Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Neuromodulation in one form or another has been studied for decades for various disease states. Although its mechanism of action remains un-explained, numerous clinical success stories suggest it is a therapy with efficacy and durability. Controlled studies have led to the approval of sacral neuromodulation for urinary urgency and frequency, urinary retention, and urinary urge incontinence. The future holds hopeful possibilities for the application of neuromodulation, namely in the areas of interstitial cystitis, in-tractable pain syndromes, fecal incontinence and constipation, spinal cord injury, and erectile dysfunction. Neuromodulators have also been used in nonurologic conditions, including chronic headaches and intractable chest pain. In adults and children, in the neurologically intact and neurologically impaired, neuromodulation has been shown to improve the quality of life of those suffering chronic disease states. Neuromodulation is changing the future of urology. Treatment of voiding dysfunction and likely other disorders, such as pelvic pain, sexual dysfunction, and bowel disorders, will no longer rely only on medications that are "OK" or destructive-reconstructive procedures that suffer from significant complications. Rather, by modulating the nerves, the urologists will treat these disorders in a minimally invasive fashion and neuromodulation will become the first-line therapy before any major surgery is undertaken.
 ...
PMID:Expanding indications for neuromodulation. 1569 77

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men, between 40 and 70 years of age. In the first major trial of sildenafil in ED, at 24 weeks, improved erections were reported by 77 and 84% of men taking sildenafil 50 and 100mg, respectively. Subsequently, sildenafil has been reported to be effective in men with ED associated with diabetes and prostate cancer, and in psychogenic ED. Sildenafil is safe in men with coronary artery disease, provided it is not used with the nitrates (a contraindication). The most commonly reported adverse effects with sildenafil are headache, flushing and dyspepsia. Vardenafil is more potent and more selective than sildenafil at inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5. Vardenafil is similarly effective to sildenafil in the treatment of ED. The only advantage that vardenafil has over sildenafil is that it does not inhibit phosphodiesterase-6 to alter colour perception, a rare side effect which sometimes occurs with sildenafil. Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Tadalafil is similarly effective as sildenafil in the treatment of ED. In comparison studies, tadalafil is preferred to sildenafil (50/100mg) by men with ED, possibly because of its longer duration of action. Of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, tadalafil may displace sildenafil as the drug of choice among men with ED.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction. 1570 77

The efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) were assessed in a 6-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Australian men with mild, moderate or severe ED of organic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology were randomised to tadalafil 20 mg as needed (n = 93) or placebo (n = 47). Efficacy assessments included the international index of erectile function (IIEF) and the sexual encounter profile (SEP) diary. Tadalafil significantly improved erectile function compared with placebo (p < 0.001, all measures). At the end of the study, the mean per-patient proportion of successful sexual intercourse attempts (SEP question three) was 73.5% for patients treated with tadalafil and 26.8% for placebo-treated patients. Improved erections were reported by 78% of tadalafil-treated patients compared to 12.8% of placebo-treated patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events--headache and dyspepsia--were generally mild or moderate. Tadalafil was effective and well tolerated in Australian men with mild to severe ED.
 ...
PMID:A 6-month study of the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in Australian men. 1585 88

In a previous study assessing tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), tadalafil 20 mg was shown to improve erectile function for up to 36 hours vs placebo. This study sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of both 10- and 20-mg tadalafil vs placebo at 2 prespecified assigned times of 24 and 36 hours postdosing. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study randomized 483 men with ED into 6 groups according to a combination of treatment (placebo, tadalafil 10 or 20 mg) and assigned time (24 or 36 hours) for intercourse attempts. Patients were stratified by baseline ED severity based on Erectile Function Domain scores. The study had 4 phases: a 4-week run-in (no ED medication taken); a 2- to 4-week equilibration (dosing as needed); a 4- to 6-week assessment; and a 6-month open-label extension. During the assessment phase, men took a total of 4 doses of study medication, each dose separated by more than or equal to 7 days. Efficacy was measured as the mean per-patient percentage of successful intercourse attempts (Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3: SEP3) during the assessment phase. Men taking either 10- or 20-mg tadalafil had a significant increase in SEP3 from baseline scores vs placebo at both 24 hours (P = .038 and <.001 for 10 and 20 mg, respectively) and 36 hours (P < .001 for both doses) postdose. The mean per-patient percentages of successful intercourse attempts for the 24-hour time point were 41.8%, 55.8%, and 67.3% for placebo and tadalafil 10 and 20 mg, respectively; for the 36-hour time point, the mean per-patient percentages were 32.8%, 56.2%, and 61.9% for placebo and tadalafil 10 and 20 mg, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, and nasopharyngitis. Both 10- and 20-mg tadalafil improved erectile function for up to 36 hours postdosing in men with ED of varied severity.
 ...
PMID:Tadalafil improved erectile function at twenty-four and thirty-six hours after dosing in men with erectile dysfunction: US trial. 1586 97

