Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We compared verapamil and propranolol hydrochloride for monotherapy of hypertension. Verapamil lowered blood pressure (BP) more effectively than propranolol in black and white patients. Verapamil was equally effective in blacks and whites, whereas propranolol was more effective in whites. Heart rate was reduced by 6.0 beats per minute by verapamil, and by 13.6 beats per minute by propranolol. In blacks, verapamil lowered systolic BP 16.9 vs 8.1 mm Hg for propranolol; verapamil reduced diastolic BP 12.8 vs 8.6 mm Hg for propranolol. In whites, verapamil lowered systolic BP 19.0 vs 12.7 mm Hg for propranolol; verapamil reduced diastolic BP 16.7 vs 12.3 mm Hg for propranolol. Increases in systolic BP were observed in 22% and 3.4% of patients receiving propranolol and verapamil, respectively. The PR interval was increased from 163.5 to 174.9 ms for verapamil vs 160.3 to 164.4 ms for propranolol. Constipation (15%) and headaches (10%) were most frequent complaints for verapamil vs fatigue (18%) and dizziness (7%) for propranolol. Changes in blood biochemistry values were of small magnitude. We conclude that verapamil monotherapy is a safe and effective means of achieving BP control in patients with essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of verapamil and propranolol for the initial treatment of hypertension. Racial differences in response. 353 60

The antihypertensive effect of twice-daily nicardipine, an investigational calcium-channel blocker, was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, single-blind trial in 18 adult patients with essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure [BP] of greater than or equal to 95 and less than or equal to 120 mmHg). Following a 4-week run-in period in which patients received placebo for the final 2 weeks, nicardipine was administered for 12 weeks with a treatment goal of a supine diastolic BP of less than 90 mmHg at 12 hours postdosing or to a maximum dose of 60 mg twice daily. Supine and standing BPs and heart rates were determined at 1 hour and 12 hours postdosing. At all dose levels, supine and standing BPs were reduced at 1 hour after dosing, with partial loss of efficacy seen at 12 hours. Increases in heart rate seen at 1 hour were not significant at 12 hours. Eight patients withdrew from the study for minor, although troublesome, side effects, such as palpitations and headaches. These data suggest that nicardipine monotherapy given in a twice-daily dosing regimen has only a limited role to play in the chronic treatment of patients with essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Twice-daily nicardipine in the treatment of essential hypertension. 353 14

Nitrendipine is a new nifedipine-like calcium antagonist antihypertensive agent. In this study, nitrendipine 5-40 mg orally bid was administered for up to three months to 16 patients with severe essential hypertension (untreated supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 115 mm Hg). Hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol or both were also given to patients who did not achieve goal blood pressure with nitrendipine alone. Five patients achieved goal blood pressure (supine less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) with nitrendipine alone and six more after the addition of a second drug, and only four required triple-drug therapy. One patient was terminated from the study because of headaches, a common nitrendipine side effect. This study demonstrates that nitrendipine is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of severe hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness of a new calcium antagonist in severe hypertension. 379 49

Forty-three patients with mild essential hypertension were randomized into two double-blind studies: pinacidil vs. placebo or pinacidil vs. hydralazine. Pinacidil (62 +/- 18 mg/day) decreased office systolic and diastolic blood pressures from 145 to 137 mm Hg and from 98 to 89 mm Hg, respectively, after 6 weeks of therapy. Similarly, hydralazine (128 +/- 28 mg/day) reduced supine systolic blood pressure from 140 to 134 mm Hg and supine diastolic blood pressure from 93 mm Hg to 84 mm Hg. Significant tachycardia was not noted with either drug. Ambulatory blood pressure was monitored for 24 h during the placebo-washout and efficacy phases with both pinacidil and hydralazine. Mean 24-h blood pressure was 128 systolic and 81 diastolic with pinacidil and 121 systolic and 76 diastolic with hydralazine. Reduction in awake hypertensive diastolic blood pressure was significant for both pinacidil and hydralazine. Normal sleep diastolic blood pressure was not reduced by pinacidil but was reduced by hydralazine. Side-effects with both drugs included edema, headache, and palpitations. These data demonstrate that pinacidil is as effective an antihypertensive agent as hydralazine.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive efficacy of pinacidil--automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. 380 13

116 patients from 4 clinics participated in a double blind study to assess the efficacy of (BAY l 5240), a nifedipine-acebutolol fixed combination (10 mg + 100 mg), as compared to nifedipine 20 mg in essential hypertension. During the 10 week study, the mean recumbent blood pressure decreased 1 to 3 h after treatment from 175.5/105.2 to 148.3/88.0 mmHg in the BAY l 5240 group and from 174.3/102.9 to 150.3/86.5 mmHg in the nifedipine group. The results also showed a comparable decrease in the mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures before treatment (24 h after last tablet) and after physical exertion before and after either drug given for 4 weeks. Doubling of the dose for 4 additional weeks produced a moderate and similar additional decrease in blood pressure. The results show the possibility of treating essential hypertension with a low dose of a beta-adrenergic blocking agent in combination with 10 mg nifedipine. Both regimens were well tolerated. One patient in the BAY l 5240 group and 2 in the nifedipine group, all treated by the same investigator, were withdrawn from the study because of headache during the nifedipine pre-period.
 ...
PMID:Effects of BAY l 5240, a fixed combination of low dose nifedipine and acebutolol on hypertension: comparison with standard dose nifedipine. 388 99

