tablets, are available in some countries. Isosorbide 5-mononitrate, a potent metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, is achieving increasing popularity as an antianginal drug. Optimum nitrate therapy requires a good understanding of the properties of the various formulations, particularly onset and duration of action and propensity to induce tolerance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) and the organic nitrates. Choosing the method of administration. 311 8

The antianginal effects of sustained-released oral nitroglycerin were evaluated in patients with chronic stable angina using a double-blind randomized protocol. Nineteen patients were inducted into the trial and 17 of these completed the study. Two doses of oral nitroglycerin were used; 2.6 mg and 6.5 mg given three times daily for a period of 2 weeks, the patients crossing over to the alternative dose at the end of each period. Evaluation of effect was carried out 2 hours after the morning dose using graded treadmill exercise testing with on-line computer analysis of the electrocardiogram (EKG) (CASE, Marquette Electronics, Inc.). Various exercise parameters were measured and the results compared to placebo values and between the two dosages. The aim was to demonstrate an antianginal effect and to look for a dose-response relationship and for attenuation of effect if any on continued administration. The mean +/- SEM exercise time on placebo was 6.7 +/- 0.6 min, increasing to 8.6 +/- 8 min (p less than 0.02) with 2.6 mg tds dosage and 8.4 +/- 0.7 min (p less than 0.01) with 6.5 mg tds of oral nitroglycerin. None of the other exercise-derived indices were altered significantly by oral nitroglycerin. Two patients were withdrawn because of severe headaches and both were receiving the higher dose. The data did not demonstrate any dose-response relationship but confirmed the anti-anginal efficacy of sustained action oral nitroglycerin. This efficacy did not show any significant attenuation of effect on continued administration, indicating a possible lack of development of tolerance.
 ...
PMID:Oral nitroglycerin in angina pectoris--evaluation of effect by computerized exercise testing using two different doses. 315 16

Nicardipine is currently being evaluated in clinical trials as a treatment for angina and hypertension. Over 2,000 patients have received nicardipine, most at dosages of 20 to 40 mg 3 times daily. In 12 double-blind, parallel-group studies (4 of them placebo-controlled) the efficacy of nicardipine was evaluated in mild to moderate hypertension; supine systolic blood pressure was lowered by 10 to 15 mm Hg and supine diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg. A clear dose response is present at dosages from 10 to 40 mg 3 times daily. Patients with angina were treated in 9 double-blind, crossover design studies: 4 of these were placebo-controlled; 3 were comparison studies with beta blockers; 2 were comparisons with nifedipine. Treadmill exercise tests were the major measure of efficacy. Results of these studies showed consistent, statistically significant improvement in exercise tolerance and time to onset of angina, and clinical improvement in patients with chronic stable angina. The effective dosages of nicardipine were 30 or 40 mg 3 times daily. A placebo-controlled study demonstrated remarkable efficacy in patients with vasospastic angina. No deaths or serious adverse reactions were attributed to nicardipine during clinical trials. The most common side effects reported were flushing, palpitations, headache and pedal edema. These appeared to be due to the drug's pharmacologic property of vasodilatation.
 ...
PMID:An overview of the safety and efficacy of nicardipine in clinical trials. 330 Feb 39

We have treated eleven patients with chronic stable angina pectoris with slow-release oxprenolol (160 mg and 320 mg) in a double-blind crossover study and evaluated its efficacy objectively by exercise testing between 180 and 240 min after dosing. The mean exercise time increased significantly from 6.2 min on placebo to 7.2 min and 7.3 min on oxprenolol 160 mg and 320 mg respectively. No overall beneficial effects could be demonstrated for the higher dose. A further 20 patients received slow release oxprenolol 160 mg and 10/170 mg "Oros" (osmotic release) oxprenolol in a double-blind crossover study using exercise testing and ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at 21-23 h after dosing. The mean exercise time increased significantly from 7.0 min on placebo to 8.3 min on slow-release oxprenolol and to 8.1 min on "Oros" oxprenolol. The effects of the 2 treatments on exercise and ambulatory heart rates were comparable. Two patients were withdrawn during the double-blind treatment period while receiving oxprenolol slow-release, one because of unstable angina and another because of throbbing headache. These findings confirm that slow-release oxprenolol is effective in treating chronic stable angina pectoris at the 160-mg dose. "Oros" oxprenolol 10/170 mg has a profile of action closely similar to but without any additional benefit over slow-release oxprenolol 160 mg.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of oxprenolol slow release and osmotic release by exercise testing and ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. 355 93

This study evaluated 1 year the efficacy of therapy with nicardipine in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Twenty-five male patients were entered. After a placebo run-in phase, the patients received nicardipine 30 mg, nicardipine 40 mg, and placebo, three times daily given in random, double-blind manner for 8 weeks. A double-blind, cross-over study comparing nicardipine with placebo was then undertaken. After 5 months of open treatment with nicardipine 90 or 120 mg day-1, patients received either placebo or nicardipine for 3 weeks, each followed by the alternative treatment for an additional 3 weeks and further open-label treatment with nicardipine for another 3-5 months. There were no significant changes in the PR, QRS or QT intervals, or in the QRS pattern during the short-term and long-term studies. There were no significant differences in mean heart rate after nicardipine compared with baseline. During treatment with nicardipine 120 mg day-1, patients reported significantly fewer anginal attacks compared with placebo, and nitroglycerin consumption also decreased. Nicardipine increased treadmill time, time to onset of angina, and time to one mm ST segment depression. These effects were maintained after 6 months of continued nicardipine therapy. Adverse effects were minor and well tolerated and included headache, dizziness, gastrointestinal upset, flushing paraesthesia and pedal oedema. Abrupt withdrawal of nicardipine at the end of the study resulted in a rapid return of the original symptoms but without further deterioration from the baseline measurements. Nicardipine was effective in the treatment of stable effort angina pectoris; this benefit was maintained for the entire year of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Short- and long-term treatment of stable effort angina with nicardipine, a new calcium channel blocker: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, repeated cross-over study. 392 59

The results of an open prospective study that evaluated the long-term clinical safety of nicorandil are presented. This study included 199 patients with severe chronic stable angina treated over a 1-year period. The most often reported adverse event was headache, which was responsible for most of the study withdrawals due to clinical intolerance (9.6%). When using a progressive titration scheme, this incidence was substantially reduced to 2.7%. As with other less frequent adverse events (dizziness, gastrointestinal disorders), headaches were reported as being mild to moderate in severity, were experienced during the first days of treatment, and, if treatment was maintained, usually resolved within a few days. The incidence of adverse events was not modified when nicorandil was given in combination with a beta-blocker, a calcium antagonist, or both agents. Cardiovascular safety was satisfactory and laboratory parameters were not altered. At the end of the study, 70% of patients were maintained on nicorandil. These results are in agreement with those reported from the nicorandil safety database, which gathered 1152 patients treated by nicorandil, including those of the present study. In comparative studies of nicorandil versus beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, or nitrates, the overall incidence of adverse events was no different between the two treatment groups, although the safety profile differed according to the drug category.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Nicorandil safety in the long-term treatment of coronary heart disease. 764 28


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>