Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0018681 (headache)
 56,091 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although headache is sometimes regarded as a symptom of severe hypertension, its relationship to blood pressure is not clear. In 11,710 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension we have found that headache was common and may be reduced by treatment. We found a clear relationship between the frequency of reports of headache and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure irrespective of treatment or the type of drug used to treat hypertension. Calcium antagonists appeared most likely to be a cause of headache in hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:Headache and blood pressure: evidence of a close relationship. 254 48

Selective alpha 1 adrenergic receptor blocking agents lower blood pressure by reducing the increased peripheral vascular resistance that characterizes essential hypertension. Prazosin and terazosin have been shown to be well tolerated in clinical practice and seldom cause impotence or metabolic abnormalities. The most common adverse effects--dizziness, headache, and asthenia--are generally well tolerated and infrequently lead to discontinuation of therapy. First-dose syncope can usually be avoided by initiating therapy with low doses administered at bedtime. Finally, the alpha 1 receptor antagonists do not adversely affect such cardiovascular risk factors as hypokalemia, serum lipid profile, and left ventricular hypertrophy. In fact, alpha 1 antagonists reduce total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein plus very-low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and thus may contribute to the overall management of cardiovascular risk by blood pressure reduction and improvement of the serum lipid profile. Since the goal of treating chronic essential hypertension is to improve morbidity and mortality, the choice of therapy should be influenced by the agent's ability to modify as many risk factors as possible. Alpha 1 adrenoreceptor antagonists beneficially impact several cardiovascular risk factors and thus merit consideration as first-line antihypertensive therapy.
 ...
PMID:New perspectives on selective alpha 1 blockade. 257 43

In a multicentre open trial involving 229 investigators, cicletanine, a new antihypertensive agent, was administered orally in doses of 50 to 100 mg/day either alone (1,238 patients) or combined with another drug (430 patients). In this second group of patients with essential hypertension whose BP had not been normalized by a beta-blocker (n = 157), a calcium inhibitor (n = 67), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (n = 134) or an alpha-blocker (n = 7), cicletanine normalized BP (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 48.8% of the patients and significantly lowered BP values which fell from 177.7 +/- 15.9/103.3 +/- 6.3 mmHg to 157.2 +/- 17.6/88.8 +/- 8.7 mmHg. The addition of cicletanine to treatments with beta-blockers, calcium inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors normalized BP in 48%, 52% and 47% of patients respectively. A significant reduction of symptoms was noted, notably as regards headache, dizziness, palpitations, lower limb oedema, asthenia, auditory disorders and dyspnoea. The side-effects reported (headache, dizziness, gastralgia, nausea, pruritus) were minor and non-specific; they accounted for the withdrawal of only 8 patients. The only significant, though moderate, biochemical variations observed were decreases in natremia and cholesterolaemia unconfirmed by qualitative analysis. Altogether, cicletanine proved to be effective and well tolerated when administered in combination with other antihypertensive drugs belonging to three main therapeutic classes.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of cicletanine. Results obtained with bitherapy]. 257 67

The antihypertensive effectiveness and the clinical and biochemical safety of cicletanine were evaluated in 84 patients (28 women, 56 men) presenting with permanent essential hypertension without severe cardiovascular complications. The hypertension was insufficiently controlled by a beta-blocker, a centrally acting antihypertensive drug or nifedipine. After 3 months of treatment during which cicletanine was added to each of these three classes of drugs, there was a significant fall of systolic arterial pressure (-18 mmHg with beta-blockers, -17 mmHg with central agents and -26 mmHg with nifedipine) and diastolic arterial pressure (-22, -21 and -28 mmHg respectively), resulting in normalization of blood pressure (less than 160/95 mmHg) in 63%, 43% and 50% respectively of patients in each therapeutic group. The fall of blood pressure was accompanied by a significant decrease of functional symptoms (headache, palpitations, dizziness); in the nifedipine group, the addition of cicletanine resulted in complete regression of anginal attacks. The therapeutic combinations were well tolerated; only two patients were excluded from the study for undesirable effects unascribable to cicletanine. Otherwise, the side-effects observed were minor. The biochemical values measured did not significantly vary, and the variations noted were of small amplitude.
 ...
PMID:[Cicletanine administered with other antihypertensive agents]. 257 68

