Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cadralazine is a peripheral arteriolar vasodilator which, unlike hydralazine or dihydralazine, has a protected hydrazino group. In hypertensive patients the optimal effect, based on the antihypertensive efficacy to tolerability ratio, is seen after a 15 mg dose when the drug is administered as monotherapy. When administered in combination with other antihypertensive agents, a 10 mg daily dosage seems appropriate. Noncomparative trials have shown that, in patients who had failed to respond adequately to a beta-blocker and/or diuretic, the addition of cadralazine 10 to 30 mg once daily reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure by 11 to 19%/13 to 22%. This antihypertensive effect becomes evident over a 2- to 6-week period of therapy and persists during longer term administration. Comparative studies have shown that cadralazine is superior to placebo, and has a similar blood pressure lowering effect to hydralazine, dihydralazine and prazosin in patients not controlled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic but who continued to receive these treatments. Similarly, cadralazine and chlorthalidone were equally effective in reducing blood pressure in resting hypertensive patients but cadralazine shows an advantage in reducing the pressor response in exercising patients. Cadralazine is well tolerated when administered with a beta-blocker or diuretic. Most adverse effects become less frequent and severe with continued use, occur more frequently at dosages of 20 mg/day or more, and do not generally require withdrawal of therapy. Manifestations of the drug's vasodilating properties such as headache, asthenia, dizziness, palpitations and flushing are the most commonly reported symptoms during cadralazine monotherapy, but these may be reduced during combination therapy. The drug does not appear to induce a systemic lupus-like erythematosus syndrome, as may occur with hydralazine, but additional clinical experience is required to completely exclude this possibility. In conclusion, because of its efficacy as a second- or third-line antihypertensive agent, its simple once daily dosage regimen and favourable risk: benefit ratio, cadralazine may have a useful role, particularly in those hypertensive patients who do not respond adequately to established antihypertensive treatments. However, the therapeutic potential of cadralazine cannot be clearly established until the present limited clinical base is expanded to include comparisons with other classes of vasodilating drugs (ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists), and its utility in the management of other indications such as severe hypertension during pregnancy has been adequately explored.
 ...
PMID:Cadralazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension. 208 13

Dilevalol, the RR-stereoisomer of labetalol, is a non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with substantial partial beta 2-agonist and negligible alpha 1-blocking activity. Reduction in blood pressure during dilevalol administration is associated with peripheral vasodilatation, and heart rate remains essentially unchanged. Following oral administration, dilevalol is completely absorbed. Once-daily administration is possible, due to a long elimination half-life. Large well-controlled trials reveal that dilevalol is equivalent in antihypertensive efficacy to metoprolol, the ACE inhibitors captopril and enalapril, and the calcium antagonist nifedipine. Smaller noncomparative and comparative trials demonstrate the blood pressure-lowering effects of dilevalol and suggest an efficacy at least equivalent to that of the 'pure' beta-blockers atenolol and propranolol and the alpha 1-blockers urapidil and doxazosin. Dilevalol appears to be well tolerated, the most frequent adverse effects being dizziness, headache and diarrhoea in only about 7% of patients each. Unlike alpha 1-blockers and labetalol, dilevalol is not commonly associated with orthostatic hypotension. Thus, data suggest that dilevalol, with its distinctive pharmacological profile, is likely to be a useful addition to the options currently available for treating patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Dilevalol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in hypertension. 218 2

Various antihypertensive drugs reduce blood pressure by different mechanisms. In some instances, adverse reactions occur because of specific hemodynamic effects. Examples include syncope with alpha-blockade or vasodilator therapy; fatigue or exercise intolerance with the reduction in cardiac output following the use of beta-adrenergic inhibitors; edema, headaches, or dizziness with the use of vasodilators such as calcium entry blockers; renal failure in patients with renal artery stenosis or renal insufficiency following the use of ACE inhibitors; and marked hyponatremia with volume depletion following the use of diuretics, especially in elderly patients. In the majority of patients, however, blood pressure lowering can be achieved without significant adverse effects. Combining small doses of different agents with different hemodynamic actions often results in good blood pressure control and minimal reactions. Examples of these include diuretics and beta-adrenergic inhibitors, diuretics and ACE inhibitors, and beta-blockers and vasodilators.
 ...
PMID:Do different hemodynamic effects of antihypertensive drugs translate into different safety profiles? 220 Jun 92

The safety and tolerability of lisinopril (1.25-160 mg daily) were assessed in 3,270 patients (2,688 hypertensives and 582 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF] and 280 healthy subjects. The duration of therapy ranged from a single dose to 43 months; 438 patients received lisinopril for at least 12 months (mean 20 months). In the hypertensive population, the most frequent adverse events reported were headache, dizziness, cough, nausea, diarrhoea and fatigue, although not all of these events were thought to be related to lisinopril; 6.1% discontinued lisinopril due to adverse clinical events, most commonly cough and nausea. Twelve hypertensive patients died (0.45%), but most of these were not receiving lisinopril at the time of death and none was considered to be drug-related. In CHF patients, the most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, hypotension and fatigue. Again, not all of these reports were considered to be drug-related. Therapy was withdrawn in 9.6% of patients--hypotension, dizziness, diarrhoea and rash being the most frequent reasons. Fifty-three CHF patients died (9.1%) and in three cases death was considered to be related to lisinopril therapy. Hypotension, orthostatic effects or dizziness following the initial dose of lisinopril occurred infrequently (in 1.3% of the hypertensive group, including those receiving hydrochlorothiazide, and in 4.8% of CHF patients). Changes in laboratory parameters were generally minor and seldom resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Long-term treatment of hypertension and CHF with lisinopril for at least 3 years confirms that the drug is well tolerated. Overall, the side-effect profile is very similar to that of other ACE inhibitors with regard to class-specific effects. However, taste disturbance was rarely observed.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience with lisinopril. Observations on safety and tolerability. 255 Jun 41