Pinacidil, a new cyanoguanidine derivative, is an antihypertensive agent with arteriolar vasodilating properties, which acts on precapillary resistance vessels. A trial was carried out in 30 patients with essential hypertension WHO I-II. The treatment period was divided into three phases. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amiloride were administered for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and supine and standing blood pressure decreased significantly. During Phase 2 pinacidil was added to HCTZ/amiloride for the following 3 months. A further significant reduction in blood pressure was obtained. In the next period of treatment (Phase 3) patients were divided into two groups. For 1 month Group A (15 patients) received pinacidil alone and Group B (15 patients) received HCTZ/amiloride. Conventional laboratory blood tests in all patients remained unchanged during treatment. Reported side effects during Phase 2 were headache (2 patients), dizziness (3 patients), palpitations (2 patients) and ankle oedema (2 patients). Plasma renin activity was slightly increased at the end both of Phases 1 and 2. Plasma catecholamines were increased but not significantly at the end of Phase 2 as compared to Phase 1. The results indicate that pinacidil is effective in lowering blood pressure in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effect of pinacidil on blood pressure, plasma catecholamines and plasma renin activity in essential hypertension. 389 69

114 patients from four clinics participated in a double blind study designed to assess the efficacy of a nifedipine-acebutolol fixed combination -10 mg + 100 mg - as compared with acebutolol -200 mg- in essential hypertension. During the ten week study the mean blood pressure readings (s.d.) 1-3 h after treatment decreased from 179.2/104.8 (10.2/6.2) to 150.3/87.7 (9.8/7.7) in the combination group and from 181.7/106.5 (14.4/7.0) to 150.4/89.0 (15.0/10.4) in the acebutolol group. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were also decreased after exertion (load) and 24 hours after treatment at the end of the 6th week of the study. A doubling of the dose from week 7 to 10 did not change these figures. These results reveal the possibility of treating essential hypertension with a low dose of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in combination with 10 mg nifedipine. Both drugs were well tolerated. 3 patients (5%) in the combination group and 3 patients in the acebutolol group were withdrawn from the study because of headache and dizziness.
 ...
PMID:Effects of a fixed combination of low dose nifedipine and acebutolol on essential hypertension: comparison with standard dose acebutolol. 391 Mar 3

A controlled multicentre trial was organised to compare the effects of 20 mg Nifedipine tablets (N) and 2,5 mg Indapamide tablets (I) during a 4 months' treatment period after a placebo period, in 59 patients with moderate essential hypertension (n = 59). The results of blood pressure measurements of 18 patients treated by nifedipine (1 tablet twice daily) and 22 patients treated by indapamide (1 tablet every morning) were compared. The systolic blood pressure, after 10 minutes recumbency, fell from 165 +/- 10 mmHg to 148 +/- 13 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and the diastolic pressure from 104 +/- 6 mmHg to 86 +/- 7 mmHg (p less than 0.01) in the patients treated with nifedipine. In the indapamide group, the SBP fell from 164 +/- 13 mmHg to 152 +/- 15 mmHg (p less than 0.01) and the DBP from 100 +/- 4 mmHg to 87 +/- 6 mmHg (p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes of heart rate with either drug; plasma creatinine, potassium and uric acid concentrations were also unchanged. There was a higher incidence of headaches and tiredness in the nifedipine group, whilst patients treated with indapamide complained more often of muscular cramps. Flushing was observed in nearly a quarter of the patients in both groups. These results confirm that both nifedipine and indapamide induce significant and persistant falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Although the fall was greater with nifedipine than with indapamide, the difference was not statistically significant. The tolerance was satisfactory in both groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Comparative effects of nifedipine and indapamide in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. 393 9

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of oral nicardipine in 91 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension over a period of 12 months. All patients started on a fixed nicardipine dose of 30 mg three times daily which was adjusted in the range 10-40 mg three times daily, where necessary to achieve a target diastolic blood pressure less than 95 mm Hg. At 6 weeks, blood pressure (mean +/- s.e. mean) was reduced from an average of 190 +/- 22/112 +/- 8 to 167 +/- 23/96 +/- 11 mm Hg supine and from 180 +/- 21/113 +/- 7 to 154 +/- 17/95 +/- 11 mm Hg standing and remained controlled in all patients throughout the study. A total of 96 unwanted experiences were reported by 49 patients (54%); 17 (19%) reported a single symptom once and two (2%) reported a single symptom more than once. The most frequently reported adverse experiences were peripheral oedema in 27 (28%) and headaches in 15 patients (16%). The majority of the adverse experiences occurred in the first 3 months of treatment. Ten patients (11%) withdrew from the study during this time and eight (9%) in the subsequent 9 months because of drug-related side effects; five others (5%) withdrew for unrelated reasons. The incidence of adverse experiences was dose-related. Three patients reported unwanted effects on 10 mg three times daily, eight on 20 mg three times daily, 36 on 30 mg three times daily, and 12 on 40 mg three times daily oral nicardipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A study of the long-term efficacy and tolerability of oral nicardipine in hypertensive patients. 394 Jan 58

Twenty three patients with essential hypertension who were uncontrolled on diuretic and/or beta-receptor antagonist therapy were treated additionally with the vasodilator, pinacidil, in an open study. Significant reduction in mean blood pressure was achieved. Supine and erect systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell by 44/25 mmHg and 37/24 mmHg respectively over the study period of 12 weeks. Side-effects such as dizziness, headache, facial flushing and mild oedema were experienced by 10 patients during the study, all of which were mild and transient and did not require withdrawal from pinacidil therapy. Pinacidil is an effective and well tolerated agent in the treatment of essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Pinacidil, a new vasodilator, in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. 400 40


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10