Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Thirty-three men with stable exercise-induced angina pectoris entered a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in which controlled-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate 60 mg once daily was compared with conventional isosorbide dinitrate 20 mg 3 times daily. Each drug was given for 2 weeks. Twenty-eight patients completed the study and data on exercise variables are available in 23 patients. Treatment with either drug resulted in significant antianginal effects, when measured 6 hours after a single dose and after 2 weeks of therapy compared with baseline placebo; however, there were significantly fewer signs of myocardial ischemia during treatment with isosorbide-5-mononitrate. There was no evidence of tolerance to either drug treatment but a significant attenuation of resting blood pressure (but not of exercise blood pressure) was observed with both drugs. Headache was the only clinically significant adverse event during therapy and it occurred more frequently in the isosorbide dinitrate treatment group (p less than 0.05 vs placebo); 3 such patients had to withdraw from the study because of headache. Thus, once-daily, controlled-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate appears as effective as conventional isosorbide dinitrate 3 times daily in patients with stable angina pectoris. The once-daily administration is convenient and improves patient compliance.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the effects of a controlled-release formulation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate and conventional isosorbide dinitrate on exercise performance in men with stable angina pectoris. 218 93

This study reports the results of a retrospective review of the case records of 28 seriously ill patients who received intravenous cimetidine (generally 300 mg q8h) for the treatment of gastric discomfort and/or hemorrhage or for prophylaxis against stress-induced ulcers. Most of these patients presented with complex symptoms arising from a variety of pathological conditions including ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, and trauma. A number of patients also had acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Over two-thirds of the patients treated with intravenous cimetidine demonstrated a reduction in gastrointestinal symptom severity, and a statistically significant reduction in the mean severity rating for all patients was observed. Adverse reactions reported during cimetidine therapy were generally mild to moderate in severity and required discontinuance of therapy in only one patient. The most common complaint was headache. Intravenous cimetidine administered q8h offers a safe and cost-effective approach to H2-receptor blockade and reduction of gastric acid secretion in patients who are temporarily unable to take oral medication.
 ...
PMID:Intensive care experience with intravenous cimetidine. 228 32

Within the last decade it became obvious that the treatment of angina pectoris alone is not sufficient. Modern goals include the optimization of anti-ischemic treatment ("silent myocardial ischemia") without compromising quality of life, as well as the reduction of fatal and non-fatal cardiac events. The failure of nitrates to continuously protect from myocardial ischemia ("nitrate tolerance") requires a modification of the current step-care recommendations for medical treatment. Numerous combinations of nitrates, betablockers and calcium channel blockers compensate for each other regarding their effects on heart rate, contractility, peripheral resistance and coronary blood flow. Recommendations for combination therapy decisively depend on the choice of the first-line drug. Only nitrates reduce myocardial preload by venodilation and substitute for EDRF-deficiency. After headaches disappear, nitrates do not affect quality of life and they are cheap. The nitrate-induced acceleration of heart rate should be compensated by the addition of beta-blockers or heart rate-decreasing calcium channel blockers. Therefore, the combination of nitrates with heart-rate-increasing calcium channel blockers, such as nifedipine, should be avoided. Many studies have proven the superiority of different double and triple therapies, as compared to their single components. A few reports, however, did not confirm this increase of anti-ischemic efficacy with combination therapy. The improvement of prognosis is proven for beta blockers without ISA in subgroups of patients with acute or post myocardial infarction and can be assumed for nitrates as well. With regard to prognosis, calcium channel blockers were inferior to nitrates and beta blockers. The combination of nitrates with a non-ISA betablocker should be preferred in post myocardial infarction patients with ventricular arrhythmias, whereas the combination of nitrates with a heart rate decreasing calcium channel blocker should be preferred in patients with COPD, severe peripheral arterial disease or severe diabetes. The combination of nitrates with a heart-rate-increasing calcium channel blocker should be considered in patients with sinus bradycardia, first degree AV-block, or proven coronary spasm. In patients with congestive heart failure, betablockers and calcium channel blockers should be avoided. To optimize medical treatment of ischemic heart disease, intermittent high dosage ISDN plus a beta blocker without ISA or ISDN plus a calcium channel blocker like verapamil are recommended. Frequently, however, the patient decides by himself, based on unacceptable side effects.
 ...
PMID:[Combination of anti-angina drugs]. 257 81