A comparative, controlled, open hypertension study using the direct vasodilator endralazine and the ACE-inhibitor captopril in combined therapy for severe and moderately severe hypertension is described. Both vasodilators cause an approximately 20% reduction in supine and upright blood pressure. Extreme side effects such as hematological alterations, autoimmune states or uncontrollable water retention were not observed. Subjective symptoms, particularly severe headaches, were especially evident after endralazine use. This side effect may possibly be eliminated by gradual titration over several weeks.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy with the vasodilators captopril and endralazine]. 286 3

Seventeen patients with migraine headaches, occurring at least twice a month, were successfully treated with an ACE inhibitor for prophylaxis. Most were given enalapril, some used lisinopril. Duration of treatment ranged from 3 months to 3 years. Side effects were generally not noted. Cough occurred in four patients. The mechanism of action is unknown. The lack of side effects and the presence of clearly sustained benefit in this small group of migraineurs should prompt further study and use of this class of drugs for prophylaxis.
Headache 1995 Sep
PMID:ACE inhibitors for prophylaxis of migraine headaches. 759 40

A 50-year-old very obese man had suffered from hypertension for more than 20 years and had undergone various treatment regimens, the last being with an ACE inhibitor. Since his hypertension had nevertheless increased, and he developed dizziness and headaches, a combination of ACE-inhibitor and calcium antagonist was now tried, followed--when this treatment proved unsuccessful--by the fixed-combination preparation containing enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide. This at last led to a reduction in his blood pressure to approaching normal values, and his subjective symptoms cleared up.
 ...
PMID:[Lowering blood pressure in an obese patient with long-term hypertension. Using a fixed combination of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide]. 760 92

A 48-year-old male patient, a surgeon, displayed a right temporo-occipital cerebral haematoma (5 x 7 cm). He had a history of chronic left occipital migraine-like cephalalgia from the age of 16 and hypertension was diagnosed when he was 42 years old. As therapy, he used ACE inhibitors, nifedipine and clonidine for hypertension and for cephalalgia a combination of aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine. During the last 2-3 months before the detection of cerebral haematoma, injections with piritramide were made when severe headaches were unbearable. The patient was operated on the 7th day since the onset of cerebral haematoma after a "wait and see" period of repeated clinical and CT-scan assessment. The initial option of the patient was surgical. We consider that the patient's profession (medical/surgical profile) may have played a positive motivation for the surgical option.
 ...
PMID:Option for surgical management of cerebral haematoma: case report. 777 46

Amlodipine belongs to the dihydropyridine class of calcium channel blockers. Both short and long term studies indicate that amlodipine effectively lowers mild to moderately elevated blood pressure and relieves symptoms of angina pectoris. In comparative studies, its antihypertensive efficacy is similar to that of other established agents such as beta-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors and other calcium channel blockers (including the dihydropyridines); limited comparative data are, however, available in patients with angina pectoris. Amlodipine may offer potential in patients with congestive heart failure. Vasodilator adverse events such as oedema, headaches, and flushing are commonly observed with amlodipine. The drug does not appear to cause postural hypotension, reflex tachycardia or cardiac conduction disturbances. Comparative studies suggest that amlodipine is at least as well tolerated as other standard agents. Thus, amlodipine provides an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of hypertension, and offers potential for patients with angina pectoris. Its beneficial effects in patients with congestive heart failure require confirmation in future studies.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. 852 73

Combination therapy with the new ACE inhibitor moexipril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) results in significant blood pressure (BP) reductions. This study compares the efficacy and safety of moexipril plus HCTZ to that of a standard combination treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 1 month placebo run-in period, 140 hypertensive patients whose sitting diastolic BP (DBP) averaged 95-114 mm Hg were randomized to receive either once daily moexipril 7.5 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or metoprolol 100 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg for the following 12-week double-blind treatment period. At biweekly visits BP was controlled sphygmomanometrically and the occurrence of adverse events (AE) was documented. At study endpoint adjusted mean reductions in sitting systolic/diastolic BP seen with both combinations were -17.6 mm Hg/-12.8 mm Hg and -17.2 mm Hg/-13.9 mm Hg in the moexipril/HCTZ and metoprolol/HCTZ groups, respectively. The response rate to both kinds of combinations were very similar, 69% and 74% in the moexipril/HCTZ and metoprolol/HCTZ groups, respectively. The percentage of patients which experienced one or more AEs were 46% in the moexipril/HCTZ and 61% in the metoprolol/HCTZ group. Headache and cough which are the most frequently reported AEs after treatment with ACE inhibitors were seen in 9% and 10% of the patients in the moexipril/HCTZ group compared to 10% and 4% in the metoprolol/HCTZ group. The study indicates that the combination of moexipril 7.5 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg is as efficacious and safe as metoprolol 100 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive treatment with moexipril plus HCTZ vs metoprolol plus HCTZ in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. 914 Aug 1


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>