Erectile dysfunction (ED) profoundly affects the quality of life. The prevalence of ED in renal transplant recipients is reported by high as 50% to 60%. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in these patients with ED as well as its effects on graft function and on cylosporine or tacrolimus concentrations. Thirty-nine recipients with ED and serum creatinine values<2 mg/dL were treated with vardenafil. ED was assessed using the self-administered International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). ED was diagnosed by using penile color-Doppler ultrasonography and intracavernosal injection. Vardenafil efficacy was assessed by readministering the IIEF questionnaire after 4 weeks of therapy. Serum creatinine levels, creatinine clearances, and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations were measured before and after vardenafil therapy. Twenty-one recipients with ED served as placebo controls and 15 without ED as another control group. The IIEF scores improved from 12.80+/-3.5 to 26.46+/-2.4 in vardenafil-treated patients with ED (P<.001). Renal function and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations did not change with vardenafil therapy. Side effects were observed in 7 (18%) patients: headache in three, palpitations in one, flushing in two, and dyspepsia in one. This study demonstrated that ED improved with vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with ED. For 4 weeks vardenafil therapy was free of side effects. Renal function tests did not change. Also, no dose change in immunosuppressive drugs was required during 4 weeks of verdanafil therapy.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with erectile dysfunction. 1679 9

Nitrates are very effective antianginal and anti-ischaemic agents. Provision of a long nitrate-free interval or low plasma nitrate levels prior to the morning dose prevents the loss of clinical efficacy by preventing the development of tolerance. However, side effects during nitrate therapy are common. Headache is the most common side effect of nitrates; often dose-related and reported by up to 82% of patients in placebo-controlled trials. Nearly 10% of patients are unable to tolerate nitrates due to disabling headaches or dizziness. In others, headaches are mild-to-moderate in severity and either resolve or diminish in intensity with continued nitrate therapy. Nitrate-induced hypotension is common, but often asymptomatic. In rare instances, nitrate-induced hypotension is severe and accompanied by marked slowing of the heart rate and syncope. Use of nitrates in patients who experience syncope after administration of nitrates is contraindicated. Nitrates rarely cause coronary steal and myocardial ischaemia. Nitrate rebound may occur and patients may experience nocturnal anginal episodes during intermittent therapy with nitroglycerin patches. Administration of nitrates is contraindicated with concomitant use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, as combination therapy may lead to profound hypotension and even death. There are disturbing observational reports in the literature that continuous, prolonged use of nitrates may lead to increased mortality and recurrent myocardial infarctions. Large, randomised, placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm or refute these reports; until then, the use of nitrates to treat angina is here to stay.
 ...
PMID:Side effects of using nitrates to treat angina. 1690 56

The discovery that inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) reduces the degradation of cGMP, allowing erectile function to occur by relaxation of penile smooth muscle, represents a revolutionary approach or the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Three PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) are clinically available at this time, and extensive drug design efforts are registered for finding agents with a better activity, enhanced selectivity and reduced side effects. Many classes of such compounds have been reported, belonging to diverse chemical entities. The drug design has been very much facilitated after the report of the X-ray crystal structure of the PDE5 catalytic domain in complex with the three clinically used derivatives. PDE5 inhibitor therapy, has been found to be effective in special clinical populations, such as those with prostate cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The duration of action of sildenafil and vardenafil is of about 4 hours, whereas that of tadalafil is of about 36 hours, and the overall safety of the treatments is good. There is a risk of hypotension if nitrates are given concurrently with the PDE5 inhibitors. Common side-effects include headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion, dyspepsia and transient visual impairment. There are pharmacological interactions between these drugs and other medications metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (P3A4 isoform), such as the azole antifungals, erythromycin and the HIV protease inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors--drug design and differentiation based on selectivity, pharmacokinetic and efficacy profiles. 1701 39