A 71 year old man sought neurological advice because for two years he had suffered from headache every time he made an effort. A treadmill stress test showed a relation between effort, headache and depression of ST segments on E.C.G. With isosorbide dinitrate and diltiazem, the manifestations improved. This suggests a referred head pain due to myocardial ischemia.
Headache 1989 Jun
PMID:Walk headache: an unusual manifestation of ischemic heart disease. 275 41

There is some suggestion in the literature that patients with migraine may be at an increased risk for developing complications as a result of cerebral angiography. To assess this risk, we reviewed the charts of 142 patients with migraine. A total of 149 angiograms were performed for acute headache (55), new focal symptoms (40), exertional (including coital) headaches (nine), hemiplegic migraine (three), ophthalmoplegic migraine (five), vertebrobasilar migraine (six), migraine accompaniments (three), and other causes (14). Transient events were seen in six patients and these were transient amnesia (one), hemisensory changes (two), hemiparesis (one), global confusion (one), and angina (one). One patient with a history of severe ischemic heart disease developed a myocardial infarction two hours after angiography. Focal cerebral events occurred in 2.6% of cases. This compares with a rate of complications of 2.8% caused by angiography in a prospective study of 1002 patients from our center. According to our findings, it appears that a history of migraine does not increase the risk of complications caused by angiography. Angiography during episodes of acute headaches would also appear to be a safe procedure. Transient focal neurologic symptoms, however, are not infrequent, especially in cases of classic migraine.
 ...
PMID:Migraine and the risks from angiography. 339 65

Although the exposure of human subjects to prostacyclin (PGI2) infusion has been broad, no systematic approaches have been made in order to investigate the dose-related side effects in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease (CAD). We studied 25 patients with typical chest pain and overt CAD. All patients underwent a cycloergometer stress testing (25 W increments at 2-min intervals). PGI2 was infused in scalar doses up to 10 ng/kg/min. During the infusion 25 patients (100%) had facial flushing, 7 (28%) moderate headache and one (4%) had nausea. In addition, 4 patients experienced the typical chest pain and had significant (greater than or equal to 0.1 mV) ST segment depression at 8.10 ng/kg/min infusion rates. These patients had lower tolerance to exercise (6.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9 min; p less than 0.05) and coronary artery lesions more severe than those observed in patients without drug-induced angina pectoris. Our data therefore indicate that PGI2 at therapeutic doses may induce myocardial ischemia in patients with angina pectoris, low tolerance to exercise and severe CAD. In patients with mild to moderate degree of CAD, PGI2 was found to be well tolerated. These findings suggest that patients with angina pectoris and low tolerance to exercise should be excluded from clinical studies directed at elucidating the effectiveness of PGI2 in cardiovascular disorders.
 ...
PMID:Side effects of prostacyclin in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease. 390 57

Occupational health problems among 100 tobacco processing workers were investigated. Symptoms, including vomiting, giddiness, headache, etc. were found among 69 exposed subjects. It was also observed that the excretion rate of nicotine and cotinine increased among exposed subjects. Biochemical parameters were found to be within the normal range. Electrocardiographic findings were non-specific and clinically there was no evidence of hypertension or ischemic heart disease. Therefore, the symptoms in tobacco processing workers might possibly result from mild nicotine toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Occupational health problems among tobacco processing workers: a preliminary study. 408 13

