Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effects of a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, on blood pressure (BP) and renal function were studied in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). These effects were compared with those of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril. In addition, the effects of amlodipine on BP and renal function were studied in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. In five of six nephrectomised salt-loaded SHR, increases in BP, urinary excretion of protein and serum creatinine were attenuated by the administration of 2 mg/kg/day of amlodipine. The progression of renal histological damage was also markedly decreased. The protective effects of amlodipine against renal damage were similar to those of enalapril. However, the mechanisms of action of these two agents seem to differ as, unlike enalapril, amlodipine did not significantly dilate the efferent arteriole in hydronephrotic perfused rat kidney. In a clinical study, 2.5-5 mg/day of amlodipine was administered once a day for 8-10 weeks to 39 hypertensive patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl to < 5 mg/dl) or renal parenchymal disease (serum creatinine < 5 mg/dl). A significant reduction in BP (reduction of mean BP > or = 13 mm Hg) was observed in 28 patients (80%). Headache was experienced as a side-effect in one of 35 patients (2.9%). With respect to the influence of amlodipine on renal function, mean values of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were unchanged for the total group whereas a slight elevation of serum creatinine was observed in four of 35 patients (11.4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Renal effects of amlodipine. 778 8

The risk of renal papillary necrosis and renal dysfunction due to the chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is unknown. In a prospective study of 259 heavy analgesic users seen in a general medical hospital over an 11-year-period beginning in January 1982, 69 new cases of analgesic nephropathy with renal papillary necrosis were confirmed by intravenous urogram (26.6%), ultrasonography (30.4%), and/or computed tomography (43%). Twenty-nine of these patients (42%) had consumed excessive quantities of NSAIDs alone; an additional nine patients (13%) had consumed NSAIDs predominantly in combinations with paracetamol, aspirin, phenacetin, caffeine, and/or traditional herbal medications. Of those patients who consumed NSAIDs alone, 17 had consumed only a single type of NSAID and the remaining 12 had consumed multiple types of NSAIDs. The amount of NSAIDs administered ranged from 1,000 to 26,600 capsules or tablets over a 2- to 25-year period. Renal impairment (serum creatinine, 126 to 778 mumol/L) was noted in 26 of these 38 patients (64.8%). The reasons given for consuming NSAIDs include gouty arthritis (18 patients), osteoarthritis (seven patients), rheumatoid arthritis (six patients), chronic headache (three patients), gouty arthritis plus chronic headache (three patients), and chronic backache (one patient). All patients were prescribed these drugs and were followed medically. The occurrence of analgesic nephropathy was predominantly in males (male to female ratio, 1.9:1). Most of the patients did not have the characteristic psychological profile attributed previously to analgesic abuse nephropathy. Associated addictive habits, such as the use of psychotropic drugs and sleeping tablets, purgative abuse, and alcoholism, were absent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Chronic renal disease and papillary necrosis associated with the long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as the sole or predominant analgesic. 802 20

Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was administered at 2.5-5.0 mg/day for 8 weeks to 35 hypertensive patients with renal dysfunction, and its efficacy and safety were evaluated. The target reduction in blood pressure was achieved in 28 of the 35 patients (80%), while blood pressure was decreased in 4 patients (11.4%) and unchanged in 3 patients (8.6%). A side effect of mild headache was reported by one patient (2.9%). In addition, abnormal changes in laboratory values were observed in five patients, but all of the changes were mild. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels both increased in two of these five patients, and serum creatinine levels increased in another two patients. Serum amlodipine concentration was 4.86 +/- 2.57 ng/ml (n = 8) and 3.01 +/- 1.02 ng/ml (n = 8) in patients receiving a daily dose of 2.5 mg for 2-5 weeks and 8-10 weeks, respectively. Serum concentration in patients receiving 5 mg from Weeks 2-6 was 9.72 +/- 6.89 ng/ml (n = 6) after 7-9 weeks, suggesting no tendency for the accumulation of this drug. The drug was rated as of clinical benefit in 27 of the 35 patients (77.1%), and as slightly beneficial in another 5 patients (14.3%). Thus, amlodipine significantly decreased the blood pressure while causing little or no aggravation of renal dysfunction in hypertensive patients with renal impairment.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of amlodipine in hypertensive patients with renal dysfunction. 807 Jan 49

The pattern of analgesic use, abuse and incidence of analgesic-associated nephropathy in 79 patients with chronic headache was studied. Sixty-eight of these patients had migraine. Most patients had consumed a combination of analgesics (81%) while 19% had taken single analgesics for their headache. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used analgesics (96.2%) followed by paracetamol (70.9%) and aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine compounds (5.1%). Mefenamic acid was the commonest nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumed (97.4%). Analgesic abuse which was defined as a minimum total of 1 kg of analgesics such as paracetamol or aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine compounds or 400 capsules/tablets of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was noted in 65 patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly abused analgesics (89.2%) followed by paracetamol (38.5%). Forty-five of the 65 analgesic abusers had an intravenous urogram or ultrasound performed and renal papillary necrosis was documented in one patient. Three (4.6%) of the analgesic abusers had mildly raised serum creatinine levels. Mild proteinuria of less than 1 gm/litre was present in 27.7% of abusers. In conclusion, although analgesic use and abuse is common in patients with chronic headache, the short term incidence of analgesic-associated nephropathy (2.2%) and renal impairment (4.6%) was low. Prolonged observations will be necessary to ascertain the safety of these drugs for long term use.
Headache 1993 Sep
PMID:Analgesic use and chronic renal disease in patients with headache. 826 86