To assess the duration of the antihypertensive effect of the dihydropiridine calcium antagonist felodipine in conventional (C-F) and slow-release (ER-F) formulations, 12 patients with essential hypertension underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at the end of a 2-week treatment period with C-F 5 mg b.d., ER-F 10 mg once daily (o.d.) and placebo. C-F, ER-F and placebo were given in a double-blind 3 x 3 latin square design 4 times replicated. There was no systematic change in the ABP profile over the three study periods regardless of the treatment. In comparison to placebo, the mean 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed a significant and similar reduction after both formulations of F. Compared to placebo, C-F and ER-F induced a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure for 15 and 21 h, respectively, and of diastolic blood pressure for 16 and 21 h, respectively. Three patients complained of headache (mild in 2, moderately severe in 1), and two patients of nocturia, with either formulation of F.
 ...
PMID:Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during sustained treatment with conventional and extended-release felodipine in mild-to-moderate hypertension. 261 50

In a multi-center, double-blind parallel-group study involving patients with essential hypertension (grade I/II), the antihypertensive effect and toleration of the postsynaptic alpha-1 receptor blocker, urapidil, was compared with that of the calcium antagonist, nifedipine. After a one-week wash-out, and one week period on placebo, the patients received either urapidil 60 mg in the morning and evening (n = 81), or nifedipine retard 20 mg mornings and evenings (n = 87), over a period of 12 weeks. The results show that urapidil and nifedipine administered alone, produce an effective lowering of blood pressure. The reduction in systolic blood pressure-approximately 12 hours after the last administration-was, on average, 10 mmHg for urapidil, and 14 mmHg for nifedipine. The reduction in systolic blood pressure was more marked under nifedipine (19 mmHg) than under urapidil (10 mmHg). The difference in heart rate at the end of the treatment phase did not differ significantly from the pre-treatment figure with either drug. The 12-week treatment with urapidil and nifedipine had no effect on lipid metabolism. Fourteen patients receiving urapidil, and 24 patients on nifedipine complained of undesirable side effects (in particular headaches and giddiness). Flushing occurred only in the nifedipine group. 8 patients on urapidil and 3 on nifedipine discontinued due to side effects.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive effect and tolerance to urapidil. Comparison with nifedipine in a multicenter double-blind study]. 264 88

1. In order to examine whether nitrendipine was superior to slow release nifedipine as monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, the two agents were administered to 22 patients in a double-blind randomized cross-over study, incorporating low and titrated dose regimes. 2. Six patients failed to complete the study because of vasodilator side-effects such as headache, flushing and ankle swelling. Three were taking nitrendipine and three took nifedipine and all withdrawals occurred at the introduction of the drug. 3. Both agents reduced blood pressure in the 16 patients who completed the study, and neither agent was superior to the other; mean blood pressure after the placebo phase was 177 +/- 5.5/100 +/- 2.6 mm Hg supine and 175 +/- 5.3/113 +/- 2.4 mm Hg standing. At the end of therapy with nifedipine pressures were 160 +/- 4.0/91 +/- 3.0 mm Hg supine and 158 +/- 4.6/103 +/- 2.7 mm Hg standing. After 8 weeks treatment with nitrendipine blood pressures were 162 +/- 4.4/90 +/- 2.9 mm Hg supine and 161 +/- 6.2/104 +/- 2.7 mm Hg standing. Comparisons of these attained blood pressures on both agents showed no statistically significant differences. 4. Nitrendipine did not appear to be effective on a once daily basis.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind randomized cross-over study of the efficacy and tolerability of nifedipine and nitrendipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. 265 87