A review of the available literature concerning sudden withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs shows that withdrawal syndromes after cessation of such agents have occurred with beta-blockers, methyldopa, clonidine hydrochloride, guanabenz, and bethanidine sulfate. Most commonly, these syndromes are limited to nervousness, tachycardia, headache, and nausea 36 to 72 hours after cessation of the drug. In rare cases, serious exacerbation of myocardial ischemia (beta-blockers) or hypertension (clonidine, methyldopa) may occur in the posttreatment period. The withdrawal syndromes generally respond promptly to reinstitution of antihypertensive therapy. The infrequent occurrence of withdrawal syndromes should not discourage use of these efficacious agents.
 ...
PMID:Withdrawal syndromes and the cessation of antihypertensive therapy. 611 20

Labetalol is a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent for oral and intravenous use in the treatment of hypertension. It is a nonselective antagonist at beta-adrenoceptors and a competitive antagonist of postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptors. Labetalol is more potent at beta that at alpha 1 adrenoceptors in man; the ratio of beta-alpha antagonism is 3:1 after oral and 6.9:1 after intravenous administration. Labetalol is readily absorbed in man after oral administration, but the drug, which is lipid soluble, undergoes considerable hepatic first-pass metabolism and has an absolute bioavailability of approximately 25%. There are no active metabolites, and the elimination half-life of the drug is approximately 6 hours. Unlike conventional beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, labetalol, when given acutely, produces a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure with little alteration in heart rate or cardiac output. However, like conventional beta-blockers, labetalol may influence the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and respiratory function. Clinical studies have shown that the antihypertensive efficacy of labetalol is superior to placebo and to diuretic therapy and is at least comparable to that of conventional beta-blockers, methyldopa, clonidine and various adrenergic neuronal blockers. Labetalol administered alone or with a diuretic is often effective when other antihypertensive regimens have failed. Studies have shown that labetalol is effective in the treatment of essential hypertension, renal hypertension, pheochromocytoma, pregnancy hypertension and hypertensive emergencies. In addition, preliminary studies indicate that labetalol may be of value in the management of ischemic heart disease. The most troublesome side effect of labetalol therapy is posture-related dizziness. Other reported side effects of the drug include gastrointestinal disturbances, tiredness, headache, scalp tingling, skin rashes, urinary retention and impotence. Side effects related to the beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of labetalol, including asthma, heart failure and Raynaud's phenomenon, have been reported in rare instances.
 ...
PMID:Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and adverse effects. 631 May 29

The pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of three calcium-channel blocking agents--verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem--are reviewed. Verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem are absorbed well after oral dosing, but absolute bioavailability of each is reduced substantially by a first-pass effect. Each drug is metabolized extensively (verapamil and diltiazem to moderately active metabolites) by the liver. A substantial percentage of each drug is bound to plasma proteins, but the binding is of clinical importance only for nifedipine (92--98% protein bound). Intravenous verapamil has become the agent of first choice for treatment of acute paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT); use of chronic oral verapamil therapy for prophylaxis remains controversial. Verapamil and diltiazem have been evaluated with mixed results for atrial flutter and fibrillation. For treatment of myocardial ischemia, calcium-channel blockers may be of some value (possibly in combination with nitrates of B blockers). All three agents have been studied in patients with exertional angina with good results. Calcium-channel blockers appear to be equal with nitrates for treatment of variant angina. Patients with hypertropic cardiomyopathy have been treated with verapamil and nifedipine with promising results. Nifedipine has been effective for treatment of essential hypertension. Adverse effects of calcium-channel blockers have been relatively minor or infrequent. Diltiazem overall has the best side-effect profile, with adverse effects causing discontinuation of therapy in about 2--10% of patients; verapamil in intermediate (8--10%) and nifedipine the worst (17%) in this respect. The most common side effects generally are fatigue, headache, dizziness, skin rash, and peripheral edema. While they generally should be reserved for patients in whom more conventional therapy has failed (except those with PSVT), calcium-channel blockers appear to have a valid role as reserve agents for exertional and variant angina, cardiomyopathy, and hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Update on calcium-channel blocking agents. 635 66


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>