In the last ten years ivermectin appeared an efficient and safe alternative to diethylcarbamazine which is known to induce severe adverse reactions in loiasis, including encephalitis. After these results, large scale ivermectin treatments against onchocerciasis were carried out in Central Africa where loiasis is also endemic; and seven cases of severe reaction were reported in Cameroon since 1991, during these mass ivermectin treatments. In order to study adverse reactions in patients harbouring high load of Loa loa microfilariae (mf), we realized careful hospital based treatment in 112 patients with more than 3,000 mf/ml (ml) blood. Patients received once 200 micrograms ivermectin per kilogram at day 0 (D0). Clinical examination was made daily during the four following days (D1 to D4). Blood and urine samples were analysed before treatment and at D1 and D3. Lumbar puncture was made at D1 for 39 patients with more than 10,000 mf/ml; at D3 for the 49 following patients without consideration for the level of parasitaemia, and at D0 and D3 for ten voluntary patients. For analysis the patients were distributed in 3 groups according to initial parasitaemia: the first group included 50% out of the patients, those whose parasitaemia was fewer than 15,000 mf/ml blood; the second group included 25% patients whose parasitaemia was between 15,000 and 30,000 mf/ml; the third group included the last 25% patients whose parasitaemia was higher than 30,000 mf per ml blood. Adverse reactions were observed in 71% out of the patients. Symptoms described were fever, pruritus, headache, arthralgia. Most symptoms appeared 24 to 36 hours after treatment. Temperature increased significantly in group 3. Microfilaraemia decreased by 85% in the 3 groups during the 4 days following treatment. C-reactive-protein increased dramatically after treatment in all patients (p < 10(-4)). Some patients presented blood in urine in three groups but haematuria reached 35% of patients in group 3. Proteinuria is noted among 33% of all patients but 20% in group 1 and 2 versus 70% in group 3. Loa loa mf were observed in urine of half the patients, but in low amounts (< 10 mf per 50 ml urine). In cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), some mf appeared at D1 or D3 in people heavily infected with Loa loa, reaching 80% of the patients of group 3. LP made at D0 in ten patients with parasitaemia higher than 30,000 mf/ml blood confirmed that CSF was naturally microfilaria free before treatment. One patient presented severe troubles with fever, asthenia and conscience troubles beginning at D3, reactive coma at D4, renal impairment with transitory anuria; progressive improvement in 2 weeks and complete recovery at D22; he presented 102 mf/ml CSF at D6. The study confirmed that ivermectin treatment is generally well tolerated. Among people with high Loa loa parasitaemia the symptoms after treatment are frequent but mild. However severe cases with conscience troubles are possible, and may occur in about 1% of subjects with more than 3,000 mf/ml blood. Severity of adverse reactions was linked to level of parasitaemia before treatment. The critical parasitaemia level which could lead to expect serious adverse effects seems to be 30,000 ml/ml blood. These informations should induce carefulness to carry out large scale treatments against filariosis in endemic areas of Loa loa.
 ...
PMID:[Secondary effects of the treatment of hypermicrofilaremic loiasis using ivermectin]. 855 62

Five clinical studies were conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of candesartan cilexetil in patients with either normal or impaired renal or hepatic function. Participants in these open-label, single- or parallel-group prospective studies were administered candesartan cilexetil 8 or 12 mg as a single oral dose and then, in all but one study, as a repeated once-daily oral dose regimen. A total of 94 patients of either gender aged between 18 and 75 years with normal or mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction (Study 1) and normal or mild to moderate/severe renal dysfunction (Studies 2-5) were included. Subjects recruited to all studies evaluating the effect of renal impairment also had some degree of hypertension. Patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment showed no significant differences in the key plasma pharmacokinetic parameters or plasma protein binding profile of candesartan compared with healthy volunteers. In patients with mild to moderate or severe renal impairment there were significant increases in the maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve and elimination half-life of candesartan and its inactive metabolite (CV-15959) when compared to volunteers with normal renal function following repeated administration of candesartan cilexetil 8 or 12 mg. However, there was no evidence of accumulation following treatment with the 8 mg dose apart from those with severe disease requiring dialysis. Nevertheless, dialysis itself did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetic profile of candesartan or that of CV-15959. Candesartan cilexetil was found to have a good safety profile and to be well tolerated by patients with hepatic or renal impairment. There were no clinically relevant changes detected in vital signs, laboratory safety parameters or in ECG readings. The most common adverse events were headache and dizziness. This series of studies show that candesartan cilexetil 8 mg once daily is suitable for administration to patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment with no need for additional dose adjustment. A lower starting dose may be appropriate in patients with severe renal impairment including those requiring dialysis.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of candesartan cilexetil in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. 933 Oct 4