A multicentre, non-randomised, open-label study assessed whether personal distress caused by erectile dysfunction (ED) affected psychosocial outcomes of tadalafil treatment. Eligible Swedish men at least 18 years old reporting > or =3-month history of ED were stratified into two groups (manifest or mild/no distress) based upon a distress question administered at enrollment. Tadalafil 20 mg was taken as needed for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between the two distress groups in change from baseline in the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) spontaneity domain. Secondary outcome measures were PAIRS sexual self-confidence and time concerns domains, Life Satisfaction (LiSat-11) checklist and a Global Assessment of Treatment Response. The study also assessed tolerability. Of 662 men enrolled, 88% had manifest distress and 12% had mild/no distress. Baseline-to-endpoint changes for PAIRS domains were not significantly different between groups. Baseline-to-endpoint changes in LiSat-11 items were not significantly different between groups except for satisfaction with sexual life. Compared with men without ED, below normal baseline satisfaction with partner relationship and family life were normalised at endpoint. Over 90% of men reported improved erection and ability to engage in sexual activity. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, myalgia, dyspepsia, flushing and back pain. One man discontinued because of myalgia; 630 (95%) completed the study. In conclusion, erectile distress levels vary among patients with ED and distress can affect intra-familiar aspects of life, which may have implications for clinical practise. However, distress does not appear to hinder improvement in both mechanical and psychosocial outcomes of tadalafil treatment.
 ...
PMID:The effect of tadalafil on psychosocial outcomes in Swedish men with erectile distress: a multicentre, non-randomised, open-label clinical study. 1707 36

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vardenafil in primary care, we undertook a post-marketing surveillance study in 384 men with erectile dysfunction (ED), enrolled by 22 family physicians in Korea, from July 2004 to August 2005. Of the 384 patients enrolled, 343 (89.3%) returned for efficacy assessment and safety evaluation. Among the latter, 279 patients (81.3%) reported that their erectile function improved, 292 (92.1%) showed enhanced IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function)-5 scores and 265 (77.9%) responded that they were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with vardenafil treatment. The most frequent reason for patient satisfaction with vardenafil was erectile potency (62.4%), followed by safety (42.4%), rapid onset (35.3%), adequate duration of efficacy (28.5%) and easy administration (25.9%). A total of 23 adverse events were observed in 18 patients, with the most frequent being hot flushes (3.2%), followed by headache (1.2%), nasal congestion (0.6%), color vision disturbance (0.3%), dizziness (0.3%), dry mouth (0.3%), dyspepsia (0.3%), nausea (0.3%) and diarrhea (0.3%). Only one patient discontinued vardenafil as a direct result of an adverse event. These results suggest that vardenafil prescribed by primary care physicians improved erectile function and was well tolerated by patients with ED.
 ...
PMID:Post-marketing surveillance study of the efficacy and safety of vardenafil among patients with erectile dysfunction in primary care. 1728 34

Vardenafil is a selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It was found to be effective in a high percentage of patients and a broad spectrum of underlying conditions. It potentiates the increase in intracellular cGMP in the corpora cavernosa in response to sexual stimuli, resulting in enhanced and prolonged erections. The overall tolerability and safety profile is acceptable, with headache, flushing, rhinitis and dyspepsia being the major reported side effects. Importantly, tolerability and safety in cardiovascular patients seems to be good with no significant increase in cardiovascular events that could be directly attributed to the pharmacologic agent. Only mild blood-pressure lowering effects were observed in healthy individuals, as well as hypertensive patients on multiple antihypertensive agents. However, special caution is mandatory if vardenafil is administered in combination with alpha-blockers, as significant hypotension might occur. Importantly, any drug serving as a nitric oxide donor is contraindicated in combination with vardenafil.
 ...
PMID:Vardenafil: a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5 for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. 1747 42


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>