The efficacy and safety of prazosin GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system), a new extended-release once-a-day formulation, were assessed both as monotherapy in mild essential hypertension and in combination with a diuretic in moderate essential hypertension in two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Prazosin GITS (Minipress XL) given once daily in doses of either 10 or 20 mg significantly reduced sitting and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo in both mild and moderate essential hypertension. There were minimal, clinically insignificant changes in heart rate following prazosin-GITS treatment (2.5, 10, and 20 mg) compared with placebo treatment. Prazosin GITS was well tolerated; the most common adverse experiences reported were headache, dizziness, and fatigue. All adverse experiences in the moderate hypertension group and the majority (91 percent) in the mild hypertension group were mild-to-moderate in severity. The results from these multicenter trials demonstrate the efficacy and safety of this new extended-release once-a-day formulation of prazosin in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of Minipress XL, a new once-a-day formulation of prazosin. 266 73

1. The antihypertensive efficacy of a long acting formulation of the calcium channel blocking drug, nicardipine, was assessed using clinic and ambulatory (Remler M2,000) blood pressure measurements. 2. Eleven patients with essential hypertension (mean +/- s.e. mean; 173 +/- 6.6/103 +/- 1.9 mmHg) completed a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. The dose of nicardipine used was 60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. 3. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was reduced from 164 +/- 5.3/97 +/- 2.9 to 151 +/- 5.2/88 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P less than 0.01); this effect was shown to be sustained for 8 h after the morning dose. Mean ambulatory heart rate was not significantly affected by treatment. 4. Clinic lying systolic blood pressure was reduced on treatment from 169 +/- 7.1 to 157 +/- 5.9 mmHg (P less than 0.2) and diastolic blood pressure from 99 +/- 3.6 to 89 +/- 3.9 mmHg (P less than 0.05). 5. One patient was withdrawn because of dizziness and flushing while on nicardipine; vasodilatory side effects such as headache, palpitations and flushing on nicardipine were noted by three patients. 6. We conclude that the long acting formulation of nicardipine studied in a dose of 60 mg twice daily is effective as monotherapy and is relatively well tolerated in mild hypertension. 7. This study highlights the importance of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in detecting significant changes in blood pressure, thereby permitting the study of small numbers of patients.
 ...
PMID:The effect of slow-release nicardipine on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in mild hypertension. 267 16

In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel study, the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol (20 mg once daily) and/or chlorthalidone (25 mg once daily) were analyzed in 186 patients with essential hypertension. Following a 2- to 4-week placebo baseline period, patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups (betaxolol or chlorthalidone) and studied for 6 weeks while receiving single therapy and an additional 6 weeks with a combination of the two agents. Significant decreases from baseline supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed in both groups at the end of the single-therapy phase (11 mm Hg in SDBP for betaxolol and 12 mm Hg in SDBP for chlorthalidone); a further significant decrease (7 mm Hg for betaxolol and 8 mm Hg for chlorthalidone in SDBP) was observed from the end of the single-therapy phase to the end of the combination-therapy phase. Changes in supine systolic blood pressure (SSBP) from baseline to the end of the single-therapy phase were 10 mm Hg for the betaxolol and 16 mm Hg for the chlorthalidone group. In all cases, within-group changes were statistically significant. From the end of single therapy to end of combination therapy there was an additional 14-mm Hg and 13-mm Hg reduction in SSBP in the betaxolol and chlorthalidone groups, respectively. Overall, 89% of the randomized patients completed the single-treatment phase (phase I), and 89% of those patients completed the combined therapy phase (phase II). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in the clinical response rate (SDBP at or below 90 mm Hg or a decrease from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg). A substantial percentage of patients completing phase I responded to either single agent (58% for betaxolol and 65% for chlorthalidone). Among patients completing phase II therapy, the combination of the two agents produced a greater response rate (83% for the betaxolol-first group and 85% for the chlorthalidone-first group). In conclusion, both agents were effective and well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events in the single-therapy phase were headache, arthralgia, and dizziness, while bradycardia, rhinitis, arthralgia, and dizziness were most frequent in the combination-therapy phase. The combination of betaxolol (20 mg) and chlorthalidone (25 mg) once daily produced an additive antihypertensive effect regardless of which drug was administered first.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol and chlorthalidone as monotherapy and in combination. 268 73


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>