Losartan is a novel orally active nonpeptidal antihypertensive agent that specifically blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. This paper compares the short- and long-term safety and tolerability of losartan with those of placebo. Approximately 3800 patients with mild-to-severe essential hypertension were enrolled in 16 double-masked and 4 open clinical trials worldwide. Of these, approximately 2900 were treated with losartan either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. These trials included patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 133). An additional 5 trials enrolled hypertensive patients with compromised renal function (n = 115) or heart failure (n = 220). Losartan dosages primarily ranged from 10 to 150 mg once daily, with most patients receiving 50 to 100 mg per day. Hypertension trials generally lasted 12 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, and asthenia/fatigue, but only dizziness occurred more frequently (> or = 1%) in the losartan-treated groups. Cough occurred in 3.1% of patients treated with losartan and 2.6% of patients treated with placebo. The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events in the losartan- and placebo-treated groups was similar among patients with hypertension and either diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, or heart failure. The data suggest that losartan can be safely administered in hypertensive patients with concomitant illnesses. It can be considered for first-line therapy and is suitable as an alternative therapy in patients already experiencing side effects with other agents.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan. 937 6

This was an open-label, parallel group study to compare the pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of eprosartan in subjects with normal renal function (Clcr > 80 mL/min; n = 8) and patients with mild (Clcr 60-80 mL/min; n = 8), moderate (Clcr 30-59 mL/min; n = 15), or severe (Clcr < 30 mL/min; n = 3) renal insufficiency. Each subject received oral eprosartan 200 mg twice daily for 6 days and a single dose on day 7. Mean total maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) were similar for healthy subjects and those with mild renal impairment, but were an average of 25% to 35% and 51% to 55% greater for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Mean renal clearance (Clr), which was similar for healthy subjects and patients with mild renal impairment, was decreased an average of 41% and 95% in the groups with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively, compared with normal subjects. Eprosartan was highly bound to plasma proteins in all groups; however, the unbound fraction was increased approximately two-fold in the group with severe renal impairment. Mean unbound Cmax and AUC0-12 were an average of 53% to 61% and 185% to 210% greater for the patients with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Headache was the most common adverse experience reported in all subgroups. Eprosartan was safe and well tolerated regardless of degree of renal impairment. Cmax and AUC were increased and renal clearance decreased in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment in comparison to healthy subjects and patients with mild renal impairment. However, based on the moderate renal clearance and known safety profile of eprosartan, it is not necessary to adjust the dose of eprosartan in patients with renal insufficiency.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of eprosartan in healthy volunteers and in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. 954 43

The fixed low-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the non-thiazide diuretic indapamide has been evaluated in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Combination therapy aims to improve overall therapeutic efficacy while minimising adverse effects. In well-designed multicentre clinical trials, perindopril/indapamide at doses ranging from 2/0.625 to 8/2.5 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control. A similar reduction in supine BP was observed when combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was compared with losartan 50 mg/day or atenolol 50 mg/day. Similar reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP were also seen with perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day and irbesartan 150 mg/day. However, response and normalisation rates were significantly higher with combination therapy than with losartan or irbesartan monotherapy. Combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy effectively reduced BP in elderly patients aged 65 to 85 years to a significantly greater extent than either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Supine BP was also normalised in approximately two-thirds of patients in a small noncomparative trial in patients with hypertension and renal impairment. Low-dose perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were headache and cough. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of diuretics, occurred with a higher incidence with combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy than with either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day has shown efficacy in well designed comparative trials with atenolol, losartan and irbesartan including elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Studies comparing this dosage of perindopril/ indapamide with other combination therapies would be beneficial in allowing the place of perindopril/indapamide to be more accurately determined. The fixed-low dose combination of perindopril/indapamide provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day: a review of its place in the management of hypertension. 1146 78

Anemia is a common complication in patients with hematologic malignancies, and is caused by a variety of mechanisms, including neoplastic cell infiltration into the bone marrow, hemolysis, nutritional deficiencies, and defects in erythropoiesis as a result of the disease itself or cytotoxic therapy. The anemia associated with multiple myeloma is caused by inadequate erythropoietin levels consequent to renal impairment and the effect of inflammatory cytokines. The degree of anemia can have prognostic importance, as is the case with multiple myeloma, or be a significant indicator of disease stage, as noted with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Anemia results in fatigue, exhaustion, dizziness, headache, dyspnea, and decreased motivation, seriously affecting a patient's quality of life. Since anemia is so prevalent in hematologic malignancy patients, its treatment must be an integral part of disease management, to improve quality of life and to possibly increase potential survival. Clinical studies have shown that effectively treating anemia and increasing hemoglobin levels using recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) has a significant effect on transfusion requirements and quality of life.
 ...
PMID:The effects of anemia in hematologic malignancies: more than a symptom. 1208 53


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>